Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:13:33.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human, Transhuman, Posthuman Digital Archaeologies: An Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2019

Marta Díaz-Guardamino  and
Colleen Morgan
Marta Díaz-Guardamino
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Durham University
Colleen Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Current archaeological thought evokes a sparking Catherine wheel: spinning fireworks that detonate light, colour, and sound with every movement. These theoretical turns swirl alongside the ongoing development and adoption of scientific and digital techniques that have wide-ranging implications for archaeological practices and interpretations. Two particularly combustible developments are posthumanism and the ontological turn, which emerged within the broader humanities and social sciences. Posthumanism rejects human exceptionalism and seeks to de-centre humans in archaeological discourse and practice. Linked to this is the so-called ‘ontological turn’ (aka the ‘material turn’), a shift away from framing archaeological research within a Western ontology and a movement beyond representationalism (i.e. focusing on things themselves rather than assuming that objects represent something else).

Type
Article
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 22 , Special Issue 3: Digital Archaeologies , August 2019 , pp. 320 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, J. 2001. The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. 1997. Mothers, Monsters, and Machines. In: Medina, K.C.N., ed. Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 59–79.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, O.T. & Cipolla, C. 2017. Archaeological Theory in the New Millennium: Introducing Current Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huggett, J. 2017. The Apparatus of Digital Archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 44. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.44.7Google Scholar
Jervis, B. 2018. Assemblage Thought and Archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Perry, S. & Taylor, J. 2018. Theorising the Digital: A Call to Action for the Archaeological Community. In: Matsumoto, M. & Uleberg, E., eds. Oceans of Data: Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
Richardson, L.-J. & Lindgren, S. 2017. Online Tribes and Digital Authority: What Can Social Theory Bring to Digital Archaeology? Open Archaeology, 3: 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2017-0008Google Scholar
Taylor, J., Issavi, J., Berggren, A., Lukas, D., Mazzucato, C., Tung, B. et al. 2018. ‘The Rise of the Machine’: The Impact of Digital Tablet Recording in the Field at Çatalhöyük. Internet Archaeology, 47. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.47.1Google Scholar