Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T15:49:53.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some third thoughts on Max Müller and solar mythology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Michael P. Carroll
Get access

Extract

Who now reads Max Müller ? Almost nobody, I suspect. If the readers of this article know Müller's name at all, they likely encountered it in some review of the various (and now discredited) theories of myth and religion that were popular in the nineteenth century, and such reviews hardly encourage anyone to seek out Müller's original work. Typically, these reviews present only a very brief and very general summary of Müller's ‘solar mythology’, and then go on to disparage Müller's work, often in a fairly extreme language. Thus, Munz (1973: 75) calls Müller ‘the most flamboyant of all nineteenth century philologists’, Puhvel (cited in Larson, 1974: 4) calls Müller's theory of myth a ’Victorian gingerbread’, and Thompson (1946:371) even suggests that ‘any modern reader who examines it [Müller's theory] begins todoubt his own sanity’.

Type
Le mythe du mythe
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , November 1985 , pp. 262 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, C. (1980), Flying saucers, spoon-bending, and Atlantis: a structural analysis of new mythologies, Sociological Review, XXVIII, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, L. B. (1980), Folklore, anthropology, and psychoanalysis, Journal of Psychoanalytic Anthropology, III, 259–279.Google Scholar
Buck, C. D. (1949), A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo- European Languages (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Carroll, M. P. (1977), Of Atlantis and ancient astronauts: the structural analysis of two modern myths, Journal of Popular Culture, XI, 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. P. (1978), The savage bind: Lévi Strauss', myth analysis and anglophone social science, Pacific Sociological Review, XXI, 467–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. P. (1982), The Rolling Head: towards a revitalized psychoanalytic perspective on myth, Journal of Psychoanalytic Anthropology, V, 29–56.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. P. (1983), Myth, methodology and transformation in the Old Testament: the stories of Esther, Judith and Susanna, Sciences Religieuses/Studies in Religion, XII, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. P. (forthcoming), The Trickster feigns death and commits incest: some methodological contributions to the study of myth, Behavior Science Research, XIX.Google Scholar
CodÈRe, H. (1974), La geste du chien d'Asdiwal: the story of Mac, American Anthropologist, LXXVI, 42–47.Google Scholar
Cox, G. (1870), The Mythology of the Aryan Nations (London, Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Dorson, R. (1965), The eclipse of solar mythology, in Sebeok, T. (ed.), Myth: a symposium (Bloomington, Indiana University Press), pp. 25–63.Google Scholar
Dorson, R. (1968), The British Folkloris (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Dumézil, G. (1968–1973), Mythe et épopie, 3 volumes (Paris, Gallimard).Google Scholar
Dundes, A. (1965), The Study of Folklore (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
Dundes, A. (1980), Interpreting Folklore (Bloomington, Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Durkheim, È (1912), Les formes èlèmentaires de la vie religieuse: le système toté mique en Australie (Paris, Alcan) [English translation 1915].Google Scholar
Elms, Alan (1977), The three bears: four interpretations, Journal of American Folklore, LXXXX, 257–273.Google Scholar
Feldman, B. and Richardson, R. (1972), The Rise of Modern Mythology: 1660–1860 (Bloomington, Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1976 [1900]), The Interpretation of Dreams (Harmondsworth, England, Penguin).Google Scholar
Gimbutas, M. (1970), Proto-Indo-European culture: the Kurgan culture during the fifth, fourth and third millenia B.C., in Cardona, G., Hoenigswald, H. and Senn, A. (eds.), Indo-European and Indo-Europeans (Philadelphia, University of Philadelphia Press), pp. 155–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, W. (1970), The evolution of pastoralism and Indo-European origins, in Cardona, G., Hoenigswald, H. and Senn, A. (eds.), op. cit. pp. 253–266.Google Scholar
Hudson-Williams, T. (1961), A Short Introduction to the Study of Comparative Grammar (Indo-European) (Cardiff, University of Wales Press).Google Scholar
Kronenfeld, D. and Decker, H. (1979), Structuralism, in Siegal, B. (ed.), Annual Review of Anthropology, VIII (Palo Alto, Calif., Annual Reviews, Inc.).Google Scholar
Lang, A. (1913 [1887]), Myth, Ritual and Religion (London, Longmans).Google Scholar
Larson, G. (1974), Introduction: the study of mythology and comparative mythology, in Larson, G. (ed.), Myth in Indo-European Antiquity (Berkeley, University of California Press), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessa, W. (1979), The apotheosis of Marespa, in Lessa, W. and Vogt, E. (eds.), Reader in Comparative Religion (New York, Harper and Row), pp. 169–173.Google Scholar
LÉVi-Strauss, Cl. (1955), The structural study of myth, Journal of American Folklore, LXXVIII, 428–444.Google Scholar
LÉVi-Strauss, Cl. (1958), La geste d'Asdiwal, école Pratique des Hautes études, Section des Sciences religieuses, annual (1958–59), Paris. [English translation 1967].Google Scholar
LÉVi-Strauss, Cl. (1964), Le Cru et le Cuit (Paris, Librairie Plon) [English translation 1969].Google Scholar
Littledale, R. F. (1909 [1870]), The Oxford solar myth, in M. MÜller, Comparative Mythology edited by Palmer, A. S. (London, Routledge), pp. XXXI–XLVII.Google Scholar
Littleton, C. S. (1980), The New Comparative Mythology (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Lockwood, W. B. (1969), Indo-European Philology (London, Hutchinson University Library).Google Scholar
Maranda, P. and Maranda, E. (eds.), (1971), Structural Analysis of Oral Tradition (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MÜller, M. (1873), Introduction to the Science of Religion (London, Longmans).Google Scholar
MÜller, M. (1876), Chips from a German Workshop, Volume IV (New York, Scribner's).Google Scholar
MÜller, M. (1881 a), Chips from a German Workshop, Volume I (New York, Scribner's).Google Scholar
MÜller, M. (1881 b), Chips from a German Workshop, Volume II (New York, Scribner's).Google Scholar
MÜller, M. (1889), Natural Religion (London, Longmans).Google Scholar
MÜller, M. (1892), Anthropological Religion (London, Longmans).Google Scholar
MÜLler, M. (1901), Last Essays: first series (London, Longmans).Google Scholar
Munz, P. (1973), When the Golden Bough Breaks (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Palmer, A. S. (1909), Introductory preface on Solar Mythology, in M. MÜller, Comparative Mythology, edited by Palmer, A. S. (London, Routledge) [reprinted by Arno Press, 1971], pp. v-xxix.Google Scholar
Pedersen, H. (1931), Linguistic Science in the Nineteenth Century: methods and results (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (1981), Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities: structure in the early history of the Sandwich Islands Kingdom (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Sharpe, E. (1975), Comparative Religion (London, Duckworth).Google Scholar
Spiro, M. E. (1979), Whatever happened to the id?, American Anthropologist, LXXXI, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieme, Paul (1964), The comparative method for reconstruction in linguistics, in Hymes, D. (ed.), Language in Culture and Society (New York, Harper and Row), PP. 585–598.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. (1946), The Folktale (New York, Holt, Rinehard and Winston).Google Scholar