Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:55:54.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The accountability of power: Democracy and governance in modern times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2011

Peter Hupe  and
Arthur Edwards
Peter Hupe*
Affiliation:
Associate professors, Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Arthur Edwards*
Affiliation:
Associate professors, Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
*
* E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
* E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In modern governing, a variety of actors in the public domain daily make decisions with consequences for the common good, but how these actors are held accountable to political representatives is not always clear. While representative democracy in most societies still functions as the traditional standard, deficits in democratic control are perceived. There is an exercise of power-without-corresponding-representation. At the same time modern citizens appear hard to engage in politics. Representation-without-corresponding-participation also appears. We address this dual problem, one of accountability and one of legitimacy, in terms of political theory. Various strategies are explored, indicating that some of them contribute to bringing democracy up to date more than others. In particular, it seems fundamental to rethink contemporary democracy by connecting it with the multi-dimensional character of governance. Functional participation by modern citizens can enhance the legitimacy of the exercise of power by making the latter accountable in a multi-local way.

Keywords

democracygovernancepoliticsaccountabilitypowerpostmodernity
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , 23 May 2012 , pp. 177 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andeweg, R.B.Irwin, G.A. (2005), Governance and Politics in the Netherlands, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Behn, R.D. (2001), Rethinking Democratic Accountability, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bekkers, V.J.J.M.Homburg, V.M.F. (2002), ‘Administrative supervision and information relationships’, Information Polity 7(2–3): 129–141.Google Scholar
Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Dijkstra, A.G., Edwards, A.R.Fenger, H.J.M. (eds) (2007), Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Assessing the Democratic Legitimacy of Governance Practices, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Benz, A.Papadopoulos, Y. (eds) (2006), Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Birch, A.H. (2001), Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blatter, J. (2007), Governance: Theoretische Formen und historische Transformationen, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Bovens, M.A.P. (2000), De Vierde Macht revisited: Over ambtelijke macht en publieke verantwoording, University of Utrecht: inaugural address, September 13.Google Scholar
Bovens, M.A.P. (2005a), ‘Public accountability’, in E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn, Jr and C. Pollitt (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–206.Google Scholar
Bovens, M.A.P. (2005b), ‘De verspreiding van de democratie’, Beleid en Maatschappij 32(3): 119–127.Google Scholar
Bovens, M.A.P., Derksen, W., Witteveen, W., Becker, F.Kalma, P. (1995), De Verplaatsing van de Politiek: Een Agenda voor Democratische Vernieuwing, Amsterdam: Wiardi Beckman Stichting.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (1998), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vols. I/III, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. (2003), ‘Deliberative democratic theory’, Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307–326.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dubnick, M.J.Romzek, B.S. (2003), ‘Accountability and the centrality of expectations in American Public Administration’, Research in Public Administration 2: 37–78.Google Scholar
Edelenbos, J.Klijn, E.H. (2006), ‘Managing stakeholder involvement in decision-making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in The Netherlands’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(3): 417–446.Google Scholar
Engelen, E.R.Sie Dhian Ho, M. (eds) (2004), De Staat van de Democratie: Democratie Voorbij de Staat (WRR-verkenning 4), Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Erkkilä, T. (2007), ‘Governance and accountability. A shift in conceptualization’, Public Administration Quarterly 31(1): 1–38.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, A. (2006), ‘Survey article: the legitimacy deficits of the European Union’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 14(4): 441–468.Google Scholar
Frederickson, H.G.Smith, K.B. (2003), The Public Administration Theory Primer, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Frey, B.S. (2003), ‘Flexible citizenship for a global society’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 2(1): 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, D. (2006), Models of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hill, M.J.Hupe, P.L. (2009), Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance, 2nd edn., London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (1994), Associative Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (1997), From Statism to Pluralism, London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (2000), ‘Democracy and governance’, in J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
Hood, C.C. (2005), ‘Public management: the word, the movement, the science’, in F. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn, Jr and C. Pollitt (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7–26.Google Scholar
In ‘t Veld, R.J.Kruiter, A.J. (2002), ‘Volksvertegenwoordiging moet worden afgeschaft’, NRC Handelsblad, March 22.Google Scholar
Kiser, L.L.Ostrom, E. (1982), ‘The three worlds of action: a meta-theoretical synthesis of institutional approaches’, in E. Ostrom (ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 179–222.Google Scholar
Klijn, E.H.Skelcher, C. (2007), ‘Democracy and governance networks: compatible or not?’, Public Administration 85(3): 587–608.Google Scholar
Kohnstamm Committee (2004), Een herkenbare staat: investeren in de overheid. Report of the Working Group ‘Verzelfstandigde organisaties op Rijksniveau’, The Hague.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. (2003), Governing as Governance, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1985), Il Principe/The Prince (translated by H. Mansfield), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2006), Polity-Scepticism, Party Failings, and the Challenge to European Democracy’, Uhlenbeck Lecture 24, Wassenaar: Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study.Google Scholar
Mulgan, R. (2000), ‘ “Accountability”: an ever-expanding concept?’, Public Administration 78(3): 555–573.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2002), Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (2003), ‘Cooperative forms of governance: problems of democratic accountability in complex environments’, European Journal of Political Research 42(4): 473–501.Google Scholar
Pierre, J. (2009), ‘Reinventing governance, reinventing democracy?’, Policy and Politics 37(4): 591–609.Google Scholar
Pierre, J.Peters, B.G. (eds) (2000), Governance, Politics and the State, New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997), Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Sabine, G. (1952), ‘The two democratic traditions’, The Philosophical Review 61(4): 451–474.Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2001), ‘Making democratic connections: political equality, deliberation and direct democracy’, Acta Politica 36(4): 361–379.Google Scholar
Schudson, M. (1998), The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E.Torfing, J. (eds) (2007), Theories of Democratic Network Governance, Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Thomassen, J.J.A. (1991), ‘Democratie, problemen en spanningsvelden’, in J.J.A. Thomassen (ed.), Hedendaagse Democratie, Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom H.D. Tjeenk Willink, pp. 15–33.Google Scholar
Van der Meer, J.Ham, M. (2001), De Verplaatsing van de Democratie, Amsterdam: De Balie.Google Scholar
Van Thiel, S. (2000), Quangocratization: Trends, Causes and Consequences. University of Utrecht: dissertation.Google Scholar
Warren, M.E. (2008), ‘Citizen representatives’, in M.E. Warren and H. Pearse (eds), Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1947), The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations (translated by A.M. Henderson and T. Parsons), Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wille, A. (2001), ‘Politieke participatie en representativiteit in het interactieve beleidsproces’, in J. Edelenbos and R. Monnikhof (eds), Lokale Interactieve Beleidsvorming, Utrecht: Lemma, pp. 87–115.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. (1941), ‘The study of public administration’, Political Science Quarterly 56(December): 197–222.Google Scholar