Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:35:17.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Myths to Markets

Power, Institutions, and the Reification of Imagined Histories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

Elizabeth Carter
Elizabeth Carter*
Affiliation:
The University of New Hampshire [[email protected]]
Get access

Abstract

This article posits that institutionalized mythologies can create comparative production advantages. Myths shape collective identity, mobilize actors, and fundamentally reshape production dynamics. Myths are institutionalized in market rules, regulations and structures, leading to the reification of the myth. The myth functions as if it is true, not because it is true, but because it shapes the rules of production. Yet without the initial myth, specific production incentives—and even their institutional comparative advantages—would not exist. My theory integrates approaches from modernist historians (“imagined communities”) and economic sociologists (“imagined futures”) to explain how myths (“imagined histories”) shape contemporary market outcomes, using the example of the French wine market. This argument contributes to the historical institutionalist approach, which focuses on the historical power dynamics between competing groups and the present-day social and market consequence of their institutionalized solutions.

Résumé

Cet article affirme que les mythologies institutionnalisées créent parfois des avantages productifs comparatifs. Les mythes façonnent l’identité collective, mobilisent les acteurs et modifient en profondeur la dynamique de la production. Ils sont institutionnalisés dans les règles du marché, les réglementations et les structures, ce qui conduit à leur réification. Le mythe fonctionne comme s’il était vrai, non pas parce qu’il l’est, mais parce qu’il façonne les règles de production. Pourtant, sans le mythe initial, des incitations spécifiques à la production n’existeraient pas—tout comme leurs avantages comparatifs institutionnels. Ma théorie propose d’intégrer les approches des historiens modernistes (« communautés imaginées ») et des sociologues économiques (« futurs imaginés ») pour expliquer comment les mythes (« histoires imaginées ») façonnent les résultats du marché contemporain, en prenant l’exemple du marché du vin en France. Il s’agit de contribuer à une approche institutionnaliste historique centrée sur la dynamique de pouvoir entre des groupes rivaux et les conséquences sociales et marchandes de leurs solutions institutionnalisées.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag behauptet, dass institutionalisierte Mythen gelegentlich vergleichende Produktionsvorteile schaffen. Diese Mythen gestalten die kollektive Identität, mobilisieren die Handelnden und verändern nachhaltig Produktionsdynamiken. Ihre Verankerung in Marktregeln, Vorschriften und Strukturen führt zur Reifikation des Mythos. Letzterer mutiert zur Wahrheit, nicht weil er wahr ist, sondern weil er die Produktionsregeln mitgestaltet. Gleichzeitig kann festgestellt werden, dass es ohne einen Auslösungsmythos keine produktionsspezifischen Anreize geben würde – ebenso wenig wie ihre institutionellen komparativen Vorteile. Mein theoretischer Ansatz integriert die Überlegungen moderner Historiker (,,erfundene Gemeinschaften“) und Wirtschaftssoziologen (,,erfundene Zukunft“), um die durch Mythen (,,erfundene Geschichten“) geprägten zeitgenössischen Marktergebnisse zu erklären, z.B. den frz. Weinhandel. Diese Argumentation unterstützt den historischen Institutionsansatz, der sich auf historisch gewachsene Machtdynamiken zwischen konkurrierenden Gruppen und aktuellen sozialen sowie wirtschaftlichen Konsequenzen ihrer institutionalisierten Lösungen bezieht.

