Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:52:15.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choosing whom to betray: populist right-wing parties, welfare state reforms and the trade-off between office and votes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2014

Alexandre Afonso
Alexandre Afonso*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Economy, King’s College London, London, UK
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyses the impact of populist right-wing parties (PRWPs) on welfare state reforms in Western Europe in the light of the trade-off that they face between office and votes. On the one hand, PRWPs appeal to traditionally left-leaning blue-collar ‘insiders’ supportive of social insurance schemes. On the other hand, they have only been able to take part in government as junior coalition partners with liberal or conservative parties who are more likely to retrench these very same welfare programmes. In this context, the article argues that these parties have to choose between betraying their electorate (and losing votes), and betraying their coalition partners (and losing office). When they choose office, it enables welfare state retrenchment by allowing their coalition partners to curtail left-wing opposition, but entails high electoral costs for PRWPs. When they choose votes, it generates deadlock and potentially jeopardizes their participation in government. The paper draws on a comparative analysis of pension reforms during three periods of government participation of PRWPs: the Schüssel I and II cabinets in Austria (2000–06), the Rutte I cabinet in the Netherlands (2010–12) and three pension reforms in Switzerland between 1995 and 2010. The analysis draws on original primary material and interviews.

Keywords

radical right partieswelfare state reformpensionsNetherlandsAustriaSwitzerland
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 7 , Supplement 2 , May 2015 , pp. 271 - 292
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akkerman, T. (2012), ‘Comparing radical right parties in government: immigration and integration policies in nine countries (1996–2010)’, West European Politics 35(3): 511–529.Google Scholar
Akkerman, T. and De Lange, S. (2012), ‘Radical right parties in office: incumbency records and the electoral cost of governing’, Government and Opposition 47(4): 574–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzheimer, K. (2012), ‘Working-class Parties 2.0?’, in J. Rydgren (ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right, London: Routledge, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Bale, T. (2003), ‘Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe’s bipolarising party systems’, West European Politics 26(3): 67–90.Google Scholar
Bornschier, S. (2010), Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bulletin Officiel du Conseil National (2003), Session D’automne 2003, Bern: Parlamentsdienste.Google Scholar
CBS (2011), ‘Stemgedrag Stemgerechtidigen Tweede Kamerverkiezingen’. Retrieved 11 April 2014 from http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?VW=T&DM=SLNL&PA=81107NED&LA=NL Google Scholar
CPB (2010), Keuzes in Kaart 2011–2015. Effect Van Negen Verkiezingsprogramma’s Op Economie En Milieu, Den Haag: Centraal PlanBureau.Google Scholar
Curia Vista (2004), ‘Note De Synthèse: 0.014 11ème Révision De l’AVS’. Retrieved 11 April 2014 from http://www.parlament.ch/f/suche/pages/legislaturrueckblick.aspx?rb_id=20000014 Google Scholar
Debat Tweede Kamer (2011), ‘Regeling Van Werkzaamheden En Het Debat Over Het Pensioenakkoord’. Retrieved 11 April 2014 from http://debatgemist.tweedekamer.nl/debatten/regeling-van-werkzaamheden-en-het-debat-over-het-pensioenakkoord Google Scholar
De Lange, S. (2007), ‘A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right’, Party Politics 13(4): 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lange, S. (2012), ‘New alliances: why mainstream parties govern with radical right‐wing populist parties’, Political Studies 60(4): 899–918.Google Scholar
De Lange, S. and Art, D. (2011), ‘Fortuyn versus Wilders: an agency-based approach to radical right party building’, West European Politics 34(6): 1229–1249.Google Scholar
Der Standard (2003a), ‘Können Bei Pensionen Nicht an Fpö Vorbei’, 26 May 2003: 6.Google Scholar
Der Standard (2003b), ‘Ausschuss Soll Koalition Voranbringen’, 4 June 2003: 4.Google Scholar
Der Standard (2003c), ‘Pensions-volksabstimmung Sorgt Für Schwarz-blaue Turbulenzen’, 7 April 2003: 6.Google Scholar
Der Standard (2004), ‘Haider: Volle Pension Nach 45 Jahren – “da Fährt Der Zug Drüber”’, 28 August 2004: 1.Google Scholar
Der Standard (2006), ‘Kurz Im Blick’, 6 November 2006: 7.Google Scholar
Der Standard (2013), ‘FPÖ Bei Arbeitern, SPÖ Bei Pensionisten Vorne’, 29 September 2013.Google Scholar
DerStandard.at (2003a), ‘Haider: “Debakel Für Die Koalition”’. Retrieved 11 April 2014 from http://derstandard.at/1434951 Google Scholar
DerStandard.at (2003b), ‘Pensionslotto Mit Vielen Verlierern’. Retrieved 11 April 2014 from http://derstandard.at/1254264 Google Scholar
De Telegraaf (2009), ‘Wilders Zweert Bij AOW op 65’, 6 September 2009.Google Scholar
Eironline (2003), ‘Austria: Major Industrial Action Planned Over Pensions Reform’, European Industrial Relations Observatory online 2003 (5). Retrieved 11 April 2014 from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2003/05/inbrief/at0305201n.htm Google Scholar
Engeli, I. (2004), Analyse Des Votations Fédérales Du 16 Mai 2004, Geneva: Vox.Google Scholar
FPÖ (2008), Österreich Im Wort. Wahlprogramm 2008, Vienna: FPÖ.Google Scholar
Giger, N. and Nelson, M. (2011), ‘The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment’, European Journal of Political Research 50(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Hakhverdian, A. and Koop, C. (2007), ‘Consensus democracy and support for populist parties in Western Europe’, Acta Politica 42(4): 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, S. (2010), The politics of welfare state reform in Continental Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S. and Walter, S. (2010), ‘Restructuring Swiss welfare politics: post-industrial labour markets, globalization and attitudes towards social policies’, in H. Kriesi and S. Hug (eds.), Value Change in Switzerland, Lanham: Lexington Books, pp. 143–168.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S., Mach, A. and Papadopoulos, I. (2004), ‘From corporatism to partisan politics: social policy making under strain in Switzerland’, Swiss Political Science Review 10(2): 33–59.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S., Picot, G. and Geering, D. (2013), ‘Rethinking party politics and the welfare state’, British Journal of Political Science 43(1): 221–240.Google Scholar
Heinisch, R. (2003), ‘Success in opposition-failure in government: explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office’, West European Politics 26(3): 91–130.Google Scholar
Immerzeel, T., Coffé, H. and Van der Lippe, T. (2013), ‘Explaining the gender gap in radical right voting’, Comparative European Politics, advance online publication 1 July 2013; doi:10.1057/cep.2013.20.Google Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E. (2005), ‘The vulnerable populist right parties’, European Journal of Political Research 44(3): 465–492.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and McGann, A.J. (1995), The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2008), West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Le Nouveau Quotidien (1993a), ‘Les Femmes Travailleront Deux Ans de Plus’, 11 March 1993: 7.Google Scholar
Le Nouveau Quotidien (1993b), ‘Vers l’égalité Devant l’AVS’, 10 March 1993: 9.Google Scholar
Le Nouveau Quotidien (1994a), ‘Les Socialistes Refusent l’épreuve De Force Sur l’AVS’, 10 October 1994: 9.Google Scholar
Le Nouveau Quotidien (1994b), ‘L’avenir De l’Etat Social Durcit Le Clivage Gauche-droite’, 24 January 1994: 9.Google Scholar
Le Temps (2000a), ‘L’UDC Lance l’offensive contre l’AVS au risque de heurter sa base’, 6 March 2000: 1.Google Scholar
Le Temps (2000b), ‘Accusée de brader l’AVS, l’UDC esquisse une prudente marche arrière’, 8 March 2000.Google Scholar
Le Temps (2001), ‘Christoph Blocher Vise le Talon D’achille Des Radicaux: Leurs Échecs Économiques’, 21 March 2001.Google Scholar
Luther, K.R. (2009), ‘The revival of the radical right: the Austrian Parliamentary Election of 2008’, West European Politics 32(5): 1049–1061.Google Scholar
Luther, K.R. (2011), ‘Of goals and own goals: a case study of right-wing populist party strategy for and during incumbency’, Party Politics 17(4): 453–470.Google Scholar
Lutz, G. (2008), Selects 2007, Lausanne: FORS.Google Scholar
Lutz, G. (2012), Eidgenössische Wahlen 2011. Wahlteilnahme Und Wahlentscheid, Lausanne: Selects.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007), Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2013), ‘Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: so what?’, European Journal of Political Research 52(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, W.C., Plasser, F. and Ulram, P.A. (2004), ‘Party responses to the erosion of voter loyalties in Austria’, in P. Mair, W. Muller and F. Plasser, et al. (eds.), Political Parties and Electoral Change, London: Sage, pp. 145–178.Google Scholar
Nai, A., Lloren, A. and Gavilanes, A. (2010), Analyse Vox des Votations Fédérales du 7 Mars 2010, Bern: GFS.Google Scholar
Nationalrat (1994), Sitzung 7. Oktober 1994: Schlussabstimmungen.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2009a), ‘We wilden AOW zachte landing geven’: PvdA-fractieleider Hamer over AOW’, 3.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2009b), ‘AOW-akkoord Zet PvdA Op Scherp’, 1.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2009c), ‘Kabinet Ontziet De Kwetsbare Groepen’, 17 October 2009: 15.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2010a), ‘Wilders Laat AOW-eis Vallen’, 10 June 2010: 1.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2010b), ‘Wat Telt Zwaarder Voor De PVV: Hoofddoekjes of De Huren?’, 11 August 2010: 3.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2010c), ‘Werk En Sociale Zekerheid’, 14 October 2010: T22.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2010d), ‘Rond Sociale Zekerheid is PVV De Hoop Van Links’, 19 August 2010: 3.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2010e), ‘De PVV Heeft Nu Een Positieve Boodschap’, 24 April 2010: 2.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2010f), ‘Harde Opties Immigratie En Asiel Onderzocht’, 29 September 2010: 1.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2010g), ‘Kabinet Botst Met PVV Over Pensioenen’, 11 November 2010: 15.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2010h), ‘PVV Wil Rechts Kabinet Gedogen’, 23 April 2010: 1.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2011a), ‘Laagste Inkomens Eerder Met Pensioen’, 6 December 2011: 2.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2011b), ‘Kamp Kan in Pensioendebat Kritische Kamer Verwachten’, 28 June 2011: 22.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad (2012), ‘Gevaarlijk Spel Met Pensioenakkoord’, 6 April 2012: 26.Google Scholar
NRC Handelsblad online (2012), ‘Wilders Wil Nieuwe Verkiezingen – “hoe Eerder, Hoe Beter”’. Retrieved 21 April 2012 from http://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2012/04/21/wilders Google Scholar
Obinger, H. and Talos, E. (2006), Sozialstaat Österreich Zwischen Kontinuität Und Umbau. Eine Bilanz Der ÖVP/FPÖ/BZÖ Koalition, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Oesch, D. (2008), ‘Explaining workers’ support for right-wing populist parties in Western Europe’, International Political Science Review 29(3): 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, I. (2005), ‘Populism and the other side of consociational democracies’, in D. Caramani and Y. Mény (eds.), Challenges to Consensual Politics. Democracy, Identity and Populist Protest in the Alpine Region, Brussels: Peter Lang, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar
Pressedienst SVP (2010), ‘Unverantwortlichen Sozialausbau Verhindert’. Retrieved 11 April 2014 from http://www.svp.ch/aktuell/medienmitteilungen/unverantwortlichen-sozialausbau-verhindert/ Google Scholar
PVV (2010), De Agenda Van Hoop En Optimisme: PVV Verkiezingsprogramma 2010–2015, Den Haag: PVV.Google Scholar
Regierungsprogramm (2000), Regierungsprogramm. Zukunft Im Herzen Europas. Österreich Neu Regieren, Wien: Federal Chancellery.Google Scholar
Rijksoverheid (2010a), Gedoogakkoord VVD-PVV-CDA, Den Haag: Rijksoverheid.Google Scholar
Rijksoverheid (2010b), Regeerakkoord VVD-CDA, Den Haag: Rijksoverheid.Google Scholar
Rovny, J. (2013), ‘Where do radical right parties stand?’, European Political Science Review 5(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, D. (2005), ‘Insider–outsider politics in industrialized democracies: the challenge to social democratic parties’, American Political Science Review 99(1): 61–74.Google Scholar
Schain, M.A. (2006), ‘The extreme-right and immigration policy-making: measuring direct and indirect effects’, West European Politics 29(2): 270–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schludi, M. (2005), The Reform of Bismarckian Pension Systems, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarz, D. (2009), Zwischen Fraktionszwang Und Freiem Mandat: Eine Untersuchung Des Fraktionsabweichenden Stimmverhaltens Im Schweizerischen Nationalrat Zwischen 1996 Und 2005, Bern: Books on Demand GmbH.Google Scholar
Selb, P. and Lachat, R. (2004), Elections 2003 (Selects: Swiss Electoral Studies Vol. 8), Zurich: Institut für Politikwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Strom, K. (1990), ‘A behavioral theory of competitive political parties’, American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 565–598.Google Scholar
Swank, D. and Betz, H.G. (2003), ‘Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe’, Socio-Economic Review 1(2): 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (2006), ‘Making the difference in social europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Van Spanje, J. (2010), ‘Contagious parties’, Party Politics 16(5): 563.Google Scholar
Van Spanje, J. (2011), ‘Keeping the rascals in: anti-political-establishment parties and their cost of governing in established democracies’, European Journal of Political Research 50(5): 609–635.Google Scholar
Vox (1995), Analyse Des Votations Fédérales Du 25 Juin 1995, Bern: GFS.Google Scholar
VVD (2010), Orde Op Zaken: Verkiezingsprogramma 2010–2014, Den Haag: VVD.Google Scholar
Williamson, V., Skocpol, T. and Coggin, J. (2011), ‘The tea party and the remaking of republican conservatism’, Perspectives on Politics 9(1): 25–43.Google Scholar
Wirtschaftsblatt (2003), ‘Dem Ersten Streiktag Folgen Durchhalteparolen’, 7 May 2003.Google Scholar
Zaslove, A. (2004), ‘Closing the door? The ideology and impact of radical right populism on immigration policy in Austria and Italy’, Journal of Political Ideologies 9(1): 99–118.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Afonso Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Afonso Supplementary Material(File)
File 25.2 KB