Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:04:18.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond American negativity: toward a general understanding of the determinants of negative campaigning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Christian Elmelund-Præstekær
Christian Elmelund-Præstekær*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
*
* E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article supplements and further develops the almost exclusively American literature on the determinants of negative campaigning by analyzing the tone of the Danish parties’ election campaigns. It concludes that proximity to governmental power matters, as oppositional parties are more negative than incumbents. This is comparable to the American experiences. The prospect of electoral failure, however, does not affect the tone the same way as poor poll standings do in the US. Moreover, it is suggested that future studies of negativity might consider how different party organizations affect the campaign tone; at least this study finds indications that parties with large proportions of party identifiers are slightly more negative than other parties. Finally, it is found that parties campaign differently in different channels of communication; that is, they are generally more negative in channels that allow direct interaction among politicians. This finding poses the question whether some channels are better empirical sources for studies of negativity than others, which is addressed in the closing section of the article.

Keywords

negative campaigningmultiparty systempartiesgeneral electioncontent analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 137 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, M. Brurrell, N. (2002), ‘The negativity effect in political advertising. A meta-analysis’, in J.P. Dillard and M. Pfau (eds), The Persuasion Handbook. Developments in Theory and Practice, London, UK: Sage Publications, pp. 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S. Iyengar, S. (1995), Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate, New York, USA: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Asp, K. Esaiasson, P. (1996), ‘The modernization of Swedish campaigns: individualization, professionalization, and medialization’, in D. Swanson and P. Mancini (eds), Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy. An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences, Westport, CT, USA: Praeger, pp. 73–90.Google Scholar
Benoit, K. Laver, M. (2006), Party Policy in Modern Democracies, London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bille, L. (1998), Dansk partipolitik 1987–1998, København, Denmark: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets forlag.Google Scholar
Bille, L. (2001), Fra valgkamp til valgkamp. Dansk partipolitik 1998–2001, København, Denmark: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets forlag.Google Scholar
Bille, L. (2006), Det nye flertal. Dansk partipolitik 2001–2005, København, Denmark: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets forlag.Google Scholar
Blais, A. Massicotte, L. (2002), ‘Electoral systems’, in L. Ledoc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds), Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, London, UK: Sage Publications, pp. 40–69.Google Scholar
Buell, E.H. Sigelman, L. (2008), Attack Politics: Negativity in Presidential Campaigns since 1960, Lawrence, Kansas, USA: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. Stokes, D. (1960), The American Voter, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Damore, D. (2002), ‘Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative’, Political Research Quarterly 55(3): 669–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, P. Peterson, D. (2002), ‘The Impact of Negative Campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 Senatorial Primaries’, Political Research Quarterly 55(4): 845–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, USA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Duverger, M., [1951] (1959), Political Parties: Their Organization and Activities in the Modern State, London, UK: Methuen.Google Scholar
Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2008), ‘Negative campaigning in a multiparty system’, Representation 44(1): 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (forthcoming), ‘Issue ownership as a determinant of negative campaigning’, International Political Science Review.Google Scholar
Elmelund-Præstekær, C., Elklit, J. Kjaer, U. (forthcoming), ‘The massive stability of the Danish multi-party system: a phyrric victory?’, in K. Lawson (ed.), Political Parties and Democracy, Santa Barbara, CA, USA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Elmelund-Præstekær, C. Hopmann, D.N. (2008), Teflon og Bullshit? Ti myter om politik, journalistik og valgkampe, Odense, Denmark: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, P. Håkansson, N. (2002), Besked ikväll! Valprogrammen i svensk radio och tv, Värnamo, Sweden: Fälth & Hässler.Google Scholar
Fridkin, K.L. Kenney, P. (2004), ‘Do negative messages work? The impact of negativity on citizens’ evaluations of candidates’, American Politics Research 32(5): 570–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geer, J. (2006), In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns, Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, K.M. Pedersen, R.T. (2008), ‘Negative campaigning in a multiparty system’, Scandinavian Political Studies 31(4): 408–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J.E. Hess, G.D. (1996), ‘A spatial theory of positive and negative campaigning’, Games and Economic Behavior 17(2): 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A.F. Krippendorff, K. (2007), ‘Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data’, Communication Methods and Measures 1(1): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, A. Rhine, S. (1998), ‘Attack politics in presidential nomination campaigns: an examination of the frequency and determinants of intermediated negative messages against opponents’, Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 691–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, P. Lucas, J. (2006), ‘The fairer sex? Gender and negative campaigning in US elections’, American Politics Research 34(1): 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, N. (1999), Valretorik. Om politiskt språk i partipropagandan, Göteborg, Sweden: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen Göteborgs universitet.Google Scholar
Jamieson, K.H. (1993), Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy, New York, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson-Cartee, K. Copeland, G.A. (1991), Negative Political Advertising: Coming of Age, Hillsdale, Michigan, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. (1991), ‘Political broadcasts: an analysis of form, content, and style in presidential communication’, in L.L. Kaid, J. Gerstle and K. Sanders (eds), Mediated Politics in Two Cultures: Presidential Campaigning in the United States and France, London, UK: Praeger, pp. 59–72.Google Scholar
Kahn, K.F. Kenney, P. (1999), The Spectacle of US Senate Campaigns, Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, K.F. Kenney, P. (2004), No Holds Barred: Negativity in US Senate Campaigns, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kaid, L.L. Holtz-Bacha, C. (1995), ‘Political advertising across cultures: campaigning content, styles, and effects’, in L.L. Kaid and C. Holtz-Bacha (eds), Western Democracies: Parties and Candidates on Television. London, UK: Sage Publications, pp. 206–227.Google Scholar
Karvonen, L. (1991), ‘The study of election campaigns: an introduction’, Scandinavian Political Studies 14(3): 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R. (1986), ‘Party government: a rationalistic conception’, in F. Castles and R. Wildenmann (eds), Visions and Realities of Party Government, Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter, pp. 31–71.Google Scholar
Katz, R. Mair, P. (eds) (1992), Party Organizations in Western Democracies 1960–1990. A Data Handbook, London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Katz, R. Mair, P. (1995), ‘Changing models of party organization and party democracy. The emergence of the Cartel party’, Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheimer, O. (1966), ‘The transformation of West European party systems’, in J. Lapalombara and M. Weiner (eds), Political Parties and Political Development, Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, pp. 177–200.Google Scholar
Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. et al. (2006), Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in the Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990–2003, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koole, R.A. (1994), ‘The vulnerability of the Modern Cadre Party in the Netherlands’, in R.S. Katz and P. Mair (eds), How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, London, UK: Sage Publications, pp. 278–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krabs, T.B. Holian, D.B. (2007), ‘Competitive positioning, deracialization, and attack speech: a study of negative campaigning in the 2001 Los Angeles Mayoral election’, American Politics Research 35(1): 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2004), Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology, London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Krogstad, A. (2001), ‘Image and issue in televised debates’, in K. Gomard and A. Krogstad (eds), Instead of the Ideal Debate: Doing Politics and Doing Gender in Nordic Political Campaign Discourse, Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press, pp. 155–184.Google Scholar
Krogstad, A. (2004), ‘Fjernsynsvalgkamp. Noen retoriske øvelser i fordeling av skyld og ære’, in B. Aardal, A. Krogstad and H.M. Narud (eds), I valgkampens hete. Strategisk kommunikasjon og politisk usikkerhed, Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 85–111.Google Scholar
Lau, R. Pomper, G. (2001), ‘Negative campaigning by US Senate candidates’, Party Politics 7(1): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R. Pomper, G. (2004), Negative Campaigning: an Analysis of US State Elections, Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman & Littlefiels Publishers.Google Scholar
Lau, R., Sigelman, L., Heldman, C. Babbitt, P. (1999), ‘The effects of negative political advertisements: a meta-analytic assessment’, American Political Science Review 93(4): 851–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R., Sigelman, L. Rover, I.B. (2007), ‘The effects of negative political advertisements: a meta-analytic reassessment’, The Journal of Politics 69(4): 1176–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M. Schofield, N. (1998), Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe, Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, N. Chi-Keung, C. (2003), ‘The impact of electoral rule change on party campaign strategy: Hong Kong as a case study’, Party Politics 9(3): 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, P. (2002), ‘Comparing party systems’, in L. Ledoc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds), Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, London, UK: Sage Publications, pp. 88–107.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (2004), ‘Inside the black box of negative campaign effects: three reasons why negative campaigns mobilize’, Political Psychology 25(4): 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, M. (2007), ‘Themen, Argumente, rhetorische Strategien. Die Inhalte des TV-Duells’, in M. Maurer, C. Reinemann, J. Maier and M. Maier (eds), Schröder gegen Merkel. Wahrnehmung und Wirkung des TV-Duells 2005 im Ost-West-Vergleich, Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
Müller, W. (2000), ‘Political parties in parliamentary democracies: making delegation and accountability work’, European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P., Curtice, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M. et al. (1999), On Message: Communicating the Campaign, London, UK: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, A. (1988), Political Parties: Organization and Power, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, M.N. (1982), ‘Towards a new typology of party lifespans and minor parties’, Scandinavian Political Studies 5(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perloff, R.M. Kinsey, D. (1992), ‘Political advertising as seen by consultants and journalists’, Journal of Advertising Research 32(3): 53–60.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. Djupe, P. (2005), ‘When primary campaigns go negative: the determinants of campaign negativity’, Political Research Quarterly 58(1): 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A. Teune, H. (1970), Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, New York, USA: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Reber, B.H. Benoit, W.L. (2001), ‘Presidential debate stories accentuate the negative’, Newspaper Research Journal 22(3): 28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridout, T.N. Franz, M. (2008), ‘Evaluating measures of campaign tone’, Political Communication 25(2): 158–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, W. (1996), The Strategy of Rhetoric. Campaigning for the American Constitution, New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ruscher, J. (2001), Prejudiced Communication – a Social Psychological Perspective, New York, USA: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, D. Norris, P. (2005), ‘The impact of political advertising in the 2001 UK general election’, Political Research Quarterly 58(4): 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. [2005] (1976) Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis, Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, E.J. (2009), ‘Global patterns of virtual mudslinging: comparing the use of attacks on German and American campaign web sites’. The 67th Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Sjöblom, G. (1968), Party Strategies in a Multiparty System, Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Skaperdas, S. Grofman, B. (1995), ‘Modeling negative campaigning’, American Political Science Review 89(1): 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, K. (1990), ‘A behavioural theory of competitive political parties’, American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 565–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theilmann, J. Wilhite, A. (1998), ‘Campaign tactics and the decision to attack’, The Journal of Politics 60(4): 1050–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, S.R. (2002), ‘Tripelvalget 2001: Valgvind, meningsmålinger og valgkamp’, Politica 34(1): 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar