Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:17:17.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new questionnaire assessing the opinions of the relatives of patients with schizophrenia on the causes and social consequences of the disorder: reliability and validity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

L. Magliano ,
C. Marasco ,
M. Guarneri ,
C. Malangone ,
G. Lacrimini ,
P. Zanus  and
M. Maj
L. Magliano
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN — Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Naples, Italy
C. Marasco
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN — Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Naples, Italy
M. Guarneri
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN — Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Naples, Italy
C. Malangone
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN — Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Naples, Italy
G. Lacrimini
Affiliation:
Mental Health Service of ArezzoArezzo, Italy
P. Zanus
Affiliation:
Mental Health Service of TriesteTrieste, Italy
M. Maj
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN — Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Naples, Italy
Get access

Summary

This paper describes the development and the validation of a questionnaire assessing the opinions of the relatives of patients with schizophrenia on the causes and the social consequences of the disorder. The final version of the questionnaire includes 28 items, grouped in four sub-scales (social restrictions, social distance, utility of treatments, biopsychosocial causes of schizophrenia), whose intra-rater reliability ranges from 0.36 to 0.84. Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which tests the content validity of the sub-scales, ranges from 0.56 to 0.66. Factor analysis identifies two factors (opinions on social consequences and the utility of treatments, and the beliefs on the causes of schizophrenia), which account for the 73% of the total variance. This questionnaire may be particularly useful to assess relatives'beliefs about schizophrenia and to target psychosocial interventions in the families of patients with schizophrenia.

Keywords

familyopinionsquestionnairereliabilityschizophreniavalidity
Type
Original articles
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1999 , pp. 71 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Morosini, PLRoncone, RVeltro, FPalomba, U.Casacchia, M. Routine assessment tools in psychiatry: a questionnaire on family attitudes and burden. Ital J Psychiatr Behav Sci 1991 ; 1 : 95–101.Google Scholar
Magliano, LVeltro, FGuarneri, MMarasco, C. Clinical and socio-demographic correlates of coping strategies in relatives of schizophrenic patients. Eur Psychiatry 1995 ; 10 : 155–158.10.1016/0767-399X(96)80104-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magliano, LGuarneri, MMarasco, CTosini, PMorosini, PLMaj, M. A new questionnaire assessing coping strategies in relatives of patients with schizophrenia: development and factor analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996 ; 94 : 224–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magliano, LFadden, GEconomou, MXavier, MHeld, TGuarneri, Met alSocial and clinical factors influencing the choice of coping strategies in relatives of patients with schizophrenia: results of the BIOMED I study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998 ; 33 : 405–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magliano, LFadden, GMadianos, MCaldas, DEAlmeida, JMHeld, Tet alBurden on the families of patients with schizophrenia: results of the BIOMED I study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998 ; 33 : 413–419.10.1007/s001270050074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarrow, MSchwartz, CGMurphy, HSDeasy, LC. The psychological meaning of mental illness in the family. J Soc Issues 1955 ; 11 : 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldebrote, BMFolkard, S. Some factors related to outcome and adjustment in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1961 ; 37 : 223–235.Google Scholar
Beels, CC. Family and social management of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1975 ; 13 : 97–118.10.1093/schbul/1.13.97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, GWBirley, JLTWing, JK. Influence of family life on the course of schizophrenic disorders : a replication. Br J Psychiatry 1972 ; 121 : 241–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birley, JHudson, B. The family, the social network and rehabilitationIn: Watts, FNBennett, DH eds. Theory and Practice of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Chichester: Wiley & Sons; 1983. p. 8995.Google Scholar
Freeman, HESimmons, OG. Mental patients in the community: family settings and performance levels. Am Sociol Rev 1958 ; 23 : 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struening, ELCohen, J. Factorial invariance and other psychometric characteristics of the opinions about mental factors. ucat Psychol Measur 1963 ; 23 : 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, SMDear, JM. Scaling community attitudes towards the mentally ill. Schizophr Bull 1981 ; 7 : 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrowclough, CTarrier, NWatts, SVaughn, CBamrah, JSFreeman, HL. Assessing the functional value of relatives'knowledge about schizophrenia: a preliminary report. Br J Psychiatry 1987 ; 151 : 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brockington, IFHall, PLevings, JMurphy, C.. The Community's tolerance of the mentally ill. Br J Psychiatry 1993 ; 162 : 93–99.10.1192/bjp.162.1.93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angermeyer, MCMatschinger, H. Social distance towards the mentally ill: results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany Psychol Med 1997 ; 27 : 131–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.