Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T10:56:25.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropological thought in the wake of the French devolution:la Société des observateurs de l'homme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Benjamin Kilborne
Get access

Extract

In recent months a number of lively and stimulating papers have been published dealing with the meaning of history within the discipline of anthropology (Bermann 1978, Boon 1980, Cannon 1978, Cohn 1980, Higonnet 1980). In the literature, however, relatively little emphasis has been given to the variation in anthropological ideas within the tradition of anthropology. One very important aspect of such variation is to be found in the relationship between particular national cultural traditions and the development of anthropological ideas. Writers who have tended to see the history of the discipline in terms of biological paradigms, utilitarian behaviorism, and various conceptions of anthropology as 'objective' science, have failed to grasp adequately either the continuity or the range of variation within the anthropological tradition. Therefore, anthropologists and those thinking about the history of anthropology need to analyze anthropological ideas in historical context. Such an attempt to reconsider the past arouses opposition because it necessarily contradicts rationalist assumptions about anthropology as a science akin to the natural sciences, obedient to the laws of progress and independent of humanpreoccupations, a curious claim anyway for a science of man.

Type
Soziologische Selbstbespiegelung
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , May 1982 , pp. 73 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balfour, Henri, President's Address. The relationship of museums to the study of anthropology, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society XXXIV (1904), 10–20.Google Scholar
Berman, Morris, Social change and scientific organization. The Royal Institution 1799–1814 (Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Boon, James O., Comparative Deenlightenment: Paradox and limits in the history of ethnology, Daedalus, CIX (1980), 73–91Google Scholar
Buffon, Georges Louis Leclerc, Comte de, (Œuvres complètes) (ed. de LacéPède, Comte) (Paris, Rapet, 1817–1818).Google Scholar
Cabanis, Jean Georges, Coup doeil sur les révolutions et sur la réforme de la médecine (1795), in (Œuvres philosophiques, éditées par) Lehec, C. et Cazeneuve, J. (Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1956).Google Scholar
Cabanis, Jean Georges, Notice sur Benjamin Franklin (1798–1800?), in (Œuvres complètes) (Paris, Firmin-Didot, 1824) tome V.Google Scholar
Cabanis, Jean Georges, Rapports du physique et du moral de I'homme (1802), in (Œuvres complètes) (Paris, Firmin-Didot, 1824) tome V.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles, The utilitarious revisited, American Journal of Sociology, LXXXV (1979), 516–550.Google Scholar
Cannon, Susan Faye, Science in Culture: the early Victorian period (New York, Science History Publications, 1978).Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S., History and anthropology: the state of play, Comparative Studies in Society and History, XXII (1980), 198–221.Google Scholar
Copans, Jean and Jamin, Jean, AUX origines de Vanthropologie francaise (Paris, éditions Le Sycomore, 1978).Google Scholar
Crosland, Maurice, The Society of Arcueil: a view of French science at the time of Napoleon I (London, Heinemann, 1967).Google Scholar
Gaulmier, Jean, L'idéologue Volney 1757–1820. Contribution à l'histoire de l'orientalisme en France (Beyrouth, Impr. catholique Le Deux, 1951).Google Scholar
Gérando, Joseph-Marie de, Des signes et de l'art de penser considérés dans leurs rapports mutuels (Paris, Goujon fils, 1799), 4 volumes.Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles C., Science in the French Revolution (1959), in Barber, Bernard and Hirsch, Walker (eds), The Sociology of Science (Glencoe, The Free Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles C., The Encyclopedic and the Jacobin Philosophy of Science: a study in ideas and consequences, in Claghtt, Marshall (ed.), Critical Problems in the History of Science (Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Guillois, A., Le salon de Mme Helvétius (Paris, Calmann-Levy, 1894).Google Scholar
Gusdorp, , Georges, , La conscience révolutionnaire: les Idéologues (Paris, Payot, 1978).Google Scholar
Hallowell, A. Irving, The history of anthropology as an anthropological problem (1962), in Contributions to Anthropology: selected papers of A. Irving Hallowell (Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Hamy, E.T., Les origines du Musée d'ethnographie histoire et documents (Paris, Ernest Leroux, 1900).Google Scholar
Hamy, E.T., Les collections anthropologiques et ethnographiques du voyage de découvertes aux terres australes (1801–1804), Bulletin du Coimité des travaux historiques et scientifiques (1906), 1, pp. 24–34.Google Scholar
Higonnet, Patrice L.R., The politics of linguistic terrorism and grammatical hegemony during the French Revolution, Social History, V (1980), 41–69.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (Konigsberg, Friedrich, 1798). Transl. as Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View by Gregor, Mary J. (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Lanthu-Laura, Georges, Histoire de la phrénologie: l'homme et son cerveau selon F. J. Gall (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1970).Google Scholar
Lopez, Claude Anne, Mon Cher Papa Franklin and the Ladies of Paris (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Moravia, Alberto, La scienza dell'uomo nel Settecento (Rome, Laterza, 1970; revised ed.: 1978).Google Scholar
Picavet, P., Les idéalogues: essai sur l'histoire des idées et des théories scientifiques, philosophiques, religieuses, etc., en France depuis 1789 (Paris, Félix Alcan, 1891; reprint: New York, Arno Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Reboul, Robert Marie de, Louis-Franpois Jauffret: sa vie et ses ceuvres (Paris, J. Baur et Détaille, 1869).Google Scholar
Sicard, abbé Roch Ambroise Cucuhbon, dit, Elemens de grammaire générale, appliqués à la langue française (revised ed. Paris, Deterville, 1801).Google Scholar
Sicard, , Théorie des signes pour l'instruction des sourds-muets, suivie d'une notice sur l'enfance de Massieu (Paris, Impr. de l'lnstitution des sourds-muets, 1808).Google Scholar
Stocking, George, French anthropology in 1800, Isis, LV (1964), 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volney, comte de, Les mines ou Méditations sur les révolutions des Empires (Paris, Desneuve, 1791).Google Scholar
Volney, comte de, Voyage en Égypte et en Syrie (1787), édition critique par J. Gaulmier (Paris/ La Haye, Mouton, 1959).Google Scholar
Williams, L. Pearce, Science, Education and the French Revolution, Isis, XLIV (1953). 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. Pearce, Science, Education and Napoleon I, Isis, XLVII (1956), 369–382.Google Scholar
Williams, L. Pearce, The Politics of Science in the French Revolution, in Clagett, Marshall (ed.), Critical Problems in the History of Science (Madison, University of Madison, 1959).Google Scholar