Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:27:48.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

World Systems, Cores, and Peripheries in Prehistoric Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Anthony Harding
Anthony Harding*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
*
[email: [email protected]]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper reviews the rise and utility of World Systems Theory in archaeology, with particular reference to Europe and the Bronze Age. After a consideration of its origins in the 1970s and 1980s, the main aspects of the theory are discussed. The evidence that shows that the Bronze Age world was highly interconnected is presented, and the implications of a World Systems view of the period considered. In an attempt to work towards a new narrative of the European Bronze Age, a brief discussion of network methods is introduced, since these offer an alternative, ‘bottom-up’, approach to the period which, it is argued, is more appropriate to the data than the World Systems approach.

Dans cet article on examine la montée et l'utilité du concept du système-monde en archéologie, plus particulièrement en ce qui concerne l'Europe et l'Âge du Bronze. Après avoir analysé ses origines dans les années 1970 et 1980, on étudie les principaux aspects de cette théorie et on présente les éléments de preuve démontrant que l'Âge du Bronze était fortement interrelié. Enfin sont examinées les implications d'une approche de cette période qui se base sur le concept du système-monde. Afin d'établir une nouvelle vision de l'Âge du Bronze en Europe, une brève explication de la manière de fonctionnement des réseaux s'impose, car ces méthodes proposent une approche alternative ‘ascendante’ de la période qui semble plus appropriée aux données que le concept du système-monde. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag betrachtet die Entwicklung und Anwendung der Weltsystem-Theorie in der Archäologie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung Europas und der Bronzezeit. Nach einer Erörterung ihrer Ursprünge in den 1970er und 1980er Jahren werden die wichtigsten Aspekte dieser Theorie diskutiert. Es werden weiterhin die Indizien, dass die bronzezeitliche Welt intensiv vernetzt war, dargelegt sowie die Auswirkungen einer Weltsystem-Sicht der Zeitepoche behandelt. Um der Geschichtsschreibung der europäischen Bronzezeit neue Impulse zu vermitteln, wird eine kurze Diskussion von Netzwerkmethoden angeschlossen, da diese einen alternativen Bottom-Up-Ansatz zu dieser Periode bieten, der, wie hier ausgeführt wird, den Daten angemessener ist als die Methodik der Weltsystem-Theorie. Translation by Heiner Schwarzberg.

Keywords

World Systems TheoryWorld-Systems AnalysisCore-Periphery TheoryBronze AgeEuropenetwork analysisconcept du système-mondeanalyse du système-mondethéorie du centre et de la périphérieÂge du BronzeEuropeanalyse des réseauxWeltsystem-TheorieWeltsystem-AnalyseKern-Peripherie-TheorieBronzezeitEuropaNetzwerkanalyse
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , 2013 , pp. 378 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2013 

References

Abu-Lughod, J.L. 1989. Before European Hegemony. The World System A.D. 1250–1350. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ammann, B., Furger, A.R., Joos, M., Liese-Kleiber, H. 1977. Die neolithischen Ufersiedlungen von Twann, Band 3. Der bronzezeitliche Einbaum und die nachneolithischen Sedimente. Bern: Staatlicher Lehrmittelverlag.Google Scholar
Anfinset, N., Wrigglesworth, M. eds. 2012. Local Societies in Bronze Age Northern Europe. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Arnoldussen, S., Fokkens, H. eds. 2008. Bronze Age Settlements in the Low Countries. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Barfield, T.J. 1989. The Perilous Frontier. Nomadic Empires and China, 221 BC to AD 1757. Cambridge MA and Oxford: Blackwell. Studies in Social Discontinuity.Google Scholar
Bass, G.F., Pulak, C., Collon, D., Weinstein, J. 1989. The Bronze Age Shipwreck at Ulu Burun: 1986 Campaign. American Journal of Archaeology, 93: 1–29.Google Scholar
Berezanskaja, S.S., Kločko, V.I. 1998. Das Gräberfeld von Hordeevka. Rahden/Westf.: Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH. Archäologie in Eurasien, Band 5.Google Scholar
Berg, I. 1999. The Southern Aegean System. Journal of World-Systems Research, 5: 475–84.Google Scholar
Bergerbrant, S. 2007. Bronze Age Identities: Costume, Conflict and Contact in Northern Europe 1600–1300 BC. Lindome: Bricoleur Press. Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 43.Google Scholar
Bintliff, J.L. 1997. Regional Survey, Demography, and the Rise of Complex Societies in the Ancient Aegean: Core-Periphery, Neo-Malthusian, and Other Interpretive Models. Journal of Field Archaeology, 24: 1–38.Google Scholar
Bjorhem, N., Säfvestad, U. 1993. Fosie IV. Bebyggelsen under brons- och järnalder. Malmö: Malmö Museer. Malmöfynd 6.Google Scholar
Bouzek, J. 1969. Homerisches Griechenland im Lichte der archäologischen Quellen. Prague: Universita Karlova. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philosophica et Historica, Monographia 29.Google Scholar
Bouzek, J. 1985. The Aegean, Anatolia and Europe: Cultural Interrelations in the Second Millennium B.C. Prague and Göteborg: Academia/Paul Åström.Google Scholar
Bouzek, J. 1994. Late Bronze Age Greece and the Balkans: A Review of the Present Picture. Annual of the British School at Athens, 89: 217–34.Google Scholar
Brughmans, T. 2012. Thinking through Networks: a Review of Formal Network Methods in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19.Google Scholar
Champion, T.C. ed. 1989a. Centre and Periphery: Comparative Studies in Archaeology. London: Routledge. One World Archaeology.Google Scholar
Champion, T.C. 1989b. Introduction. In: Champion, T.C, ed. Centre and Periphery. Comparative Studies in Archaeology. London: Unwin Hyman. One World Archaeology 11, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Chase-Dunn, C., Hall, T.D. eds. 1991. Core/Periphery Relations in Precapitalist Worlds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Chase-Dunn, C., Hall, T.D. 1993. Comparing World-Systems: Concepts and Working Hypotheses. Social Forces, 71: 851–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czebreszuk, J. 2011. Bursztyn w kulturze mykeńskiej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.Google Scholar
David, W. 1997. Altbronzezeitliche Beinobjekte des Karpatenbeckens mit Spiralwirbel- oder Wellenbandornament und ihre Parallelen auf der Peloponnes und in Anatolien in frühmykenischen Zeit. In: Roman, P.I., ed. The Thracian World at the Crossroads of Civilizations I (Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Thracology, Constanţa-Mangalia-Tulcea 1996). Bucharest: Institutul Român de Tracologie, pp. 247–305.Google Scholar
Dietler, M. 1998. Consumption, Agency, and Cultural Entanglement: Theoretical Implications of a Mediterranean Colonial Encounter. In: Cusick, J.G., ed. Studies in Culture Contact: Interaction, Culture Change and Archaeology. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 25, pp. 288–315.Google Scholar
Ehser, A., Borg, G., Pernicka, E. 2011. Provenance of the Gold of the Early Bronze Age Nebra Sky Disk, Central Germany: Geochemical Characterization of Natural Gold from Cornwall. European Journal of Mineralogy, 23: 895–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J.A., Chenery, C.A., Fitzpatrick, A.P. 2006. Bronze Age Childhood Migration of Individuals near Stonehenge, Revealed by Strontium and Oxygen Isotope Tooth Enamel Analysis. Archaeometry, 48: 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, V. 2010. Les bronzes en contexte palafittique sur les rives du Léman et des Trois-Lacs (Suisse occidentale). , Faculté des Sciences, Université de Genève. Geneva: Atelier d'impression ReproMail.Google Scholar
Fischer, V. 2011. The Deposition of Bronzes at Swiss Lakeshore Settlements: New Investigations. Antiquity, 85: 1298–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, A.P. 2011. The Amesbury Archer and the Boscombe Bowmen - Bell Beaker Burials at Boscombe Down, Amesbury, Wiltshire. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Wessex Archaeology, Report 27.Google Scholar
Flammini, R. 2011. Northeast Africa and the Levant in Connection: a World-Systems Perspective on Interregional Relationships in the Early Second Millennium BC. In: Wilkinson, T.C., Sherratt, S., Bennet, J., eds. Interweaving Worlds: Systemic Interactions in Eurasia, 7th to 1st millennia BC. Papers from a Conference in Memory of Professor Andrew Sherratt. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 205–17.Google Scholar
Frank, A.G. 1993. Bronze Age World System Cycles. Current Anthropology, 34: 383–429.Google Scholar
Frank, A.G., Gills, B.K. eds. 1993. The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedman, J., Rowlands, M.J. 1977. Notes towards an Epigenetic Model of the Evolution of ‘Civilization’. In: Friedman, J., Rowlands, M.J., eds. The Evolution of Social Systems. London: Duckworth, pp. 201–78.Google Scholar
Geschwinde, M. 2000. Die Hügelgräber auf der Grossen Heide bei Ripdorf im Landkreis Uelzen. Wachholtz: Neumünster. Göttinger Schriften zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte, 27.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, M. 1965. Bronze Age Cultures in Central and Eastern Europe. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Hall, T.D., Chase-Dunn, C. 1993. The World-Systems Perspective and Archaeology: Forward into the Past. Journal of Archaeological Research, 1: 121–43.Google Scholar
Harding, A. 1984. The Mycenaeans and Europe. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harding, A. 2007. Interconnections between the Aegean and Continental Europe in the Bronze and Early Iron Ages: Moving beyond Scepticism. In: Galanaki, I., Tomas, H., Galanakis, Y., Laffineur, R., eds. Between the Aegean and Baltic Seas: Prehistory across Borders (Proceedings of the International Conference Bronze and Early Iron Age Interconnections and Contemporary Developments between the Aegean and the Regions of the Balkan Peninsula, Central and Northern Europe, Zagreb April 2005). Liège and Austin: University de Liège and University of Austin at Texas. Aegaeum 27, pp. 47–56.Google Scholar
Haustein, M., Gillis, C., Pernicka, E. 2010. Tin Isotopy – a New Method for Solving Old Questions. Archaeometry, 52: 816–32.Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A. 1991. Räumliche Mobilität von Personen in der mittleren Bronzezeit des westlichen Mitteleuropa. Germania, 69: 49–62.Google Scholar
Johansen, K.L., Laursen, S.T., Holst, M.K. 2004. Spatial Patterns of Social Organization in the Early Bronze Age of South Scandinavia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 23: 33–55.Google Scholar
Kardulias, P.N. 1999a. Flaked Stone and the Role of the Palaces in the Mycenaean World-System. In: Parkinson, W.A., Galaty, M.L., eds. Rethinking Mycenaean Palaces: New Interpretations of an Old Idea. Los Angeles: UCLA Institute of Archaeology, pp. 61–71.Google Scholar
Kardulias, P.N. 1999b. Multiple Levels in the Aegean Bronze Age World-System. In: Kardulias, P.N., ed. World-Systems Theory in Practice. New York and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 179–201.Google Scholar
Kardulias, P.N. ed. 1999c. World-Systems Theory in Practice. Leadership, Production and Exchange. Lanham/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Kardulias, P.N. 2002. Review of European Societies in the Bronze Age, by A F Harding. American Antiquity, 67: 582–83.Google Scholar
Kardulias, P.N. 2007. Negotiation and Incorporation on the Margins of World-Systems: Examples from Cyprus and North America. Journal of World-Systems Research, 13: 55–82.Google Scholar
Kardulias, P.N. 2009. World-Systems Applications for Understanding the Bronze Age in the Eastern Mediterranean. In: Parkinson, W.A., Galaty, M.L., eds. Archaic State Interaction. The Eastern Mediterranean in the Bronze Age. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press, pp. 53–80.Google Scholar
Kardulias, P.N., Hall, T.D. 2008. Archaeology and World-Systems Analysis. World Archaeology, 40 (4): 572–83.Google Scholar
Kimmig, W. 1964. Seevölkerbewegung und Urnenfelderkultur. Ein archäologisch-historischer Versuch. In: Uslar, R.V., Narr, K.J. eds. Studien aus Alteuropa, Teil 1. Köln-Graz: Böhlau Verlag, pp. 220–83.Google Scholar
Knape, A., Nordström, H.-Å. 1994. Der Kultgegenstand von Balkåkra. Stockholm: Statens Historiska Museum. Museum of National Antiquities, Stockholm, Monographs, 3.Google Scholar
Knappett, C. 2011. An Archaeology of Interaction. Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knappett, C. ed. 2013. Network Analysis in Archaeology. New Approaches to Regional Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Knappett, C., Evans, T., Rivers, R. 2008. Modelling Maritime Interaction in the Aegean Bronze Age. Antiquity, 82: 1009–24.Google Scholar
Knöpke, S. 2009. Der urnenfelderzeitliche Männerfriedhof von Neckarsulm. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss. Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg 116.Google Scholar
Kohl, P.L. 1978. The Balance of Trade in Southwestern Asia in the Mid-Third Millennium B.C. Current Anthropology, 19: 463–92.Google Scholar
Kohl, P.L. 1987. The Use and Abuse of World Systems Theory: the Case of the Pristine West Asian State. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 11: 1–35.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1987. Center and Periphery in Bronze Age Scandinavia. In: Rowlands, M., Larsen, M.T., Kristiansen, K., eds. Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–85.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1994. The Emergence of the European World System in the Bronze Age: Divergence, Convergence and Social Evolution during the First and Second Millennia BC in Europe. In: Kristiansen, K., Jensen, J., eds. Europe in the First Millennium B.C. Sheffield: J.R. Collis Publications. Sheffield Archaeological Monographs 6, pp. 7–30.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1998. Europe before History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 2011. Bridging India and Scandinavia: Institutional Transmission and Elite Conquest during the Bronze Age. In: Wilkinson, T.C., Sherratt, S., Bennet, J., eds. Interweaving Worlds: Systemic interactions in Eurasia, 7th to 1st millennia BC. Papers from a Conference in Memory of Professor Andrew Sherratt. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 243–65.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., Larsson, T.B. 2005. The Rise of Bronze Age Society. Travels, Transmissions and Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kümmel, C. 2001. Frühe Weltsysteme: Zentrum und Peripherie-Modelle in der Archäologie. Rahden/Westfalen: Marie Leidorf. Tübinger Texte, Materialien zur Ur- und Frühgeschichtlichen Archäologie, Band 4.Google Scholar
La Lone, D.E. 1994. An Andean World-System: Production Transformations under the Inka Empire. In: Brumfiel, E.M., ed. The Economic Anthropology of the State. Lanham & London: University Press of America. Monographs in Economic Anthropology 11, pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maran, J. 2011. Lost in Translation: The Emergence of Mycenaean Culture as a Phenomenon of Globalization. In: Wilkinson, T.C., Sherratt, S., Bennet, J., eds. Interweaving Worlds: Systemic interactions in Eurasia, 7th to 1st millennia BC. Papers from a Conference in Memory of Professor Andrew Sherratt. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 282–94.Google Scholar
Maran, J., Stockhammer, P.W. eds. 2012 Materiality and Social Practice: Transformative Capacities of Intercultural Encounters. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Matthäus, H. 1977-78. Neues zur Bronzetasse aus Dohnsen, Kreis Celle. Die Kunde, 28–29: 51–69.Google Scholar
Meller, H. 2010. Nebra: Vom Logos zum Mythos - Biographie eines Himmelsbildes. In: Meller, H., Bertemes, F., eds. Der Griff nach die Sternen. Wie Europas Eliten zu Macht und Reichtum kamen. Internationales Symposium in Halle (Saale) 16.-21. Februar 2005. Halle (Saale): Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte. Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle (Saale) 5, pp. 23–73.Google Scholar
Mozsolics, A. 1957. Archäologische Beiträge zur Geschichte der grossen Wanderung. Acta Archaeologica (Budapest), 8: 119–56.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, H. 1961. Die Vollgriffschwerter der Urnenfelderzeit aus Bayern. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Needham, S. 2009. Encompassing the Sea: ‘Maritories’ and Bronze Age Maritime Interactions. In: Clark, P., ed. Bronze Age Connections. Cultural Contact in Prehistoric Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 12–37.Google Scholar
Needham, S., Parfitt, K., Varndell, G. 2006. The Ringlemere Cup. Precious Cups and the Beginning of the Channel Bronze Age. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Negroni Catacchio, N. 1972. La problematica dell'ambra nella protostoria italiana: le ambre intagliate de Fratta Polesine e le rotte mercantili nell'Alto Adriatico. Padusa, 8: 1–18.Google Scholar
Negroni Catacchio, N. 1999. Produzione e commercio dei vaghi d'ambra tipo Tirinto e tipo Allumiere alla luce delle recenti scoperte. In: Paoletti, O., ed. Protostoria e Storia del ‘Venetorum Angulus'. Atti del XX Convegno di studi etruschi ed italici, Portogruaro – Quarto d'Altini – Este – Adria, 16–19 ottobre 1996. Pisa, Roma: Instituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali, pp. 241–65.Google Scholar
Oelze, V.M., Nehlich, O., Richards, M.P. 2012. ‘There's No Place like Home’ No Isotopic Evidence for Mobility at the Early Bronze Age Cemetery of Singen, Germany. Archaeometry, 54: 752–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pailes, R.A., Whitecotton, J.W. 1979. The Greater Southwest and Mesoamerican ‘World’ System: An Explanatory Model of Frontier Relationships. In: Savage, W.W., Thompson, S.I., eds. The Frontier: Comparative Studies, vol. 2. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 105–21.Google Scholar
Peregrine, P.N., Feinman, G.M. eds. 1996. Pre-Columbian World Systems. Madison: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Price, T.D., Knipper, C., Grupe, G., Smrcka, V. 2004. Strontium Isotopes and Prehistoric Human Migration: the Bell Beaker Period in Central Europe. European Journal of Archaeology, 7: 9–40.Google Scholar
Price, T.D. Wahl, J. forthcoming. Local and Foreign Males in a Late Bronze Age Cemetery at Neckarsulm. South-Western Germany: Strontium Isotope Investigations. Google Scholar
Radina, F., Recchia, G. eds. 2010. Ambra per Agamemnone. Indigeni e Micenei tra Adriatico, Ionio ed Egeo. Bari: Mario Adda Editore.Google Scholar
Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum Mainz 1990. Orientalisch-ägäische Einflüsse in der europäischen Bronzezeit. Bonn: Habelt. Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum Mainz, Forschungsinstitut für Vor- und Frühgeschichte, Monographien 15.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M., Larsen, M.T., Kristiansen, K. eds. 1987. Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. New Directions in Archaeology.Google Scholar
Scarre, C., Healy, F. eds. 1993. Trade and Exchange in Prehistoric Europe: Proceedings of a Conference Held at the University of Bristol, April 1992. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Oxbow Monograph 33.Google Scholar
Schauer, P. 1983. Orient im spätbronze- und früheisenzeitlichen Occident. Kulturbeziehungen zwischen der Iberischen Halbinsel und dem Vorderen Orient während des späten 2. und des ersten Drittels des 1. Jahrtausends v. Chr. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 30: 175–94.Google Scholar
Schauer, P. 1984. Spuren minoisch-mykenischen und orientalischen Einflusses in atlantischen Westeuropa. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 31: 137–86.Google Scholar
Schauer, P. 1985. Spuren orientalischen und ägäischen Einflusses im bronzezeitlichen Nordischen Kreis. Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 32: 123–95.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. 1977. Was there a Pre-Capitalist World-System? Peasant Studies, 6: 20–29.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 1993a. What would a Bronze-Age World System Look Like? Relations between Temperate Europe and the Mediterranean in Later Prehistory. Journal of European Archaeology, 1 (2): 1–57.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 1993b. ‘Who are you Calling Peripheral?’ Dependence and Independence in European Prehistory. In: Scarre, C., Healy, F., eds. Trade and Exchange in Prehistoric Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Oxbow Monograph 33, pp. 245–55.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 1994. Core, Periphery and Margin: Perspectives on the Bronze Age. In: Mathers, C., Stoddart, S., eds. Development and Decline in the Mediterranean Bronze Age. Sheffield: J.R. Collis Publications, pp. 335–45.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M.L.S. 1997. Reading Dress: the Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology, 5: 93–114.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, E. 1961. Eine mykenische Bronzetasse von Dohnsen, Kr. Celle. Germania, 39: 11–22.Google Scholar
Stein, G. 1999. Rethinking World-Systems: Diasporas, Colonies and Interaction in Uruk Mesopotamia. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Stein, G. 2002. From Passive Periphery to Active Agents: Emerging Perspectives in the Archaeology of Interregional Interaction. American Anthropologist, 104: 903–16.Google Scholar
Thrane, H. 1990. The Mycenaean Fascination: A Northerner's View. In: Schauer, P., ed. Orientalisch-Ägäische Einflüsse in der europäischen Bronzezeit. Ergebnisse eines Kolloquiums vom 16.-19.10.1985 in Mainz. Bonn: Habelt. Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum Mainz, Monographien 15, pp. 165–79.Google Scholar
Von Uslar, R. 1955. Der Goldbecher von Fritzdorf bei Bonn. Germania, 33: 319–23.Google Scholar
Wahl, J. 2009. Die menschliche Skelettreste aus dem urnenfelderzeitlichen Männerfriedhof von Neckarsulm ‘Trendpark Süd’. In: Der urnenfelderzeitliche Männerfriedhof von Neckarsulm. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss. Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg 116, pp. 339–49.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World-system. I, Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York and London: Academic Press. Studies in Social Discontinuity.Google Scholar
Warburton, D.A. 2011. What might the Bronze Age World-System Look Like? In: Wilkinson, T.C., Sherratt, S., Bennet, J., eds. Interweaving Worlds: Systemic Interactions in Eurasia, 7th to 1st Millennia BC. Papers from a Conference in Memory of Professor Andrew Sherratt. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 120–34.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R., Wilkins, D. 1989. Greeks and Natives in South-East Italy: Approaches to the Archaeological Evidence. In: Champion, T.C., ed. Centre and Periphery: Comparative Studies in Archaeology. London: Routledge. One World Archaeology, pp. 102–26.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. 2004. The Power Configuration Sequence of the Central World System, 1500–700 BC. Journal of World-Systems Research, 10: 655–720.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T.C., Sherratt, S., Bennet, J. eds. 2011. Interweaving Worlds: Systemic Interactions in Eurasia, 7th to 1st millennia BC. Papers from a Conference in Memory of Professor Andrew Sherratt. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar