Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T17:48:17.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Drawing from Bourdieu - Neil Fligstein and Doug McAdam, A Theory of Fields (Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2012)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2015

David L. Swartz*
Affiliation:
Boston University [[email protected]].
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, Howard, 2006. “A Dialogue on the Ideas of ‘World' and ‘Field' with Alain Pessin”, Sociological Forum, 21: 275-286.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Richard, 2000, Pierre Bourdieu, revised, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lynd, Robert S., 1986 [1939], Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Science in American Culture, Middletown, Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Martin Levi, John. 2003, “What is Field Theory?”, American Journal of Sociology, 109 (1): 1-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medvetz, Thomas, 2012, Think Tanks in America, Chicago/London, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Medvetz, Thomas, 2013. “Les think tanks dans le champ du pouvoir étasunien”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 200: 44-55.Google Scholar
Swartz, David, 2013, Symbolic Power, Politics, and Intellectuals: The Political Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swartz, David L. 2006, “Pierre Bourdieu and North American political Sociology: Why He Doesn't Fit in But Should”, French Politics 4: 84-89.Google Scholar