Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:46:13.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Un nuevo cuestionario que evalúa las opiniones de los familiares de los pacientes con esquizofrenia sobre las causas y las consecuencias sociales del trastorno: fiabilidad y validez

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

L. Magliano ,
C. Marasco ,
M. Guarneri ,
C. Malangone ,
G. Lacrimini ,
P. Zanus  and
M. Maj
L. Magliano
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Nápotes SUN - Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Nápoles
C. Marasco
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Nápotes SUN - Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Nápoles
M. Guarneri
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Nápotes SUN - Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Nápoles
C. Malangone
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Nápotes SUN - Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Nápoles
G. Lacrimini
Affiliation:
Servicio de Salud Mental de Arezzo
P. Zanus
Affiliation:
Servicio de Salud Mental de Trieste, Italia
M. Maj
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Nápotes SUN - Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138Nápoles
Get access

Resumen

Este artículo describe el desarrollo y la validación de un cuestionario que evalúa las opiniones de los familiares de los pacientes con esquizofrenia sobre las causas y las consecuencias sociales del trastorno. La versión final del cuestionario incluye 28 elementos, agrupados en cuatro subescalas (restricciones sociales, distancia social, utilidad de los tratamientos, causas biopsicosociales de la esquizofrenia), cuya fiabilidad intra-evaluador va de 0,36 a 0,84. El coeficiente alfa de Cronbach, que examina la validez de contenido de las subescalas, va de 0,56 a 0,66. El análisis factorial identifica dos factores (las opiniones sobre las consecuencias sociales y la utilidad de los tratamientos y las creencias sobre las causas de la esquizofrenia), que explican el 73% de la varianza total. Este cuestionario puede ser particularmente útil para evaluar las creencias de los familiares sobre la esquizofrenia y para llevar a cabo intervenciones psicosociales en las familias de los pacientes con esquizofrenia.

Keywords

familiaopinionescuestionariofiabilidadesquizofreniavalidez
Type
Artículo original
Information
European Psychiatry (Ed. Española) , Volume 6 , Issue 7 , October 1999 , pp. 419 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliografía

Morosini, PL, Roncone, R, Veltro, F, Palomba, U, Casacchia, M.Routine assessment tools in psychiatry: a questionnaire on family attitudes and burden. Ital J Psychiatr Behav Sci 1991; 1: 95–101.Google Scholar
Magliano, L, Veltro, F, Guarnen, M, Marasco, C.Clinical and socio-demographic correlates of coping strategies in relatives of schizophrenic patients. Eur Psychiatry 1995; 10: 155–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magliano, L, Guarneri, M, Marasco, C, Tosini, P, Morosini, PL, Maj, M.A new questionnaire assessing coping strategies in relatives of patients with schizophrenia: development and factor analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996; 94: 224–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magliano, L, Fadden, G, Economou, M, Xavier, M, Held, T, Guarneri, M, et al.Social and clinical factors influencing the choice of coping strategies in relatives of patients with schizophrenia: results of the BIOMED I study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998; 33: 405–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magliano, L, Fadden, G, Madianos, M, Caldas de Almeida, JM, Held, T, et al.Burden on the families of patients with schizophrenia: results of the BIOMED I study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998; 33: 413–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarrow, M, Schwartz, CG, Murphy, HS, Deasy, LC.The psychological meaning of mental illness in the family. J Soc Issues 1955; 11: 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maldebrote, BM, Folkard, S.Some factors related to outcome and adjustment in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1961; 37: 223–35.Google Scholar
Beels, CC.Family and social management of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1975; 13: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, GW, Birley, JLT, Wing, JK.Influence of family life on the course of schizophrenic disorders: a replication. Br J Psychiatry 1972; 121: 241–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birley, J, Hudson, B.The family, the social network and rehabilitation. In: Watts, FN, Bennett, DH, eds. Theory and Practice of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Chichesster. Wiley & Sons, 1983. p. 89–95.Google Scholar
Freeman, HE, Simmons, OG.Mental patients in the community: family settings and performance levels. Am Sociol Rev 1958; 23: 147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struening, EL, Cohén, J.Factorial invariance and other psychometric characteristics of the opinions about mental factors. Educat Psychol Measur 1963; 23: 289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, SM, Dear, JM.Scaling community attitudes towards the mentally ill. Schizophr Bull 1981; 7: 225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrowclough, C, Tarrier, N, Watts, S, Vaughn, C, Bamrah, JS, Freeman, HL.Assessing the functional valué of relatives’ knowledge about schizophrenia: a preliminary report. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brockington, IF, Hall, P, Levings, J, Murphy, C.The Community’s tolerance of the mentally ill. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 162: 93–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angermeyer, MC, Matschinger, H.Social distance towards the mentally ill: results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany. Psychol Med 1997; 27: 131–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lecturas Complementarias

Atkinson, JM, Coia, DA.Families coping with schizophrenia. Chichester: Wiley & Sons; 1995.Google Scholar
Wing, JK.Reasoning about madness. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1978.Google Scholar