Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:17:52.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Citizenship for Sale

Neomedieval, not Just Neoliberal?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2016

Ana Tanasoca
Ana Tanasoca*
Affiliation:
University of Canberra [[email protected]].
Get access

Abstract

Opponents of commodification say that some things should not be for sale. Is citizenship one of them? Citizenship-by-investment schemes of naturalization allow investors virtually to “buy” citizenship. Revisiting objections to the older practice of selling another civic status—noble status—underscores many reasons why this trade may be regarded as problematic. The practice of selling citizenship is not only similar to that of selling honours but might also be thought wrong in analogous ways.

Résumé

Les opposants à la marchandisation affirment que certaines choses ne devraient pas pouvoir être vendues. La citoyenneté est-elle l’une de ces choses ? Certains mécanismes de naturalisation par acquisition de « citoyenneté par investissement » permettent virtuellement aux investisseurs d’acheter leur citoyenneté. Un retour sur les objections formulées à l’encontre d’une pratique plus ancienne de vente d’un autre statut civique – la noblesse – souligne les nombreuses raisons pour lesquelles ce commerce peut être considéré comme problématique. La pratique de vente de citoyenneté n’est pas seulement similaire à celle de la vente d’honneurs, elle peut être considérée comme mauvaise pour des raisons analogues.

Zusammenfassung

Vermarktungsgegner behaupten, dass gewisse Dinge nicht verkauft werden dürften. Gehört die Staatsangehörigkeit dazu? Einbürgerungsmechanismen basierend auf dem Erwerb der Staatsangehörigkeit durch Investitionen erlauben Investoren virtuell ihre Staatsbürgerschaft zu erwerben. Einwände, dass früher ein ziviler Status wie der eines Adelstitels käuflich erworben werden konnte, verdeutlichen, weshalb dieses Geschäft als problematisch angesehen werden muss. Die Praxis des Staatsangehörigkeitsverkaufs ist nicht nur mit der von Ehrentiteln vergleichbar, sondern sie muss auch aus analogen Gründen als schlecht betrachtet werden.

Keywords

Investor citizenshipThe sale of honoursSelling citizenshipCommodificationCitoyenneté par investissementVente d’honneursVente de citoyennetéMarchandisationInvestor StaatsbürgerschaftDer Verkauf von EhrungenVerkauf von StaatsbürgerschaftKommodifizierung
Type
Varia
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , April 2016 , pp. 169 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alter, Jean, 1970. Les Origines de la Satyre Anti-Bourgeoise en France (Geneva, Droz).Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth S., 1990. “Is Women’s Labour a Commodity?” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19: 71-92.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth S., 1990. “The Ethical Limitations of the Market”, Economics and Philosophy, 6: 179-295.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, 2004. The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York, Schocken Books).Google Scholar
Arundell, Thomas, 1603. “Letter to Lord Cecil”, in The Cecil Papers, CP. 187/93. Available at http://cecilpapers.chadwyck.com/search/displayItem.do?QueryType=articles&ResultsID=141BCB39F4F11CC27F&filterSequence=0&ItemNumber=1&ItemID=15_0480.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert and Hamilton, William D., 1981. “The Evolution of Cooperation”, Science, 211: 1390-1396.Google Scholar
Balzan, Jurgen, 2013. “Contentious Citizenship Scheme Approved”, Malta Today, November 12, 2013. Available at http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/en/newsdetails/news/national/Contentious-citizenship-scheme-approved-20131112.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S., 1987. “Why Not Let Immigrants Pay for Speedy Entry?”in Becker, Gary S. and Becker, Guity Nashat, eds, The Economics of Life (New York, McGraw-Hill: 58-60).Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S., 1992. “An Open Door For Immigrants—the Auction”, Wall Street Journal, October 14, 1992.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S., Lazear, Edward P., 2013. “A Market Solution to Immigration Reform”, Wall Street Journal, March 1, 2013.Google Scholar
Bitton, David, 1969. The French Nobility in Crisis (Stanford, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Bloch, Jean-Richard, 1934. L’Anoblissement en France au temps du François Ier. Essai d’une définition de la condition juridique et sociale de la noblesse au début du XVIe siècle (Paris, Felix Alcan).Google Scholar
Borna, Shaheen and Stearns, James N., 2002. “The Ethics and Efficacy of Selling National Citizenship”, Journal of Business Ethics, 37: 193-207.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert, 2011. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Brock, Michael, 1973. The Great Reform Act (London, Hutchinson University Library).Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph H., 1987. “Aliens and Citizens: the Case for Open Borders”, The Review of Politics, 49: 251-273.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph H., 2010. Immigrants and the Right to Stay (Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., 2009. Why Not Socialism? (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Der Spiegel, 2013. “Hit by the Levy: Cyprus Mulls Citizenship Offer for Russians”, April 15, 2013. Available at http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/cyprus-mulls-giving-russian-investors-citizenship-a-894409.html.Google Scholar
Dzankic, Jelena, 2012. “The Pros and Cons of Ius Pecuniae: Investor Citizenship in Comparative Perspective”, EUI Working Paper, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, 2012/14.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard, 1985. “Why Restrain Alienation?” Columbia Law Review, 85: 970-990.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton and Friedman, Rose, 1980. Free to Choose (Harmondsworth, Penguin).Google Scholar
Gintis, Herbert, Smith, Eric Alden and Bowles, Samuel, 2001. “Costly Signalling and Cooperation”, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 213: 103-119.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., 1993. “Structures of Political Order: the Relational Feminist Alternative”, in Shapiro, Ian and Hardin, Russell, eds., Political Order (New York, New York University Press: 498-522).Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., 2004. “Support With Strings: Workfare as an ‘Impermissible Condition’”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21: 297-308.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David (eds), 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hardin, Garrett, 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, 162: 1243-1248.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R., 1939. Value & Capital (Oxford, Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hidalgo, Javier, forthcoming. “Selling Citizenship: a Defence”, Journal of Applied Philosophy.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Fred, 1977. Social Limits to Growth (London, Routledge and Keegan Paul).Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Home Office 2014. Migration Advisory Committee, “Tier 1 (Investor) Route: Investment Thresholds and Economic Benefits”, February 2014. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/285220/Tier1investmentRoute.pdf.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W., 1967. “The Theory of Investment Behaviour”, in Ferber, Robert, ed., Determinants of Investment Behaviour (New York, Columbia University Press: 129-175).Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W., 1971. “Econometric Studies of Investment Behavior: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, 9: 1111-1147Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, 2012. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. ed. Mary, Gregor (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst, 1997. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Le Roux, Nicolas, 2011. “L’Épreuve de la vertu. Condition nobiliaire et légitimation de l’honorabilité au XVIe siècle”, Les Vecteurs de l’idéal. La légitimité implicite, lamop, Rome, December 2011.Google Scholar
Lewis, David K., 1969. Convention (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven, 2003. “Invasions of the Market,”in Dworkin, Ronald, ed., From Liberal Values to Democratic Transitions (Budapest, Central University Press: 57-78).Google Scholar
Machivelli, Niccolò, [1532] 2008. The Prince, (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Mahncke, Julia and Ignatzi, Christian, 2013. “European Citizenship Sold to the Super Wealthy”, Deutsche Welle, November 15, 2013. Available at http://www.dw.de/european-citizenship-sold-to-the-super-wealthy/a-16756198.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, 1972. “On the Jewish Question”, in Tucker, R. C., ed., Marx-Engels Reader, (New York, Norton: 24-51).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, 1973. Grundrisse, trans. Martin, Nicolaus (Harmondsworth, Penguin).Google Scholar
Mayes, Charles R., 1957. “The Sale of Peerages in Early Stuart England”, Journal of Modern History, 29: 21-37.Google Scholar
Okun, Arthur M., 1975. Equality and Efficiency, the Big Tradeoff (Washington, Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
Perez v. Brownell. 1958. 356 U.S. 44.Google Scholar
Peter, Laurence, 2013. “EU Shrugs Off European Race to Woo Rich Foreigners”, BBC News, November 18, 2013. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-24940012.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne, 2013. Our Bodies, Whose Property? (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl, 1944. The Great Transformation (Boston, MA, Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane, 1987. “Market Inalienability”, Harvard Law Review, 100: 1849-1937.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane, 1996. Contested Commodities (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Reding, Viviane, 2014. “Citizenship Must Not Be For Sale”, Speech at the European Commission, January 15, 2014. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-18_en.htm.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan, 1985. “Inalienability and the Theory of Property Rights”, Columbia Law Review, 85: 931-969.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael, 1998. “What Money Can’t Buy”, Tanner Lectures, Oxford, May 11–12.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael, 2012. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux).Google Scholar
Satz, Debra, 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be For Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel, 1997. “Relationships and Responsibilities”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26: 189-209.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K., 1977. “Rational Fools: a Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6: 317-344.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, 2009. The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet, 2011. “Picking Winners: Olympic Citizenship and the Global Race for Talent”, Yale Law Journal, 120: 2088-2139.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet and Hirschl, Ran, 2014. “On Citizenship, States, and Markets”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 22: 231-257.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg, 1990. The Philosophy of Money (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A., 1951. “A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship”, Econometrica, 19: 293-305.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, [1776] 1975. The Wealth of Nations, in Campbell, R. H., Skinner, A. S. and Todd, W. B., eds. (Oxford, Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Smith, Jay M., 1996. The Culture of Merit (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence, 1958. “The Inflation of Honours 1558-1641”, Past and Present, 14: 45-70.Google Scholar
Tobin, James, 1970. “On Limiting the Domain of Inequality”, Journal of Law and Economics, 13: 263-277.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H., 1985. “The Abortion Funding Conundrum: Inalienable Rights, Affirmative Duties, and the Dilemma of Dependence”, Harvard Law Review, 99: 330-343.Google Scholar
Trivers, Robert L., 1971. “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism”, Quarterly Review of Biology, 46: 35-57.Google Scholar
United Nations 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.html.Google Scholar
Vrousalis, Nicholas, 2012. “Jazz Bands, Camping Trips and Decommodification: G.A. Cohen on Community”, Socialist Studies, 8: 141-163.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, 1983. Spheres of Justice (Oxford, M. Robertson).Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E., 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting (New York, Free Press).Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A., 1996. “Payments and Social Ties”, Sociological Forum, 11: 481-495.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A., 2000. “The Purchase of Intimacy”, Law and Social Inquiry, 25: 817-843.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A., 2007. The Purchase of Intimacy (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar