Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:51:21.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-dimensional anxiety: A confirmation using a computerized neuropsychological testing of attentional performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

JP Mialet ,
JC Bisserbe ,
A Jacobs  and
HG Pope
JP Mialet
Affiliation:
61, boulevard des Invalides, 75007, Paris, France
JC Bisserbe
Affiliation:
Inserm, U 302, Hôpital de la Salpétrière, 63, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013Paris, France
A Jacobs
Affiliation:
CNRS, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, 31, chemin Joseph-Aiguier, 13402Marseille cedex 20, France
HG Pope
Affiliation:
Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Get access

Summary

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of anxiety on attentional performance with neutral stimuli. It was set up as follows: a fourfold comparison was made of trait anxiety and state anxiety. Sixty-two undergraduate students were included in the study, and four groups of subjects were set up by a median split of the scores obtained on the Spielberger Trait and State Anxiety Inventory (STAI): high trait-high state (N = 18); high trait-low state (N = 11); low trait-low state (N = 23); low trait-high state (N = 10). A computerized battery of neuropsychological tests, the ACE battery, was administered to provide a multidimensional assessment of attention. The ACE battery comprises five tests which assess the following aspects of attention: ability to monitor a routine task; temporal preparation; visual detection; memory span; visual spatial attention and memory. High state anxious subjects displayed impairment in executive functions, manifested by a significantly higher level of motor preparation in a simple reaction time (RT) task and a speed accuracy trade-off in a divided attention task; high trait anxious subjects performed significantly better on the visual detection task. No trait × state interaction was found. It was concluded that high state anxiety is associated with psychomotor alertness and high trait anxiety with perceptual alertness. These two dimensions of psychometric anxiety seem to have effects on attention that are independent of one another and which should be analysed separately in the future.

Keywords

trait anxietystate anxietycomputerized neuropsychological testingattentionmotor preparationperceptual alertness
Type
Original articles
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 11 , Issue 7 , 1996 , pp. 344 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, ATEmery, GAnxiety Disorders and Phobias: a Cognitive Perspective New York: Basic Books, 1985Google Scholar
Cohen, AIvry, RIllusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept perform 1989; 15: 650–663CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, RO'Donnnell, BFNeuropsychological models of attentional dysfunction In: Cohen, RA ed. The Neuropsychology of Attention New York, London: Plenum Press, 1993; 329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, JAThe effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychol Rev 1959; 66: 83–201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, MWAnxiety, learning, and memory: a reconceptualization J Res Pers 13 1979 363–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, MWAttention and Arousal Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1982; 95–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, MWAnxiety and cognitive functioning In: Burrows, GDRoth, MNoyes, R Jr eds. Handbook of anxiety volume III Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990; 419–435Google Scholar
Eysenck, MWAnxiety: The Cognitive Perspective Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Ltd, 1992Google Scholar
Eysenck, MWKeane, MTCognitive Psychology. A Student's Handbook Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, 1990; 483–487Google Scholar
Eysenck, MWMcLeod, CMathews, ACognitive functioning and anxiety. Psychol Res 1987; 49: 189–195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, MPResponse reversal performance as a function of drive level In: Eysenck, HJ ed. Experiments in Motivation Oxford: Pergamon, 1964; 108–117Google Scholar
Fox, EAllocation of visual attention and anxiety. Cognit Emot 1993; 7: 207–215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, EAttentional bias in anxiety: a defective inhibition hypothesis Cognit Emot 821994 165–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geen, RGTest anxiety and visual vigilance J Pers Soc Psychol 4941985 963–970CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, MThe assessment of anxiety by ratings. Br J Med Psychol 1959; 1: 165–183Google Scholar
Harris, AEHanish, CAnxiety and the span of apprehension J Nerv Ment Dis 17531987 134–137CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(orig 1890)James, WThe Principles of Psychology Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press, 1983Google Scholar
Maller, JBZubin, JThe effects of motivation upon intelligence tests scores. J Genet Psychol 1932; 41: 136–151Google Scholar
Mathews, AMcleod, CSelective processing of threat cues in anxiety states. Behav Res Ther 1985; 23: 563–569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathews, AMcleod, CDiscrimination of threat cues without awareness in anxiety states. J Abnorm Psychol 1986; 95: 131–138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathews, AMay, JMogg, KEysenck, MWAttentional bias in anxiety: selective search or defective filtering?. J Abnorm Psychol 1990; 99: 166–173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, GJones, DMChamberlain, AGInteractive effects of extraversion and arousal on attentional task-performance —multiple resources or encoding processes J Pers Soc Psychol 5641989 629–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, CMathews, ATata, PAttentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 1986; 95: 15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mialet, JPJacobs, ABisserbe, JC Computerized battery of neuropsychological tests for a cognitive analysis of attention: a preliminary study Paper presented at the 3rd Eur Conf Psychol Assessment Aug 27–30, 1995 University of Trier GermanyGoogle Scholar
Mialet, JPPichot, PLe pistage visuel. Son intérêt pour l'analyse des troubles de l'attention chez les schizophrènes. Ann Méd Psychol 1980; 3: 325–335Google Scholar
Mirsky, AFPrimac, DWDuncan, CCAhearn, MBKellam, SGAnalysis of the elements of attention: a neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychol Rev 1991; 2: 109–143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, MIPetersen, SEThe attention system of the human brain. Ann Rev Neurosci 1990; 13: 25–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, MIRothbart, MAttention mechanisms and conscious experience Conf Consciousness and Cognition St Andrews, Scotland Sept 1990Google Scholar
Pribram, KHMcGuinness, DArousal, activation and effort in the control of attention. Psychol Rev 1975; 82: 116–149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiman, EMMarcus, ERaichle, MERobins, EMintun, MAFusselman, MJFox, PTPrice, JLHackman, KANeuroanatomical correlates of a lactate-induced anxiety attack. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46: 493–500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiman, EMFusselman, MJFox, PTRaichle, MENeuroanatomical correlates of anticipatory anxiety. Science 1989; 243: 1071–1074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rueckl, JGCave, KRKosslyn, SMWhy are ‘what’ and ‘where’ processed by separate cortical visual systems? A computational investigation. J Cognit Neurosci 1989; 1: 171–186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, HERelation of the narrowing of the visual field with an increase in distance to manifest anxiety J Exp Psychol 6841964 334–336CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, WShiffrin, RMControlled and automatic human information processing. I. Detection, search and attention. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 1–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, KLLim, AThe impact of anxiety on visual attention to central and peripheral events Behav Res Ther 2741989 345–351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, KLJohnson, TLEffects of arousal on attention to central and peripheral visual stimuli. Acta Psychol 1987; 66: 157–172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, KLEgerman, BKlein, RMEffects of arousal on human visual performance. Percept Psychophys 1984; 35: 547–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, RMSchneider, WControlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory Psychol Rev 8421977 127–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, CDAnxiety as an emotional state In: Spielberger, CD ed. Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research volume I London: Academic Press, 1972Google Scholar
Spielberger, CDGorsuch, RLushene, RThe State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Test Manual Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970Google Scholar
Stroh, CMThe influence of personality and age on the relationship between vigilance performance and arousal level In: Mackie, RR ed. Vigilance theory Operational Performance and Physiological Correlates New York: Plenum Press, 1977; 617–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, REThe Biopsychology of Mood and Arousal Oxford, New York: Oxford Univ Press, 1989Google Scholar
Wine, JTest anxiety and direction of attention Psychol Bull 7621971 92–104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yerkes, RMDodson, JDThe relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J Comp Neurol Psychol 1908; 18: 459–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.