Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:34:35.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food Sharing in Europe: Between Regulating Risks and the Risks of Regulating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Karolina Zurek
Karolina Zurek*
Affiliation:
Swedish National Board of Trade and Stockholm University, European University Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Underground kitchens, public fridges and local meals at strangers’ homes offer an interesting and economically attractive alternatives to traditional channels of food distribution. The new practices of food sharing facilitated by technological development and using new social media combine an interest in modern engaged consumerism with a promise of more sustainable food chains and waste reduction. The main objective of this article is to map and analyse the risks and regulatory challenges posed by the variety of emerging sharing economy practices in the food sector. Drawing on the identification of the key features of sharing economy and the specificity of food in that context, this article discusses various forms, scales and motivations behind the existing food sharing initiatives. The article describes three main categories of food sharing models, namely harvest sharing, meal sharing and leftover sharing, and illustrates them with concrete examples of networks or platforms. Against this background, the article scrutinizes the major risks and challenges of food sharing, ranging from individual and public health and safety to market fragmentation. Reviewing the available regulatory options to address these risks, and juxtaposing them with the risks stemming out of regulatory intervention as such, the contribution calls for balanced approach to food sharing governance in the European Union.

Type
Special Issue on the Risks and Opportunities of the Sharing Economy
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 675 - 687
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1- Belk, Russell, ‘Sharing’ (2010) 36 journal of Consumer Research 715–734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Curven, Michael and Jaeggi, Adrian V., ‘Food Sharing’ in Scott, Robert A. and Kosslyn, Stephen M. (eds) Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioural Studies (Wiley & Sons 2015)Google Scholar.

2- Lessons on food sharing from anthropology and behavioural studies are based on recent article by Gurven and Jaeggi and literature review provided therein, ibid

3- Felländer, Anna, Ingram, Claire and Teigland, Robin, Sharing economy. Embracing change with caution (Näringspolitiskt Forum Rapport #11, 2015) 7 Google Scholar

4- Cohen, Molly and Sundararajan, Arun, ‘Self-regulation and innovation in the peer-to-peer sharing economy’ [2015] 82 University of Chicago Law Review Dialogue 116 Google Scholar

5- European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy [2016] COM(2016) 356 final, 3 Google Scholar

6- Hamari, Juho, Sjöklint, Mimmi and Ukkonen, Antti, ‘The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption’ [2015] Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, doi:10.1002/asi.23552Google Scholar

7- Fernández-Armesto, Felipe, Food: A History (Macmillan, 2001)Google Scholar

8- van Waarden, Frans, ‘Tastes, Traditions, Transactions and Trust: The Public and Private Regulation of Food’ in Ansell, Christopher and Vogel, David (eds), What’s the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety (MIT Press, 2001)Google Scholar.

9- See evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals by the UN, pertaining to Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger <http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/poverty.shtml> accessed 9 August 2016.

10- FAO, IFAD and WFP, The State of Food Insecurity in the World: Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress (FAO 2015) and Coleman-Jensen, Alisha et al., Household food security in the U.S. in 2012 (USDA, 2013)Google Scholar.

11- Alisha Coleman-Jenssen, ibid, 6-8 and Marc-Tizoc Gonzales, ‘Hunger, Poverty and the Criminalization of Food Sharing in the New Gilded Age’ [2015] 23 Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 1-2.

12- Eurostat, Living Conditions in Europe. 2014 Edition (Eurostat, 2014) 26–44 Google Scholar.

13- Echols, Marsha A., Food Safety and the WTO. The Interplay of Culture, Science and Technology (Kluwer Law International, 2001)Google Scholar; Josling, Timothy, Roberts, Donna and Orden, David, Food Regulation and Trade: Toward a Safe and Global System (Institute for International Economics, 2004)Google Scholar; Zurek, Karolina, European Food Regulation after Enlargement: Facing the Challenges of Diversity (Brill, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14- OECD, Household food consumption: trends, environmental impacts and policy responses, Sustainable consumption: sector case study series, ENV/EPOC/WPNEP(2001)13/FINAL (OECD, 2001) 8–9 Google Scholar

15- FAO, Key facts on food loss and waste you should know! <http://www.fao.org/save-food/resources/keyfindings/en/> accessed 9 August 2016 +accessed+9+August+2016>Google Scholar

16- See for example FAO, Mitigation of food wastage. Societal costs and benefits [2014] <http://www.fao.Org/publications/card/en/c/a530f2ad-499c-400f-b9c0-6c8988f2ee9d/> accessed 9 August 2016 +accessed+9+August+2016>Google Scholar

17- Piergiuseppe Morone et al., Tackling food waste through a sharing economy approach: an experimental analysis (MPRA Paper No. 70626, 2016) and Rombach, Meike and Bitsch, Vera, ‘Food movements in Germany: Slow Food, Food Sharing and Dumpster Diving’ [2015] 13 International Food and Agribusiness Management Review Google Scholar

18- OECD, The development effectiveness of food aid. Does tying matter? (OECD, 2006)Google Scholar

19- Mousseau, Frederic, Food Aid or Food Sovereignty? Ending World Hunger in our Time (The Oakland Institute, 2005)Google Scholar

20- OECD, The development effectiveness…cit., 11.

21- Social supermarkets typically offer low-price grocery products, which were donated by producers and retailers, and which are withdrawn from the traditional distribution channels, to low-income consumers.

