Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T11:18:04.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epidemiología psiquiátrica moderna: el reto de la investigación de los factores de riesgo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

Aslihan Polat  and
Henning Tiemeier
Aslihan Polat
Affiliation:
Centro Médico Erasmus, Departamento de Epidemiología y Bioestadística, PO Box 1738, 3000 RD Rotterdam, Países Bajos Departamento de Psiquiatria del Niño y del Adolescente, Rotterdam, Países Bajos
Henning Tiemeier
Affiliation:
Centro Médico Erasmus, Departamento de Epidemiología y Bioestadística, PO Box 1738, 3000 RD Rotterdam, Países Bajos Departamento de Psiquiatría del Niño y del Adolescente, Rotterdam, Países Bajos

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
European Psychiatry (Ed. Española) , Volume 12 , Issue 6 , September 2005 , pp. 315 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2005

References

Bibliografía

[1] Heun, R, Hein, S. Risk factors of major depression in the elderly. European Psychiatry 2005; 20: this issue.Google Scholar
[2] Kraepelin, E. Vergleichende Psychiatrie. Zentbl Nervenheilk Psychiat 1904; 27: 433-7 [as quoted by Shephered M.Psychiatric epidemiology and the classification of mental disorders. Int J Epidemiol 1982;11:312–3].Google Scholar
[3] Srole, L, Langner, TS, Michael, ST, Opler, MK, Rennie, TAC. Mental health in the metropolis: the Midtown Manhattan Study. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1962.Google Scholar
[4] Regier, DA, Myers, JK, Kramer, M. The NIMH epidemiologic catchment area program. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:934–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[5] Sartorius, N. Epidemiology and clinical psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 1997;133:289–98.Google Scholar