Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:07:41.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Are Bucrania Doing in Tombs? Art and Agency in Neolithic Sardinia and Traditional South-East Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Guillaume Robin
Guillaume Robin*
Affiliation:
School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interior of Neolithic tombs in Europe is frequently decorated with carved and painted motifs. In Sardinia (Italy), 116 rock-cut tombs have their walls covered with bucrania (schematic depictions of cattle head and horns), which have long been interpreted as representations of a bull-like divinity. This article reviews similar examples of bucranium ‘art’ in the tombs of three traditional societies in South-East Asia, focusing on the agency of the motifs and their roles within social relationships between the living, the dead, and the spiritual world. From these ethnographic examples and the archaeological evidence in Sardinia, it is suggested that bucrania in Neolithic tombs were a specialized form of material culture that had multiple, cumulative effects and functions associated with social display, memory, reproduction, death, and protection.

L'intérieur des tombes néolithiques européennes est fréquemment décoré de motifs gravés et peints. En Sardaigne (Italie), 116 tombes hypogées ont leurs murs ornés de bucranes (têtes and cornes bovines schématiques), qui ont longtemps été interprétés comme des représentations d'une divinité taurine. Cet article examine des exemples similaires de bucranes dans trois sociétés traditionnelles du Sud-est asiatique, avec une attention particulière sur l'agentivité des motifs et leurs rôles au sein des relations sociales unissant les vivants, les morts et le monde surnaturel. Sur la base de ces exemples ethnographiques et des données archéologiques en Sardaigne, nous proposons que les bucranes des tombes néolithiques constituaient une forme spécialisée de culture matérielle aux fonctions et effets multiples et cumulatifs, associées à l'affichage social, la commémoration, la reproduction, la mort et la protection.

In Europa waren die neolithischen Steingräber oft mit gemeißelten und bemalten Motiven innerhalb verziert. In Sardinien (Italien) sind die Wände von 116 Felsgräbern mit Bukranien verziert. Diese schematischen Darstellungen von Rinderköpfen und Hörnern hat man lang als Bildnisse einer Gottheit in der Form eines Stieres angesehen. In diesem Artikel werden ähnliche Beispiele von Bukranion-Kunst in den Gräbern von traditionellen Gesellschaften in Südost-Asien besprochen und die Wirkung der Motive und deren Rolle innerhalb der sozialen Beziehungen zwischen den Toten, den Lebenden und der geistigen Welt werden besonders ausgewertet. Diese ethnografischen Beispiele und die archäologischen Funde aus Sardinien deuten darauf hin, dass die Bukranien in den neolithischen Gräbern eine spezialisierte Form der materiellen Kultur darstellten, in denen mehrere, kumulative Wirkungen und Funktionen, die mit Auffassungen über gesellschaftliche Anerkennung, Erinnerung, Tod und Schutz verknüpft waren, einbezogen waren. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

Neolithic artagencyrock-cut tombsSardiniacattleSouth-East Asian ethnographyart néolithiqueagentivitétombes hypogéesSardaignebovinsethnographie du Sud-est asiatiqueneolithische KunstWirkungFelsgräberSardinienRinderSüdost-AsienEthnografie
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , November 2017 , pp. 603 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R.L. 2004a. The Megalithic Tradition of West Sumba: A Preliminary Report of Research Conducted by Ron Adams (Simon Fraser University) in Collaboration with Dra Ayu Kusumawati (Balai Arkeologi Denpasar) and Dr Haris Sukendar (Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional) in West Sumba, Indonesia (July/August, 2003). Unpublished report, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby.Google Scholar
Adams, R.L. 2004b. An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Feasting in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 23: 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R.L. 2005. Ethnoarchaeology in Indonesia Illuminating the Ancient Past at Çatalhöyük? American Antiquity, 70: 181–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R.L. 2009. Transforming Stone: Ethnoarchaeological Perspectives on Megalith Form in Eastern Indonesia. In: Scarre, C., ed. Megalithic Quarrying: Sourcing, Extracting and Manipulating the Stones. Proceedings of the XVth UISPP World Congress (Lisbon, 4–9 September 2006), Volume 31, Session WS02 (BAR International Series S1923). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
Adams, R.L. 2010. Megalithic Tombs, Power, and Social Relations in West Sumba, Indonesia. In: Calado, D., Baldia, M. & Boulanger, M., eds. Monumental Questions: Prehistoric Megaliths, Mounds and Enclosures. Proceedings of the XVth UISPP World Congress (Lisbon, 4–9 September 2006), Volume 8, Session C68 (Part II) (BAR International Series S2123). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 279–84.Google Scholar
Anati, E. & Varela Gomes, M. 2013. The Züschen I Megalithic Monument (Kassel, Hessen) and its Engravings: Animal Traction, Ploughs, Carts and Wagons in Neolithic Europe. Lisbon: Instituto de Arqueologia e Paleociencias.Google Scholar
Antona Ruju, A. & Lo Schiavo, F. 1989. Oredda – Sassari, la domus delle doppie spirali. In: Campus, L. Dettori, ed. La cultura di Ozieri. Problematiche e nuove acquisizioni. Atti del I Convegno (Ozieri, gennaio 1986–aprile 1987). Ozieri: Il Torchietto, pp. 49–74.Google Scholar
Bailloud, G., Boujot, C., Cassen, S. & Le Roux, C.-T. 1995. Carnac: les premières architectures de pierre. Paris: CNMHS/CNRS.Google Scholar
Borić, D. 2008. First Households and ‘House Societies’ in European Prehistory. In: Jones, A., ed. Prehistoric Europe: Theory and Practice. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 109–42.Google Scholar
Cámara Serrano, J.A. & Spanedda, L. 2002. Decoración, representaciones figuradas y áreas rituales en la prehistoria reciente sarda: acumulación, control del territorio y jeraquización. In: Waldren, W.H. & Ensenyat, J.A., eds. World Islands in Prehistory: International Insular Investigations. Vth Deia International Conference of Prehistory. (BAR International Series 1095). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 373–94.Google Scholar
Camps, G. & Longerstay, M. 2000. Haouanet. In: G. Camps, ed. Encyclopédie berbère en ligne, volume 22: Hadremetum-Hidjaba. Available at: http://encyclopedieberbere.revues.org/1697 [accessed 8 April 2016].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassen, S. 2005. Pigeon-Raven and Sperm Whale, Magical Objects and Domestic Horned. The Division of the World during the Early neo-Neolithic in Western France. Documenta Praehistorica, 32: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassen, S. & Robin, G. 2009. Le corpus des signes. Enregistrement et analyses descriptives. In: Cassen, S., ed. Autour de la Table: explorations archéologiques et discours savants sur une architecture néolithique restaurée à Locmariaquer, Morbihan (Table des Marchands et Grand Menhir). Nantes: Université de Nantes, pp. 819–44.Google Scholar
Cassen, S., Chaigneau, C., Grimaud, V., Lescop, L., Pétrequin, P., Rodríguez Rellán, C. & Vourc'h., M. in press. Measuring Distance in the Monumentalities of the Neolithic in Western France. In: Hinz, M. & Müller, J., eds. Megaliths, Societies, Landscapes: Early Monumentality and Social Differentiation in Neolithic Europe. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Castaldi, E. 1976. Il ‘culto del toro’ nella preistoria della Sardegna ed il problema delle tre cavità sull'alto dei prospetti delle tombe di giganti. Archivio per l'Antropologia e l'Etnologia, 106: 439–58.Google Scholar
Cauvin, J. 2000. The Birth of the Gods and the Origins of Agriculture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology: People, Places and Broken Objects in the Prehistory of South-Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1949. The Origin of Neolithic Culture in Northern Europe. Antiquity, 23: 129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocco, D. & Usai, L. 1989. Un monumento preistorico nel territorio di Cornus. In: Ampsicora e il territorio di Cornus: atti del II Convegno sull'archeologia romana e altomedievale nell'oristanese, Cuglieri, 22 dicembre 1985. Taranto: Scorpione, pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
Condominas, G. 1957. Nous avons mangé la forêt de la pierre-génie Gôo (Hii saa Brii Mau-Yaang Gôo): chronique de Sar Luk, village Mnong Gar (tribu proto-indochinoise des hauts-plateaux du Viet-Nam central). Paris: Mercure de France.Google Scholar
Congiu, F. 1997. Dieci anni di archeologia. In: Pani, A., ed. Speleomantes. Antologia del TAG. 1987–1997. Dieci anni di attività. Thiesi: Truma de Arkeo-Guturulugia Monte Majore, pp. 57–58.Google Scholar
Contu, E. 1962. Alcune osservazioni su ‘domus de janas’ edite ed inedite di Alghero e Sassari. Studi Sardi, 17 (1959–1961): 626–35.Google Scholar
Contu, E. 1964. La Tomba dei Vasi Tetrapodi in località Santu Pedru (Alghero-Sassari). Monumenti Antichi pubblicati per cura della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, 47: 1–198.Google Scholar
Contu, E. 1965a. Tombe preistoriche dipinte e scolpite di Thiesi e Bessude (Sassari). Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche, 19(1964): 233–63.Google Scholar
Contu, E. 1965b. La Sardegna dall'età del Rame alla prima età del Bronzo. In: Barreca, F. et al. , ed. Breve storia della Sardegna. Torino: Edizioni Rai Radiotelevisione Italiana, pp. 35–43.Google Scholar
Contu, E. 1966. Ipogei con ‘corna sacrificali’ plurime di Bròdu (Oniferi-Nuoro). Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche, 21: 195–200.Google Scholar
Contu, E. 1997. La Sardegna preistorica e nuragica. I. La Sardegna prima dei nuraghi. Sassari: Chiarella.Google Scholar
Crnobrnja, A., Simić, Z. & Janković, M. 2009. Late Vinča Culture Settlement at Crkvine in Stubline: Household Organization and Urbanization in the Late Vinča Culture Period. Starinar, 59: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, N. & Kramer, C. 2001. Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. & Payne, S. 1993. A Barrow Full of Cattle Skulls. Antiquity, 67: 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMarrais, E. & Robb, J. 2013. Art Makes Society: An Introductory Visual Essay. World Art, 3: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demartis, G.M. 1986. La necropoli di Anghelu Ruju. Sardegna Archeologica, Guide e Itinerari 2. Sassari: Carlo Delfino.Google Scholar
Demartis, G.M. 1991. La Necropoli di Puttu Codinu. Sardegna Archeologica, Guide e Itinerari 13. Sassari: Carlo Delfino.Google Scholar
Demartis, G.M. 1992. La tomba dell'Architettura Dipinta. Un ipogeo neolitico di Putifigari. Bollettino di Archeologia, 7: 1–21.Google Scholar
Demartis, G.M. 1998. Tomba V di Montalé, Sassari. Necropoli di Su Crucifissu Mannu, Porto Torres. Il triangolo della Nurra, 2/4. Viterbo: Betagamma.Google Scholar
Derudas, P.M. 2004a. La necropoli di Mesu ’e Montes (Ossi). Sardegna Archeologica, Guide e Itinerari 35. Sassari: Carlo Delfino.Google Scholar
Derudas, P.M. 2004b. Le necropoli ipogeiche di S'Adde ‘e Asile, Noeddale e la tomba di Littos Longos nel territorio di Ossi. Sardegna Archeologica, Guide e Itinerari 36. Sassari: Carlo Delfino.Google Scholar
Dietler, M. 2011. Feasting and Fasting. In: Insoll, T., ed. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 179–94.Google Scholar
Fraser, S. 2015. Mammals in Late Neolithic Orkney (with Reference to the Mammal Bone Recovered from the Links of Noltland, Westray) (unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giot, P.-R. & Morzadec, H. 1990. Contribution à l’étude de l’ère monumentale préhistorique: les lapides stantes de Saint Samson. Les Dossiers du Centre Régional Archéologique d'Alet, 18: 43–52.Google Scholar
Hachem, L., Guichard, Y., Farruggia, J.-P., Dubouloz, J. & Ilett, M. 1998. Enclosure and Burial in the Earliest Neolithic of the Aisne Valley. In: Edmonds, M. & Richards, C., eds. Understanding the Neolithic of North-Western Europe. Glasgow: Cruithne Press, pp. 127–40.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. 2009. Funerals as Feasts: Why Are they So Important? Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19: 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, C. 1999. Houses and Monuments: Two Aspects of Settlements in Neolithic and Copper Age Sardinia. In: Brück, J. & Goodman, M., eds. Making Places in the Prehistoric World: Themes in Settlement Archaeology. London: UCL Press, pp. 112–28.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1992. Burials, Houses, Women and Men in the European Neolithic. In: Hodder, I., ed. Theory and Practice in Archaeology. London: Routledge, pp. 45–80.Google Scholar
Hofmann, D. 2013. Living by the Lake: Domestic Architecture in the Alpine Foreland. In: Hofmann, D. & Smyth, J., eds. Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe. New York: Springer, pp. 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, J. 1986. So My Name Shall Live: Stone Dragging and grave-building in Kodi, West Sumba. Bijdragen tot de Taal-Land-en Volkenkunde, 142: 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, J. 1988. Arts and Cultures of Sumba. In: Barbier, J.-P. & Newton, D., eds. Islands and Ancestors: Indigenous Styles of Southeast Asia. Munich: Prestel, pp. 120–37.Google Scholar
Hoskins, J. 1993a. Violence, Sacrifice, and Divination: Giving and Taking Life in Eastern Indonesia. American Ethnologist, 20: 159–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, J. 1993b. The Play of Time: Kodi Perspectives on Calendars, History and Exchange. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hoskins, J. 1998. The Stony Faces of Death: Funeral and Politics in East and West Sumba. In: Barbier, J.-P., ed. Messages in Stone: Statues and Sculptures from Tribal Indonesia. Geneva: Tribal Art Publications & Milan: Musée Barbier-Mueller and Skira Editore, pp. 167–97.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J., Macfarlane, A., Harrison, S. & Herle, A. 1990. The Nagas: Hill Peoples of Northeast India: Society, Culture and the Colonial Encounter. Stuttgart: Hansjörg Mayer.Google Scholar
Jannel, C. & Lontcho, F. 1992. Les Toradjas d'Indonésie: laissez venir ceux qui pleurent. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Jong, E.B.P. de 2013. Making a Living between Crises and Ceremonies in Tana Toraja: The Practice of Everyday Life of a South Sulawesi Highland Community in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R.A. & Gillespie, S.D. eds. 2000. Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, H.E. 1955. Die Bedeutung des Dorftores bei den Angami-Naga. Geographica Helvetica, 10: 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, H.E. 1962. Formen und Motive in der Kunst des älteren Megalithentums Südostasiens. Tribus: Jahrbuch des Linden-Museums, 11: 89–107.Google Scholar
Keane, W. 1990. Embodied Memory: Tombs on Sumba. Art Tribal (Bulletin semestriel publié par l'Association des Amis du Musée Barbier-Mueller), 2: 3–16.Google Scholar
Keane, W. 1997. Signs of Recognition: Powers and Hazards of Representation in an Indonesian Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, W. 2010. Marked, Absent, Habitual: Approaches to Neolithic Religion at Çatalhöyük. In: Hodder, I., ed. Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kis-Jovak, J.I., Nooy-Palm, H., Schefold, R. & Schilz-Dornburg, U. 1988. Banua Toraja: Changing Patterns in Architecture and Symbolism among the Sa'dan Toraja of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Koubi, J. 1982. Rambu solo’, ‘la fumée descend’: le culte des morts chez les Toradja du Sud. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Laporte, L. & Tinevez, J.-Y. 2004. Neolithic Houses and Chambered tombs of Western France. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14: 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Quellec, J.-L. 2006. Megalithic Art in France: Recent Developments. In: Joussaume, R., Laporte, L. & Scarre, C., eds. Origin and Development of the Megalithic Monuments of Western Europe. International Conference (Bougon, 26–30 October 2002). Bougon: Musée des Tumulus de Bougon, pp. 687–718.Google Scholar
Levi, D. 1952. La necropoli di Anghelu Ruiu e la civiltà eneolitica della Sardegna. Studi Sardi, 10–11 (1950–1951): 5–51.Google Scholar
Lilliu, G. 1958. Religione della Sardegna prenuragica. Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana, 66: 7–96.Google Scholar
Lilliu, G. 1963. La civiltà dei Sardi dal Neolitico all'età dei nuraghi. Torino: Edizioni Radiotelevisione italiana.Google Scholar
Lilliu, G. 1999. Arte e religione della Sardegna prenuragica: idoletti, ceramiche, ogetti d'ornamento. Sardegna archeologica: studi e monumenti 4. Sassari: Carlo Delfino.Google Scholar
Manca, G. & Zirottu, G. 1999. Pietre magiche a Mamoiada: perdas longas e pintadas, domos de janas, tumbas de gigantes, nuraghes. Monumenti visitati in memoria di Giovanni ed Emanuele Melis. Mamoiada: Associazione Folk Mamuthones e Issohadores ‘Peppino Beccoi’.Google Scholar
Marciniak, A. & Pollard, J. 2015. Animals and Social Relations. In: Fowler, C., Harding, J. & Hofmann, D., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 745–56.Google Scholar
Melis, M.G. 2010. L'architecture domestique en Sardaigne (Italie) entre la fin du Néolithique et le Chalcolithique. In: Gheorghiu, D., ed. Neolithic and Chalcolithic Archaeology in Eurasia: Building Techniques and Spatial Organisation. XVth Congress of the UISPP, Lisbon, 4–9 September 2006 (BAR International Series 2097). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 157–63.Google Scholar
Melis, M.G. 2012. La dimensione simbolica e sociale della Sardegna preistorica attraverso le manifestazioni funerarie: alcune osservazioni. Sardinia, Corsica et Baleares Antiquae, 9: 13–26.Google Scholar
Melis, P. 1991. La Domus dell'Elefante (Sardegna Archeologica, Guide e Itinerari 15). Sassari: Carlo Delfino.Google Scholar
Melis, P. 2009. La necropoli ipogeica di Calancoi-Sos Saltos (Sassari). Studi Sardi, 34: 73–92.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1967. Çatal Hüyük: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Merella, S. 2007. Giorrè-S'Elighe Entosu. La necropoli neolitica a domus de janas di Cargeghe (Catalogo Sardo 4). Cargeghe: Biblioteca di Sardegna.Google Scholar
Merella, S. 2009. Tombe ipogeiche ad Ittiri. La necropoli di Ochila. Sassari: Il Punto Grafico.Google Scholar
Mills, J.P. 1926. The Ao Nagas. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mills, J.P. 1937. The Rengma Nagas. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moravetti, A. 2000. Ricerche archeologiche nel Marghine Planargia, volume II. Sassari: Carlo Delfino.Google Scholar
Müller, D.W. 1999. Petroglyphen aus mittelneolitischen Gräbern von Sachsen-Anhalt. Herkunft, Datierung und Bedeutung. In: Beinhauer, K.W., Cooney, G., Guksch, C.E. & Kus, S., eds. Studien zur Megalithik. Weissbach: Beier & Beran, pp. 199–214.Google Scholar
Nanoglou, S. 2015. A Miniature World: Models and Figurines in South-East Europe. In: Fowler, C., Harding, J. & Hofmann, D., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 621–32.Google Scholar
Nooy-Palm, C.H.M. 1979. The Sa'dan-Toraja: A Study of their Social Life and Religion. Volume 1: Organization, Symbols and Beliefs (Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Institut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 87). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Nooy-Palm, C.H.M. 1988. The Mamasa and Sa'dan Toraja of Sulawesi. In: Barbier, J.-P. & Newton, D., eds. Islands and Ancestors: Indigenous Styles of Southeast Asia. Munich: Prestel, pp. 86–105.Google Scholar
Nooy-Palm, C.H.M. 1999. Sulawesi: The Woodcarving of the Sa'dan and Mamasa Toraja. In: Newton, D., ed. Art of the South Seas: Island Southeast Asia, Melanesia, Polynesia, Micronesia. The Collections of the Musée Barbier-Mueller. Munich: Prestel, pp. 90–101.Google Scholar
Odyuo, I. 2013. The Various Aspects of Naga art. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9: 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pannoux, S. 1991. Le tombeau mahafale, lieu d'expression des enjeux sociaux: tradition et nouveauté. In: Esoavelomandroso, M., ed. Cohésion sociale, modernité et pression démographique: l'exemple du Mahafale (Aombe 3). Paris: Office de la recherche scientifique et technique outre-mer.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., Godden, K., Heurtebize, G., Radimilahy, C., Ramilisonina, Retsihisatse, Schwenninger, J.-L. & Smith, H. 2010. Pastoralists, Warriors and Colonists: The Archaeology of Southern Madagascar (BAR International Series S2139). Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitzalis, G. 2000. La necropoli di Murrone a Chiaramonti. Almanacco Gallurese, 8: 94–102.Google Scholar
Pollard, J. 2006. A Community of Beings: Animals and People in the Neolithic of Southern Britain. In: Serjeantson, D. & Field, D., eds. Animals of the Neolithic of Britain and Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 135–48.Google Scholar
Richards, C. & Jones, R. eds. 2016. The Development of Neolithic House Societies in Orkney. Oxford: Windgather Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riu, V. & Ventura, V. 1970. Il fascino di Monte d'Accoddi. Bollettino della Società Sarda di Scienze Naturali, 4: 39–59.Google Scholar
