Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T16:11:17.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diferenciación de personas adoptadas con riesgo genético de esquizofrenia alto frente a bajo según índices ajustados del MMPI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

Virva Siira ,
Karl-Erik Wahlberg ,
Jouko Miettunen ,
Pekka Tienari  and
Kristian Làksy
Virva Siira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oulu, Box 5000, 90014Oulu, Finlandia
Karl-Erik Wahlberg
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oulu, Box 5000, 90014Oulu, Finlandia
Jouko Miettunen
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oulu, Box 5000, 90014Oulu, Finlandia
Pekka Tienari
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oulu, Box 5000, 90014Oulu, Finlandia
Kristian Làksy
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Universidad de Oulu, Box 5000, 90014Oulu, Finlandia
Get access

Resumen

El propósito de este estudio era encontrar signos potenciales de vulnerabilidad genética a la esquizofrenia. Se evaluó las diferencias entre personas adoptadas con riesgo genético alto de esquizofrenia (cuya madre biológica tenía un trastorno del espectro de la esquizofrenia) y adoptados de control de madres biológicas sin trastorno del espectro de la esquizofrenia. Las comparaciones entre estos grupos se basaron en las puntuaciones de las subescalas del Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnesota (MMPI) ajustadas según el género, la edad en la evaluación del MMPI, la edad de la colocación en la familia adoptiva y la clase social. Los sujetos eran una submuestra de un total de 182 adoptados examinados y 136 adoptados mentalmente sanos en el Estudio de Familias Adoptivas Finlandesas. Se encontró que el grupo de alto riesgo era distinguible del grupo de bajo riesgo a partir de la desviación de las puntuaciones en las escalas de Hostilidad, Hipomanía y Sinceridad. Estas escalas pueden medir la vulnerabilidad genética y posiblemente también ser indicativas de una desviación psicométrica que prediga el comienzo futuro de la esquizofrenia.

Keywords

EsquizofreniaMMPIVariables demográficasEstudio de adopciónEstudio del riesgo alto
Type
Original
Information
European Psychiatry (Ed. Española) , Volume 13 , Issue 7 , October 2006 , pp. 335 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliografía

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1987.Google Scholar
Amminger, GP, Pape, S, Rock, D, Roberts, SA, Squires-Wheeler, E, Kestenbaum, C, et al. The New York High-Risk Project: comorbidity for axis I disorders are preceded by childhood behavioral disturbance. J Nerv Ment Dis 2000;188:751–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bland, M. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
Bolinskey, PK, Gottesman, II, Nichols, DS, Shapiro, BM, Roberts, SA, Adamo, UH, et al. A new MMPI-derived indicator of liability to develop schizophrenia: evidence from the New York high-risk project. Assessment 2001;8:127–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, JW, Parnas, J, Cannon, TD, Schulsinger, F, Mednick, SA. MMPI variables predictive of schizophrenia in the Copenhagen High-Risk Project: a 25-year follow-up. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999; 99:432–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comblatt, BA, Obuchowski, M, Roberts, S, Pollack, S, Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Cognitive and behavioral precursors of schizophrenia. Dev Psychopathol 1999;11:487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, PJ, West, SG, Finch, JF. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1996;1:16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlstrom, WG, Welsh, GS, Dahlstrom, L. An MMPI handbook, volume 1, clinical interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1982.Google Scholar
Davis, WE. Age and the discriminative “power” of the MMPI with schizophrenic and nonschizophrenic patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1972;38:151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eichman, WJ. Discrimination of female schizophrenics with configural analysis of the MMPI profile. J Consult Psychol 1959;23:442–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Neurobehavioral deficits in offspring of schizophrenic parents: liability indicators and predictors of illness. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2000;97:65–71.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Early neurobehavioral deficits as phenotypic indicators of the schizophrenia genotype and predictors of later psychosis. Am J Med Genet A 2001;105:23–4.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, AF, Webb, JT, Lewak, R. Psychological assessment with the MMPI. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1989.Google Scholar
Golden, RR, Meehl, PE. Detection of the schizoid taxon with MMPI indicators. J Abnorm Psychol 1979;88:217–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodson, JH, King, GD. A clinical and actuarial study on the validity of the Goldberg index for the MMPI. J Clin Psychol 1976;32:328–35.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottesman, II, Shields, J. Schizophrenia and genetics: a twin study vantage point. San Diego: Academic Press; 1972.Google Scholar
Gottesman, II. Complications to the complex inheritance of schizophrenia. Clin Genet 1994;46:116–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, RL. The MMPI: an interpretive manual. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1980.Google Scholar
Grove, WM. Psychometric detection of schizotypy. Psychol Bull 1982;92(l):27–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haier, RJ, Rosenthal, D, Wender, PH. MMPI assessment of psychopathology in adopted-away offspring of schizophrenics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35:171–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, DR, Gottesman, II, Heston, LL. Some possible childhood indicators of adult schizophrenia inferred from children of schizophrenics. Br J Psychiatry 1976;129:142–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, EC, Abukmeil, SS, Byme, M, Clafferty, R, Grant, E, Hodges, A, et al. Edinburgh High Risk Study: findings after 4-year: demographic, attainment and psychopathological issues. Schizophr Res 2000;46:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendler, KS, O'Neil, FA, Burke, J, Murphy, B, Duke, F, Straub, RE, et al. Irish study of high-density schizophrenia families: field methods and power to detect linkage. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 1996;67:179–90.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, KS, Myers, JM, O'Neill, FA, Martin, R, Murphy, B, MacLean, CJ, et al. Clinical features of schizophrenia and linkage to chromosomes 5q, 6 p, 8p, and lOp in the Irish study of high-density schizophrenia families. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:402–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kugelmass, S, Faber, N, Ingraham, LJ, Frenkel, E, Nathan, M, Mirsky, AF, et al. Reanalysis of SCOR and anxiety measures in the Israeli High-Risk Study. Schizophr Bull 1995;21:205–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacCrimmon, DJ, Cleghom, JM, Asarnow, RF, Steffy, RA. Children at risk for schizophrenia: clinical and attentional characteristics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:671–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullagh, P, Nelder, JP. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metsänen, M, Wanlberg, K-E, Saarento, O, Tarvainen, T, Miettunen, J, Koistinen, P, et al. Early presence of thought disorder as a prospective sign of mental disorder. Psychiatry Res 2004;125:193–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, TW, Paciello, RA. Discriminative dimension of the MMPI as a function of age and psychopathology. J Clin Psychol 1980;36:758–9.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnesota Veterans Administration Hospital-MMPI Research Laboratory. An atlas for the P-code system of MMPI interpretation. Minneapolis: MN: Veterans’ Administration Hospital; 1975.Google Scholar
Moldin, SO, Gottesman, II, Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Psychometric validation of psychiatric diagnoses in the New York high-risk study. Psychiatry Res 1987;22:159–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moldin, SO, Gottesman, II, Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Searching for the psychometric boundaries of schizophrenia: evidence from the New York high-risk study. J Abnorm Psychol 1987;96:354–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moldin, SO, Gottesman, II, Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L, Cornblatt, BA. Psychometric deviance in offspring at risk for schizophrenia: I. Initial delineation of a distinct subgroup. Psychiatry Res 1990;32:297–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moldin, SO, Rice, JP, Gottesman, II, Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Psychometric deviance in offspring at risk for schizophrenia: II. resolving heterogeneity through admixture analysis. Psychiatry Res 1990;32: 311–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moldin, SO, Rice, JP, Gottesman, II, Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Transmission of a psychometric indicator for liability to schizophrenia in normal families. Genet Epidemiol 1990;7:163–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newmark, CS, Gentry, L, Simpson, M, Jones, T. MMPI criteria for diagnosing schizophrenia. J Pers Assess 1978;42:366–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newmark, CS, Gentry, L, Whitt, JK. Utility of MMPI Indices of schizophrenia with adolescents. J Clin Psychol 1983;39:170–2.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newmark, CS, Jones, MT, McKee, DC, Simpson, M, Boren, RB, Prillaman, K. Using discriminant function analysis with clinical, demographic, and historical variables to diagnose schizophrenia. Br J Med Psychol 1980;53:365–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, CS, Hutchins, TC. Age and MMPI Indices of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychol 1980;36:768–9.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuechterlein, KH. Vulnerability models for schizophrenia: State of the art. In: Haffier, H, Gattaz, WF, Janzarik, W, editors. Search for the causes of schizophrenia. Giessen: Springer-Verlag; 1987. p. 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuechterlein, KH, Dawson, ME. A heuristic vulnerability/stress model of schizophrenic episodes. Schizophr Bull 1984;10:300–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olin, SS, John, RS, Mednic, SA. Assessing the predictive value of teacher reports in a high risk sample for schizophrenia: a ROC analysis. Schizophr Res 1995;16:53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, A. Development of MMPI scales based on a reference group of psychiatric patients. Psychol Monogr 1962;76:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, D. Genetic theory and abnormal behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970.Google Scholar
Siira, V, Wahlberg, K-E, Miettunen, J, Läksy, K, Tienari, P. Psychometric deviance measured by MMPI in adoptees at high risk for schizophrenia and their adoptive Controls. J Pers Assess 2004;83(1):14–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sillitti, J. MMPI-derived indicators of organic brain dysfunction. J Clin Psychol 1982;38:601–5.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Finland. 17. Helsinki: The Center of Statistics; 1983.Google Scholar
Tienari, P, Sorri, A, Lahti, I, Naarala, M, Wahlberg, K-E, Moring, J, et al. Genetic and psychosocial factors in schizophrenia: the Finnish Adoptive Family Study. Schizophr Bull 1987;13:477–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tienari, P, Wynne, LC, Moring, J, Läksy, K, Nieminen, P, Sorri, A, et al. Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia: sample selection and adoptee DSM-III-R diagnoses. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000;101:433–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tienari, P, Wynne, LC, Sorri, A, Lahti, I, Läksy, K, Moring, J, et al. Genotype environment interaction in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2004;184:216–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tienari, P, Wynne, LC, Läksy, K, Moring, J, Nieminen, P, Sorri, A, et al. Genetic boundaries of the schizophrenia spectrum: evidence from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:1587–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walters, GD. The MMPI and schizophrenia: a review. Schizophr Bull 1983;9:226–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walters, GD. Schizophrenia. In: Greene, RL, editor. The MMPI: use with specific populations. Philadelphia: Grune and Stratton; 1988. p. 50–73.Google Scholar
Watson, CG. An MMPI scale to separate braindamaged from schizophrenic men. J Consult Clin Psychol 1971;36:121–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, NF. Patterns of childhood social development in adult schizophrenics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35(2): 160–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wauck, IA. Schizophrenia and the MMPI. J Clin Psychol 1950; 6:279–84.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, JS. Substantive dimensions of self-report in the MMPI item pool. Psychol Monogr 1966;80:1–42 (Whole No. 630).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zubin, J, Spring, B. Vulnerability—a new view of schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol 1977;86:103–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zubin, J, Steinhauer, SR, Day, R, van Kammen, DP. Schizophrenia at the crossroads: a blueprint for the 80s. Compr Psychiatry 1985; 26:217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar