Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:33:01.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Death, exchange and reproduction in the British Bronze Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Joanna Brück
Joanna Brück*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the character and role of exchange in Bronze Age Britain. It critiques anachronistic models of competitive individualism, arguing instead that the circulation of both artefacts and the remains of the dead constructed the self in terms of enduring interpersonal ties. It is suggested that the conceptual divide between people and things that typifies post-Enlightenment rationalism has resulted in an understanding of Bronze Age exchange that implicitly characterizes objects as commodities. This article re-evaluates the relationship between people and things in Bronze Age Britain. It explores the role of objects as active social agents; the exchange of artefacts and of human remains facilitated the production of the self and the reproduction of society through cyclical processes of fragmentation, dispersal and reincorporation. As such, Bronze Age concepts of personhood were relational, not individual.

Cet article étudie le caractère et le rôle des échanges pendant l'âge du Bronze britannique. Il critique des modèles anachronistes de compétition individuelle et soutient plutôt que la circulation et des artefacts et des dépouilles mortelles a construit le moi en termes de liens personnels persistants. On peut suggérer que le fossé conceptuel entre hommes et choses, typique du rationalisme de l'après-Siècle des Lumières, a résulté dans une conception des échanges de l'âge du Bronze considérant implicitement les objets comme matières premières. Cet article reconsidère la relation entre hommes et choses en Grande-Bretagne à l'âge du Bronze. Il étudie le rôle des objets comme facteurs sociaux actifs; l'échange d'artefacts et de dépouilles mortelles facilitait la naissance du moi et la reproduction de la société par des processus cycliques de fragmentation, dispersion et réincorporation. Comme tel, les concepts de la personnalité à l'âge du Bronze étaient relationnels, et non pas individuels.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Aufsatz untersucht den Charakter und die Rolle von Austausch in der britischen Bronzezeit. Er kritisiert anachronistische Modelle des konkurrierenden Individualismus und hebt vielmehr darauf ab, dass die Zirkulation von Artefakten wie auch von Überresten der Verstorbenen das Selbst im Sinne fortdauernder zwischenmenschlicher Verbindungen formte. Es wird vorgeschlagen, dass die konzeptionelle Trennung zwischen Menschen und Dingen, die den Rationalismus der Nachaufklärungszeit ausmachte, zu einem Verständnis des bronzezeitlichen Austausches führte, das Objekte ausschließlich als Waren sah. Der vorliegende Beitrag reevaluiert die Beziehung zwischen Menschen und Dingen in der britischen Bronzezeit. Er untersucht die Rolle von Objekten als aktive sozial Handelnde; der Austausch von Artefakten und menschlichen Überresten förderte die Entstehung des Selbst und die Reproduktion der Gesellschaft durch zyklische Prozesse von Fragmentation, Zerstreuung und Wiedereingliederung. Als solche waren die bronzezeitlichen Konzepte der Persönlichkeit relational, nicht individuell.

Keywords

BritainBronze Ageburialexchangeobject biographiespersonhoodsettlementtransformationGrande-Bretagneâge du Bronzeenterrementchangebiographies d'objetspersonnalitéhabitattransformationBritische InselnBronzezeitBestattungAustauschObjektbiografienPersönlichkeitSiedlungTransformation
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , 2006 , pp. 73 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, C., Harman, M. and Wheeler, H., 1987. Bronze Age cremation cemeteries in the East Midlands. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 53:187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.G., 1942. A cinerary urn from Sandmill Farm, Stranraer. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 76:79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashbee, P., 1960. The Bronze Age Round Barrow in Britain. London: Phoenix House.Google Scholar
Bailey, C., 1980. Excavation of three round barrows in the parish of Kingston Russell. Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society 102:19–31.Google Scholar
Banks, I., 1995. The excavation of three cairns at Stoneybum Farm, Crawford, Lanarkshire, 1991. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 125:289–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, A. and Doherty, C., 1998. A note on the analysis of white inlay in Beaker and Early Iron Age Pottery. The Old Potter's Almanack 6(6):3–4.Google Scholar
Barnatt, J., 1994. Excavation of a Bronze Age unendosed cemetery, cairns, and field boundaries at Eaglestone Flat, Curbar, Derbyshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60:287–370.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., 1994. Fragments from Antiquity: an Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Battaglia, D., 1990. On the Bones of the Serpent: Person, Memory and Mortality in Sabarl Island Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, K., 2006. Hoards and Deposition of the Irish Bronze Age. Unpublished , School of Archaeology, University College Dublin.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. and Parry, J., 1982. Introduction: death and the regeneration of life. In Bloch, M. and Parry, J. (eds), Death and the Regeneration of Life: 1–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M. and Parry, J., 1989. Introduction: money and the morality of exchange. In Parry, J. and Bloch, M. (eds), Money and the Morality of Exchange: 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, D., 1988. Excavation at the North Ring, Mucking, Essex. Chelmsford: East Anglian Archaeology Report 43.Google Scholar
Bordo, S., 1987. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, A., 2004. Worked bone assemblage. In Brossler, A., Early, R. and Allen, C., Green Park (Reading Business Park). Phase 2 Excavations 1995: 99–100. Oxford: Oxford Archaeology.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. and Harman, M., 1999. Human remains. In Barclay, A. and Halpin, C., Excavations at Barrow Hills, Radley, Oxfordshire. Vol 1: The Neolithic and Bronze Age Monument Complex: 59. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1984. The Social Foundations of Prehistoric Britain: Themes and Variations in the Archaeology of Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1985. Exchange and social distance - the structure of Bronze Age artefact distributions. Man (N.S.) 20(4):692–704.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1990. The Passage of Arms: An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoards and Votive Deposits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 2000. An Archaeology of Natural Places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 2005. Ritual and Domestic Life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. and Ellison, A., 1975. Rams Hill: A Defended Bronze Age Enclosure and its Landscape. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, British Series 19.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. and Ford, D., 2004. A long distance connection in the Bronze Age: joining fragments of a Ewart Park sword from two sites in England. In Roche, H., Grogan, E., Bradley, J., Coles, J. and Raftery, B. (eds), From Megaliths to Metals: Essays in Honour of George Eogan: 174–177. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Brown, N., 1988. A Late Bronze Age enclosure at Lofts Farm, Essex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 54:249–302.Google Scholar
Brown, N., 1995a. Prehistoric pottery. In M. Atkinson, A Late Bronze Age enclosure at Broomfield, Chelmsford. Essex Archaeology and History 26:8–14.Google Scholar
Brown, N., 1995b. Ardleigh reconsidered: Deverel-Rimbury pottery in Essex. In Kinnes, I. and Varndell, G. (eds), ‘Unbaked Urns of Rudely Shape’: Essays on British and Irish Pottery for Ian Longworth: 123–44. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 55.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 1995. A place for the dead: the role of human remains in the Late Bronze Age. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61:245–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brück, J., 1999a. Houses, lifecycles and deposition on Middle Bronze Age settlements in southern England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 65:145–166.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 1999b. Ritual and rationality: some problems of interpretation in European archaeology. Journal of European Archaeology 2(3):313–344.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 2004. Material metaphors: the relational construction of identity in early Bronze Age burials in Ireland and Britain. Journal of Social Archaeology 4(3):7–33.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 2006. Fragmentation, personhood and the social construction of technology in middle and late Bronze Age Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16(3):297–315.Google Scholar
Burgess, C., 1980. The Age of Stonehenge. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Burgess, C. and Shennan, S.J., 1976. The Beaker phenomenon: some suggestions, 1: general comments and the British evidence, 2: some comments on the European evidence. In Burgess, C. and Miket, R. (eds), Settlement and Economy in the Third and Second Millennia BC: 309–331. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, British Series 33.Google Scholar
Champion, T., Gamble, C., Shennan, S. and Whittle, A., 1984. Prehistoric Europe. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clamagirand, B., 1980. The social organisation of the Ema of Timor. In Fox, J.J. (ed.), The Flow of Life: Essays on Eastern Indonesia: 134–151. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.V., Cowie, T.G. and Foxon, A., 1985. Symbols of Power at the Time of Stonehenge. Edinburgh: National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland.Google Scholar
Cleal, R., 1995. Pottery fabrics in Wessex from the fourth to second millennia BC. In Kinnes, I. and Varndell, G. (eds), ‘Unbaked Urns of Rudely Shape’: Essays on British and Irish Pottery for Ian Longworth: 185–194. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 55.Google Scholar
Collis, J., 1983. Wigber Low, Derbyshire: A Bronze Age and Anglian Burial Site in the White Peak. Sheffield: Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Cook, M., 2000. An Early Bronze Age multiple burial cist from Mill Road Industrial Estate, Linlithgow, West Lothian. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 130:77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, T., 2004. Special places for special axes? Early Bronze Age metalwork from Scotland in its landscape setting. In Shepherd, I. and Barclay, G. (eds), Scotland in Ancient Europe: The Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of Scotland in their European Context: 247–261. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Curwen, E.C., 1934. A Late Bronze Age farm and a Neolithic pit-dwelling on New Barn Down, Clapham, near Worthing. Sussex Archaeological Collections 75:136–170.Google Scholar
Dacre, M. and Ellison, A., 1981. A Bronze Age cemetery at Kimpton, Hampshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 47:147–203.Google Scholar
De Coppet, D., 1981. The life-giving death. In Humphreys, S. and King, H. (eds), Mortality and Immortality: The Anthropology and Archaeology of Death: 175–204. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Demokopoulou, K., Elyère, C., Jensen, J., Jockenhövel, A. and Mohen, J.-P., 1999. Gods and Heroes of the European Bronze Age. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Earle, T., 1987. Chiefdoms in archaeological and ethnohistorical perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 16:279–308.Google Scholar
Earle, T., 1997. How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellison, A., 1972. The Bronze Age pottery In E.W. Holden, A Bronze Age cemetery-barrow on Itford Hill, Beddingham, Sussex. Sussex Archaeological Collections 110:104–113.Google Scholar
Ellison, A., and Drewett, P., 1971. Pits and post-holes in the British Early Iron Age: some alternative explanations. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 37:183–194.Google Scholar
Forman, S., 1980. Descent, alliance and exchange ideology among the Makassae of East Timor. In Fox, J.J. (ed.), The Flow of Life: Essays on Eastern Indonesia: 152–177. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., 2004. The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gero, J., 2000. Troubled travels in agency and feminism. In Dobres, M.A. and Robb, J. (eds), Agency in Archaeology: 34–39. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibson, A., 2004. Burials and Beakers: seeing beneath the veneer in late Neolithic Britain. In Czebrezuk, J. (ed.), Similar but Different: Bell Beakers in Europe: 173–192. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. and Marshall, Y., 1999. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology 31(2):169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C., Lynch, F. and White, H., 1982. The excavation of two round barrows on Launceston Down, Dorset (Long Crichel 5 and 7). Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society 104:39–58.Google Scholar
Greenwell, W., 1894. Antiquities of the Bronze Age in the Heathery Burn Cave, near Stanhope, County Durham. Archaeologia 54:87–114.Google Scholar
Gregory, C., 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gross, M. and Averill, M.B., 1983. Evolution and patriarchal myths of scarcity and competition. In Harding, S. and Hintikka, M.B. (eds), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of science: 71–95. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Gwilt, A., Kucharski, K., Silvester, R. and Davis, M., 2005. A Late Bronze Age hoard from Trevalyn Farm, Rossett, Wrexham, with some observations on hoarding practice and gold bracelet weights. Studia Celtica 39:27–61.Google Scholar
Hill, J.D., 1995. Ritual and Rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: A Study on the Formation of a Specific Archaeological Record. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (British Series 242).Google Scholar
Hingley, R., 1997. Iron, ironworking and regeneration: a study of the symbolic meaning of metalworking in Iron Age Britain. In Gwilt, A. and Haselgrove, C. (eds), Reconstructing Iron Age Societies: New Approaches to the British Iron Age: 9–18. Oxford: Oxbow (Monograph 71).Google Scholar
Hoskins, J., 1989. Why do ladies sing the blues? Indigo dyeing, cloth production and gender symbolism in Kodi. In Weiner, A. and Schneider, J. (eds), Cloth and Human Experience: 141–173. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hoskins, J., 1998. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hundt, H., 1955. Versuch der Deutung der Depotfunde der Nordischen Jüngeren Bronzezeit, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung Mecklenburgs. jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, Mainz 2:95–140.Google Scholar
Jockenhövel, A., 1991. Räumliche Mobilität von Personen in der mittleren Bronzezeit des westlichen Mitteleuropa. Germania 69:49–62.Google Scholar
Jones, A., 2002. A biography of colour: colour, material histories and personhood in the early Bronze Age of Britain and Ireland. In Jones, A. and MacGregor, G. (eds), Colouring the Past: The Significance of Colour in Archaeological Research: 159–74. Berg: Oxford.Google Scholar
Jordanova, L.J., 1980. Natural facts: a historical perspective on science and sexuality. In MacCormack, C. and Strathern, M. (eds), Nature, Culture and Gender: 42–69. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I., 1986. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective: 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 1987. From stone to bronze – the evolution of social complexity in Northern Europe, 2300–1200 BC. In Brumfiel, E. and Earle, T. (eds), Specialization, Exchange and Complex Societies: 30–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 1998. Europe Before History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. and Larsson, T., 2005. The Rise of Bronze Age Society: Travels, Transmissions and Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Küchler, S., 1987. Malangan: art and memory in a Melanesian society. Man 22(2):238–255.Google Scholar
Ladle, L., and Woodward, A., 2003. A Middle Bronze Age house at Bestwall, Wareham, Dorset: an interim report. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 69:265–277.Google Scholar
Levy, J., 1996. Heterarchy in Bronze Age Denmark: settlement pattern, gender and ritual. In Ehrenreich, R., Crumley, C. and Levy, J. (eds), Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Society: 41–53. American Anthropological Association, Archaeological Papers 6.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G., 1984. The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lynch, F., 1971. Report on the re-excavation of two Bronze Age cairns in Anglesey: Bedd Branwen and Treiorwerth. Archaeologia Cambrensis 120:11–83.Google Scholar
Lynch, F., 1984. Moel Goedog circle 1: a complex ring cairn near Harlech. Archaeologia Cambrensis 133:8–50.Google Scholar
Macpherson-Grant, N., 1994. The pottery. In D.R.J. Perkins, N. Macpherson-Grant and E. Healey, Monkton Court Farm evaluation, 1992. Archaeologia Cantiana 114:248–288.Google Scholar
Malmer, M., 1992. Weight systems in the Scandinavian Bronze Age. Antiquity 66(251):377–388.Google Scholar
Maraszek, R., 2000. Late Bronze Age axe hoards in western and northern Europe. In Pare, C. (ed.), Metals Make the World go Round. The Supply and Circulation of Metals in Bronze Age Europe: 208–224. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Marsden, B., 1970. The excavation of the Bee Low round cairn, Youlgreave, Derbyshire. Antiquaries Journal 50(2):186–215.Google Scholar
Martin, E., 1976. The excavation of two tumuli on Waterhall Farm, Chippenham, Cambridgeshire, 1973. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 77:1–21.Google Scholar
Mauss, M., 1985. A category of the human mind: the notion of the person; the notion of the self. In Carrithers, M., Collins, S. and Lukes, S. (eds), The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History: 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, M., 1990. The Gift: the Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McKinley, J., 1994. Spong Hill Part VII: The Cremations. Chelmsford: East Anglian Archaeology report 69.Google Scholar
Mercer, R.J. and Midgley, M.S., 1997. The Early Bronze Age cairn at Sketewan, Balnaguard, Perth and Kinross. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 127:281–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, C., 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Morris, B., 1991. Western Conceptions of the Individual. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Morris, E., 1994. Pottery. In C.M. Hearne and M.J. Heaton, Excavations at a Late Bronze Age settlement in the Upper Thames Valley at Shorncote Quarry near Cirencester, 1992. Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 112:34–43.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J.R., 1905. Forty Years’ Researches in British and Saxon Burial Mounds of East Yorkshire. London: A. Brown and Sons.Google Scholar
Nebelsick, L., 2000. Rent asunder: ritual violence in Late Bronze Age hoards. In Pare, C. (ed.), Metals Make the World go Round. The Supply and Circulation of Metals in Bronze Age Europe: 160–175. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Needham, S., 1987. The metallurgical debris. In D.G. Buckley and J.D. Hedges, The Bronze Age and Saxon Settlements at Springfield Lyons, Essex: An Interim Report: 11–12. Chelmsford: Essex County Council Occasional Paper 5.Google Scholar
Needham, S., 1990. The Petters Late Bronze Age Metalwork. London: British Museum Occasional Paper 70.Google Scholar
Needham, S., 1996. Chronology and periodisation in the British Bronze Age. In Randsborg, K. (ed.), Absolute chronology: archaeological Europe 2500-500 BC. Acta Archaeologica 67:121–140.Google Scholar
Needham, S., 2000a. The gold and copper metalwork. In G. Hughes, The Lockington Gold Hoard: 23–47. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Needham, S., 2000b. Power pulses across a cultural divide: cosmologically driven acquisition between Armorica and Wessex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 66:151–207.Google Scholar
Needham, S., 2001. When expediency broaches ritual intention: the flow of metal between systemic and buried domains. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7(2):275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowakowski, J., 1991. Trethellan Farm, Newquay: the excavation of a lowland Bronze Age settlement and Iron Age cemetery. Cornish Archaeology 30:5–242.Google Scholar
O'Brien, W., Northover, J. and Stos, S., 2004. Lead isotopes and metal circulation. In O'Brien, W., Ross Island: Mining, Metal and Society in Early Ireland: 538–551. Galway: Department of Archaeology, NUIG.Google Scholar
O'Connor, B., and Cowie, T., 2001. Scottish connections: some recent finds of Early Bronze Age decorated axes from Scotland. In Metz, W.H., van Beek, B.L. and Steegstra, H. (eds), Patina: Essays Presented to Jay Jordan Butler on the Occasion of his 80th Birthday: 207–230. Groningen: Metz, Van Beek and Steegstra.Google Scholar
O'Shea, J., 1996. Villagers of the Maros. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., Chamberlain, A. and Craig, O., 2005. Evidence for mummification in Bronze Age Britain. Antiquity 79(305):529–546.Google Scholar
Perkins, D., n.d. An Assessment/Research Design: South Dumpton Down, Broadstairs. Unpublished report, Trust for Thanet Archaeology.Google Scholar
Petersen, P.F., 1972. Traditions of multiple burial in Later Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Britain. Archaeological Journal 129:22–55.Google Scholar
Petersen, P.F., 1981. The Excavation of a Bronze Age Cemetery on Knighton Heath, Dorset. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, British Series 98.Google Scholar
Primas, M., 1997. Bronze Age economy and ideology: central Europe in focus. Journal of European Archaeology 5(1):115–130.Google Scholar
Randsborg, K., 1973. Wealth and social structure as reflected in Bronze Age burials – a quantitative approach. In Renfrew, A.C. (ed.), The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory: 565–570. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A.C., 1974. Beyond a subsistence economy: the evolution of social organisation in prehistoric Europe. In Moore, C.B. (ed.), Reconstructing Complex Societies: an Archaeological Colloquium: 69–96. Cambridge, MA: H.N. Sawyer (Supplement to the Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 20).Google Scholar
Rowlands, M., 1980. Kinship, alliance and exchange in the European Bronze Age. In Barrett, J.C. and Bradley, R.J. (eds), Settlement and Society in the British Later Bronze Age: 59–72. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, British series 83.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M., 1984. Conceptualizing the European Bronze and Iron Ages. In Bintliff, J. (ed.), European Social Evolution: Archaeological Perspectives: 147–156. Bradford: University of Bradford.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M., Gosden, C. and Bradley, R., 1986. Modernist fantasies in prehistory Man (N.S.) 21(4):745–748.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M., 1972. Stone Age Economics. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Savory, H.N., 1964. Dinorben: A Hill-Fort Occupied in Early Iron Age and Roman Times. Cardiff: National Museum of Wales.Google Scholar
Seager Thomas, M., 1999. Stone finds in context: a contribution to the study of later prehistoric artefact assemblages. Sussex Archaeological Collections 137:39–48.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.E., 1975. The social organisation at Branç. Antiquity 49(196):279–288.Google Scholar
Shennan, S., 1982. Ideology, change and the European Early Bronze Age. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology: 155–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shennan, S., 1986. Interaction and change in third millennium BC western and central Europe. In Renfrew, C. and Cherry, J. (eds), Peer-Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change: 137–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shennan, S., 1993. Commodities, transactions and growth in the central European Early Bronze Age. Journal of European Archaeology 1(2):59–72.Google Scholar
Shepherd, I., 1982a. The artefacts. In T. Watkins, The excavation of an Early Bronze Age cemetery at Barns Farm, Dalgety, Fife. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 112:99–113.Google Scholar
Shepherd, I., 1982b. Comparative background: the assemblage. In T. Watkins, The excavation of an Early Bronze Age cemetery at Barns Farm, Dalgety, Fife. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 112:129–32.Google Scholar
Sheppard, T., 1941. The Parc-y-meirch hoard, St George parish, Denbighshire. Archaeologia Cambrensis 96:1–10.Google Scholar
Sheridan, A. and Davis, M., 2002. Investigating jet and jet-like artefacts from prehistoric Scotland: the National Museums of Scotland project. Antiquity 76(294):812–825.Google Scholar
Sheridan, A., and Davis, M., 2003. The v-perforated buttons. In L. Baker, A. Sheridan and T. Cowie, An early Bronze Age ‘dagger grave’ from Rarneldry Farm, near Kingskettle, Fife. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 133:89–95.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1993. What would a Bronze Age world system look like? Relations between temperate Europe and the Mediterranean in later prehistory. Journal of European Archaeology 1(2):1–57.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A., 1994. The emergence of élites: earlier Bronze Age Europe, 2500-1300 BC. In Cunliffe, B. (ed.), The Oxford Illustrated Prehistory of Europe: 244–276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherratt, S., 2000. Circulation of metals and the end of the Bronze Age in the eastern Mediterranean. In Pare, C. (ed.), Metals Make the World go Round. The Supply and Circulation of Metals in Bronze Age Europe: 82–98. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Stanford, S.C., 1982. Bromfield, Shropshire – Neolithic, Beaker and Bronze Age sites, 1966–79. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 48:279–320.Google Scholar
Strathern, A., 1981. Death as exchange: two Melanesian cases. In Humphreys, S. and King, H. (eds), Mortality and Immortality: The Anthropology and Archaeology of Death: 205–223. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M., 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M., 1998. Social relations and the idea of externality. In Renfrew, C. and Scarre, C. (eds), Cognition and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Symbolic Storage: 135–147. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2004. Archaeology and Modernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, N., 1991. Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material culture and Colonialism in the Pacific. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thorpe, I.J. and Richards, C., 1984. The decline of ritual authority and the introduction of Beakers into Britain. In Bradley, R. and Gardiner, J. (eds), Neolithic Studies: a Review of Some Recent Research: 67–84. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, British Series 133.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 1999. Metaphor and Material Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Treherne, P., 1995. The warrior's beauty: the masculine body and self-identity in Bronze Age Europe. journal of European Archaeology 3(1):105–144.Google Scholar
Turner, L., 1998. A re-interpretation of the Late Bronze Age metalwork hoards of Essex and Kent. Unpublished , Department of Archaeology, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Valeri, V, 1980. Notes on the meaning of marriage prestations among the Huaulu of Seram. In Fox, J.J. (ed.), The Flow of Life: Essays on Eastern Indonesia: 178–192. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vandkilde, H., 1996. From Stone to Bronze. The Metalwork of the Late Neolithic and Earliest Bronze Age in Denmark. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Verlaeckt, K., 1998. Metalwork consumption in Late Bronze Age Denmark. In Mordant, C., Pernot, M. and Rychner, V. (eds), L'Atelier du Bronzier en Europe du XXe au VIIIe Siècle avant notre Ère, Tome III: Production, Circulation et Consommation du Bronze, 259–71. Paris: Comités des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques.Google Scholar
Verlaeckt, K., 2000. Hoarding and the circulation of metalwork in late Bronze Age Denmark. In Pare, C. (ed.), Metals Make the World go Round. The Supply and Circulation of Metals in Bronze Age Europe: 197–208. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Watkins, T., 1982. The excavation of an Early Bronze Age cemetery at Barns Farm, Dalgety, Fife. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 112:48–141.Google Scholar
Weiner, A., 1987. The Trobrianders of Papua New Guinea. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Weiner, A., 1989. Why cloth? Weaving, gender and power in Oceania. In Weiner, A. and Schneider, J. (eds), Cloth and Human Experience: 33–72. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, A., 1992. Inalienable Possessions: the Paradox of Keeping while Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, A., 2000a. British Barrows: a Matter of Life and Death. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Woodward, A., 2000b. The prehistoric pottery. In G. Hughes, The Lockington Gold Hoard: 48–61. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Woodward, A., 2002. Beads and Beakers: heirlooms and relics in the British early Bronze Age. Antiquity 76(294):1040–1047.Google Scholar
Woodward, A., Hunter, J., Ixer, R., Maltby, M., Potts, P., Webb, P., Watson, J. and Jones, M., 2005. Ritual in some Early Bronze Age grave goods. Archaeological Journal 162:31–64.Google Scholar