Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:21:36.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Welfare State: A Fundamental Dimension of Modern Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2015

David Garland
David Garland*
Affiliation:
New York University [[email protected]].
Get access

Abstract

What, in fact, is the Welfare State? This article traces the emergence of the welfare state as a specific mode of government, describing its distinctive rationality as well as its characteristic forms, functions and effects. It identifies five sectors of welfare governance, the relations between them, and the various forms these take in different times and places. It discusses the contradictory commitments that shape welfare state practices and the problems associated with these practices and contradictions. It situates welfare state government within a long-term account of the changing relations between the social and the economic spheres. And it argues that the welfare state ought to be understood as a “normal social fact”—an essential (though constantly contested) part of the social and economic organization of modern capitalist societies.

Résumé

Qu'est-ce que l'Etat-providence? Nombre de commentateurs en font un moment historique dans la Grande-Bretagne de l'après-guerre ou l'Amérique du New Deal. Les académiques discutent de « la mort du social » et d'un glissement de « l'Etat social vers l'Etat pénal » comme si l'Etat-providence avait été transformé par le néo-libéralisme. Cet article retrace l'émergence de l'Etat-providence comme mode spécifique de gouvernance, en décrivant sa rationalité propre tout comme ses formes caractéristiques, ses fonctions et ses effets. Il identifie cinq secteurs de gouvernance de l'Etat-providence, leurs relations ainsi que les différentes formes qu'ils peuvent prendre en fonction de la période et des lieux observés. Il étudie les engagements contradictoires qui façonnent les pratiques de l'Etat-providence, tout comme les problèmes et contradictions associés à ces pratiques. Il situe le gouvernement de l'Etat-providence dans une analyse à long terme des relations évolutives entre les sphères sociale et économique. L'article propose de considérer l'Etat-providence comme un « fait social normal » – une partie essentielle (bien que constamment contestée) de l'organisation sociale et économiques des sociétés capitalistes modernes.

Zusammenfassung

Was ist ein Wohlfahrtsstaat? Zahlreiche Kommentatoren sprechen über ihn, als handele es sich um einen historischen Moment im Nachkriegsengland oder im Amerika des New Deal. Akademiker sprechen vom „Tod des Sozialen“ und vom Übergang des „Sozialstaats zum Strafstaat“, als ob der Sozialstaat vom Neoliberalismus verändert worden wäre. Dieser Aufsatz geht der Entstehung des Sozialstaats als spezifischer Regierungsform auf den Grund, wobei sowohl seine eigene Rationalität als auch seine charakteristischen Formen, Aufgaben und Auswirkungen beschrieben werden. Er identifiziert fünf Regierungsbereiche des Wohlfahrtsstaates, sowie deren, je nach Ära und Ort verschiedenen, Beziehungen und Ausformungen. Er untersucht die gegensätzlichen Versprechen, die den Wohlfahrtsstaat charakterisieren, sowie die Probleme und Widersprüche dieser Praktiken. Die Regierung des Wohlfahrtsstaates wird in eine Langzeituntersuchung der sich wandelnden Veränderungen zwischen sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Sphären einbezogen. Der Aufsatz schlägt vor, den Wohlfahrtsstaat als einen „normalen sozialen Sachverhalt“ zu begreifen – einen bedeutenden Bestandteil (obwohl dauernd angezweifelt) der sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Organisation der modernen kapitalistischen Gesellschaften.

Keywords

Welfare stateGovernmentalityCapitalismNeo-LiberalismMoral economyNormal social factEtat-providenceGouvernanceNéo-libéralismeEconomie moraleFait social normalWohlfahrtsstaatRegierungNeoliberalismusMoralische WirtschaftNormaler sozialer Sachverhalt
Type
Key Concept
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , December 2014 , pp. 327 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Appleby, Joyce, 2010. The Relentless Revolution: A History of Capitalism (New York, Norton).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Peter, 1992. The Politics of Social Solidarity (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Barr, Nicholas, 1992. “Economic Theory and the Welfare State: A Survey and Interpretation”, Journal of Economic Literature, 30 (2): 741-803.Google Scholar
Barr, Nicholas, 2001. The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, and Uncertainty and the Role of the State (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Beveridge, William, 1942. Social Insurance and Allied Services (London, HMSO).Google Scholar
Beveridge, William, 1944. Full Employment in a Free Society (London, George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Beveridge, William, 1997. “Classifying Welfare States: A Two-Dimensional Approach”, Journal of Social Policy 26 (3): 351-372.Google Scholar
Beveridge, William, 2007. The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies to the New Social Risks (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa, 1961. “The Welfare State in Historical Perspective”, European Journal of Sociology, 2 (2): 221-58.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G., Leibfried, Stephan, Lewis, Jane, Obinger, Herbert and Pierson, Christopher, eds., 2010. Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Chakrabortty, Aditya, 2013. “The Welfare State: An Obituary”, The Guardian, 7 January.Google Scholar
Donzelot, Jacques, 1980. The Policing of Families (London, Hutcheson).Google Scholar
Duménil, Gérard and Levy, Dominique, 2004. Capital Resurgent: Roots of the Neoliberal Revolution (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile, 2013. The Rules of Sociological Method (London, Palgrave MacMillan).Google Scholar
Edgerton, David, 2005. Warfare State: Britain 1920-1970 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge, Polity Press).Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ewald, François, 1986. Histoire de l’État-providence (Paris, Grasset).Google Scholar
Ferragina, Emanuele and Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin, 2011. “Welfare Regime Debate: Past, Present, Future” Policy and Politics, 39 (4): 583-611.Google Scholar
Flora, Peter and Heidenheimer, Arnold J., eds., 2005. The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America (New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1991. “Governmentality” in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P., eds., The Foucault Effect (London, Harvester).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977-1978 (New York, Palgrave MacMillan).Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, 1987. “Women, Welfare and the Politics of Needs Interpretation”, Thesis Eleven, 17: 88-106.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, Ian, 1979. The Political Economy of the Welfare State (London, MacMillan).Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard, 2011. The Illusion of Free Markets (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Harris, Jose 1972. Unemployment and Politics: A Study of English Social Policy, 1886-1914 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Harvey, David, 1995. A Brief History of Neoliberalism (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A.von, 1944. The Road to Serfdom (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh, 2010. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden (Colchester, ECPR Press).Google Scholar
Hirshman, Albert O., 1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before its Triumph (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Hirshman, Albert O., 1991. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Hirshman, Albert O., 1992. “The Welfare State in Trouble: Structural Crisis or Growing Pains” in Rival Views of Market Society and other Recent Essays (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul Q., 1981. “The Genesis of the Social”, Politics and Power, 3: 67-82.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, 1996. The Age of Extremes: A History of the World 1914-1991 (New York, Vintage Books).Google Scholar
Hong, Young-Sun, 1998. Welfare, Modernity and the Weimar State, 1919-1933 (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher, 1997. The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael, 1984. The Needs of Strangers (London, Chatto & Windus).Google Scholar
Judt, Tony (2010) Ill Fares the Land: A Treatise on Our Present Discomforts (New York, Allen Lane).Google Scholar
Keynes, John M., 1926. The End of Laissez-faire (London, Hogarth Press).Google Scholar
King, Desmond, 1995. Actively Seeking Work: The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare in the United States and Great Britain (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Kristof, Nicholas, 2014. “A Nation of Takers?” New York Times, 26 March. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/27/opinion/kristof-a-nation-of-takers.html?_r=0Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul, 2007. The Conscience of a Liberal (New York, Norton).Google Scholar
Le Grand, Julian, 1982. The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
Marmor, Theodore R. et al. ., 1990. America’s Misunderstood Welfare State: Persistent Myths, Enduring Realities (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas H., 1963. Sociology at the Crossroads (London, Heineman).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, 1848/2012. The Communist Manifesto (New York, Verso).Google Scholar
McKibben, Ross, 2013. “Anything But Benevolent”, London Review of Books, 35 (8), 23rd April.Google Scholar
Meek, James, 2011. “It’s Already Happened”, London Review of Books, 33 (18), 22 September: 3-10.Google Scholar
Murray, Charles, 1984. Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950-80 (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie, 2010. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pepler, Hilary D. C., 1915. Justice and the Child (London, Constable).Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul, 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment, revised edition (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Plant, Raymond, 2010. The Neo-liberal State (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl, 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (New York, Farrar and Rinehart).Google Scholar
Prasad, Monica, 2012. The Land of Too Much: American Abundance and the Paradox of Poverty (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Dana and Arkin, William, 2011. Top Secret America: The New American Security State (Boston, Little Brown).Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, 1996. “The Death of the Social? Refiguring the Territory of Government”, Economy and Society, 25 (3): 327-356.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo, 2011. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust and Inequality in International Perspective (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Rowntree, Benjamin S., 1935/1941. Poverty and Progress: A Second Survey of York (London, Longmans Green).Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph, 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
Scott, James C., 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Subsistence and Rebellion in Southeast Asia (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan, 2007. “Rise of the Carceral State”, Social Research, 74 (2): 471-508.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 2010. “A genealogy of the concept of the state” in Hent, Kalmo and Skinner, Quentin eds., Sovereignty in Fragments.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa, 2013. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sowell, Thomas, 2006. On Classical Economics New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, 2011. “The Crises of Democratic Capitalism”, New Left Review, 71: 5-29.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, 2012. “How to Study Contemporary Capitalism” European Journal of Sociology 53 (1): 1-28.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward P., 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the 18th Century”, Past & Present, 50: 76-136.Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M., 1958. Essays on ‘The Welfare State’ (London, Unwin Books).Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M., 1968. Commitment to Welfare (London, Harper Collins).Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M., 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy (London, Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Jim, 1990. Public Policy and the Economy Since 1900 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Toye, Richard, 2010. “Winston Churchill’s ‘Crazy Broadcast’: Party, Nation and the 1945 Gestapo Speech”, Journal of British Studies, 49 (3): 655-680.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob, 1960. “The Intellectual History of Laissez Faire”, Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 45-69.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc, 2009. Punishing the Poor (Durham, Duke University Press).Google Scholar
Waltzer, Michael, 1984. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Webb, Beatrice, 1909. The Minority Report to the Poor Law Commission (London, Printed for the National Committee to Promote the Break-up of the Poor Law).Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney, 1926. “The End of Laissez Faire”, The Economic Journal, 36 (143): 443-441.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1948. “Politics as a Vocation” in Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C., eds., From Max Weber (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L., 1975. The Welfare State and Equality: Stuctural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Witt, John F., 2004. The Accidental Republic (Cambridge, Harvard).Google Scholar
Yergin, Daniel and Stanislaw, Joseph, 2002. The Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy Revised Edition (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar