Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:27:44.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why do some oil exporters experience civil war but others do not?: investigating the conditional effects of oil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2013

Matthias Basedau  and
Thomas Richter
Matthias Basedau
Affiliation:
GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, Germany
Thomas Richter*
Affiliation:
GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, Germany
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to quantitative studies, oil seems the only natural resource that is robustly linked to civil war onset. However, recent debates on the nexus of oil and internal conflict have neglected the fact that there are a number of peaceful rentier oil states in existence. Few efforts have been made to explain why some oil-exporting countries have experienced civil war while others have not. We thus address this puzzle, by arguing that civil war risks depend on the specific conditions of oil production and how they come to structure state–society relations. Specifically, we expect that states that are either highly dependent on oil or who have problematic relations with oil regions are prone to civil war. However, these risks will be mitigated either when democratic institutions can manage conflicts peacefully or when abundant oil revenues can be spent in such a way as to buy peace. We test this conditional argument by comparing 39 net oil exporters, using a (crisp-set) Qualitative Comparative Analysis – a methodology particularly suited to test conditional relationships in medium-N samples. Our results largely confirm our conditional hypotheses. Conditions of oil production are ambiguous, and particular combinations thus explain the onset of civil war. Specifically, we find that high abundance is sufficient to ensure peace, while two distinct pathways lead to civil war: the combination of high dependence and low abundance, as well as the overlap of ethnic exclusion and oil reserves in non-abundant and non-democratic oil states.

Keywords

oilcivil warcsQCAethnic exclusionpolitical institutions
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , November 2014 , pp. 549 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basedau, M. and Lay, J. (2009), ‘Resource curse or rentier peace? The ambigious effects of oil wealth and oil dependence on violent conflict’, Journal of Peace Research 46(6): 757–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C.C. (2009), ‘Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an approach’, in Rihoux B. and Ragin C.C. (eds), Configurational Comparative Methods, London: Sage, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Le Billon, P. (2008), ‘Diamond wars? Conflict diamonds and geographies of resource wars’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98(2): 345–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Billon, P. (2012), Wars of Plunder: Conflicts, Profits and the Politics of Resources, London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Brunnschweiler, C.N. and Bulte, E.H. (2009), ‘Natural resources and violent conflict: resource abundance, dependence, and the onset of civil wars’, Oxford Economic Papers 61(4): 651–674.Google Scholar
Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A. (2004), ‘Greed and grievance in civil war’, Oxford Economic Papers 56(4): 563–595.Google Scholar
Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A. (2005), ‘Resource rents, governance, and conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 625–633.Google Scholar
Cranston, M.W. (1954), Freedom: A New Analysis, London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. (2009), ‘What causes civil wars? Integrating quantitative research findings’, International Studies Review 11(4): 707–735.Google Scholar
Dunning, T. (2008), Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Englebert, P. and Ron, J. (2004), ‘Primary commodities and war: Congo-Brazzaville’s ambivalent resource curse’, Comparative Politics 37(1): 61–81.Google Scholar
Fearon, J.D. and Laitin, D.D. (2003), ‘Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war’, American Political Science Review 97(1): 75–90.Google Scholar
Fearon, J.D. (2005), ‘Primary commodities exports and civil war’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 483–507.Google Scholar
Fjelde, H. (2009), ‘Buying peace? Oil wealth, corruption and civil war, 1985–99’, Journal of Peace Research 46(2): 199–218.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, N.P., Wallensteen, P. and Eriksson, M. (2002), ‘Armed conflict 1946–2001: a new dataset’, Journal of Peace Research 39(5): 615–637.Google Scholar
Grofman, B. and Schneider, C.Q. (2009), ‘An introduction to crisp set QCA, with a comparison to binary logistic regression’, Political Research Quarterly 62(4): 662–672.Google Scholar
Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gates, S. and Gleditsch, N.P. (2001), ‘Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war’, American Political Science Review 95(1): 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegre, H. and Sambanis, N. (2006), ‘Sensitivity analysis of empirical results on civil war onset’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(4): 508–535.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M. (2005), ‘Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution – uncovering the mechanisms’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 508–537.Google Scholar
Hunziker, P. and Cederman, L.-E. (2012), ‘No extraction without representation’, Petroleum Production and Ethnonationalist Conflict, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Indra De, S. (2002), ‘Paradise is a bazaar? Greed, creed, and governance in civil war, 1989–99’, Journal of Peace Research 39(4): 395–416.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, S.N. and Kocher, M.A. (2007), ‘How ‘Free’ is free riding in civil wars?: Violence, insurgency, and the collective action problem’, World Politics 59(2): 177–216.Google Scholar
Lowi, M.R. (2009), Oil wealth and the poverty of politics: Algeria compared, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luciani, G. (1987), ‘Allocation vs. production state’, in Beblawi H. and Luciani G. (eds), The Rentier State, London: Croom Helm, pp. 63–84.Google Scholar
Lujala, P., Gleditsch, N.P. and Gilmore, E. (2005), ‘A diamond curse? Civil war and a lootable resource’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 538–562.Google Scholar
Lujala, P. (2010), ‘The spoils of nature: armed civil conflict and rebel access to natural resources’, Journal of Peace Research 47(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Luong, P.J. and Weinthal, E. (2006), ‘Rethinking the resource curse: ownership, structure, institutional capacity, and domestic constraints’, Annual Review of Political Science 9: 241–263.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2010), ‘After KKV: the new methodology of qualitative research’, World Politics 62(1): 120–147.Google Scholar
Marshall, M.G., Gurr, T.R. and Jaggers, K. (2010), ‘ Polity IV Project: Dataset Users’ Manual, Arlington, VA/Severn, MD: Center for Systemic Peace, http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm (accessed 30 January 2011).Google Scholar
Metelits, C.M. (2008), ‘The consequences of rivalry: explaining insurgent violence using fuzzy sets’, Political Research Quarterly 62(4): 673–684.Google Scholar
Perreault, T. (2008), Natural Gas, Indigenous Mobilization and the Bolivian State, Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. http://www.unrisd.org/unrisd/website/document.nsf/70870613ae33162380256b5a004d932e/f270e0c066f3de7780256b67005b728c/$FILE/dp114.pdf (accessed 28 August 2012).Google Scholar
Ragin, C.C. (1987), The comparative method moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C.C. (2008), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rihoux, B. and De Meur, G. (2009), ‘Crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA)’, in Rihoux B. and Ragin C.C. (eds), Configurational Comparative Methods, London: Sage, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar
Ross, M.L. (2004a), ‘What do we know about natural resources and civil war?’, Journal of Peace Research 41(3): 337–356.Google Scholar
Ross, M.L. (2004b), ‘How do natural resource influence civil war? Evidence from thirteen cases’, International Organization 58(1): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M.L. (2006), ‘A closer look at oil, diamonds, and civil war’, Annual Review of Political Science 9(1): 265–300.Google Scholar
Ross, M.L. (2012), The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustad, S.A. and Binningsbø, H.M. (2012), ‘A price worth fighting for? Natural resources and conflict recurrence’, Journal of Peace Research 49(4): 531–546.Google Scholar
Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2010), ‘Standards of good practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets’, Comparative Sociology 9(3): 397–418.Google Scholar
Shabafrouz, M. (2010), Fuel for Conflict or Balm for Peace? Assessing the Effects of Hydrocarbons on Peace Efforts in Algeria GIGA Working Paper, 132, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies http://ideas.repec.org/p/gig/wpaper/132.html (accessed 12 May 2011).Google Scholar
Skaaning, S.-E. (2011), ‘Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results’, Sociological Methods & Research 40(2): 391–408.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (2004), ‘Oil wealth and regime survival in the developing world, 1960–1999’, American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 232–246.Google Scholar
Snyder, R. and Bhavnani, R. (2005), ‘Diamonds, blood, and taxes – a revenue-centered framework for explaining political order’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 563–597.Google Scholar
Sorens, J. (2011), ‘Mineral production, territory, and ethnic rebellion: the role of rebel constituencies’, Journal of Peace Research 48(5): 571–585.Google Scholar
Vink, M.P. and Van Vliet, O. (2009), ‘Not quite crisp not yet fuzzy? Assessing the potentials and pitfalls of multi-value QCA’, Field Methods 21(3): 265–289.Google Scholar
Vreeland, J.R. (2008), ‘The effect of political regime on civil war: unpacking anocracy’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(3): 401–425.Google Scholar
Wegenast, T. and Basedau, M. (2014), ‘Ethnic fractionalization, natural resources and armed conflict’, Conflict Management and Peace Science (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Wucherpfennig, J., Weidmann, N.B., Cederman, L.-E., Girardin, L., Duhart, P., Brown, G., Flora, J. and Wimmer, A. (2010), ‘GeoEPR dataset’, http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/epr/faces/study/StudyPage.xhtml?studyId=36582&studyListingIndex=2_67abddb8f445c0f8c8711029cd65 (accessed 31 January 2011).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Basedau and Richter Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Basedau and Richter Supplementary Material(File)
File 480.3 KB