Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T10:52:31.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2739 – Drug Interactions in a Regional Secure Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

N. Rasquinha
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, Dartford, London, UK
P. Patil
Affiliation:
South West London and St George's Mental Health Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Polypharmacy continues to be a major concern in psychiatry. Besides the risk of unintended and untoward pharmacological interactions, it carries the potential to cause prescriber liability and increased healthcare costs. Although polypharmacy has been commonly reported in forensic units, there have been no studies examining potentially serious pharmacological interactions in secure settings.

Aims and objectives:

To identify the prevalence of potential pharmacological interactions through a cross-sectional study of prescribing patterns in a medium secure unit in the UK.

Methods:

Medications prescribed for all 43 patients on 3 male medium secure wards in London in September 2012 were analyzed for potential pharmacological interactions using the Medscape Drug Database/Interaction checker.

Results:

A total of 233 regular and 113 ‘as required (p.r.n)’ medications were prescribed. 98 medications were psychotropic and 248 were physical health related. 284 potential pharmacological interactions were present with an average of 6.6 interactions per patient (1-28), involving 31 of the 43 patients(72.09%). These interactions were categorized into four groups: 1.Contraindicated (4.65% of patients;2 interactions) 2.Serious-Use Alternative(30.23% patients;20 interactions) 3.Significant- Monitor Closely(69.6% patients; 232 interactions) and 4.Minor(39.53% patients;30 interactions). Interestingly, 65% of contraindicated/serious interactions involved non-psychotropic medication.

Conclusions:

The findings highlight the high prevalence of potential pharmacological interactions in the forensic population. The challenging presentations in forensic psychiatry often necessitate ‘p.r.n. prescribing’ and medication augmentation to treat partial response. However, this can lead to unpredictable and dangerous interactions. Clinicians should be mindful of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic implications prior to prescribing psychotropic and non-psychotropic drugs.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.