Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T18:28:27.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2148 – Agomelatine Augmentation In Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

E. Tzavellas
Affiliation:
Athens University Medical School, 1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
D. Karaiskos
Affiliation:
Athens University Medical School, 1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
I. Ilias
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Elena Venizelou Hospital, Athens, Greece
I. Liappas
Affiliation:
Athens University Medical School, 1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
T. Paparrigopoulos
Affiliation:
Athens University Medical School, 1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Augmentation treatment has been the subject of several studies in treatment-resistant obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). We hypothesized that medications with a dual action on the melatoninergic and serotoninergic systems may be of use in treatment-resistant OCD.

Objectives/aims

In this open label study we investigated the efficacy and safety of agomelatine augmentation in treatmentresistant OCD.

Methods

Twelve patients, aged 18–50, fulfilling OCD criteria, with no response to a 16-week or longer treatment with a selective serotonine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) at the indicated dose, were assigned to receive agomelatine augmentation. Subjects were assessed with the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and were screened for treatmentemergent side effects at baseline, week 8 and week 12 of treatment.

Results

The overall Y-BOCS score fell during the duration of the study (all comparisons among baseline, 8th week and 16th week were statistically significant, p < 0.01). On the obsession Y-BOCS scale a drop was noted, which led to statistical significance at the 16th week of the study (p < 0.05). Regarding the compulsion Y-BOCS scale a drop was also noted, particularly from baseline to the 8th week of the study (p < 0.01). Dizziness (16.6%) and headache (8.4%) were the most often reported side effects of treatment.

Conclusion

Agomelatine could be efficacious and well tolerated as an augmenting agent in refractory to treatment OCD. Further controlled studies are warranted to explore the efficacy of agomelatine, as well as the potential role of circadian rhythm modulation both in the pathophysiology and treatment of OCD.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.