Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:28:02.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Island identities: ritual, travel and the creation of difference in Neolithic Malta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

John Robb
John Robb*
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, UK
*
[email: [email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Malta's Neolithic megalithic ‘temples’, unique in the Mediterranean, provide a striking challenge to the archaeological imagination. Most explanations have employed a simple functionalism: the temples resulted from Malta's insularity. Such explanations lack the theoretical grounding provided by studies of agency and meaning, and they do not sufficiently account for Malta's pattern of integration into and differentiation from a central Mediterranean regional culture. I argue that: (a) contextual evidence suggests that the temples created settings for rites emphasizing local origins and identity; (b) even in periods of greatest cultural difference, the Maltese had contacts with nearby societies, and Maltese travellers probably recognized cultural differences in important ritual practices; and (c) when ritual practitioners began reinterpreting a common heritage of meanings to create the temple rites, they also created a new island identity based on these rites. In effect, after two millennia of cultural similarity to their neighbours, the Neolithic Maltese created a cultural island, perhaps in reaction to changes in the constitution of society sweeping Europe in the fourth millennium BC. The result was an island of cultural difference similar in scale and, perhaps, origin to many other archaeologically unique settings such as Val Camonica, the Morbihan, Stonehenge, and Chaco Canyon.

Les ‘temples’ néolithiques de Malte, uniques en Méditerranée, représentent un défi à l'imagination archéologique. La plupart des interprétations ont recours à un simple fonctionalisme: les temples résulteraient de la condition insulaire de Malte. De telles explications ne tiennent cependant pas compte des aspects théoriques fondamentaux découlant de différentes études sur l'activité et la signification de ces temples. Le schéma spécifique de Malte, poursuivant une intégration dans la culture régionale de la Méditerranée centrale tout en développant une différenciation explicite de celle-ci, n'est pas assez respecté. Je soutiens que: a) l'évidence contextuelle semble indiquer que les temples étaient conçus, par les rites y attachés, de façon à renforcer l'origine et l'identité locales; b) même pendant les périodes de très grande différence culturelle, les Maltais étaient en contacte avec les sociétés avoisinantes, et les voyageurs maltais discernaient probablement des différences culturelles dans les coutumes rituelles importantes; et que c) lorsque les praticiens rituels commençaient à réinterpréter l'imaginaire collectif pour façonner les rites propres au temple, ils créaient simultanément une nouvelle identité insulaire fondée sur ces rites. En effet, après deux millénaires de ressemblance culturelle à leurs voisins, le néolithique maltais créait une culture insulaire propre, peut-être en réaction aux changements intra-sociétaux dans l'Europe du quatrième millénaire avant J-C. Le résultat en était une différence culturelle comparable - peut-être aussi en ce qui concerne son origine - à d'autres sites archéologiques tels que Val Canonica, Morbihan, Stonehenge et Chaco Canyon.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Maltas neolithische megalithische ‘Tempel’ - einzigartig im Mittelmeerraum - regen auf eindrucksvolle Weise die Phantasie der Archäologen an. Die meisten Erklärungen bedienen sich eines simplen Funktionalismus: die Tempel sollen aus Maltas insularer Abgeschiedenheit resultieren. Derartigen Interpretationen fehlt jedoch die theoretische Basis. Weiterhin begründen sie nicht ausreichend Maltas Muster der kulturellen Integration in bzw. der Abtrennung von der Welt des zentralen Mittelmeerraumes. Der Verfasser stellt fest, daß (a.) kontextuelle Argumente es wahrscheinlich machen, daß die Tempel den Hintergrund für Riten bildeten, die eine lokale Herkunft und Identität betonten, (b.) die Malteser selbst in Perioden größter kultureller Unterschiede Kontakte zu den umliegenden Kulturen pflegten und maltesische Reisende höchst-wahrscheinlich die kulturellen Unterschiede in wichtigen rituellen Praktiken erkannten und (c.) als die Ausübenden dieser Handlungen begannen, zur Entwicklung der Tempelriten ein gemeinsames inhaltliches Erbe zu reinterpretieren, sie damit gleichzeitig auch eine neue Insel-Identität entwickelten, die auf diesen Riten beruhte. So schufen die Malteser nach zwei Jahrtausenden kultureller Ähnlichkeit zu ihren Nachbarn während des Neolithikums zur geographischen auch eine kulturelle Inselstellung - dies möglicherweise in Reaktion auf die gesellschaftlichen Umwälz-ungen, die Europa im vierten vorchristlichen Jahrtausend erschütterten. Das Resultat war eine Insel deutlich abweichender kultureller Prägung, die in ihrem Erscheinungsbild und vielleicht auch ihrer Ursache vielen anderen einzigartigen archäologischen Denkmälern, wie z.B. Val Camonica, Morbihan, Stonehenge und Chaco Canyon, ähnelt.

Keywords

Copper AgecosmologyethnogenesisidentityMediterraneantrade
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , 2001 , pp. 175 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, M.A. and Wilshusen, R.H., 1990. Large-scale integrative facilities in tribal societies: cross-cultural and southwestern US examples. World Archaeology 22:133–146.Google Scholar
Anati, E., 1985. The question of fertility cults. In Bonnanno, A. (ed.), Archaeology and Fertility Cult in the Ancient Mediterranean: 2–16. Amsterdam: Gruner.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E., 1995. Transportation innovation and social complexity among maritime hunter-gatherer societies. American Anthropologist 97:733–747.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., 1994. Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barth, F., 1987. Cosmologies in the Making: A Generative Approach to Cultural Variation in Inner New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G., 1936. Naven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, E., 1997. Strategic symbolism: miniature nuraghi of Sardinia. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 10:151–164.Google Scholar
Bonanno, A., 1996. Temple megalithism vs funerary megalithism:the case of the Maltese Islands. XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences (Forlì, Italy, 8–14 September 1996) Colloquia 9:103–7.Google Scholar
Bonanno, A., Gouder, T., Malone, C., and Stoddart, S., 1990. Monuments in an island society: the Maltese context. World Archaeology 22:190–205.Google Scholar
Broodbank, C., 1989. The longboat and society in the Cyclades in the Keros-Syros culture. American Journal of Archaeology 93:319–337.Google Scholar
Brydone, P., 1780. A Tour through Sicily and Malta. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Castellana, G., 1995. La necropoli protoeneolitica di Piano Vento nel territorio di Palma di Montechiaro. Agrigento: Regione Sicilia Assessorato Regionale Beni Culturali Ambientali e Pubblica Istruzione.Google Scholar
Cazzella, A., 1994. Dating the ‘Copper Age’ in the Italian peninsula and adjacent islands. Journal of European Archaeology 2:1–19.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1996. The origin of tells in Eastern Hungary. In Topping, P. (ed.), Neolithic Landscapes: 139–164. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1998. Objectification, embodiment, and the value of places and things. In Bailey, D. (ed.), The Archaeology of Value: 106–130. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 730).Google Scholar
Cherry, J. F., 1978. Generalization and the archaeology of the state. In Green, D., Haselgrove, C., and Spriggs, M. (eds), Social Organization and Settlement: 411–437. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Cowgill, G., 1975. On the causes and consequences of ancient and modern population change. American Anthropologist 77:505–525.Google Scholar
Devereux, P. and Jahn, R. G., 1996. Preliminary investigations and cognitive considerations of the acoustical resonance of selected archaeological sites. Antiquity 70:665–666.Google Scholar
Dietler, M., and Herbich, I., 1998. Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. In Stark, M. (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries: 232–263. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Dobres, M.-A., and Robb, J., eds, 2000. Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge. Emberling, G., 1997. Ethnicity in complex societies: archaeological perspectives. Journal of Anthropological Research 5:295–344.Google Scholar
Evans, J.D., 1959. Malta. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Evans, J.D., 1971. Prehistoric Antiquities of the Maltese Islands. London: Athlone. EVANS, J.D., 1976. Archaeological evidence for religious practices in the Maltese Islands during the Neolithic and Copper Ages. Kokalos 22:130–146.Google Scholar
Evans, J.D., 1977. Island archaeology in the Mediterranean: problems and opportunities. World Archaeology 9:12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J.D., 1984. Maltese prehistory: a reappraisal. In Waldren, W. (ed.), The Deya Conference of Prehistory: Early Settlement in the Western Mediterranean Islands and their Peripheral Areas, Part ii: 490–497. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E., 1940. The Nuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feil, D., 1987. The Evolution of Highland Papua New Guinea Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugazzola Delpino, M.A. and Mineo, M., 1995. La piroga neolitica del lago di Bracciano (‘La Marmotta 1’). Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana 86:197–266.Google Scholar
Giannitrapani, E., 1997a. Sicilia e Malta durante il Neolitico. In Tusa, S. (ed.), Prima Sicilia: 201–212. Palermo: Ediprint.Google Scholar
Giannitrapani, E., 1997b. Rapporti tra la Sicilia e Malta durante l'Età del Bronzo. In Tusa, S. (ed.), Prima Sicilia: 429–444. Palermo: Ediprint.Google Scholar
Glass, P., 1988. Trobriand symbolic geography. Man 23:56–76.Google Scholar
Godelier, M. and Strathern, A., eds, 1991. Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graziosi, P., 1974. L'arte preistorica in Italia. Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Hegmon, M., 1998. Technology, style and social practices: archaeological approaches. In Stark, M. (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries: 264–79. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Helms, M., 1988. Ulysses' Sail. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, K. and Whitehouse, R, 1998. Anthropomorphic figurines and the construction of gender in Neolithic Italy. In Whitehouse, R. (ed.), Gender and Italian Archaeology: Challenging the Stereotypes: 95–126. London: Accordia Research Centre.Google Scholar
Ingamells, J., 1997. A Dictionary of British and Irish Travelers in Italy 1701–1800. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S., 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kelly, R., 1985. The Nuer Conquest: Structure and Development of an Expansionist System. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, R., 1993. Constructing Inequality: the Fabrication of a Hierarchy of Virtue among the Etoro. Ainn Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Knauft, B., 1993. South Coast New Guinea Cultures: History, Comparison, Dialectic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leighton, R, 1992. Stone axes and exchange in south Italian prehistory: new evidence from old collections. Journal of the Accordia Research Centre 3:11–40.Google Scholar
Levy, J.E., 1992. Orayvi Revisited: Social Stratification in an ‘Egalitarian’ Community. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B., 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malone, C., 1985. Pots, prestige and ritual in Neolithic southern Italy. In Malone, C. and Stoddart, S. (eds), Papers in Italian Archaeology IV: the Cambridge Conference: 118–151. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Malone, C. and Stoddart, S., 1996. Maltese and Mediterranean megalithism in the light of the Brochtorff Circle. XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences (Forlì, Italy, 8–14 September 1996) Colloquia 9:109–114.Google Scholar
Malone, C., Stoddart, S. and Trump, D., 1988. A house for the temple builders: recent investigations on Gozo, Malta. Antiquity 62:297–301.Google Scholar
Malone, C., Bonanno, A., Gouder, T., Stoddart, S. and Trump, D. H., 1993. The death cults of prehistoric Malta. Scientific American 269:110–117.Google Scholar
Malone, C., Stoddart, S., Bonanno, A., Gouder, T. and Trump, D., 1995. Mortuary ritual of 4th millennium BC Malta: the Zebbug period chambered tomb from the Brochtorff Circle at Xaghra (Gozo). Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61:303–345.Google Scholar
Malone, C., Stoddart, S. and Tommony, M., 1997. Articulating disarticulation: a Maltese experience. Paper presented at Theoretical Archaeology Group meeting, Bournemouth, UK.Google Scholar
Maniscalco, L., 1989. Ocher containers and trade in the central Mediterranean Copper Age. American Journal of Archaeology 93:537–541.Google Scholar
Morter, J., 1999. A ‘social’ structure and ‘social structure’: recent architectural finds from the middle Neolithic site at Capo Alfiere, Calabria. In Tykot, R.H., Morter, J., and Robb, J.E. (eds), Social Dynamics of the Prehistoric Central Mediterranean: 83–96. London: Accordia Research Centre.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, F., 1996. Le industrie litiche oloceniche: forme, materie prime e aspetti economici. In Leighton, R. (ed.), Early Societies in Sicily: New Developments in Archaeological Research: 41–56. London: Accordia Research Centre.Google Scholar
O'Hare, G., 1990. A preliminary study of polished stone artefacts in prehistoric southern Italy. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 56:123–152.Google Scholar
Ortiz, A., ed., 1979. Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 9: Southwest. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina, , 1998. Stonehenge for the ancestors: the stones pass on the message. Antiquity 72:308–326.Google Scholar
Patton, M., 1996. Islands in Time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1965. Ancient Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pluciennik, M., 1997. Historical, geographical, and anthropological imaginations: early ceramics in southern Italy. In Cumberpatch, C. and Blinkhom, P. (eds), Not So Much a Pot, More a Way of Life: 37–56. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1979. Before Civilization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robb, J., 1994a. Burial and social reproduction in the Peninsular Italian Neolithic. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 7:29–75.Google Scholar
Robb, J., 1994b. Gender contradictions: moral coalitions and inequality in prehistoric Italy. Journal of European Archaeology 2:20–49.Google Scholar
Robb, J., 1999. Great persons and big men in the Italian Neolithic. In Tykot, R. H., Morter, J., and Robb, J.E. (eds), Social Dynamics of the Prehistoric Central Mediterranean: 111–122. London: Accordia Research Centre.Google Scholar
Robb, J., in press. Time and biography: osteobiography of the Italian Neolithic life-span. In Tarlow, S., Pluciennik, M., and Hamilakis, Y. (eds), Thinking through the Body. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Robb, J. and Durham, P., 1998. The Neolithic obsidian trade in the central Mediterranean: modelling trade routes. Poster presented at the UK Computer Applications in Archaeology conference, Southampton.Google Scholar
Shennan, S., 1982. Ideology, change and the European Bronze Age. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology: 155–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1981. Plough and pastoralism: aspects of the secondary products revolution. In Hodder, I., Isaac, G., and Hammond, N. (eds), Pattern of the Past: Studies in Honor of David Clarke: 261–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1994. The transformation of early agrarian Europe: the later Neolithic and Copper Ages, 4500-2500 BC. In Cunliffe, B. (ed.), The Oxford Illustrated Prehistory of Europe: 167–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skeates, R., 1993. Neolithic exchange in central and southern Italy. In Scarre, C. and Healy, F. (eds), Trade and Exchange in Prehistoric Europe: 109–114. Oxford: The Prehistoric Society.Google Scholar
Skeates, R., 1995. Animate objects: a biography of prehistoric ‘axe-amulets’ in the central Mediterranean region. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61:279–301.Google Scholar
Skeates, R., 1998. The social life of Italian Neolithic painted pottery. In Bailey, D. (ed.), The Archaeology of Value: 131–141. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Stoddart, S., 1999. Long-term dynamics of an island community: Malta 5500 BC — AD 2000. In Tykot, R. H., Morter, J., and Robb, J. E. (eds), Social Dynamics of the Prehistoric Central Mediterranean: 137–148. London: Accordia Research Centre.Google Scholar
Stoddart, S., Bonanno, A., Gouder, T., Malone, C. and Trump, D., 1993. Cult in an island society: prehistoric Malta in the Tarxien period. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3:3–19.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1990. Monuments from the inside: the case of the megalithic Irish tombs. World Archaeology 22:168–89.Google Scholar
Trump, D., 1966. Skorba: Excavations Carried Out on Behalf of the National Museum of Malta, 1961–1963. London: Society of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
Trump, D., 1976a. The collapse of the Maltese temples. In Sieveking, G., Long-worth, I. H., and Wilson, K. E. (eds), Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology: 605–609. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Trump, D., 1976b. Contatti siculo-maltesi prima dell'età del bronzo. Kokalos 23:23–32.Google Scholar
Trump, D., 1981. Megalithic architecture in Malta. In Evans, J.D., Cunliffe, B., and Renfrew, C. (eds), Antiquity and Man: Essays in Honour of Glyn Daniel: 128–140. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Tusa, S., 1993. La Sicilia nella preistoria. Palermo: Sellerio.Google Scholar
Tykot, R. H., 1997. Characterization of the Monte Arci (Sardinian) obsidian sources. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:467–479.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R., 1972. The rock-cut tombs of the central Mediterranean. Antiquity 46:275–281.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R., 1981. Megaliths of the central Mediterranean. In Evans, J., Cunliffe, B. and Renfrew, C. (eds), Antiquity and Man: Essays in Honour of Glyn Daniel: 106–127. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R., 1992. Underground Religion: Cult and Culture in Prehistoric Italy. London: Accordia Research Center.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., 1996. Europe in the Neolithic: The Creation of New Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zammit, T., 1930. Prehistoric Malta: The Tarxien Temples. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Zammit-Maempel, G., 1977. An Outline of Maltese Geology. Birkirkara: Progress Press.Google Scholar