Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:12:35.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Peter Mitchell. The Donkey in Human History: An Archaeological Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 306 pp., 133 illustr., 32 in colour, 6 tables, hbk, ISBN 978-0-19-874923-3)

Review products

Peter Mitchell. The Donkey in Human History: An Archaeological Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 306 pp., 133 illustr., 32 in colour, 6 tables, hbk, ISBN 978-0-19-874923-3)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2019

Pauline Hanot*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human HistoryJena, Germany

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bulliet, R.W. 1990. The Camel and the Wheel. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. 2015. Horse Nations: The Worldwide Impact of the Horse on Indigenous Societies Post-1492. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. 2017. Why the Donkey Did Not Go South: Disease as a Constraint on the Spread of Equus asinus into Southern Africa. African Archaeological Review, 34: 2141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-017-9245-3Google Scholar
Ritvo, H. 2007. On the Animal Turn. Daedalus, 136: 118–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2007.136.4.118Google Scholar