Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:55:24.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trans-Uralian Iron Age Ceramics – A New Outlook

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Svetlana Sharapova
Svetlana Sharapova*
Affiliation:
Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
[email: [email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers the results of an analysis undertaken on pottery recovered mostly from multi-phase Iron Age sites in the Trans-Urals region of Russia. It focuses on a particular project involving fieldwork and the subsequent analysis of archaeological contexts and the laboratory studies of pottery morphology, ornamentation, technology, and statistics, with an attempt to apply the concept of style. This type of research project is unusual for Russian ceramic studies and the article begins with a consideration of the formal typological approach to the study of artefacts, which is a traditional aspect of Russian archaeology and is still the primary focus of many research programmes.

Cet article porte sur les résultats d'analyses de céramique provenant principalement de sites multiphasiques de l'âge du fer des régions transouraliennes de la Russie. L'article fait surtout état d'un projet particulier qui englobe l'enquête sur le terrain, les analyses ultérieures des contextes archéologiques, l'examen au laboratoire de la morphologie, de l'ornementation et de la technologie de la céramique et son étude statistique, tout en essayant de mettre en application la notion de style. Ce type de projet de recherche est inhabituel pour l'étude de la céramique russe. L'article débute ainsi avec une réflexion sur l'approche typologique classique de l'étude des artefacts, qui est un aspect traditionnel de l'archéologie russe et reste le sujet principal de beaucoup de programmes de recherches.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag behandelt die Ergebnisse einer Analyse von Keramikfunden, die zumeist in mehrphasigen eisenzeitlichen Siedlungen des Trans-Ural-Gebietes in Russland geborgen wurde. Ein Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf einem speziellen Projekt, das die Feldarbeit und die anschließende Analyse archäologischer Kontexte sowie die Laborstudien der Keramikmorphologie, ornamentierung, typologie und statistik umfasst, um das Konzept des Stils näher eingrenzen zu können. Diese Form eines Forschungsprojektes ist für russische Keramikstudien ungewöhnlich, so dass der Aufsatz mit einer Zusammenfassung des formaltypologischen Ansatzes der Artefaktstudien eingeleitet wird, der ein traditioneller Aspekt der Archäologie Russlands ist und noch immer die meisten Forschungsprogramme bestimmt.

Keywords

archaeological contextceramicsIron AgestyleTrans-Uralstypologycéramiquetypologiecontexte archéologiqueâge du ferTransouralieKeramikTypologieStilarchäologischer KontextEisenzeitTrans-Ural-Gebiet
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , 2004 , pp. 177 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beltikova, Galina V., 1997. Zauralsky (itkulsky) ochag metallurgii (VII-III vv. do n.e.). Moskva: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Botalov, Serge. G. and Nikolaj, A. Polushkin, 1996. Gunno-sarmatskije pamyatniki Juzhnogo Zauralja. In Novoje v arkheologii Juzhnogo Zauralja III-V vekov: 178–193. Tchelyabisnk: Tchelyabinsk University Press.Google Scholar
Buldashov, Vadim A., 1998. Pogrebalnaja obryadnost gorokhovskoj kultury. Nobosibirsk: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Daire, Marie-Yvane and Ludmila, N. Koryakova, eds, 2002. Habitats et Necropoles de l'Age du Fer au Carrefour de l'Euraie. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Gening, Vladimir F., 1973. Programma statisticheskoj obrabotki keremiki iz arkheologicheskikh kollektsij. Sovetskaja arkheologija 1:114–135. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Gening, Vladimir F. and Margarita, K. Pozdnyakova, 1964. Prygovskoje gorodische na r. Iseti. Voprosy arkheologii Urala 6:34–71. Sverdlovsk: Ural State University.Google Scholar
Gorodtsov, Vasilij A., 1901. Russkaja doistoricheskaja keramika. Trudy 1 arkheologicheskogo s'ezda v Kieve 1:576–672. Moskva.Google Scholar
Gorodtsov, Vasilu A., 1922. K vyyavleniju drevnejshikh tekhnicheskikh priemov goncharnogo dela. Kazansky muzejny vestnik 2:178–187. Kazan’.Google Scholar
Gorodtsov, Vasilij A., 1927. Tipologicheskij metod. Ryazan'.Google Scholar
Kamenetsky, Igor S. and Alexander, A. Uzyanov, 1977. O pravilakx postrojenija gistogramm. Voprosy arkheologii Urala 14:38–49. Sverdlovsk: Urals University Press.Google Scholar
Koryakova, Ludmila N., 1988. Rannij zhelezny vek Urala i Zapadnoj Sibiri: sargatskaja kultura. Sverdlovsk: Urals University Press.Google Scholar
Koryakova, Ludmila N., 1993. Kulturno-istoricheskije obschnosti Urala i Zapadnoj Sibiri: Tobolo-Irtyshskaja provintsija na rannej i srednej stadijakh zheleznogo veka. Novosibirsk: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Koryakova, Ludmila N., Vladimir, I. Stefanov and Nina, K. Stefanova, 1991. Problemy issledovanija drevnikh poselenij i kulturno-khronologicheskaja stratigraphija peselenja Uk 3. Sverdlovsk: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Koryakova, Ludmila N. and Marie-Yvane, Daire, eds, 1997. Kultura zauralskikh skotovodov na rubezhe er. Ekaterinburg: Ekaterinburg Publisher.Google Scholar
Koryakova, Ludmila N. and Marie-Yvane, Daire, 2004. Iron Age society and environment: multi-disciplinary research in the Iset' River Valley (Russia) preliminary results. Archeolingua 18:185–214.Google Scholar
Kovrigin, Andrej A. and Svetlana, V. Sharapova, 1998. Problemy izuchenija drevnostej kashinskogo i prygovskogo tipov. In Veniamin, Alexeev (ed.), Ural v proshlom i nastojashchem: 67–73. Ekaterinburg: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Mogilnikov, Vladislav A., 1987. Ugry i samodijtsy Urala i zapadnoj Sibiri. In Valentin, Sedov (ed.), Finno-ugry i balty v epokhy srednevekovja. Arkheologija SSSR: 163–225. Moskow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Mogilnikov, Vladislav A., 1992. Lesostep Zauralja I zapadnoj Sibiri. In Boris, Rybakov (ed.), Stepnaja polosa asiatskoj chasti SSSR v skofo-sarmatskoje vremya. Arkheologija SSSR: 274–311. Moskow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Pavlu, Ivan, 1996. Pottery Origins. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Rice, Prudence M., 1987. Pottery Analysis. A Sourcebook. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salnikov, Konstantin V. 1940. Tri goda raboty na gorodische Chudaki. Kratkii Soobschenija Instituta Istorii material'noj Kultury: 5:69–71. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Sharapova, Svetlana, 1998. The Iron Age pottery decorative styles in the Transurals. Abstracts Book of the 4th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists: 146–147. Göteborg, Sweden, 23–27 September 1998. Göteborg: Länstryckeri AB.Google Scholar
Sharapova, Svetlana V., 1999. Keramika i osnovnyje ornamentalnyje stili rannego zhelznogo veka zauralskoj lesostepi. Tezisy dokladov XIV Uralskogo Akheologicheskogo soveshchaniya: 146–148. Tchelyabinsk, Russia, 21–24 April 1999. Tchelyabinsk: Rifej.Google Scholar
Sharapova, Svetlana, 2000a. Iron Age ceramics of the Transurals. In Jeannine, Davis-Kimball, Eileen, M. Murphy, Ludmila, Koryakova and Leonid, T. Yablonsky (eds), Kurgans, Ritual Sites, and Settlements: Eurasian Bronze and Iron Age: 207–214. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 890).Google Scholar
Sharapova, Svetlana V, 2000b. Keramika rannego zheleznogo veka lesostepnogo Zauralja (opyt statisticheskogo analiza). Ekaterinburg: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Sharapova, Svetlana V., 2002. Technological variability in ceramic traditions of the forest-steppe Trans-Urals in the Early Iron Age. Abstracts Book of the Northern Archaeological Congress: 76–77. Khanty-Mansiisk, Russia, 9–14 September. Ekaterinburg: “Academkniga”.Google Scholar
Sharapova, Svetlana V., 2004. Ceramic tradition and decorative styles in the Early Iron Age of the Trans-Uralian region. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia 4(20):123–134. (Novosibirsk: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.)Google Scholar
Stoyanov, Vladislav E., 1969. Panniij zheleznyj vek zapadnosibirskoj lesostepi. Dissertation of Candidate of Historical Sciences. Sverdlovsk: Ural State University.Google Scholar
Tarzov, Alexander D., 1991. Rannije kochevniki Juzhnogo Zauralja v VII-II vekakh do novoj ery. Moskva: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Victorova, Valentina D., 1969. Arkheologicheskaja karta bassejnov rek Tury i Tavdy. Dissertation of Candidate of Historical Sciences. Urals State University.Google Scholar
Victorova, Valentina D. and Valentina, F. Kerner, 1988. Pamyatniki epokhi zheleza u ozera Osinovogo. In Valentina, Kovaleva and Victor, Borzunov (eds), Materialnaja kultura drevnego naselenija Urala i Zapadnoj Sibiri: 129–141. Sverdlovsk: Urals State University.Google Scholar
Zaitseva, Ganna I., Vladimir, A. Dergatchev and Vadim, M. Masson, eds, 1996. Archaeology and Radiocarbon. St Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar