Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T17:13:20.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1046 – Switching To Lurasidone In Patients With Schizophrenia: Tolerability And Effectiveness At 6 Weeks And 6 Months

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

J. McEvoy
Affiliation:
Central Regional Hospital, Butner, NC
L. Citrome
Affiliation:
New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY
J. Hsu
Affiliation:
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Fort Lee, NJ, USA
P. Werner
Affiliation:
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Fort Lee, NJ, USA
A. Pikalov
Affiliation:
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Fort Lee, NJ, USA
J. Cucchiaro
Affiliation:
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Fort Lee, NJ, USA
A. Loebel
Affiliation:
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Fort Lee, NJ, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Effectiveness studies of therapeutic switching of antipsychotics provide valuable clinical information.

Objectives

Assess effectiveness of switching patients to lurasidone.

Aims

To evaluate 3 dosing strategies when switching patients to lurasidone.

Methods

Patients were randomized to three open-label lurasidone dosing strategies: 40mg/day for 14 days (n=74); 40mg/day for 7 days then 80mg/day for 7 days (n=88); and 80mg/day for 14 days (n=82) and stratified by their previous treatment (sedating vs non-sedating). Prior antipsychotic was tapered (50% step-down, day 8, discontinued day 14), followed by 4 weeks of flexible dose treatment (40-120 mg/day). Primary outcome was time to treatment failure (TTF). Of the 198 subjects completing core 6-week study, 149 (75.3%) enrolled in a 6-month extension study.

Results

Switching to lurasidone was well tolerated; 198 (81.1%) of subjects completed core study, 19 (7.9%) subjects experienced treatment failure of which 16 (6.7%) discontinued due to an AE. No clinically relevant differences were noted among the 3 dosing strategies. TTF was earlier in patients previously receiving sedating antipsychotics vs. non-sedating (log rank p=0.101). Core study yielded LS mean (SE) within-group improvement on PANSS total score -5.3 (±0.7), LOCF with further improvement of -1.5 (±0.9), LOCF, at Month 6 from extension baseline. Ninety-eight subjects (65.8%) completed extension phase. Premature discontinuation causes included consent withdrawal (12.1%) and AEs (11.4%). Weight and lipid changes at 6 months were minimal.

Conclusion

Switching to lurasidone was safe and well tolerated regardless of initial dosing strategy. Switched patients maintained or improved symptom control during core and extension treatment.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.