Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:25:11.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a post-secular political order?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

Mariano Barbato*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Passau, Passau, Germany
Friedrich Kratochwil*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, European University Institute, Badia Fiesolana, San Domeico di Fiesole, Florence, Italy

Abstract

The ‘return of religion’ as a social phenomenon has aroused at least three different debates, with the first being the ‘clash of civilizations’, the second criticizing ‘modernity’, and the third focusing on the public/private distinction. This article uses Habermas’ idea of a post-secular society as a prism through which we examine the return of religion and impact on secularization. In doing so, we attempt to understand the new role of religion as a challenger of the liberal projects following the decline of communism. Against this background, section four focuses on Habermas’s central arguments in his proposal for a post-secular society. We claim that the problematique in Habermas’s analysis must be placed within the wider framework of an emerging global public sphere. In this context we examine the problem of religion’s place in political process and the two readings of Habermas as suggested by Simone Chambers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G.A., Appleby, R.S. and Sivan, E. (2003), Strong Religion, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (1997), Moses the Egyptian: The Memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assmann, J. (2007), Die Mosaische Unterscheidung oder der Preis des Monotheismus, München: Hanser.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (1995), Jihad vs. Mcworld, New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Berger, P.L. (1969), A Rumor of Angels. Modern Society and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Berger, P.L. (ed.) (1999), The Desecularization of the World, Washington: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (ed.) (1967), ‘Die Entstehung des Staates als Vorgang der Säkularisation’, in Staat, Gesellschaft, Recht, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 4264.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1987), ‘Sociologie de la croyance et croyances de la sociologie’, Archives des Sciences Sociales de la Religion 63(1): 155161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, J. (1994), Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, S. (2007), ‘How religion speaks to the agnostic: Habermas on the persistent value of religion’, Constellations 14(2): 210223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, W. (1999), Why I Am Not a Secularist, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cooke, M. (2007), ‘A secular state for a post- secular society? Postmetaphysical political theory and the place of religion’, Constellations 14(2): 224238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1994), Durkheim on Religion, Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1987), Patterns of Modernity Beyond the West, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S.N. (ed.) (2002), Multiple Modernities, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ.Google Scholar
Esposito, J.L.Mogahed, D. (2007), Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think, New York: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
Flores d’Arcais, P. (2007), ‘Elf Thesen Zu Habermas’, Die Zeit, 22 November 2007.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1992), The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2008), Black Mass. The Apocalyptic Religion and the Death of Utopia, New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (translated by T. Burger and F. Lawrence). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1992), Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2003), The Future of Human Nature, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2005), Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2006a), ‘Prepolitical foundations of the democratic constitutional state?’, in J. Habermas and J. Ratzinger (eds), The Dialectics of Secularization, Ignatius Press: San Francisco, pp. 1952.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2006b), ‘Religion in the public sphere’, European Journal of Philosophy 14(1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J.Ratzinger, J. (2006), The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion, San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Hardt, M.Negri, A. (2000), Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Held, D. (1995), Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P. (1997), The Clash of Civilizations, London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P., Ajami, F., Bartley, R.L., Binyan, L.L., Kirkpatrick, J.J., Mahbubani, K., Piel, G., Weeks, A.L. (1996), The Clash of Civilizations? The Debate, New York: Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Juergensmeyer, M. (2008), Global Rebellion, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Le Goulven, K., Mendoza, R.U. (eds) (2003), Providing Gobal Public Goods, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepel, G. (1995), The Revenge of God, Cambrige, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Laustsen, C.B.Wæver, O. (2000), ‘In defense of religion: sacred referent objects for securitization’, Millennium 29(3): 705739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, H. (2004), Säkularisierung. Der Europäische Sonderweg in Sachen Religion, Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Lerner, D. (1958), The Passing of Traditional Society, Glencoe, Il: Free Press.Google Scholar
Luckmann, T. (1967), The Invisible Religion. The Problem of Religion in Modern Society, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marty, M.E.Appleby, R.S. (1995), Fundamentalism Comprehended, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P.Inglehart, R. (2004), Sacred and Secular, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, D. (2002), ‘The challenge of September 11 to secularism in international relations’, World Politics 55(1): 6695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, Benedict (2007), On Christian Hope. Spe Salvi, Encyclical Letter, Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, J.C. (2004), Truth and Tolerance: Christian Belief and World Religion, San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1999), ‘Welches neue Ethos für Europa?’, in P. Koslowski (ed.), Europa Imaginieren, Berlin: Springer, pp. 108122.Google Scholar
Schall, J.V.Pope, Benedict (2007), The Regensburg Lecture, South Bend, IN: St. Augustine Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (2002), ‘The end of the Unipolar Moment? September 11 and the future of world order’, International Relations 16: 171183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R.Bainbridge, W.S. (1985), The Future of Religion: Secularization, Revival, and Cult Formation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989), Sources of the Self, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1999), A Catholic Modernity?, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (2007), A Secular Age, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Troeltsch, E. (1960), The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1993), The Sociology of Religion, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, J.H.H. (2003), Un’Europa cristiana, Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Weiler, J.H.H. (2004), Ein christliches Europa, Salzburg: Pustet.Google Scholar
Weiler, J.H.H. (2007), ‘A Christian Europe? Europe and Christianity: rules of commitment’, European View 6(1): 143150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, R. (2005), ‘Jürgen Habermas and Post-Secular Societies’, Chronicle of Higher Education 52(5): 1617.Google Scholar