Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T16:53:13.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1086 – Barriers To Somatic Health Care In Psychiatric Inpatient Wards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

N. Okkels
Affiliation:
Organic Psychiatric Disorders and Emergency Ward (Dep. M), Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Risskov, Denmark
N.B. Thygesen
Affiliation:
Organic Psychiatric Disorders and Emergency Ward (Dep. M), Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Risskov, Denmark
B. Jensen
Affiliation:
Organic Psychiatric Disorders and Emergency Ward (Dep. M), Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Risskov, Denmark
M.H. Wendelboe
Affiliation:
Organic Psychiatric Disorders and Emergency Ward (Dep. M), Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Risskov, Denmark
P. Munk-Joergensen
Affiliation:
Organic Psychiatric Disorders and Emergency Ward (Dep. M), Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Risskov, Denmark

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Cardiometabolic diseases are under-diagnosed and under-treated in psychiatric inpatients. A common solution is implementation of screening guidelines. However, we often forget to ask the essential question: Why were our patients underdiagnosed in the first place?

Objective

To identify causes of under-diagnosing and under-treatment in the context of local clinical practices.

Method

All consecutive admissions (n=63) over 93 days were screened for hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemias and abdominal obesity. Patients identified with both (a) undiagnosed and untreated disease and (b) admission on a separate occasion within the previous two years to the ward in question, were selected for a retrospective patient file review. These patients (n=32) had their medical records scrutinized for information on how each cardiometabolic measure was assessed at previous admission.

Results

Relevant examination were performed in 38% of cases and test results were abnormal for 54% of these. Abnormal test results were evaluated in 14% of cases and none of the evaluated results were acted upon.

Conclusion

Rigorous examination and testing of patients is only of value if clinicians have the essential knowledge to interpret the results and feel responsibility to do so. These barriers must be broken down before implementing screening guidelines in routine clinical practice.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.