Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:24:33.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The past is now – an interview with Anders Högberg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Cornelius Holtorf
Cornelius Holtorf*
Affiliation:
University of Kalmar, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anders Högberg is a Swedish archaeologist whose research offers an original perspective on prehistoric flint technology but he has also been directing some innovative projects in archaeological teaching and learning. In this interview I am exploring some of the ideas that have been guiding his work in both realms. Although part of the interview is about work conducted in the past, equal weight is given to new opportunities and developments that affect the future of archaeology. Anders Högberg's ideas cannot be said to be typical or representative for any larger community, but he is operating in very specific historic circumstances that are shared to a greater or lesser extent by many other archaeologists living and working today. This interview documents the particular views on material culture, public archaeology, and the field of archaeology more generally that were held by one European archaeologist in 2008.

Keywords

archaeological pedagogiescontract archaeologycultural heritageflint knappingmaterial culturepublic archaeologyScandinavian prehistory
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , 2007 , pp. 7 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wiebe, Bijker E., 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs. Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Göran, 2004. Den fulländade människan. Livsstil – välbefinnande — ursprung. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
Derry, Linda and Malloy, Maureen (eds), 2003. Archaeologists and Local Communities. Partners in Exploring the Past. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.Google Scholar
Diamond, Jared, 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking Books.Google Scholar
Garrow, Duncan and Elizabeth, Shove, 2007. Artefacts between disciplines. The toothbrush and the axe. Archaeological Dialogues 14(2):117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Högberg, Anders, 2000. Forord. In Högberg, A. (ed.), Artefakter — arkeologiska ting. En bok om förmål ur ett arkeologiskt perspektiv: 9. University of Lund: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Högberg, Anders, 2003. Människors platser. Integration och kulturarvsbruk i fokus. Agenda kulturarvs inspirationsskrift nr. 3:132–139. Agenda kulturarv.Google Scholar
Högberg, Anders, 2004a. Bilder av skånska uppdragsarkeologi hos allmänhet ochi dagspress. META 2004(4):40–55.Google Scholar
Högberg, Anders, 2004b. Historiemedvetande och uppdragsarkeologi — tankar om alternativa kuriskapsmål. META 2004(3):3–18.Google Scholar
Högberg, Anders, 2006a. Kulturmiljöpedagogik och ledarskap. In Riddersporre, B. (ed.), Utbildningsledarskap — nu och i framtiden: 67–102. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Högberg, Anders, 2006b. Arkeologi och marigkultur, kommentarer. In Burström, M. (ed.), Rapport från Svenskt arkeologmöte 2006: 81–84. Södertörns högskola: Södertörn Archaeological Studies 4.Google Scholar
Högberg, Anders, 2006c. The EU: in need of a supranational view of cultural heritage. In Meier, T. (ed.), Landscape Ideologies: 199–208. Budapest: Archaeolingua Series Minor 22.Google Scholar
Högberg, Anders, 2007. The past is the present - prehistory and preservation from children's point of view. Public Archaeology 6(1):28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Högberg, Anders, 2008. Playing with flint and learning to knap: tracing a child's imitation of adult work in a lithic assemblage. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15(1):112–131.Google Scholar
Högberg, Anders and Deborah, Olausson, 2007. Scandinavian Flint - an Archaeological Perspective. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Holdaway, Simon and Nicola, Stern, 2004. A Record in Stone. The Study of Australia's Flaked Stone Artefacts. Museum Victoria: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Inizan, Marie-Louise, Roche, Hélène and Tiger, Jacques, 1992. Technology of Knapped Stone. Meudon: CREP.Google Scholar
Korp, Helena, 2003. Kunskapsbedömning - hur, vad och vatför. Forskning i fokus, nr. 13. Stockholm. Myndigheten för skolutveckling.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, 1992. Technology is society made durable. In Law, J. (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination: 103–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemonnier, Pierre (ed.), 1993. Technological Changes. Transformation in Material Cultures Since the Neolithic. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, André, 1964. Le geste et la parole. Paris: Editions Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Lindeberg, Staffan, 2003. Maten och folksjukdomarna - ett evolutionsmedicinskt per-spektiv. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Lindeberg, Staffan and Bo, Gräslund, 2005. Ursprungligfdda. Vad vi borde äta och varför vi inte gör det. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
Marshall, Yvonne, 2002. What is community archaeology? World Archaeology 34(2):211–219.Google Scholar
Mattsson, Katarina, 2005. Diskrimineringens andra ansikte - svenskheten och ‘det vita västerländska’. In Reyes, P. and Karnali, Reyes. (eds), Bortom Vi och Dom. Teoretiska reflektioner om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminering: 139–158. Stockholm: Rapport av Utredningen om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminerin. SOU 2005:41.Google Scholar
Mellberg, David, 2004. Det är inte min historia! In Karlsson, K.-G. and Zander, U. (eds), Historien är nu. En introduktion till historiedidaktiken: 317–334. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Nordgren, Kenneth, 2008. Vems är historien? In Andersson, N. (ed.), Historieundervisning och identitet i det mängkulturella klassrummet: 7–14. Aktuellt om Historia 2008: 1. Historielärarnas förening.Google Scholar
PaleoDiet.com, 1997–2008. The Paleolithic Diet Page. URL (visited 10 March 2008: http://www.paleodiet.com/ Google Scholar
Schlanger, Nathan and Sinclair, Anthony (eds), 1990. Technology in the Humanities. Archaeological Review From Cambridge 9 (1) issue.Google Scholar
Shanks, Michael and Christopher, Tilley, 1987. Re-constructing Archaeology. Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
SMS Dictionaries, 2008. URLs (all visited 17 April 2008): http://www.smsdictionary.co.uk/, http://www.funsms.net/sms_dictionaryhtm, http://www.mobtastic.com/sms/dictionary/sms_dictionary.asp http://www.telepk.com/paksms/smsdictionary.asp Google Scholar
Whittaker, C. John, 1994. Flintknapping, Making and Understanding Stone Tools. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar