Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:34:01.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cult of the Dead, Fetishism, and the Genesis of an Idea: Megalithic Monuments and the Tree and Pillar Cult of Arthur J. Evans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Deborah Harlan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arthur Evans is most noted for his work in Crete, particularly the excavation of the Palace of Knossos, which he began in the year 1900. As a consequence, Arthur Evans' earlier archaeology is often overlooked. This paper focuses on a series of lectures, largely unpublished, on the development of megalithic monuments and the religious cult they embodied, delivered by Evans in 1885. Evans' ideas of cult were embedded in contemporary late nineteenth century anthropological concepts set within an evolutionary context. This paper shows that these underlying ideas were also evident in Evans' later writings on the Aegean: notably, the famous article on the Tree and Pillar Cult that formed the basis of his concept of Minoan religion. By contextualizing Evans' early work, we gain a fuller understanding of why he prioritized certain information in constructing his concept of a Minoan civilization.

C'est pour son travail en Crète, et notamment les fouilles du palais de Cnossos qu'il entame en 1900, qu'Arthur Evans est célèbre. Ses travaux archéologiques antérieurs sont souvent laissés dans l'oubli. Cet article se penche sur une série des conférences, pour la plus part inédites, qu'a livrée Evans en 1855 sur le développement des monuments mégalithiques et du culte qu'ils représentent. L'approche de Evans au culte mégalithique découlaient du contexte évolutionniste anthropologique de la fin du XIXe siècle. Nous montrons ici que ces concepts sous-jacents sont aussi perceptibles dans les écrits plus tardifs de Evans sur le monde égéen, et en particulier dans son travail sur le culte de l'arbre et du pilier qui est à la base de sa conception de la religion minoenne. En contextualisant ses premiers travaux, nous pouvons mieux comprendre comment Evans privilégia certaines sources pour élaborer sa conception de la civilisation minoenne. Translation by Nathan Schlanger.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Arthur Evans ist durch seine Tätigkeit auf Kreta, besonders die Ausgrabungen des Palastes von Knossos bekannt, die im Jahr 1900 begonnen wurden. Aus diesem Grund sind Arthur Evans frühere Beiträge zur Archäologie häufig übersehen worden. Dieser Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit einer überwiegend unveröffentlichten Vorlesungsreihe, die Evans im Jahr 1885 hielt, die sich mit der Entwicklung der Megalithbauten und dem religiösen Kult, den diese verkörperten auseinandersetzte. Evans kultische Vorstellungen waren in kontemporären anthropologischen Konzepten eines evolutionären Kontexts des späten 19. Jahrhunderts verankert. Die vorliegende Arbeit zeichnet auf, dass diese grundlegenden Ideen auch in Evans späteren Schriften über die Ägäis eine Rolle spielten, besonders in dem berühmten Aufsatz über den Baum-und- Säulenkult, der als Grundlage für sein Konzept der minoischen Religion diente. Durch die Kontextualisierung von Evans Frühwerk gelangen wir zu einem besseren Verständnis, wieso er gewisse Informationen in den Vordergrund stellte, um sein Konzept der minoischen Religion zu entwickeln. Translation by Tina Jakob.

Keywords

Arthur Evansmegalithic monumentscult of the deadtree and pillar cultMinoan religionArthur Evansmonuments mégalithiquesculte des mortsculte de l'arbre et du pilierreligion minoenneArthur EvansMegalithbautenTotenkultBaum-und Säulenkultminoische Religion
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 14 , Issue 1-2 , 2011 , pp. 210 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Maney Publishing 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartel, B., 1982. A historical review of ethnological and archaeological analysis of mortuary practice. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 32–58.Google Scholar
Bateman, T., 1848. Vestiges of Antiquities of Derbyshire. London: John Russell Smith.Google Scholar
Begg, D.J.I., 2004. An archaeology of palatial masons marks on Crete. In Chapin, A.P. (ed.), XAPI∑: Essays in Honor of Sara A. Immerwahr. 1–25. Princeton: Hesperia Supplement 33.Google Scholar
Boyd Dawkins, W.B., 1874. Cave Hunting: Researches on the Evidence of Caves Respecting the Early Inhabitants of Europe. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Boyd Dawkins, W.B., 1880. Early Man in Britain and His Place in the Tertiary Period. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 2000. An Archaeology of Natural Places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
British Association, 1900. Age of stone circles. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Bradford) 70: 461.Google Scholar
Brown, A., 2001. Arthur Evans's Travels in Crete 1894–1899. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1000).Google Scholar
Darcque, P., Fotiadis, M. and Polychronopoulou, O., 2006. Mythos: La Préhistoire Egéenne du XIX e au XXI e Siècle Après J.-C . Paris: Bulletin de Gorrespondance Hellénique Supplément 46.Google Scholar
Darwin, C., 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1884. The Ashmolean Museum as a Home of Archaeology in Oxford: An Inaugural Lecture. Oxford: Ashmolean Museum.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1885a. Megalithic Monuments (i–v). Arthur Evans Archive, Ashmolean Museum, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1885b. Megalithic monuments in their sepulchral relations. Transactions of the Lancashire and Chestershire Antiquarian Society 3: 1–31.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1889. Stonehenge. Archaeological Review 2: 312–330.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1893. On the prehistoric interments of the Balzi Rossi caves near Mentone and their Relation to the Neolithic cave-burials of the Finalese. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 22: 286–307.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1895a. The Rollright Stones and their folklore. Folklore 6: 6–51.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1895b. Cretan Pictographs and Prae-Phoenician Script. London: Bernard Quaritch.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1895c. Ore the Origin of Celtic Art. Arthur Evans Archive, Ashmolean Museum, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1895–6. Goulàs, the City of Zeus. Annual of the British School at Athens 2: 169–194.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1896a. ‘The Eastern question’ in anthropology. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Liverpool) 66: 906–922.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1896b. Pillar and tree worship in Mycenaean Greece. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Liverpool) 66: 934.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1901. Mycenaean tree and pillar cult and its Mediterranean relations. Journal of Hellenic Studies 21: 99–204.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1902. The prehistoric monuments of Malta: Review of A. Mayr, