Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:46:23.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labor repertoires, neoliberal regimes and US hegemony: what ‘deviant’ Italy tells us of OECD unions’ paths to power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2014

Antonina Gentile
Antonina Gentile*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali e Politiche, Universita’ degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper notes the tendency of ‘social movement unionism’ scholarship on both sides of the Atlantic to focus on and prescribe the citizen repertoire as the single most important repertoire of labor for challenging neoliberal globalization. Consistent with liberal conceptions of civil society and theories of participatory democracy, it implicitly dismisses political unionism as a path to labor’s revitalization. It also assumes epochal change and confines neoliberalism to the post-Washington Consensus era. Deviant case analysis of Italian labor’s use of two repertoires (the citizen and the labor repertoire) and of its two regimes of capitalism (in succession, a post-WWII neoliberal regime and a post-1970 corporatist regime) over the course of the ‘American Century’ gives pause to both these contentions. This study relates labor’s citizen repertoire to the era of US hegemony that promotes changes in party-government that tend to reproduce the image of the archetypically neoliberal American polity: a polity that is devoid of ‘labor’ as a recognized category of the political community, is low in social rights, and, relatedly, is devoid of a party of labor. In this neoliberal political order, labor is perennially locked into the category of ‘citizen’ and reliant on the citizen repertoire. By contrast, the survival of parties of labor in non-US polities during the post-war wave of neoliberalism permitted union movements a route away from labor-decategorizing orders – political unionism. Now, in the post-Washington Consensus wave of neoliberal regime change, that route is more onerous owing to Third Way changes in parties of labor. The major challenge for labor movements that have experienced regime change to a neoliberal polity is in directing their efforts and even their new citizen repertoire to the task of recapturing parties of labor or to creating new ones – or risk long-term US-style labor decategorization.

Keywords

labor repertoirespolitical unionismUS hegemonyneoliberalismsocial movement unionism
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 2015 , pp. 243 - 270
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abse, T. (1994), ‘Italy: a new agenda’, in P. Anderson and P. Camiller (eds), Mapping the West European Left , London: Verso, 189–232.Google Scholar
Baglioni, G. (2011), La lunga Marcia della Cisl 1950–2010, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.R. (1999), William Z. Foster and the Tragedy of American Radicalism, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. and Elman, C. (2007), ‘Case study methods in the international relations subfield’, Comparative Political Studies 40(2): 170–195.Google Scholar
Biorcio, R. and Natale, P. (2013), Politica a 5 Stelle: Idee, storia, e strategie del movimento di Grillo, Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Buhle, P. (1999), Taking Care of Business: Samuel Gompers, George Meany, Lane Kirkland and the Tragedy of American Labor, New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Cannistraro, P. and Meyer, G. (eds) (2003), The Lost World of Italian-American Radicalism, Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Capoccia, G. and Kelemen, R.D. (2007), ‘The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism’, World Politics 59(3): 341–369.Google Scholar
Carew, A. (1984), ‘The schism within the World Federation of Trade Unions: government and trade union diplomacy’, International Review of Social History 29(3): 297–335.Google Scholar
Carew, A. (1987), Labour Under the Marshall Plan: The Politics of Productivity and the Marketing of Management Science, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Carew, A. (1996), ‘Conflict within the ICFTU: anti-communism and anti-colonialism in the 1950s’, International Review of Social History 41(2): 147–181.Google Scholar
Carew, A. (1998), ‘The American Labour Movement in Fizzland: the Free Trade Union Committee and the CIA’, Labour History 39(1): 25–42.Google Scholar
Coates, D. (ed.) (2005), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Connolly, H. and Darlington, R. (2012), ‘Radical political unionism in France and Britain: a comparative study of SUD-Rail and the RMT’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 18(3): 235–250.Google Scholar
Corbetta, P. and Gualmini, E. (2013), Il partito di Grillo, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. and Pizzorno, A. (eds) (1978a), The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe Since 1968. Vol. I: National Studies, London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. and Pizzorno, A. (eds) (1978b), The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe Since 1968. Vol. II: Comparative Analyses, London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
del Pero, M. (2001), ‘The United States and ‘psychological warfare’ in Italy, 1948–1955’, The Journal of American History 87(4): 1304–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Porta, D. (2005), ‘Making the polis: social forums and democracy in the global justice movement’, Mobilization: An International Journal 10(1): 73–94.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. (2006), ‘From corporatist unions to protest unions? On the (difficult) relations between organized labour and new social movements’, in C. Crouch and W. Streeck (eds), The Diversity of Democracy: Corporatism, Social Order and Political Conflict, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 71–97.Google Scholar
Dreiling, M. (2001), Solidarity and Contention: The Politics of Security and Sustainability in the NAFTA Conflict, New York, NY: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Dubofsky, M. and Dulles, F.R. (2004), Labor in American: A History, 8th Edn, Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, C. (1983), ‘Working-class politics and the Cold War: American intervention in the German labour movement, 1945–49’, Diplomatic History 7(4): 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, C. (1996), Drawing the Line: The American Decision to Divide Germany, 1944–1949, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erne, R. (2008), European Unions: Labor’s Quest for a Transnational Democracy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fantasia, R. and Voss, K. (2004), Hard work: Remaking the American Labor Movement, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The southern model of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 6(1): 17–37.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (ed.) (2005), Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe: Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. and Hemerijck, A. (2003), ‘Recalibrating European welfare regimes’, in J. Zeitlin and D. Trubeck (eds), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 88–128.Google Scholar
Filippelli, R.L. (1989), American Labor and Postwar Italy, 1943–1953: A Study of Cold War Politics, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Filippelli, R.L. (1992), ‘Luigi Antonini, the Italian-American Labor Council, and Cold War politics in Italy, 1943–1949’, Labor History 33(1): 102–125.Google Scholar
Frege, C. and Kelly, J. (eds) (2004), Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gentile, A. (2011), ‘Party-governments, US hegemony and a tale of two Tillys’ Weberian state’, in M. Hanagan and C. Tilly (eds), Contention and Trust in Cities and States, New York: Springer Press, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentile, A. and Tarrow, S. (2009), ‘Charles Tilly, globalization, and labour’s citizen rights’, European Political Science Review 1(3): 465–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A.L. and Bennett, A. (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, P. (1990), A History of Contemporary Italy: Society and Politics 1943–1988, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Golden, M. (1988a), Labour Divided: Austerity and Working Class Politics in Contemporary Italy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Golden, M. (1988b), Historical memory and ideological orientations in the Italian workers’ movement’, Politics and Society 16(1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guglielmo, J. (2010), Living the Revolution: Italian Women’s Resistance and Radicalism in New York City 1880–1945, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harper, J.L. (1986), America and the Reconstruction of Italy 1945–1948, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hattam, V.C. (1993), Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Studies in American Politics.Google Scholar
Hellman, S. (1975), ‘The PCI’s alliance strategy and the case of the middle classes’, in D.L.M. Blackmer and S. Tarrow (eds), Communism in Italy and France, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 372–419.Google Scholar
Hellman, S. (1988), Italian Communism in Transition: The Rise and Fall of the Historic Compromise in Turin 1975–1980, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J.D. (2001), Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. (1986), ‘Party government: a rationalistic conception’, in F.G. Castles and R. Wildenmann (eds), Visions and Realities of Party Government, Berlin: de Gruyter, 31–71.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. (1987), ‘Party government and its alternative’, in R.S. Katz (ed.), Party Governments: European and American Experiences, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1–26.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. (1990), ‘Party as linkage: a vestigial function?’, European Journal of Political Res earch 18(1): 143–161.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. and Mair, P. (1995), ‘Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party’, Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.Google Scholar
Kimeldorf, H. (1999), Battling for American Labour: Wobblies, Craft Workers, and the Making of the Union Movement, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, R. (2002), ‘Labour movement renewal in the era of globalization: union responses in the south’, in J. Harrod and R. O’Brien (eds), Global Unions: Theories and Strategies of Organized Labour in the Global Political Economy, London: Routledge, 183–203.Google Scholar
Lange, P., Ross, G. and Vannicelli, G. (1982), Unions, Change, and Crisis: French and Italian Union Strategy and the Political Economy, 1945–1980, London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, J. (1957), The Italian Labor Movement: Problems and Prospects, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, J. (1964), Interest Groups in Italian Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, H. (2004), ‘Smoke, mirrors and spooks: the International Transport Workers’ Federation Vigilance Committees, 1949–1953’, Historical Studies in Industrial Relations 17: 45–73.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M. and Marks, G. (2001), It Didn’t Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States, New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ludlam, S. and Taylor, A. (2003), ‘The political representation of labour interest in Britain’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 41(4): 727–749.Google Scholar
MacShane, D. (1992), International Labour and the Origins of the Cold War, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (eds) (2010), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marks, G. (1989), Unions in Politics: Britain, Germany, and the United States in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J.E. (1986), The United States and Italy, 1940–1950: The Politics and Diplomacy of Stabilization, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Molina, O. and Rhodes, M. (2007), ‘Industrial relations and the welfare state in Italy: assessing the potential of negotiated change’, West European Politics 30(4): 803–829.Google Scholar
Moody, K. (1998), Workers in a Lean World: Unions in the International Economy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mueller-Jentsch, W. and Sperling, H.-J. (1978), ‘Economic development, labour conflicts and the industrial relations system in West Germany’, in C. Crouch and A. Pizzorno (eds), The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe Since 1968. Vol. I: National Studies, London: Macmillan Press, 257–306.Google Scholar
Parmet, R.D. (2005), The Master of Seventh Avenue: David Dubinsky and the American Labor Movement, New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Piazza, J. (2001), ‘De-linking labor: labor unions and social democratic parties under globalization’, Party Politics 7(4): 413–435.Google Scholar
Pontusson, J. (2005), ‘Varieties and commonalities of capitalism’, in D. Coates (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 163–188.Google Scholar
Regalia, I. and Regini, M. (2004), ‘Collective bargaining and social pacts in Italy’, in H.C. Katz, W. Lee and J. Lee (eds), The New Structure of Labour Relations: Tripartism and Decentralization Ithaca, NY: ILR Press/Cornell University Press, 59–83.Google Scholar
Regalia, I., Regini, M. and Reyneri, E. (1978), ‘Labour conflicts and industrial relations in Italy’, in C. Crouch and A. Pizzorno (eds), The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe since 1968. Vol. I: National Studies, London: Macmillan Press, 101–158.Google Scholar
Regini, M. (1997), ‘Still engaging in corporatism? Recent Italian experience in comparative perspective’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 3(3): 259–278.Google Scholar
Regini, M. (2000), ‘Between deregulation and social pacts: the responses of European economies to globalization’, Politics and Society 28(1): 5–33.Google Scholar
Regini, M. (2003), ‘Tripartite concertation and Varieties of Capitalism’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 9(3): 251–263.Google Scholar
Regini, M. and Colombo, S. (2011), ‘Italy: the rise and decline of social pacts’, in S. Avdagic, M. Rhodes and J. Visser (eds), Social Pacts in Europe: Emergence, Evolution, and Institutionalization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–146.Google Scholar
Regini, M. and Regalia, I. (1997), ‘Employers, unions and the state: the resurgence of concertation in Italy?’, in M. Bull and M. Rhodes (eds), Crisis and Transition in Italian Politics, London: Frank Cass, 210–230.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (2001), ‘The political economy of social pacts: ‘Competitive corporatism’ and European welfare reform’, in P. Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–194.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (2003), ‘National ‘pacts’ and EU governance in social policy and the labour market’, in J. Zeitlin and D.M. Trubek (eds), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129–157.Google Scholar
Romero, F. (1992), The United States and the European Trade Union Movement 1944–1951, Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Rupert, M. (1995), Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, R.H. (1979), ‘Why no corporatism in America?’, in P.C. Schmitter and G. Lehmbruch (eds), Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 213–230.Google Scholar
Salvati, M. (1995), ‘The crisis of government in Italy’, New Left Review 213: 76–95.Google Scholar
Salvati, M. (2000), ‘Breve storia della concertazione all’italiana’, Stato e Mercato 60: 447–476.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. (1999), Roots of reform: Farmers , Workers and the American State 1877–1917, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Silver, B.J. (2003), Forces of Labour: Workers’ Movements and Globalization Since 1870, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silver, B.J. and Arrighi, G. (2001), ‘Workers north and south’, in L. Panitch and C. Leys (eds), Socialist Register 2001: Working Classes Global Realities, London: Merlin Press, 53–76.Google Scholar
Stepan-Norris, J. and Zeitlin, M. (2003), Left Out: Reds and America’s Industrial Unions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Storch, R. (2009), Red Chicago: American Communism at its Grassroots 1928–1935, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1967), Peasant Communism in Southern Italy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1975), ‘Communism in Italy and France: adaptation and change’, in D.L.M. Blackmer and S. Tarrow (eds), Communism in Italy and France, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 575–640.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1989), Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy 1965–1975, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.J. (2002), ‘The ‘American century’ as hegemonic cycle’, in P.K. O’Brien and A. Clesse (eds), Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846–1914 and the United States 1941–2001, Aldershot: Ashgate, 284–302.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2000), ‘Why German employers cannot bring themselves to dismantle the German model’, in T. Iversen, J. Pontusson and D.W. Soskice (eds), Unions, Employers, and Central Banks: Macroeconomic Coordination and Institutional Change in Social Market Economies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 138–169.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2009), ‘Institutional change in advanced political economies’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 47(3): 471–498.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (2008), Contentious Performances, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, L., Katz, H.C. and Hurd, R. (eds) (2001), Rekindling the Movement: Labour’s Quest for Relevance in the Twenty-First Century, Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Upchurch, M., Taylor, G. and Mathers, A. (2009), ‘The crisis of ‘social democratic’ unionism’, Labor Studies Journal 34(4): 519–542.Google Scholar
Van Goetham, G. (2006), The Amsterdam International: The World of the International Federation of Trade Unions 1913–1945, Aldershot: Ashgate, 357–361.Google Scholar
Vecoli, R.J. (2003), ‘The making and unmaking of the Italian American working class’, in P. Cannistraro and G. Meyer (eds), The Lost World of Italian American Radicalism, Westport, CT: Praeger, 51–75.Google Scholar
Verzichelli, L. (2010), Vivere di Politica, Bologna: Mulino.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (2002), ‘Three hegemonies’, in P.K. O’Brien and A. Clesse (eds), Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846–1914 and the United States 1941–2001, Aldershot: Ashgate, 357–361.Google Scholar
Weiler, P. (1981), ‘The United States, international labour, and the Cold War: the breakup of the World Federation of Trade Unions’, Diplomatic History 5(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Weiler, P. (1988), British Labour and the Cold War, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilford, H. (2002), ‘American labour diplomacy and Cold War Britain’, Journal of Contemporary History 37(1): 45–65.Google Scholar
Wilford, H. (2003), The CIA, the British Left and the Cold War: Calling the Tune, London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Wilson, G.K. (1982), ‘Why is there no corporatism in the United States?’, in G. Lehmbruch and P.C. Schmitter (eds), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, London: Sage Publications, 219–236.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. and Spies-Butcher, B. (2011), ‘When labour makes a difference: union mobilization and the 2007 federal election in Australia’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 49(S2): s306–s331.Google Scholar
Zappia, C.A. (2003), ‘From working class radicalism to Cold War anti-communism: the case of the Italian locals of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union’, in P. Cannistraro and G. Meyer (eds), The Lost World of Italian American Radicalism, Westport, CT: Praeger, 143–159.Google Scholar
Zieger, R.H. (1995), The CIO 1935–1955, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Zieger, R.H. and Gall, G.J. (2002), American Workers, American Unions: The Twentieth Century, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar