Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:44:33.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-stroke patients in rehabilitation. The relationship between biological impairment (CT scanning), physical disability and clinical depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

B Bjerg Bendsen ,
E Bjerg Bendsen ,
L Lauritzen ,
T Vilmar  and
P Bech
B Bjerg Bendsen
Affiliation:
Amtshospitalet i Vordingborg, Psychiatric Hospital. DK-4760, Vordingborg
E Bjerg Bendsen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, DK-3400Hillergød
L Lauritzen
Affiliation:
Center Rehabilitation Hospital, Esbønderup, DK-3230Gtæsted, Denmark
T Vilmar
Affiliation:
Center Rehabilitation Hospital, Esbønderup, DK-3230Gtæsted, Denmark
P Bech
Affiliation:
Center Rehabilitation Hospital, Esbønderup, DK-3230Gtæsted, Denmark
Get access

Summary

A study of 128 consecutive patients with thromboembolic stroke in a rehabilitation hospital from July 1988 to September 1990 found a prevalence of major depression of 17%. The patient population was described according to the principles of the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) according to biological impairment, measured by computerized tomography (CT) scanning of the brain and side of hemiparesis and physical disability, measured by functional movement and activities of daily living. Handicap, referring to the interaction between disability and the environmental situation, often defined as the subjective disadvantage of being ill, was not measured in this study. A stroke index with four items was generated from the parameters describing biological impairment and physical disability. The psychiatric rating scales (the 17-item Hamilton Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Melancholia Scale [MES]and the Newcastle Diagnostic Depression Scale), and the new stroke-index showed adequate coefficients of Cronbach's alpha and Loevinger, suggesting that these scales have both adequate item correlation and homogeneity (adequate hierarchical structure). The impairment disability index of stroke thus seems to be a meaningful measurement of the specific factors of this disease. There was no correlation between the stroke-index and the psychiatric rating scales measuring the emotional dimension of disability caused by the disease expressed as depression. The results suggest that the depression found among stroke patients is not a simple reaction to the physical disability of the stroke.

Keywords

strokedepressionrehabilitationWHO International Classification of ImpairmentsDisabilities and Handicapsrating scales
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 12 , Issue 8 , 1997 , pp. 399 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allerup, PSorber, GThe Rasch model for questionnaires. Report no 16 1977 Danish Inst Educ Res CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Barry, SDinan, GAlpha-2 adrenergic receptor function in poststroke depression Psychol Med 20 1990 305–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, SPhillips, OMWilliams, DCDinan, TGPlatelet 5-HT uptake in post-stroke depression Acta Psychiatr Scand 82 1990 88–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bech, PRating scales for psychopathology, health status and quality of life. A compendium on documentation in accordance with the DSM I1I-R and WHO-systems 1993 Springer-Verlag BerlinGoogle Scholar
supplBech, P, et al.The use of rating scales exemplified by a comparison of the Hamilton and the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale Acta Psychiatr Scand 62 1980 128–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bech, PStage, KBNair, NPVLarsen, JKKragh-Sørensen, PGjerris, AThe Major Depression Rating Scale (MDS). Inter-rater reliability and validity across different settings in randomized moclobemide trials J Affect Disord 42 1997 39–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryer, JBStarkstein, SEVotypka, VParikh, MPrice, TRRob-inson, RGReduction of CSF monoamine metabolites in poststroke depression: a preliminary report J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 4 1992 440–442Google ScholarPubMed
Carney, MWPRoth, MGarside, RRThe diagnosis of depressive syndromes and prediction of ECT response Br J Psychiat III 1965 659–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charaton, FBFisk, AMental and emotional results after stroke NY State Med J 1978 1403–1405Google Scholar
Cronbach, LJMeehl, PEConstruct validity in psychological tests Psychol Bull 52 1955 281–302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dam, HPedersen, HEAhlgren, PDepression among patients with stroke Acta Psychiatr Scand 80 1989 118–124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engberg, AGarde, BKreiner, SRasch analysis in the development of a rating scale for assessment of mobility after stroke Acta Neurol Scand 91 1995 28–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fedroff, JPRobinson, RGTricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of post-stroke depression J Clin Psychiatry 507(suppl)1989 18–23Google Scholar
Hamilton, MDevelopment of a Rating Scale of Primary Depressive Illness Br J Soc Clin Psychol 6 1967 278–296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House, ADennis, MWarlow, CHawton, KMolyneux, AThe relationship between intellectual impairment and mood-dis-order in the first year after stroke Psychol Med 20 1990 805–814CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, MLRoberts, MDross, ARWitten, CMMethylphenidate in stroke patients with depression Am J Phys Med Rehabil 714 1992 239–241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauritzen, LBjerg Bendsen, BVilmar, TBjerg Bendsen, ELunde, MBech, PPost-stroke depression: combines treatment with imipramine or desipramine and mianserin Psychopharmacology 114 1994 119–122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarus, LWWinemiller, DRLingam, VRNeyman, IHartman, CAbassian, MKartan, UGroves, LFawcett, JEfficacy and side effects of Methylphenidate for post-stroke depression J Clin Psychiatry 53 1992 447–449Google Scholar
Lingam, VRLazarus, LWGroces, LOh, SHMethylphenidate in treating post-stroke depression J Clin Psychiatry 49 1988 151–153Google Scholar
Lipsey, JRRobinson, RGPearlson, GDRao, KPrice, TRNortriptyline treatment of post-stroke depression: a double blind study Lancet 1984 297–300CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loevinger, JObjective tests as measurement of psychological theory Psychol Reports 1957 635–699Google Scholar
Loldrup, DLangemark, MHansen, HJKastrup, MJeppesen, KBonnevie, O, et al.The validity of the melancholia scale (MES) in predicting outcome of antidepressants in chronic idiopathic pain disorders Eur Psychiatr 6 1991 119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, FLBarthel, DWFunctional evaluation: the Barthel index Maryland State MedJ 14 1965 61–65Google ScholarPubMed
Murray, GBShea, VConn, DKElectroconvulsive therapy for post-stroke depression J Clin Psychiatry 47 1987 258–260Google Scholar
Reding, MJOrto, LAWinter, SWFortuna, IMPonte, PDMcDowell, FHAntidepressant Therapy After Stroke.A double-blind trial Arch Neurol 43 1986 763–765CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, RGStarr, LBKubos, LKPrice, TRA two year longitudinal study of post-stroke mood disorders: findings during the initial evaluation Stroke 14 1983 736–741CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, RGStarr, LBPrice, TRA two year longitudinal study of mood disorders following stroke. Prevalence and duration of six months follow up Br J Psychiatry 144 1984 256–262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, RGMorris, PLPFedoroff, JPDepression and cerebrovascular disease J Clin Psychiatry 517(suppl)1990 26–31Google ScholarPubMed
Turner, RJBeiser, MMajor depression depressive symptomatology among the physically disabled. Assessing the role of chronic stress J Nerv Ment Dis 178 1990 343–350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, PHNThe international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps of the World Health Organization In: Leidl, RPotthoff, PSchwefel, D ed. European Approach to Patient Classification Systems 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin83–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps 1980 World Health Organization GenevaGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.