Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T21:58:01.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1775 – Economic Impact Of Antidepressant Treatment Duration In a Real-life Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

M. Tournier
Affiliation:
Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France INSERM U657, Bordeaux, France Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France
R. Crott
Affiliation:
INSERM U657, Bordeaux, France
Y. Gaudron
Affiliation:
INSERM U657, Bordeaux, France
H. Verdoux
Affiliation:
Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France INSERM U657, Bordeaux, France Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The benefit-risk ratio of a long duration of antidepressant drug treatment (ADT) may not be favourable. A pragmatic way to study the consequences of ADT duration in accordance with practice guidelines is to assess its impact on health care use.

Objectives

To assess the economic impact of ADT duration in a real-life setting through the changes in direct health care costs.

Method

A historical fixed cohort study included 27,134 patients aged 18 and over with a new ADT registered in the national insurance database. The economic impact concerned health care expenditure in the first three months after treatment discontinuation. Generalized linear models compared two groups of treatment duration: less than six months and six months and over.

Results

After adjustment for care costs before and during ADT, gender, age, chronic diseases, welfare entitlement and prescriber specialty, total health care costs (in log) [-0.06 (-0.14;0.01) p = 0.11] and psychiatric care costs (in square root) [-0.08 (-0.41;0.25) p = 0.6] were similar in both groups after ADT discontinuation. Non-psychiatric care costs were significantly lower in the “long treatment duration” group compared with the “short treatment duration” group [-11.4 (-15.8;-7.0) p < 0.0001]. The decreases in total and non-psychiatric care costs after the ADT episode were larger in the “long treatment duration” group compared with the “short treatment duration” group.

Conclusions

With regard to health care costs and global health, ADT of short duration appear less effective than treatment of recommended duration.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.