22- Norden, , Food redistribution in the Nordic region. Experiences and results from a pilot study (TemaNord 2014:562) 9-10Google Scholar

23- E.g. digital food pantries, see for example Rosenberg, Tina, ‘To Feed More, Food Pantries Learn From Supermarkets’ The New York Times, Opinionator, 22 May 2015 <http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/allying-choice-and-nutrition-at-food-pantries/?_r=0> accessed 9 August 2016 +accessed+9+August+2016>Google Scholar

24- For example, social supermarkets, see Holweg, Christina and Lienbacher, Eva, ‘Social Supermarkets-a New Challenge in Supply Chain Management and Sustainability’ [2010] 11 Supply Chain Management and the Retail Industry 50 Google Scholar.

25- According to the information available on the Fruktförmedlingen website, domestic commercial production of apples in Sweden in 2010 amounted to 23 500 tonnes, and import of apples in 2006 amounted to 108 000 tonnes <http://www.aktavara.org/Pages.aspx?r_id=127718> accessed 14 August 2016

26- It has to be emphasised here that some food related risks, such as those linked to the specific requirements for transport of certain types of food, which are necessary to guarantee its safety and quality, will remain applicable.

27- See for example: Bessiere, Jacinthe, ‘Local development and heritage: traditional food and cuisine as tourist attractions in rural areas’ [1998] 38 Sociologia Ruralis 21–34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28- BBC News Magazine, ‘The home-chefs causing panic in restaurants’ BBC News Magazine (29 October 2015)Google Scholar, Pitts, Giles, ‘Airbnb for supper clubs: why chefs are upset about meal-sharing websites’ The Guardian (12 November 2015)Google Scholar, as well as academic analysis in Schindler, Sarah, ‘Regulating the Underground: Secret Supper Clubs, Pop-Up Restaurants and the Role of Law’ [2015] 82 University of Chicago Law Review Dialogue 16–34 Google Scholar

29- A study dedicated to the activity of Food Sharing, as well as Slow Food and Dumpster Diving in Germany in Meike Rombach & Vera Bitsch, supra, note 17

30- Marshall, Aarian, ‘Berlin’s Public Refrigerators Were Just Declared a Health Hazard’ The Atlantic Citylab (12 February 2016) <http://www.citylab.com/politics/2016/02/berlin-public-refridgerator-food-sharing-germany/462633/> accessed 1 October 2016 Google Scholar

31- BBC News, ‘Frome’s community fridge aims to reduce ‘avoidable’ food waste’ BBC News (30 April 2016) <http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-somerset-36177455> accessed 1 October 2016 +accessed+1+October+2016>Google Scholar

32- On risk perception and consumer behavior see: Verbekea, Wim, Frewerb, Lynn J., Scholdererc, Joachim, de Brabanderd, Hubert F., ‘Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information’ [2007] 586 Analytica Chimica Acta 2–7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33- Rosset, Peter M., Food is Different. Why We Must Get the WTO out of Agriculture (Zed Books, 2006)Google Scholar

34- WHO, Foodborne diseases outbreaks: Guidelines for investigation and control (WHO, 2008)Google Scholar

35- Bensoff, Sarah, ‘May Contain: Allergen Labeling Regulations’ [2014] 162 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1465–1493 Google Scholar

36- European Commission, From Farm to Fork, Safe Food to Europe’s Consumers (European Commission, 2004)Google Scholar

37- Dreyer, Marion and Renn, Ortwin, Food Safety Governance: Integrating Science, Precaution and Public Involvement (Springer, 2009)Google Scholar

38- See for example: Marc-Tizoc Gonzales, ‘Hunger, Poverty and the Criminalization of Food Sharing…’ supra, note 11

39- <http://www.senat.fr/leg/tas15-080.html> accessed 1 October 2016

40- <http://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/food_waste/eu_actions/date _marking/index_en.htm> accessed 1 October 2016

41- <http://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/food_waste/eu_actions/eu -platform/index_en.htm> accessed 1 October 2016

42- WHO, Foodborne diseases…, supra, note 34

43- Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [2002] OJ L 31, art. 3(15) and 18.

44- Ibid, art. 50-56

45- See for example: European Commission, Staff Working Document Accompanying the Document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy, ‘European agenda for the collaborative economy – supporting analysis’ [2016] SWD(2016) 184 final, 6Google Scholar

46- For example Finland uses an annual turnover threshold in exempting sharing economy services in the transport sector. UK, France and the Netherlands, when establishing professionalism in the area of housing services use the minimum number of days to distinguish between peer-to-peer short term rentals and those requiring authorisation. See more in the European Commission, Staff Working Document, ibid, 27

47- European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. ‘A European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy’ [2016] COM(2016) 356 final, 9Google Scholar

48- In Sweden, for example, there is an ongoing study initiated by the government concerning efficient taxation of sharing economy, with a final report to be delivered in October 2016.

49- European Commission, Staff Working Document, supra, note 45, 41.

50- European Commission, Staff Working Document, supra, note 45, 41

51- European Commission, Staff Working Document, supra, note 45, 20

52- European Commission, Communication from the Commission, supra, note 47, 2

53- European Commission, Staff Working Document, supra, note 45, 20

54- See for example discussion in Molly Cohen and Arun Sundararajan, ‘Self-regulation and Innovation…’ supra, note 4, 116-133.

55- EurActiv, ‘“Sharing economy” turns to insurers for risk protection’ EurActiv (7 June 2016) <https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/insurance-sector-key-partner-in-developing-sharing-economy-platforms> accessed 1 October 2016+accessed+1+October+2016>Google Scholar

56- European Commission, Communication from the Commission, supra, note 47

57- Ibid, 16

58- See for example: Ranchordás, Sofia, ‘Does Sharing Mean Caring? Regulating Innovation in the Sharing Economy’ [2015] 16 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 30 Google Scholar.

59- Braithwaite, John, ‘Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty’ [2002] 27 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 47–82 Google Scholar

60- Sofa Ranchordás, ‘Does Sharing Mean Caring?…’ supra, note 59, 37-39