Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:14:31.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between predisposing factors, premorbid function and symptom dimensions in psychosis: an integrated approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Almudena Guerra ,
Paul Fearon ,
Pak Sham ,
Peter Jones ,
Shon Lewis ,
Ignacio Mata  and
Robin Murray
Almudena Guerra
Affiliation:
Gerencia Torribera, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Barcelona, Spain
Paul Fearon*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Pak Sham
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Peter Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK
Shon Lewis
Affiliation:
MRCPsych, Academic Department of Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, Manchester, UK
Ignacio Mata
Affiliation:
Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona, Spain
Robin Murray
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
*
*E-mail address:[email protected] (P. Fearon).
Get access

Summary

Background.

Increasing evidence suggests psychosis may be more meaningfully viewed in dimensional terms rather than as discrete categorical states and that specific symptom clusters may be identified. If so, particular risk factors and premorbid factors may predict these symptom clusters.

Aims.

(i) To explore, using principal component analysis, whether specific factors for psychotic symptoms can be isolated. (ii) To establish the predictors of the different symptom factors using multiple regression techniques.

Method.

One hundred and eighty-nine inpatients with psychotic illness were recruited and information on family history, premorbid factors and current symptoms obtained from them and their mothers.

Results.

Seven distinct symptom components were identified. Regression analysis failed to identify any developmental predictors of depression or mania. Delusions/hallucinations were predicted by a family history of schizophrenia and by poor school functioning in spite of normal premorbid IQ (F = 6.5; P < 0.001); negative symptoms by early onset of illness, developmental delay and a family history of psychosis (F = 4.1; P = 0.04). Interestingly disorganisation was predicted by the combination of family history of bipolar disorder and low premorbid IQ (F = 4.9; P = 0.003), and paranoia by obstetric complications (OCs) and poor school functioning (F = 4.2; P = 0.01).

Conclusion.

Delusions and hallucinations, negative symptoms and paranoia all appeared to have a developmental origin though they were associated with different childhood problems. On the other hand, neither mania nor depression was associated with childhood dysfunction. Our most striking finding was that disorganisation appeared to arise when a familial predisposition to mania was compounded by low premorbid IQ.

Keywords

DimensionFactorIntegratedPremorbidPsychosisSymptom
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 17 , Issue 6 , October 2002 , pp. 311 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreasen, NCRice, JPEndicott, Jet al. The familial history approach to diagnosis. How useful is it?. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986; 43; 421–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, RColter, NCorsellis, JANet al. Postmortem evidence of structural brain changes in schizophrenia: differences in brain weight, temporal horn area, and parahippocampal gyrus compared with affective disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986; 43; 36–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon-Spoor, HEPotkin, SGWyatt, RJ. Measurement of premorbid adjustment in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1982; 3; 470–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, DJMurray, RM. The neuro-developmental basis of sex differences in schizophrenia. Psychol Med 1991;21(3):565–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, TJDone, DJSacker, A. Childhood precursors of psychosis as clues to its evolutionary origins. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci 1995; 245; 61–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Fananas, Lvan Os, JHoyos, Cet al. Dermatoglyphic a–b ridge count as a possible marker for developmental disturbance in schizophrenia: replication in two samples. Schizophr Res 1996;20;307–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, I. Schizophrenia: caused by a fault in programmed synaptic elimination during adolescence?. J Psychiatry Res 1982;17;319–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fish, BMarcus, JHans, SLet al. Infants at risk for schizophrenia: sequelae of a genetic neurointegrative defect. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:221–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Foerster, ALewis, SWOwen, MJet al. Low birth weight and a family history of schizophrenia predict poor premorbid functioning in psychosis. Schizophr Res 1991;5:13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerster, ALewis, SWOwen, MJet al. Pre-morbid adjustment and personality in psychosis: effects of sex and diagnosis. Br J Psychiatry 1991;158:171–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geddes, JRVerdoux, HTakei, Net al. Schizophrenia and complications of pregnancy and labor: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull 1999;25(3):413.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, ECFrith, CD. Validation of three dimensions of schizophrenic symptoms in a large unselected sample of patients. Psychol M 1996; 26;669–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, PBBebbington, PFoerster, Aet al. Premorbid social under achievement in schizophrenia: results from the Camberwell collaborative psychosis study. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 162; 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, PBRodgers, BMurray, RMet al. Child developmental risk factors for adult schizophrenia in the British birth cohort. Lancet 1994; 344; 1398–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, PBDone, DJ. From birth to onset: a developmental perspective of schizophrenia in two national birth cohorts. In: Keshavan, MSMurray, R editors. Neurodevelopment and Adult Psychopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 119–36.Google Scholar
Kelly, JMurray, RM. A century of schizophrenia is enough. In: Maj, MSartorius, N editors. Evidence and Experience in Psychiatry, Schizophrenia, vol. 2. WPA. Wiley; 1999.Google Scholar
Keshavan, MSAnderson, SPettegrew, JW. Is schizophrenia due to excessive synaptic pruning in the prefrontal cortex? The Feinberg hypothesis revisited. J Psychiatric Res 1994;28(3): 239–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, AKinsella, AMurphy, Pet al. The anthropometric assessment of dysmorphic features in schizophrenia as an index of its developmental origins. Psychol Med 1997;27(5):1155–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, SWMurray, RM. Obstetric complications, neuro-developmental deviance, and risk of schizophrenia. J Psychiatric Res 1987;4:413–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddle, PF. The symptoms of chronic schizophrenia. A re-examination of the positive–negative dichotomy. Br J Psychiatry 1987;151:145–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, RMLewis, SW. Is schizophrenia a neuro-developmental disorder?. Br Med J 1987;295:681–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, RMO’Callaghan, ECastle, DJet al. A neuro-developmental approach to the classification of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1992;2:319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, HE. National Adult Reading Test. Test Manual. Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson; 1982.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, ELarkin, CWaddington, JL. Obstetric complications in schizophrenia and the validity of maternal recall. Psychol M 1990;20:89–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peralta, Vde Leon, JCuesta, MJ. Are there more than two syndromes in schizophrenia? A critique of the positive–negative dichotomy. Br J Psychiatry 1992;161:335–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perneger, TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. Br Med J 1998;316:1236–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pogue-Geile, MF. Developmental aspects of schizophrenia. In: Keshavan, MSMurray, R editors. Neurodevelopment and Adult Psychopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 137–54.Google Scholar
Sham, PCJones, PBRussell, Aet al. Age at onset, sex, and familial psychiatric morbidity in schizophrenia. Camberwell collaborative psychosis study. Br J Psychiatry 1994;165;466–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, RLEndicott, JRobbins, E. Research diagnostic criteria (RDC) for a selected group of functional psychoses. 3rd ed. New York: Biometrics Research Division, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1978.Google Scholar
Stewart, ALRifkin, LAmess, PNet al. Brain structure and neurocognitive and behavioural function in adolescents who were born very preterm. Lancet 1999;353(9165):1653–7.Google ScholarPubMed
van Os, JFahy, TAJones, PBet al. Psychopathological syndromes in the functional psychoses: associations with course and outcome. Psychol Med 1996;26:161–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Os, JJones, PBLewis, Get al. Developmental precursors of affective illness in a general population birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:625–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Os, JBijl, RRavelli, A. Strauss (1969) revisited: a psychosis continuum in the general population?. Schizophr Res 2000;41:18.Google Scholar
Walsh, CAsherson, PCastle, Det al. Age of onset of schizophrenia in multiply affected families is early and shows no sex difference. In: Holliday, SGAncil, RJMacEwan, GW editors. Schizophrenia: Breaking Down the Barriers. New york: John Wiley; 1996. p. 81–97.Google Scholar
Weinberger, DR. Implications of normal brain development for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:660–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, JKCooper, JESartorius, N. The measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1974.Google Scholar
Wright, ICRabe-Hesketh, SWoodruff, PWDavid, ASMurray, RMBullmore, ET. Meta-analysis of regional brain volumes in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157(1):16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wykes, T. Can the psychiatrist learn from the psycholinguist? Detecting coherence in the disordered speech of manics and schizophrenics. Psychol Med 1981;11(3):641–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.