Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T06:33:53.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1989 – False Benzodiazepines Results In a Rapid Immunochromatography Test For Urinary Drug Detection In Tobacco Smokers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

D. Haj Mouhamed
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biochemistry-Toxicology, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
A. Ezzaher
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biochemistry-Toxicology, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
F. Neffati
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biochemistry-Toxicology, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
W. Douki
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biochemistry-Toxicology, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
L. Gaha
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Research Laboratory ‘Vulnerability to Psychotic Disorders LR 05 ES 10’, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
M.F. Najjar
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biochemistry-Toxicology, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

This study aimed to evaluate the interference of tobacco smoke on immunochromatography assay for urinary benzodiazepines detection and the interest of two biological markers and smoking status parameters as predictive factors of false results.

Methods

Our study included 256 voluntary subjects (143 passive smokers and 113 smokers). Cotinine was measured by homogenous immunoenzymatic assay and SCN- by selective electrode. Urinary drugs were detected by immunochromatographic assay. A positive result is completed by an analytical method with an immunometric assay.

Results

False positive results for benzodiazepines are significantly more frequent in smokers compared with passive smokers (90.2% Vs 22.4%, p< 10-3). For smokers, the number of cigarettes was significantly higher in subjects with falsely positive results for benzodiazepines compared with subjects with negative results (32 ± 11 Vs 20 ± 10; p= 0.04). Between these two groups, we established a significant difference for urinary cotinine (345 ± 211 Vs 117 ± 54 μg/μmol; p< 10-3) and for plasma SCN- (101.6 ± 3.4 Vs 98.8 ± 2.1μmol/L; p=10-3). Urinary cotinine and consumption duration present the highest values of AUC of the ROC curves. The cut-off of 167.6μg/μmol and 10.5 years were found as predictive factors of false positive Results.

Conclusions

Tobacco smoke interferes with immunochromatographic assay of urinary drug detection; therefore, all subjects must be questioned about their smoking status to avoid such false results during results interpretation.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.