Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:55:13.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estudio de validación de la versión francesa de la Escala de Depresión Postnatal de Edimburgo (EPDS): nuevos resultados sobre su uso y propiedades psicométricas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

N. Guedeney  and
J. Fermanian
N. Guedeney
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Instituto Mutualista Montsouris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, París
J. Fermanian
Affiliation:
Departamento de Bioestadística, Hospital Necker-Enfants Malades, 149 rué de Sèvres, 75015, París, Francia
Get access

Resumen

Se presenta la validación de la versión francesa de la Escala de Depresión Postnatal de Edimburgo (EPDS), realizada sobre una muestra de 87 mujeres en los 4 primeros meses de post- parto. El estudio de la sensibilidad, la especificidad y los valores predictivos frente a los Criterios para el estudio diagnóstico (RDC) proporcionan la puntuación de corte de 10,5 como la mejor (sensibilidad: 0,80; especificidad: 0,92). La EPDS tuvo también una buena validez de criterio como índice de la gravedad de la depresión postnatal, en comparación con la evaluación del psiquiatra. El análisis factorial muestra que la estructura interna de la EPDS se compone de dos subescalas que subrayan una descripción más precisa de la depresión postnatal. El estudio de la fiabilidad confirma la buena consistencia interna de la escala global (alfa de Cronbach: 0,76) y su buena fiabilidad test-retest a corto plazo (0,98).

Keywords

EPDSvalidezfiabilidaddepresión postnatalanálisis factorial
Type
Artículo original
Information
European Psychiatry (Ed. Española) , Volume 5 , Issue 8 , November 1998 , pp. 538 - 546
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliografía

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. DSM III-R. Washington: American Psychiatric Press; 1987.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. Standards fo r educational and psychological tests. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 1985.Google Scholar
Boyce, PM, Stubbs, J, Todd, A. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: validation for an Australian sample. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1993; 27: 472–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carothers, AD, Murray, L. Estimating psychiatry morbidity by logistic regression: application to post-natal depression in a community sample. Psychol Med 1990; 20: 695–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J, Holden, J, Sagovsky, R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10 item EPDS. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 150: 782–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J, Murray, D, Chapman, G. A controlled study of onset, duration and prevalence of postnatal depression. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 163: 27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, J, Holden, J, eds. Perinatal psychiatry. Use and misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. London: Gaskell; 1994.Google Scholar
Endicott, J, Spitzer, RV, Manuzza, S. Schedule for ajfective disorders and schizophrenia lifetime version. R. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1990.Google Scholar
Fischer, RA, Yates, F. Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. 6thEdn.Oliver, , Boyd, , eds. Edinburgh; 1963.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, KA, Lindahl, K, Harmon, RJ. Preschoolers’ response to maternal sadness: relationships with maternal depression and emotional availability. Infant Ment Health J 1992; 13: 132–46.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, DP, Hillier, VF. A scale version of the general questionnary. Psychol Med 1979; 9: 139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guelfi, JD. L ‘evaluation clinique standardisee en psychiatrie, vol I. Boulogne: Editions Medicales Pierre Fabre; 1993.Google Scholar
Guy, W, ECDU in National Institute of Mental Health, eds. Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville: NIH; 1976.Google Scholar
Harman, HH. Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1967.Google Scholar
Harris, B, Huckle, P, Thomas, R. The use of rating scales to identify postnatal depression. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 154: 813–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. Rank correlation method. London: C Griffin and Company; 1975.Google Scholar
Lundh, W, Gyllang, C. Use of the EPDS in some Swedish child health centres. Scand J Caring Sci 1993; 1: 149–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, L, Cox, J. Screening for postnatal depression during pregnancy with the EPDS. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1990; 8: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, L, Carothers, AD. The validation of the EPDS on a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 157: 288–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, H. The action of sedatives on brain stern oculomotor systems in man. Neuropharmacology 1971; 10: 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, MW, Neunaber, DJ, Zekovsky, EM. Prospective study of post partum depression: prevalence, course and predictive factors. J Abnorm Psychol 1984; 93: 158–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Hara, MW, Zekovsky, EM, Phillips, LH. Controlled prospective study of post partum mood disorders: comparison of childbearing and non childbearing women. J Abnorm Psychol 1990; 99: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, MWPost partum depression: identification and measurement in a cross cultural context. In: Cox, Holden, eds. Perinatal psychiatry: use and misuse of EPDS; 1994.Google Scholar
Pop, V, Komptroe, IH, Van Son, MJ. Characteristics of the EPDS in the Netherlands. J Affect Disord 1992; 26: 105–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radloff, LS. The CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrout, DE, Fieis, JL. Intra class correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Endicott, J, Robins, E. Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978; 36: 773–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, ML, Thompson, JM, Mitchell, EAet al. Postnatal depression in a community cohort. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1994; 28: 42–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, MC, Fineberg, HV. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1980.Google Scholar
Williams, P, Tamopolsky, A, Hand, D. Case definition and case identification in psychiatric epidemiology: Review and assessment. Psychol Med 1980; 10: 101–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, JK, Cooper, JE, Sartorius, N. Present state examination. Cambridge University Press; 1973.Google Scholar
Zelkowitz, P, Milet, TH. Screening for post partum depression in a community sample. Can J Psychiatry 1995; 1: 80–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation. The ICD-10. Classification of mental and behavioral disorders. Geneva: WHO; 1992.Google Scholar