Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:23:10.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lives of Stone, Lives of People: Re-Viewing the Engraved Plaques of Late Neolithic and Copper Age Iberia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Katina Lillios
Katina Lillios*
Affiliation:
The University of Iowa, USA
*
[email: [email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For over a century prehistorians have approached the engraved stone plaques of the Iberian late Neolithic and Copper Age (3000–2500 BC) from a monolithic and idealist perspective, viewing the plaques as representations of the Mother Goddess. Most have not addressed the plaques' variability, their method of manufacture, the organization of their production, or their biographies. This article presents new interpretations of the Iberian plaques based on the first comprehensive on-line catalogue of the plaques – the Engraved Stone Plaque Registry and Inquiry Tool (ESPRIT) (Lillios 2004) – which holds records for over 1100 plaques, each unique, from over 200 sites in Portugal and Spain. Analyses of the plaques' raw material, style, chaîne opératoire, and distribution over space suggest that different plaque types had different functions and meanings, which shifted over time. Two plaque types: the Classic plaques and the Biomorphic Simple plaques are considered in this article. In their diverse forms, the Iberian plaques appear to have been durable records of regional and local group identities and could have contributed toward legitimating and perpetuating an ideology of inherited social difference in the Iberian late Neolithic and Copper Age.

Pendant plus d'un siècle, les préhistoriens ont abordé les plaques gravées en pierre du néolithique récent et du chalcolithique ibérique (3000–2500 av.J.-C.) d'un point de vue monolithique et idéaliste, en les considérant comme représentations d'une déesse mère. La plupart d'entre eux n'ont pas tenu compte ni de la variabilité de ces plaques, ni de leur méthode de réalisation, de l'organisation de leur fabrication ou de leurs biographies. Cet article présente de nouvelles interprétations des plaques ibériques basées sur le premier catalogue complet en ligne – le Engraved Stone Plaque Registry and Inquiry Tool (ESPRIT) (Lillios 2004) – qui contient les données de plus de 1100 plaques, toutes uniques, provenant de plus de 200 sites du Portugal et de l'Espagne. Les analyses de la matière première des plaques, de leur style, de la chaîne opératoire et de leur répartition dans l'espace laissent penser que les différents types de plaques avaient des fonctions et des significations spécifiques, qui évoluaient avec le temps. Deux espèces de plaques, les plaques classiques et les plaques biomorphiques simples, sont étudiées dans cet article. Dans leurs formes diverses, les plaques ibériques semblent avoir été les témoins durables de l'identité de groupes locaux et régionaux et pourraient avoir contribué à légitimer et maintenir une idéologie basée sur des différences sociales héréditaires durant le néolithique récent et le chalcolithique de la péninsule Ibérique.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Mehr als ein Jahrhundert lang haben Prähistoriker die gravierten Steintafeln des späten Neolithikums und der Kupferzeit auf der Iberischen Halbinsel (3000–2500 v. Chr.) aus einer monolithischen und idealistischen Perspektive als Darstellungen der Muttergöttin betrachtet. Die meisten von ihnen haben dabei die Variabilität, ihre Herstellungsweise, die Organisation ihrer Produktion oder ihre Biographien nicht gewürdigt. Auf der Basis des ersten umfassenden Online-Kataloges der Tafeln, des Engraved Stone Plaque Registry and Inquiry Tool (ESPRIT) (Lilios 2004), der Informationen zu mehr als 1.100 einzelnen Stücken von über 200 Fundplätzen in Portugal and Spanien enthält, präsentiert dieser Aufsatz neue Interpretationen der Iberischen Steintafeln. Analysen von Rohmaterialien, Stil, Herstellungskette und räumlicher Verteilung deuten darauf hin, dass verschiedene Tafeltypen verschiedene Bedeutungen und Funktionen hatten, die sich im Laufe der Zeit verändert haben. Zwei Tafeltypen, die klassischen und die einfachen biomorphen Exemplare, werden in diesem Aufsatz behandelt. In ihren verschiedenen Formen scheinen die iberischen Steintafeln dauerhafte Aufzeichnungen regionaler und lokaler Gruppen-Identitäten gewesen zu sein und könnten zur Legitimierung und Fortsetzung einer Ideologie ererbter sozialer Unterschiede im späten Neolithikum und der Kupferzeit auf der Iberischen Halbinsel beigetragen haben.

Desde há mais de um século que o tema das placas de xisto decoradas do Neolítico final e do Calcolítico da Península Ibérica (3000–2500 BC) tem sido abordado pelos pré-historiadores sob uma perspectiva monolítica e idealista, em que as placas são vistas como representações da DeusaMãe. As respectivas variabilidade, técnica de fabricação e biografia só muito raramente foram objecto de tratamento. Neste artigo, propõem-se novas interpretações das placas ibéricas baseadas num catálogo on-line exaustivo, o Engraved Stone Plaque Registry and Inquiry Tool (ESPRIT) (Lillios 2004), o primeiro do seu género, com mais de 1100 entradas para outras tantas placas provenientes de mais de 200 sítios de Portugal e Espanha. A análise da matéria-prima, do estilo, da cadeia operatória e da distribuição espacial sugere que aos diferentes tipos de placas correspondiam funções e significados também eles diferentes, e que os mesmos terão mudado ao longo do tempo. Discutem-se fundamentalmente dois tipos de placas: as Clássicas e as Biomórficas. Nas suas diversas formas, as placas ibéricas parecem ter constituído registos duráveis da identidade dos grupos humanos, tanto a nível regional como local, e podem ter contribuído para a legitimação e perpetuação no Neolítico final e no Calcolítico da Península Ibérica de uma ideologia de transmissão hereditária da diferenciação social.

Keywords

Copper AgegenealogymemoryMother GoddessNeolithicPortugalslate plaquessocial inequalitySpainPortugalEspagnenéolithiquechalcolithiqueplaques en ardoisemémoiredéesse mèregénéalogieinégalité socialePortugalSpanienNeolithikumKupferzeitSchiefertafelnErinnerungMuttergottheitGenealogiesoziale UngleichheitPortugalEspanhaNeolíticoCalcolíticoplacas de xistomemóriaDeusa-Mãegenealogiahierarquia social
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , 2004 , pp. 125 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åberg, Nils, 1921. Civilisation Enéolithique dans la Péninsule Ibérique. Uppsala: A.-b. Akademiska bokhandeln i kommission.Google Scholar
Almagro Basch, Martín, 1961–1962. Un ajuar dolménico excepcional procedente de la Granja de Céspedes de Badajoz. In Universidad de Murcia (ed.), Homenajea, C. Mergelina: 35–82. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
Almagro, Gorrea, Maria, José, 1973. Los Idolos del Bronce I His pano. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Ameghino, Florentino, 1879. L'homme préhistorique dans La Plata. Revue d'Anthropologie 2:210–249.Google Scholar
Bailey, Douglass W., 2005. Prehistoric Figurines: Corporeality and Representation in the Neolithic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boone, Elizabeth Hill and Walter, D. Mignolo, eds, 1994. Writing Without Words. Alternative Literacies in Mesoamerica and the Andes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Brandherm, Dirk, 1995. Os chamados ‘báculos’ — para uma interpretação simbólico-funcional. Trabalhos de Ant ropologia e Etnologia 35:89–93.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M. and Timothy, K. Earle, eds, 1987. Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno Ramírez, Primitiva, 1992. Les plaques décorées alentéjaines: approche de leur étude et analyse. L'Anthropologie 96:573–604.Google Scholar
Bueno Ramírez, Primitiva, and de Rodrigo, Balbin Behrmann, 1992. Cart mégalithique dans la Peninsula Ibérique – une vue d'ensemble. L'Anthropologie 96:499–572.Google Scholar
Cardoso, João Luís, 1994. Leceia 1983–1993. Escavações do Povoado Fortificado Préhistórico. Oeiras: Camara Municipal de Oeiras.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Edmund and Carl, Schuster, 1986–1988. Materials for the Study of Social Symbolism in Ancient and Tribal Art: A Record of Tradition and Continuity. New York: Rock Foundation.Google Scholar
Cartailhac, Emile, 1886. Les Ages Préhistoriques de l'Espagne et du Portugal. Paris: Ch. Reinwald.Google Scholar
Chapman, Robert, 1990. Emerging Complexity: The Later Prehistory of South-East Spain, Iberia and the West Mediterranean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Robert, 2003. Archaeologies of Complexity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Correia, Vergilio, 1917. Arte pre-histórico: os idolos-placas. Terra Portuguesa 12:29–35.Google Scholar
Costin, Cathy L., 1991. Craft specialization: issues in defining, documenting, and explaining the organization of production. In Michael, B. Schiffer (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory: 1–56. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Da, Veiga, Sebastiõo, Philippes Martins Estacio, 1886, 1887. Antiguidades Monumentaes do Algarve: Tempos Prehistoricos. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional.Google Scholar
Davis, D.D., 1985. Hereditary emblems: material culture in the context of social change. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4:149–176.Google Scholar
De Morgan, Jacques, 1897. Recherches sur les Origines de l'Egypte. Paris: E. Leroux.Google Scholar
Vasconcellos, De, Leite, J., 1897. Religiões da Lusitania na parte que principalmente se refere a Portugal. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional.Google Scholar
Dietler, Michael and Ingrid, Herbich, 1998. Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. In Miriam, T. Stark (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries: 232–263. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Dobres, Marcia-Anne and John, E. Ross, eds, 2000. Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Earle, Timothy, 1997. How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, Mark, 1999. Ancestral Geographies of the Neolithic: Landscape, Monuments, and Memory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Enquist, Magnus and Anthony, Arak, 1994. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372:169–172.Google Scholar
Favre, S., Gallay, A., Farjon, K. and Depeyer, B. 1986. Steles et Monuments du Petit Chasseur. Geneva: Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Ferreira, O. Da Veiga, Zbyszewski, G., Manuel, Leitão, North, C.T. and Reynolds De Sousa, H., 1975. The megalithic tomb of Pedra Branca, Portugal. Preliminary report. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 41:167–178.Google Scholar
Fischer, John, 1961. Art styles as cultural cognitive maps. American Anthropologist 63:80–83.Google Scholar
Fleming, Andrew, 1969. The myth of the mother-goddess. World Archaeology 1:247–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forenbaher, Stašo 1999. Production and Exchange of Bifacial Flaked Stone Artifacts during the Portuguese Chalcolithic. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 756).Google Scholar
Frankowski, Eugeniusz, 1920. Estelas Discoideas de la Peninsula Ibérica. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales.Google Scholar
Gelb, Ignace J., 1952. A Study of Writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred, 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Antonio, 1987. Unequal development in Copper Age Iberia. In Elizabeth, M. Brumfiel and Timothy, K. Earle (eds), Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies: 22–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Antonio, 2002. Assessing political development in Copper and Bronze Age Southeast Spain. In Jonathan, Haas (ed.), From Leaders to Rulers: 59–81. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, Marija, 1991. Civilization of the Goddess: The World of Old Europe. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Victor S., 1989. Manifestações do sagrado na Pré-História do Ocidente Peninsular. 1. Deusa(s)-Mãe, placas de xisto e cronologias: uma nota preambular. Almansor 7:289–302.Google Scholar
GonҪalves, Victor S., 1992. Revendo as Antas de Reguengos de Monsaraz. Lisbon: Instituto Nacional de Investigação Científica.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Victor S., 1995. Sitios, Horizontes, e Artefactos. Cascais: Câmara Municipal de Cascais.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Victor S., 1999a. Reguengos de Monsaraz: Territórios Megaliticos. Lisbon: Câmara Municipal de Reguengos de Monsaraz.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Victor S., 1999b. Time, landscape and burials 1. Megalithic rites of ancient peasant societies in central and southern Portugal: an initial review. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 1:83–109.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Victor S., 2003. Manifestações do sagrado na Pré-História do Ocidente peninsular: 4. A ‘síndrome das placas loucas’. Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia 6:131–157.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Victor S., André, Pereira and Marco, Andrade, 2003. A propósito do reaproveitamento de algumas placas de xisto gravadas da regido de Evora. O Arqueólogo Portugues 21:209–244.Google Scholar
Gut, Andreas, 1990. Die Schieferplattenidole Portugals anhand des Nachlasses von Vera Leisner. Unpublished , University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Harrison, Richard J., 1974. Origins of the Bell Beaker cultures. Antiquity 48:99–109.Google Scholar
Harrison, Richard J., 1985. The ‘policultivo ganadero’, or the secondary products revolution in Spanish agriculture, 5000-1000 bc. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 51:75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Richard J. and Antonio, Gilman, 1977. Trade in the second and third millennia BC between the Maghreb and Iberia. In Markotic, V. (ed.), Ancient Europe and the Mediterranean: 89–104. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Helms, Mary W., 2000. The Curassow's Crest: Myths and Symbols in the Ceramics of Ancient Panama. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Hernando Gonzalo, Almudena, 1987. Evolución cultural diferencial del Calcolítico entre las zonas áridas y húmedas del sureste Español? Trabajos de Prehistoria 44:171–200.Google Scholar
Hernando Gonzalo, Almudena, 1997. The funerary world and the dynamics of change in southeast Spain (fourth-second millennia BC). In Margarita, Díaz-Andreu García and Simon, Keay (eds), The Archaeology of Iberia: The Dynamics of Change: 85–97. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Houston, Stephen D., 2004. The archaeology of communication technologies. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 33:223–250.Google Scholar
Hristova, Petya, 2001. Easy to make and hard to explain? Some considerations on the technology of the slate plaques from prehistoric Iberia. Unpublished MS in possession of author.Google Scholar
Instituto Técnológico Geominero De España, 1994. Mapa Geológico de la Península Ibérica, Baleares y Canarias. 1:1,000,000. Madrid: Instituto Técnológico GeoMinero de España.Google Scholar
Küchler, Susanne, 1987. Malangan: art and memory in a Melanesian society. Man 22:238–255.Google Scholar
Kunst, Michael, 1995. Central places and social complexity in the Iberian Copper Age. In Katina, T. Lillios (ed.), The Origins of Complex Societies in Late Prehistoric Iberia: 32–43. Ann Arbor, MI: International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar
Leisner, Georg and Vera, Leisner, 1943. Die Megalithgrüber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Süden. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leisner, Georg and Vera, Leisner, 1951. Antas do Concelho de Reguengos de Monsaraz. Lisbon: Uniarch.Google Scholar
Leisner, Georg and Vera, Leisner, 1956. Die Megalithgräber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Westen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leisner, Georg and Vera, Leisner, 1959. Die Megalithgräber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Westen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leisner, Vera, 1965. Die Megalithgräber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Westen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leisner, Vera, 1998. Die Megalithgräaber der Iberischen Halbinsel: Der Westen. Madrider Forschungen Vol. I, 4. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lillios, Katina T., 1993. Regional settlement abandonment at the end of the Copper Age in the lowlands of west-central Portugal. In Catherine, Cameron and Steven, Tomka (eds), Abandonment of Settlements and Regions: Ethnoarchaeological and Archaeological Approaches: 110–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lillios, Katina T., 1997. Amphibolite tools of the Portuguese Copper Age (3000-2000 BC): a geoarchaeological study of prehistoric economics and symbolism. Geoarchaeology 12:137–163.Google Scholar
Lillios, Katina T., 2002. Some new views of the engraved slate plaques of southwest Iberia. Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia 5:135–151.Google Scholar
Lillios, Katina T., 2003. Creating memory in prehistory: the engraved slate plaques of southwest Iberia. In Ruth, Van Dyke and Susan, Alcock (eds), Archaeologies of Memory: 129–150. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lillios, Katina T., 2004. The Engraved Stone Plaque Registry and Inquiry Tool (ESPRIT). http://www.uiowa.edu/-anthro/esprit (accessed 14 March 2005). Lillios, Katina T., In prep. Heraldry for the Dead: Memory, Identity, and the Engraved Stone Plaques of Late Prehistoric Iberia.Google Scholar
Lisboa, Isabel M. Comes, 1985. Meaning and messages: mapping style in the Iberian Chalcolithic. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 4:181–196.Google Scholar
Márquez, Gustavo, Georg, Leisner, and Vera, Leisner, 1952. Los Sepulcros Megaliticos de Huelva. Madrid: Ministerio de Educacion Nacional.Google Scholar
Mathers, Clay, 1984. Beyond the grave: the context and wider implications of mortuary practices in south-east Spain. In Blagg, T.F.C., Jones, R.F.J. and Simon, J. Keay (eds), Papers in Iberian Archaeology: 13–46. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 193).Google Scholar
Meskell, Lynn, 1995. Goddesses, Gimbutas, and ‘New Age’ archaeology. Antiquity 69:74–86.Google Scholar
Montero Ruiz, Ignacio, 1994. El Origen de la Metalurgia en el Sureste Peninsular. Almeria: Instituto de Estudios Almerienses.Google Scholar
Nocete, Franosco 1994. Space as coercion: the transition to the state in the social formations of La Campitia, upper Guadalquivir valley, Spain, ca 1900-1600 BC. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13:35–50.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Maria Da Luz Ferreira Da and João, Xavier Matos, 2002. The exploitation of copper ores in the south of Portugal during the Chalcolithic. Revista de Ciencias His toricas da Universidade Portucalense Infante D. Henrique 17:123–138.Google Scholar
Ramos Milián, Antonio, 1981. Interpretaciones secuenciales y culturales de la Edad del Cobre en la zone meridional de la Península Ibérica. La alternativa de materialismo cultural. Cuadernos de Prehistoria de la Universidad de Granada 6:242–256.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Carlos 1878–1880. Estudos Prehistoricos em Portugal; Noticia de Algumas Estações e Monumentos Prehistoricos, Memoria Apresentada à Academia Real das Sciencias de Lisboa. Lisbon: Typ. da Academia.Google Scholar
Roberts, Mary Nooter and Allen, F. Roberts, 1996. Memory: Luba Art and the Making of History. New York: The Museum for African Art.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Maria, Da, Conceição Monteiro, 1986a. Código Para a Andlise das Placas de Xisto Gravadas do Alto Alentejo. Castelo de Vide: Câmara Municipal de Castelo de Vide.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Maria, Da, Conceição Monteiro, 1986b. Estudo Ideológico-Simbólico das Placas de Xisto Gravadas. Castelo de Vide: Câmara Municipal de Castelo de Vide.Google Scholar
Salomon, Frank, 2001. How an Andean ‘writing without words’ works. Current Anthropology 42:1–27.Google Scholar
Sangmeister, Edward and Hermanfrid, Schubart, 1981. Zambujal, die Grabungen 1964 bis 1973. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern.Google Scholar
Santos, M.F. and Da Veiga Ferreira, O., 1969. O monumento eneolítico de Santiago do Escoural. O Arqueólogo Português 3:37–62.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, Denise, 1992. Before Writing. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, Denise, 1996. How Writing Came About. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Silva, A.M., 1999. A nécropole neolítica do Cabeço da Arruda (Torres Vedras, Portugal): os dados paleobiológicos. In Joan, Bernabeu Auban and Teresa, Orozco-Köhler (eds), II Congrés del Neolític a la Península Ibèrica, Saguntum: 355–360. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.Google Scholar
Simões, Augusto Filirre, 1878. Introducgio a Archeologia da Peninsula Iberica. Lisbon: Livraria Ferreira.Google Scholar
Siret, Louis, 1913. Questions de Chronologie et d'Ethnographie Ibériques. Paris: Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Spindler, Konrad, 1981. Cova da Moura: die Besiedlung des atlantischen Küstengebietes Mittelportugals vom Neolithikum bis an das Ende der Bronzezeit. Mainz am Rhein: Von Zabern.Google Scholar
Tilley, Christopher 1999. Metaphor and Material Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary, 2003. Signs of the Inka Khipu: Binary Coding in the Andean Knotted-String Records. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Van Den Brink, H., 1997. Birds of Prey and Owls in Europe. Netherlands: Rebo Productions.Google Scholar
Van, Dyke, Ruth, M. and Susan, Alcock, eds, 2003. Archaeologies of Memory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy, 1991. The fractal person. In Marilyn, Strathern and Maurice, Godelier (eds), Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power in Melanesia: 159–173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Washrurn, Dorothy K., 1999. Perceptual anthropology: the cultural salience of symmetry. American Anthropologist 101:547–562.Google Scholar
Washburn, Dorothy K. and Donald, W. Crowe, 1988. Symmetries of Culture. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Annette B. and Jane, Schneider, eds, 1989. Cloth and Human Experience. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Wiessner, Polly, 1983. Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 48:253–276.Google Scholar
Woods, Alexander D. and Lillios, Katina, In press. Wearing stone: experimental manufacture and use of the Iberian engraved slate plaques. Actas of the IV Congress de Arqueologia Peninsular, Faro, 2004.Google Scholar