Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:26:17.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Autonomous Intelligent Systems as Creative Agents under the EU framework for Intellectual Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Madeleine de Cock Buning
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent advancement in technology in the domain of Autonomous Intelligent Systems (AIS) shall eventually lead to autonomous technology that can perceive, learn, decide and create without any human intervention. Already now there are robots that create better versions of robots and computer programmes that produce other computer programmes. Although the ability to create is a quality that has traditionally been considered a human capacity, the sudden increase in the level of complexity of such systems as well as their learning abilities, shall ultimately render human intervention in the process of creation redundant. This makes the need to address creative agents and the challenges they bring ever more evident. This contribution assesses the output of AIS as Creative Agents and its relation to the EU framework for Intellectual Property.

Type
Special Issue on the Man and the Machine
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 310 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Turing, Alan, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, 59 Mind (1950) 236, pp. 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Boyle, James, “Endowed by their Creator? The Future of Constitutional Personhood”, The Future of the Constitution Series No. 10, 9 March 2011 (hereinafter: Boyle 2011), at p. 10.Google Scholar

3 The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’, SEC(2011) 1427 – 1428 final, COM(2012) 808 final (Horizon 2020).

4 See the future annex 7 to the Decision, ‘Work Programme 2013, Cooperation Theme 3, ICT[…]’, ECC(2012), draft available via http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/programme/challenge2_en.html (hereinafter: Work Programme 2013).

5 Work Programme 2013, at p. 33.

6 Jeroen Kraan:“Google datastofzuiger biedt steeds meer ‘briljant griezelige’ trucjes” Nu.nl, 29 May 2015, available on the Internet at <http://www.nu.nl/weekend/4057880/googles-datastofzuiger-biedt-steeds-meer-briljant-griezelige-trucjes.html> (last accessed on 14 December 2015).

7 Hannah Devlin, “Google a step closer to developing machines with human-like intelligence”, The Guardian, 21 May 2015, available on the Internet at <http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/may/21/google-a-step-closer-to-developing-machines-with-human-like-intelligence> (last accessed on 14 december 2015).

8 Asaro, Peter, “A Body to Kick But Still No Soul to Damn: Legal Perspectives on Robotics”, in: Patrick Lin, Keith Abney & George. Baker (eds), Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012) (hereinafter: Asaro 2012), p. 169.Google Scholar

9 McCarthy, Natasha, “Autonomous Systems: Social, Legal and Ethical Issues” (London: Royal Academy of Engineering 2009), at p. 2;Google Scholar Calverley, David, “Imagining a non-biological machine as a legal person”, 22 AI & Soc (2008), at p. 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Davies, Colin, “An evolutionary step in intellectual property rights – Artificial intelligence and intellectual property”, 27 Computer Law & Security Review (2011), pp. 601 et sqq., at p. 603;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Jack Copeland, “What is artificial Intelligence?”, May 2000, available on the Internet at <http://www.alanturing.net/turing_archive/pages/Reference%20Articles/What%20is%20AI.html> (last accessed on 14 October 2015). Also: Solum, Lawrence, “Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences”, 70 North Carolina Law Review (1992), pp. 1234–1238.Google Scholar

11 Ernest Davies, “The Singularity and the State of the Art in Artificial Intelligence”, Magazine Ubiquity October 2014, available on the Internet at <https://www.cs.nyu.edu/davise/papers/singularity.pdf> (hereinafter: Davies 2014), p. 1 (last accessed on 14 December 2015).

12 Kurzweil, Ray, “The Singularity is Near. When Humans Transcend Biology”, New York: Viking 2005 (hereinafter: Kurzweil 2005), p. 35, pp. 127–166.Google Scholar

13 Trevor Mogg “Meet Robear, the Japanese Robot Nurse With the Face of a Bear”, 26 February 2015, available on the Internet at: <http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/riken-robear/#/2> (last accessed on 14 December 2015).

14 Oliver Wainwright “The iCubs are coming! How robots could teach our kids and do our dirty work”, The Guardian, 20 May 2015, available on the Internet at: <http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/may/20/icub-robots-teach-kids-work-dance-swear-snog> (last accessed on 14 December 2015); see also: <http://www.icub.org/> for more information.