Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:16:21.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Engendering or reproducing politics? the curious absence of gender in latour’s climatic regime - Bruno Latour, Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime (Cambridge, Polity Press, 2018)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2020

Carrie Friese*
Affiliation:
Sociology Department, London School of Economics and Political Science [[email protected]]
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2020 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 M. McQuarrie, 2017, “The Revolt of the Rust Belt: Place and Politics in the Age of Anger,” British Journal of Sociology, 68: S120-S152.

2 J. Meek, 2019, “The Two Jacobs: James Meek on Post-Brexit Britain”, London Review of Books, 41: 13-16, page 13.

3 N. Hopwood, R. Fleming and L. Kassell, 2018, Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

4 S. E. Muller-Wille and H.-J. Rheinberger, 2012, A Cultural History of Heredity (Chicago, University of Chicago Press) ; H. Ritvo, 1995, “Possessing mother nature: Genetic capital in eighteenth-century Britain”, in J. Brewer and S. Staves , ed., Early Modern Conceptions of Property (London, Routledge: 413-426).

5 S. Franklin, 2007, Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy (Durham NC, Duke University Press); S. Franklin, 2013, Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship (Durham NC, Duke University Press).

6 A. E. Clarke and D. J. Haraway, 2018, Making Kin not Population: Reconceiving Generations (Chicago, Prickly Paradigm Press).

7 J. Latimer and M. Miele, 2013, “Naturecultures? Science, affect and the non-human,” Theory, Culture & Society, 30: 5-31.