Robb, J. 2007. The Early Mediterranean Village: Agency, Material Culture, and Social Change in Neolithic Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, J. 2015. Prehistoric Art in Europe: A Deep-time Social History. American Antiquity, 80: 635–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robin, G. 2016. Art and Death in Late Neolithic Sardinia: The Role of Carvings and Paintings in domus de janas Rock-cut Tombs. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26: 429–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, S. 1960. Aspects of Padam-Minyong Culture. Shillong: North-East Frontier Agency.Google Scholar
Schlichtherle, H. 2014. Weibliche Symbolik auf Hauswänden und Keramikgefässen: Spuren frauenzentrierter Kulte in der Jungsteinzeit? In: Röder, B., ed. Ich Mann, Du Frau: feste Rollen seit Urzeiten? Begleitbuch zur Ausstellung im Colombischlössle, 16. Oktober 2014–15. März 2015. Freiburg: Rombach, pp. 114–35.Google Scholar
Shakespear, J. 1912. The Lushei Kuki Clans. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shee Twohig, E. 1981. The Megalithic Art of Western Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Simoons, F.J. 1968. A Ceremonial Ox of India: The Mithan in Nature, Culture, and History. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W.C. 1925. The Ao Naga Tribe of Assam: A Study in Ethnography and Sociology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Solinas, M. 2003. Bonorva (Sassari). Località Sa Pala Larga. Bollettino di Archeologia, 43–45 (1997): 110–13.Google Scholar
Spanedda, L. 2009. Las domus de janas sardas. Proyección de la « religión » y proyección de la estabilidad. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueologia de la Universidad de Granada, 19: 101–37.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 1977. Arte preistorica in Sardegna. Le figurazioni taurine scolpite dell'algherese nel quadro delle rappresentazioni figurate degli ipogei sardi a domus de janas. Quaderni 5. Sassari: Dessi.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 1984. Arte e religione della Sardegna preistorica nella necropoli di Sos Furrighesos - Anela (SS). Sassari: Chiarella.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 1985. L'arte delle domus de janas nelle immagini di Jngeborg Mangold. Palazzo della Provincia, 25 Aprile–25 Maggio 1985. Sassari: Chiarella.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 1998. Cronologia dell'arte delle domus de janas. In: Balmuth, M.S., & Tykot, R.H., eds. Sardinian and Aegean Chronology. Towards the Resolution of Relative and Absolute Dating in the Mediterranean. Proceedings of the International Colloquium ‘Sardinian Stratigraphy and Mediterranean Chronology’, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, March 17–19, 1995. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 121–39.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 2000. L'ipogeismo in Sardegna: Arte, simbologia, religione. In: Melis, M.G., ed. L'ipogeismo nel mediterraneo. Origini, sviluppo, quadri culturali. Atti del Congresso Internazionale (Sassari-Oristano, 23–28 maggio 1994). Sassari: Università degli Studi di Sassari, pp. 399–425.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 2007. La simbolizzazione dei portelli d'ingresso nelle domus de janas. In: Anati, E. & Mohen, J.-P., eds. Les expressions intellectuelles et spirituelles des peuples sans écriture / The Intellectual and Spiritual Expressions of Non- Literate Peoples. UISPP-CISENP Colloquium, Paris 22–23 October 2007. Capo di Ponte: Edizioni del Centro, pp. 127–34.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 2008. Il segno e l'idea. Le figurazioni scolpite di bucranio nella preistoria della Sardegna. In: Tanda, G., & Lugliè, C., eds. Il segno e l'idea: arte preistorica in Sardegna. Cagliari: Cooperativa Universitaria Editrice Cagliaritana, pp. 99–143.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 2009. Il Neolithico recente. In: Atti della XLIV riunione scientifica: la preistoria e la protostoria della Sardegna. Cagliari, Barumini, Sassari 23–28 novembre. Volume I: relazioni generali. Firenze: Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria, pp. 59–71.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 2015. Le domus de janas decorate con motivi scolpiti. Cagliari: Condaghes.Google Scholar
Tanda, G. 2016. The Use of Burial Space and Social Relations between the Late Neolithic Age and the Copper Age in Sardinia. In: Anati, E., ed. Intellectual and Spiritual Expression of Non-Literate Peoples: Proceedings of the XVII UISPP World Congress (1–7 September, Burgos, Spain), Volume 1, Session A20. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 313–25.Google Scholar
Taramelli, A. 1909. Alghero: nuovi scavi nella necropoli preistorica a grotte artificiali di Anghelu Ruju. Monumenti Antichi dei Lincei, 19: 397–540.Google Scholar
Testart, A. 2006a. Comment concevoir une collaboration entre anthropologie sociale et archéologie? À quel prix? Et pourquoi? Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 103: 385–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testart, A. 2006b. Interprétation symbolique et interprétation religieuse en archéologie: l'exemple du taureau à Çatal Höyük. Paléorient, 32: 23–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. 2016. Art and Architecture in Neolithic Orkney: Process, Temporality and Context. Oxford: Archaeopress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. 2013. The Birth of Neolithic Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. & McFadyen, L. 2010. Animals and Cotswold-Severn Long Barrows: A Re-examination. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 76: 95–113.Google Scholar
Treuil, R. & Darcque, P. 1998. Un ‘bucrane’ néolithique à Dikili Tash (Macédoine orientale): parallèles et perspectives d'interprétation. Bulletin de correspondance hellénique, 122: 1–25.Google Scholar
Ugas, G. 1982. Padru Jossu: tomba ipogeica ed elementi di cultura material delle fasi Campaniforme A e B. In: Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri: mostra grafica e fotografica, Sanluri, Plazzo Civico 1–26 giugno 1982. Sanluri: Comune di Sanluri, pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
Usai, E. 1989. La cultura di Ozieri a Pimentel e a Siddi. In: Campus, L. Dettori, ed. La cultura di Ozieri. Problematiche e nuove acquisizioni. Atti del I Convegno (Ozieri, gennaio 1986–aprile 1987). Ozieri: Il Torchietto, pp. 217–26.Google Scholar
Usai, E. 1998. Le sequenze culturali e i rituali funerary dell'ipogeo di Scaba ‘e Arriu di Siddi (Cagliari). Quaderni della Soprintendenza Archeologica Cagliari Oristano, 15: 28–58.Google Scholar
Usai, L., Sartor, F. & Costanzi Cobau, A. 2011. Una nuova tomba dipinta della necropoli di Sa Pala Larga (Bonorva). Erentzias, 1: 13–38.Google Scholar
Verschoor van Nisse, J. 1926. Begraven op Soemba. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië, 82: 576–82.Google Scholar
Volkman, T.A. 1985. Feasts of Honor: Ritual and Change in the Toraja Highlands (Illinois studies in Anthropology 16). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
von Fürer-Haimendorf, C. 1939. The Naked Nagas. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Waterson, R. 1988. The House and the World: The Symbolism of Sa'dan Toraja House Carvings. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 15: 34–60.Google Scholar
Waterson, R. 1990. The Living House: An Anthropology of Architecture in South-East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waterson, R. 1993. Taking the Place of Sorrow: The Dynamics of Mortuary Rites among the Sa'dan Toraja. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 21: 73–96.Google Scholar
Waterson, R. 1995. Houses, Graves and the Limits of Kinship Groupings among the Sa'dan Toraja. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 151: 194–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkens, B. 2004. La fauna sarda durante l'Olocene: le conoscenze attuali. Sardinia, Corsica et Baleares Antiquae, 1(2003): 181–97.Google Scholar
Wilkens, B. 2012. Archeozoologia: il Mediterraneo, la storia, la Sardegna. Sassari: Editrice Democratica Sarda.Google Scholar
Zedda, M., Lepore, G., Mura, A., Balzano, F., Gadau, S. & Farina, V. 2012. Resti faunistici rinvenuti nel villaggio eneolitico di Su Coddu (Selargius - Cagliari). In: Atti della XLIV riunione scientifica: la preistoria e la protostoria della Sardegna. Cagliari, Barumini, Sassari 23–28 novembre. Volume III: posters. Firenze: Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria, pp. 1271–75.Google Scholar
Zervos, C. 1954. La Civilisation de la Sardaigne du début de l'énéolithique à la fin de la période nouragique, IIe millénaire–Ve siècle avant notre ère. Paris: Editions Cahiers d'Art.Google Scholar