Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:59:13.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toennies and Weber: a Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Werner J. Cahnman
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes Critiques
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 154 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Mueller, Gert H., The notion of rationality in the work of Max Weber, European Journal of Sociology, XX (1979), 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(1) The paper appeared in Logos IV and is reprinted in Max Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tübingen, Mohr, 1922), 427–474.

(2) Roth, Günther and Wittich'S, Claus translation of Weber, Max, Economy and Society (New York, Bedminster Press, 1968), I, xcviGoogle Scholar.

(3) Gesammelte Aufsätze… op. cit, p. 403.

(4) Parsons, Talcott, Weber, Max: the theory of social and economic organization (New York, Free Press, 1964), p. 136Google Scholar; comp. Parsons, , A Note on Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft, in Werner J. Cahnman, Ferdinand Toennies — A new evaluation (Leiden, E. J. Brill, 1973), p. 140Google Scholar.

(5) Toennies, Ferdinand, Thomas Hobbes. Leben und Lehre (New printing of third edition: Stuttgart, Fromman, 1971; first edition 1896)Google Scholar. Comp. Hobbes and the Politikon, Zoon, in Cahnman, Werner J. and Heberle, Rudolf, Ferdinand Toennies on Sociology Pure, Applied and Empirical (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1971), pp. 48–61Google Scholar.

(6) Sorokin, Pitirim, Contemporary Sociological Theories (New York/London 1928), p. 467.Google Scholar

(7) For a more intensive comparison, see Cahnman, Werner J., Toennies, Durkheim and Weber, , Social Science Information, XV (1977) 6, 839–853Google Scholar.

(8) Toennies and Durkheim: an exchange of reviews, in Ferdinand Toennies — A new evaluation, op. cit. p. 249.

(9) Cahnman, Werner J., Toennies, and Weber, , in Ferdinand Toennies, op. cit. pp. 257–283Google Scholar.

(10) Toennies, Ferdinand, Einführung in det Soziologie (Stuttgart, Enke Verlag, 1965; edition 1931), pp. 6 sqqGoogle Scholar. Comp. Cahnman, Toennies and Weber, op. cit.