Keywords

Political economyEconomic sociologyFranceInstitutionsNation-buildingOrganizationsÉconomie politiqueSociologie économiqueFranceInstitutionsConstruction d’une nationOrganisationsWirtschaftspolitikWirtschaftssoziologieFrankreichInstitutionenstaatsbildendOrganisationen
Type
Varia
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , August 2019 , pp. 211 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, Benedict, 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (New York, Verso Books).Google Scholar
Augelli, Enrico and Murphy, Craig N., 1997. “Consciousness, myth and collective action: Gramsci, Sorel and the ethical state,” Innovation and Transformation in International Studies (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 25-38).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachmann, Reinhard, (2001). “Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations”, Organization Studies, 22 (2): 337-365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badenoch, Alexander, 2010. “Myths of the European Network: Constructions of Cohesion in Infrastructure Maps,” Materializing Europe (Palgrave Macmillan, London: 47-77).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandelj, Nina and Wherry, Frederick F., 2011. The Cultural Wealth of Nations (Palo Alto, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens, 2011. “Where do prices come from? Sociological approaches to price formation,” Socio-Economic Review, 9 (4): 757-786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckert, Jens, 2016. Imagined Futures (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Suzanne and Locke, Richard M., 2001. “Il Caso Italiano and Globalization,” Daedalus, 130 (3): 85-104.Google Scholar
Blanqui, Adolphe, 1851. “Tableau des populations rurales de la France en 1850 ,” Journal des Economistes, 28: 9-27.Google Scholar
Block, Fred and Somers, Margaret, 2014. The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi’s Critique (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark, 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark, 2013 Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Esquerre, Arnaud, 2017. Enrichissement: une critique de la marchandise (Paris, Gallimard).Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Thévenot, Laurent, 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, [1979] 1984. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Campbell, John L., 1998. “Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy”, Theory and Society, 27: 377-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John L. and Pedersen, Ove K., 2015. “Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy”, Socio-Economic Review, 13: 679-701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Elizabeth, 2015. “Constructing Quality: Producer Power, Market Organization, and the Politics of High Value-Added Markets,” Discussion Paper: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies [December, http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp15-9.pdf].Google Scholar
Carter, Elizabeth, 2017. “In vino veritas? The development of producer trust and its market effects in regulated French and Italian quality wine markets,” in Six, Frédérique and Verhoest, Koen, eds, Trust in Regulatory Regimes, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
Carter, Elizabeth, 2018. “For What It’s Worth: Producer Politics and the Construction of Quality in French and Italian Wine Markets,” Socio-Economic Review , vol. 16, Issue 3, 1 July: 479-498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, 2008. “Internet Sales of Luxury Products: White Paper Submitted to the European Commissioner for Competition on Behalf of LVMH.” [http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/media/lvmh_contribution.pdf].Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins and Collier, David, 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Colman, Tyler, 2010. Wine Politics (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Corrado, Raffaele and Odorici, Vincenza, 2009. “Winemakers and Wineries in the Evolution of the Italian Wine Industry: 1997-2006,” Journal of Wine Research, 20: 2, 111-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debonneville, Julien, 2013. “De la lutte contre la vulnérabilité aux transferts d’argent. La migration des travailleuses domestiques au prisme du dispositif migratoire philippin,” Autrepart, 4: 69-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debonneville, Julien, 2014. “Les écoles du care aux Philippines,” Revue Tiers Monde, 1: 61-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demossier, Marion, 1997. “Producing tradition and managing social changes in the French vineyards the circle of time in Burgundy,” Ethnologia europaea, 27 (1): 47-58.Google Scholar
Demossier, Marion, 2011a. “Beyond terroir: territorial construction, hegemonic discourses, and French wine culture,” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17 (4) : 685-705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demossier, Marion 2011b. Wine Drinking Culture in France: A National Myth or a Modern Passion? (Cardiff, University of Wales Press).Google Scholar
Diaz-Bone, Rainer, 2013. “Discourse Conventions in the Construction of Wine Qualities in the Wine Market”, in Economic Sociology, 14 (2), 46-53.Google Scholar
Eymard-Duvernay, François (ed.), 2007. L’Économie des conventions: méthodes et résultats (Paris, La Découverte).Google Scholar
Fischer, Edward F., (forthcoming). “Quality and Inequality: Taste and the Creation of Value with Third Wave Coffee,” Socio-Economic Review.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, 2002. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, 2012. “The Vile and the Noble: Between Natural and Social Classifications in the French Wine World,” The Sociological Quarterly, 53 (4): 524-545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, 2013. “‘A Triple Movement’ Parsing the Politics of Crisis after Polanyi,” New Left Review, 81: May-June.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest, 1983. Nations and nationalism (Paris, Payot).Google Scholar
Gitelson, Alan R., Dudley, Robert L. and Dubnick, Melvin J., 2018. American Government: Myths and Realities (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio, 1971. “Selections from the Prison Notebooks” (New York City, International Publishers Co).Google Scholar
Guy, Kolleen M., 2003. When champagne became French: Wine and the making of a national identity (Baltimore, JHU Press).Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., 1989 The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Hall, Peter and Soskice, David, 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (Oxford, Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, 1983. The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Jacquet, Olivier 2009. Un siècle de construction du vignoble bourguignon. Les organisations vitivinicoles de 1884 aux AOC (Dijon, Éditions Universitaires de Dijon).Google Scholar
Jacquet, Olivier and Laferté, Gilles, 2006. “Le contrôle républicain du marché. Vignerons et négociants sous la Troisième République.” Annales” Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 61:5, 1147-1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers, 1982. MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975 (Palo Alto, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Laferté, Gilles, 2006. La Bourgogne et ses vins: image d’origine contrôlée (Paris, Belin).Google Scholar
Laferté, Gilles 2011. “The folklorization of French farming: marketing luxury wine in the interwar years,” French Historical Studies, 34 (4): 679-712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laferté, Gilles 2012. “End or invention of Terroirs? Regionalism in the Marketing of French Luxury Goods: the Example of Burgundy Wines in the Inter-war Years”, No. 2012/2. INRA UMR CESAER, Centre d’Economie et Sociologie appliquées à l’Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, Beljean, Stefan and Clair, Matthew. 2014. “What Is Missing? Cultural Processes and Causal Pathways to Inequality”, Socio-Economic Review, 12: 573-608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Christel and Bachmann, Reinhard, 1996. “The social constitution of trust: Supplier relations in Britain and Germany”, Organization Studies, 17 (3): 365-395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, Richard M., 1995. Remaking the Italian Economy (Ithaca, Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Matthews, Mark A., 2015. Terroir and Other Myths of Winegrowing (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Meunier, Sophie, 2000. “The French Exception,” Foreign Affairs, 79 (4): 104-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migley, Mary, 2014. The Myths We Live By (New York, Routledge).Google Scholar
Patterson, Tim and Buechenstein, John, 2018. Wine and Place: A Terroir Reader (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Phillips, Roderick, 2016. French Wine: A History (Oakland, CA, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Pinilla, Vicente, 2014. “Wine Historical Statistics: A Quantitative Approach to its Consumption, Production and Trade, 1840-1938,” American Association of Wine Economists Working Paper Series, 167 (August).Google Scholar
Ponte, Stefano and Davrion, Benoit, 2011. “Creating and controlling symbolic value: the case of South African wine,” in Bandelj, N. and Wherry, F. (eds), The Cultural Wealth of Nations (Palo Alto, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E., 1998. “Clusters and the New Economics of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, 1 Aug.Google Scholar
Roelofs, Mark, 1976. Ideology and Myth in American Politics: A Critique of a National Political Mind (Boston, MA, Little, Brown).Google Scholar
Simpson, James, 2011. Creating Wine: The Emergence of a World Industry, 1840-1914 (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Sorel, Georges, 1950. Reflections on Violence (Glencoe, The Free Press).Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, 1991. “On the Institutional Conditions of Diversified Quality Production,” in Matzner, Egon and Streeck, Wolfgang (eds), Beyond Keynesianism: The Socio-Economics of Production and Full Employment (Aldershot, Edward Elgar: 21-61).Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Schmitter, Philippe G., 1985. “Community, Market, State—and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order,” European Social Review, 1 (2): 119-138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Technology & Human Values, 37 (5): 478-505.Google Scholar
Teil, Geneviève, 2004. De la coupe aux lèvres: pratiques de la perception et mise en marche des vins de qualité (Paris, Octarès).Google Scholar
Teil, Geneviève, 2012. “No such thing as terroir? Objectivities and the regimes of existence of objects,” Science, Technology & Human Values, 37 (5): 478-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulin, Robert C., 1996. Vintages and Traditions: An Ethnohistory of Southwest French Wine Cooperatives (Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Press).Google Scholar
Ulin, Robert C., 2007. “Writing about Wine,” in Campbell, Gwynn and Guibert, Nathalie, eds, Wine, Society, and Globalization (New York, Palgrave Macmillan: 43-62).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Eugen, 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: the modernization of rural France, 1870-1914 (Stanford, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Whalen, Philip, 2007. “Burgundian regionalism and French republican commercial culture at the 1937 Paris International Exposition,” Cultural Analysis, 6: 31-69.Google Scholar
Whalen, Philip, 2009, “Insofar as the Ruby Wine Seduces Them”: Cultural Strategies for Selling Wine in Inter-War Burgundy,” Contemporary European History, 18 (1), 67-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar