Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:39:37.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regulations under International Human Rights Law and under EU Law - Two Different Regimes that Could be Better Harmonized?

The Case of Food and Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Wenche Barth Eide
Affiliation:
University of Oslo’s Department of Nutrition and Coordinator of Food, Human Rights and Corporations (FoHRC)
Asbjørn Eide
Affiliation:
University of Oslo’s Norwegian Centre for Human Rights

Extract

The global obesity epidemic was in focus at the 7th Summer Academy on Global Food Law and Policy in Gexco/Bilbao in July 2015. It approached this accelerating public health concern from the angle of risk regulations as linked to processing, trade, marketing and choice/consumption of foodstuffs, addressing also risks of negative impacts on public health at the consumer end. A wealth of expertise enlightened participants about current developments regarding EU and US legislation on risk assessments and risk management.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1- Alemanno, Alberto and Garde, Amandine, Regulating Lifestyles in Europe. How to Prevent and Control Non-Communicable Diseases Associated with Tobacco, Alcohol and Unhealthy Diets? (Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 2013), Stockholm: SIEPS. Available on the internet: http://www.sieps.se/sites/default/files/Sieps_2013_7%20WEBB.pdf Google Scholar

2- United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (UNCESCR), General Comment No. 12 on the right to adequate food, (UNCESCR, 1999), Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Available on Internet at: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/escgencom12.htm (Accessed 15.12.15.)Google Scholar

3- Supra note 1, p.

4- United Nations, UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP). Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework, (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2011), available on the internet: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf Google Scholar

5- Shift, and Mazar, , Human Rights Reporting and Assurance Framework, (Shift Projectm February 2015), available on the internet: http://www.shiftproject.org/project/human-rights-reporting-and-assurance-frameworks-initiative-rafi (Accessed 16.12.15)Google Scholar.

6- http://www.ungpreporting.org/ (Accessed 15.12.15).

7- General Comment 12 on the right to adequate food, supra note 2.

8- UNCESCR, General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12 of the Covenant), 11 August 2000, E/C.12/2000/4, Available on the internet at: http:// www.refworld.org/docid/4538838d0.html [accessed 17 December 2015]Google Scholar.

9- World Health Organization, Set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children (Geneva WHO, 2010), available on the internet: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44416/1/9789241500210_eng.pdf Google Scholar.

10- WHO, A framework for implementing the set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children (WHO, 2012), available on the internet: http://www.who. int/dietphysicalactivity/MarketingFramework2012.pdf Google Scholar.

11- WHO Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity (ECHO), Draft Final Report, 2015, WHO, Geneva. See: http://www.who.int/end-childhood-obesity/commission-ending-childhood-obesity-draft-final-report-en.pdf (Accessed 15.12.15)Google Scholar.

13- United Nations, Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN COP21, November 2015) U.N.Doc. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1, Accessible in the internet: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.