Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T12:48:42.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standardizing and disseminating knowledge: the role of the OECD in global governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Rianne Mahon  and
Stephen McBride
Rianne Mahon
Affiliation:
Institute of Political Economy, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Stephen McBride*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

If ‘knowledge is power’, it is unsurprising that the production, legitimation, and application of social scientific knowledge, not least that which was designed to harness social organization to economic growth, is a potentially contentious process. Coping with, adapting to, or attempting to shape globalization has emerged as a central concern of policy-makers who are, therefore, interested in knowledge to assist their managerial activities. Thus, an organization that can create, synthesize, legitimate, and disseminate useful knowledge can play a significant role in the emerging global governance system. The OECD operates as one important site for the construction, standardization, and dissemination of transnational policy ideas. OECD staff conducts research and produces a range of background studies and reports, drawing on disciplinary knowledge (typically economics) supplemented by their ‘organizational discourses’. This paper probes the contested nature of knowledge production and attempts to evaluate the impact of the OECD’s efforts to produce globally applicable policy advice. Particular attention is paid to important initiatives in the labour market and social policy fields – the Jobs Study and Babies and Bosses.

Keywords

global governanceOECDneo-liberalism
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 83 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Armingeon, K. (2004), ‘The OECD and national welfare state development’, in K. Armingeon and M. Beyeler (eds), The OECD and European Welfare States, London: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, L., Beyeler, M. (eds) (2004), The OECD and European Welfare States, London: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajoni, I., Berenzi, E.Neuman, E. (2007), Final Report – Hungarian Education, Orientation 1, Knowledge and Policy in education and health, research report, December.Google Scholar
Barnett, M.N.Finnemore, M. (1999), ‘The politics, power and pathology of international organizations’, International Organization 53(4): 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barroso, J., Carvalho, L., Fontoura, M., Afonso, N.Afonso, E. (2007), Report – Policy Learning Mechanisms and the Morphology of Knowledge Field Research in Portugal – Education Sector, Orientation 1, Knowledge and Policy in education and health, research report, December.Google Scholar
Brenner, N. (2004), New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, B. (2004), ‘The OECD jobs strategy and the European employment strategy: two views of the labour market and of the welfare state’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 10(3): 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1987), Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (2005), ‘Global Perestroika’, in R. Wilkinson (ed.), The Global Governance Reader, New York: Routledge, pp. 140–155.Google Scholar
Craig, D.Porter, D. (2004), ‘The third way and the third world: poverty reduction and social inclusion strategies in the rise of “inclusive” liberalism’, Review of International Political Economy 12: 387–423.Google Scholar
Deacon, B., Hulse, M.Stubbs, P. (1997), Global Social Policy: International Organizations and the Future of the Welfare State, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delvaux, B., Mangez, C., Mangez, E.Maroy, C. (2007), Final Report – Belgian Education, Orientation 1, Knowledge and Policy in education and health, research report, December.Google Scholar
Djelic, M.-L.Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006a), ‘A world of governance: the rise of transnational regulation’, in M.-L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds), Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djelic, M.-L.Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006b), ‘Institutional dynamics in a reordering world’, Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 375–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dostal, J.M. (2004), ‘Campaigning on expertise: how the OECD framed EU welfare and labour market policies – and why success could trigger failure’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(3): 440–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, M. (1996), ‘Norms, culture and world politics: insights from sociology’s institutionalism’, International Organization 50(2): 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinvalds, H. (2008), ‘The influence of OECD ideas: Danish Labour Market Policy from 1985–1993’, in R. Mahon and S. McBride (eds), The OECD and Transnational Governance, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 188–204.Google Scholar
Haas, P. (1992), ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization 46: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P.A. (1993), ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25(4): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, B. (2006), ‘Regulated regulators: global trends of state transformation’, Transnational Governance, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, B.Sundstrom, G. (2007), Governing State Agencies. Transformations in the Swedish Administrative Model, Stockholm: Scores rapportserie.Google Scholar
James, O.Lodge, M. (2003), ‘The limitations of “policy transfer” and “lesson drawing” for public policy research’, Policy Studies Review 1: 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J. (2007), ‘Redesigning citizenship regimes after neoliberalism: ideas about social investment’. Presented at RC 19 Annual Meeting, Florence, September.Google Scholar
Lodge, M. (2005), ‘The importance of being modern: international benchmarking and national regulatory innovation’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(4): 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, S., Williams, R. (2001), ‘Globalization, the restructuring of labour markets and policy convergence: The OECD “Jobs Strategy”’, Global Social Policy 1(3): 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, P.W. (1977), ‘Towards full employment and price stability: report to the OECD by a group of independent experts’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 11, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Noaksson, N.Jacobsson, K. (2003), The Production of Ideas and Expert Knowledge in OECD: The OECD Jobs Strategy in contrast with the EU Employment Strategy, Stockholm: SCORE (Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research).Google Scholar
OECD (2006), Babies and Bosses, Paris.Google Scholar
Porter, T., Webb, M. (2008), ‘Role of the OECD in the orchestration of global knowledge networks’, in R. Mahon and S. McBride (eds), The OECD and Transnational Governance, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000), National, International and Transnational Construction of New Public Management, SCORE working paper 2000–4, Stockholm: Stockholm Centre for Organisational Research, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Salzman, J.Terracino, J.B. (2006), ‘Labor rights, globalization and institutions: the role and influence of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’, in V.A. Leay and D. Warner (eds), Social Issues, Globalization and International Institutions: Labor Rights and the EU, ILO, OECD and WTO, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sawyer, M. (2004), ‘The NAIRU, labour market “flexibility”, and full employment’, in J. Stanford and L.F. Vosko (eds), Challenging the Market: The Struggle to Regulate Work and Income, Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, A. (2006), ‘A new form of governance? Comparing the open method of coordination to multilateral surveillance by the IMF and the OECD’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(1): 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, T.J. (2005), The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. (1997), From War to Wealth: 50 Years of Innovation, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Webb, M. (2004), ‘Defining the boundaries of legitimate state practices: norms, transnational actors and the OECD’s project on harmful tax competition’, Review of International Political Economy 11(4): 787–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (2008), ‘The role of the OECD in liberalising foreign investment: lessons from the MAI?’, in R. Mahon and S. McBride (eds), The OECD and Transnational Governance, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 117–133.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R. (2008), ‘From reconstructing Europe to constructing globalization: the OECD in historical perspective’, in R. Mahon and S. McBride (eds), The OECD and Transnational Governance, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar