No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Georgina Muskett, Mycenaean Art: A Psychological Approach. (British Archaeological Reports, Int. Ser. S1636, Oxford: Archaeopress, 2007, 77 pp., pbk, ISBN 978-1-4073-0075-7)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2010 Sage Publications
References
Buss, D.M., 2001. Human nature and culture: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Journal of Personality
69(6):155–178.Google Scholar
Deregowski, J.B., 1989. Real space and represented space: cross-cultural perspectives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
12:51–119.Google Scholar
Deregowski, J.B., 1995. Perception – depiction – perception, and communication: a skeleton key to rock art and its significance. Rock Art Research
12(1):3–22.Google Scholar
Engquist, M. and Arak, A., 1993. Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses. Nature
361(6411):446–448.Google Scholar
Latto, R., 1995. The brain of the beholder. In Gregory, R. et al. (eds), The Artful Eye:
66–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindstr⊘m, T.C. and Kristoffersen, S., 2001. ‘Figure it out!’ Psychological perspectives on perception of Migration Period animal art. Norwegian Archaeological Review
34(2):65–84.Google Scholar
Musgrave, J.H., Neave, R.A.H. and Prag, A.J.N.W., 1995. Seven faces from Grave Circle B at Mycenae. The Annual of the British School at Athens
90:107–36.Google Scholar
Nell, V, 2006. Cruelty's rewards: the gratification of perpetrators and spectators. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
29:211–257.Google Scholar
Reber, R. and Schwarz, N., 2006. Perceptual fluency, preference, and evolution. Polish Psychological Bulletin
37:16–22.Google Scholar