Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:07:15.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The validity of the Melancholia Scale (MES) in predicting outcome of antidepressants in chronic idiopathic pain disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

D Loldrup ,
M Langemark ,
HJ Hansen ,
M Kastrup ,
K Jeppesen ,
O Bonnevie ,
L Elsborg ,
J Olesen  and
P Bech
D Loldrup
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, 48, Dyrehavevej DK-3400, Hillerod, Denmark
M Langemark
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, 48, Dyrehavevej DK-3400, Hillerod, Denmark
HJ Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, 48, Dyrehavevej DK-3400, Hillerod, Denmark
M Kastrup
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, 48, Dyrehavevej DK-3400, Hillerod, Denmark
K Jeppesen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, 48, Dyrehavevej DK-3400, Hillerod, Denmark
O Bonnevie
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, 48, Dyrehavevej DK-3400, Hillerod, Denmark
L Elsborg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, 48, Dyrehavevej DK-3400, Hillerod, Denmark
J Olesen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, 48, Dyrehavevej DK-3400, Hillerod, Denmark
P Bech*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, 48, Dyrehavevej DK-3400, Hillerod, Denmark
*
*Correspondence and reprints
Get access

Summary

In patients with chronic idiopathic pain disorders we have analysed the construct validity of the Melancholia Scale as compared to the results with the scale in primary depression. The patients (n= 253) were treated in a placebo controlled trial with either clomipramine or mianserin independently of the Melancholia score. The construct validity of the Melancholia Scale was further analysed by the testing of the intensity model of depression versus anxiety using the Beck Depression Inventory, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Scale, and the Melancholia Scale. The construct validity in terms of scale homogeneity was analysed by Loevinger coefficients which can be considered as a latent structure evaluation. The Melancholia Scale showed acceptable homogeneity, while the Hamilton Anxiety Scale lacked sufficient homogeneity. In total, 33% of the patients had a score of 10 or more on the Melancholia Scale (corresponding to 13 or more on the Hamilton Depression Scale). The predictive validity of the Melancholia Scale was evaluated using active treatment versus placebo response after 6 weeks of therapy. It was shown that in patients with a Melancholia Scale score of 10 or more (corresponding to “less than major depression”) 72% had full recovery when treated with clomipramine, while 36% of the placebo treated patients obtained a full recovery (P≤0.05). The patients treated with mianserin obtained a full recovery in 52%. The group of patients with a Melancholia Scale score of 10 or more scored higher also on the anxiety scales indicating that the relation between depression and anxiety is a matter of severity. The depressed patients had significantly lower imipramine binding sites than the non-depressed patients.

Keywords

the Melancholia Scale (MES)painmajor depressionless than major depressionsecondary depressionclomipraminemianserin
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , 1991 , pp. 119 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM III). American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Version (DSM III-R). American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Angst, JMerikangas, KScheidegger, PWicki, W (1990) Recurrent brief depression : A new subtype of affective disorders. J Affective Disord 19, 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, RCByrne, EJ (1989) Psychiatric aspects of Parkinson’s disease: depression, dementia and rarely psychosis. Br Med J 229, 3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, GM (1880) A Practical Treatise on Nervous Exhaustion (Neurasthenia). Treat, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Bech, Ρ (1981) Rating scales for affective disorders : their validity and consistency. Thesis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 64(suppl 295), 1–101Google Scholar
Bech, Ρ (1987) Quality of life in psychosomatic research. Psychopathology 20, 169–179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bech, Ρ (1988) Rating scales for mood disorders. Applicability, consistency and construct validity. Acta Psychiatr Scand 78 (suppl 345), 45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bech, Ρ (1990a) Rating scales for anxiety and depression : Content and construct validity. J Psychiatr Res 24 (suppl 1), 73–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bech, Ρ (1990b) Methodological problems in assessing quality of life as outcome in psychopharmacology. A multiaxial approach.In: Methodology and Evaluation of Psychotropic Drugs (Benkert, OMaier, WRickels, K eds) Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Bech, PKastrup, MRafaelsen, OJ (1986) Minicompendium of rating scales for anxiety, depression, mania, schizophrenia with corresponding DSM III syndromes. Acta Psychiatr Scand 73 (suppl 326), 7–37Google Scholar
Beck, ATWard, CHMendelson, MMock, JErbaugh, J (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4, 561–571CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berrios, Bulbena-Villarasa, (1990) The Hamilton Depression Scale and the numerical description of the symptoms of depression.In: The Hamilton Scales (Bech, PCoppen, A eds) Springer, Berlin, 80–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, LS (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, HJEysenck, SBG (1976) Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. Hodder and Stoughton, LondonGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D (1972) The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23, 56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M (1969) Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. Br J Psychiatry Spec Publ 3, 76–79Google Scholar
Horowitz, MJWilner, NKaltreider, NAlvarez, W (1980) Signs and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37, 85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katon, WSullivan, MD (1990) Depression and chronic medical illness. J Clin Psychiatry 51 (suppl), 3–11Google ScholarPubMed
Leber, Ρ (1990) Quantitative estimates of drug effects in psychopharmacology: What we measure and what we do not. J Psychopharmacol 4, 53–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loevinger, J (1984) The technique of homogenous tests compared with some aspects of scale analysis and factor analysis. Psychol Bull 45, 507–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loldrup, DLangemark, MHansen, HJOlesen, JBech, Ρ (1989) Clomipramine and mianserin in chronic idiopathic pain syndrome. A placebo controlled study. Psychopharmacology 99, 1–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maier, W (1990) The Hamilton Depression Scale and its alternatives : a comparison of the reliability and validity.In: The Hamilton Scales (Bech, PCoppen, A eds) Springer, Berlin, 64–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, WPhilipp, M (1985) Comparative analysis of observer depression scales. Acta Psychiatr Scand 72, 239–245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellerup, ETBech, PHansen, HJLangemark, MLoldrup, DPlenge, Ρ (1988) Platelet 3H-imipramine binding in psychogenic pain patients. Psychiatry Res 26, 149–156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mokken, RJ (1971) A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis with Applications in Political Research. Monton, Berlin, 40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paykel, ES (1990) Use of the Hamilton Depression Scale in general practice.In: The Hamilton Scales (Bech, PCoppen, A eds) Springer, Berlin, 40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusoff, BKlerman, GL (1974) Differentiating depressed from anxious neurotic outpatients. Use of discriminant function analysis for separating of neurotic affective states. Arch Gen Psychiatry 30, 302–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, G (1980) Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Romanov, JMTurner, JA (1985) Chronic pain and depression : does the evidence support a relationship ? Psychol Bull 97, 18–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, RBech, PMellegård, HOttosson, JO (1990) Secondary depression in panic disorder : An indicator of severity with weak importance for outcome. Acta Psychiatr Scand 83 (suppl 365), 39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, CDGorsuch, RLLushene, RE (1970) The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychological Press, Paolo AltoGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1990) Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Draft of 10th Revision of the International Classification of Disease. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
Zung, WWK (1990) Discussion: depression and chronic medical illness. J Clin Psychiatry 51 (suppl), 12–14Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.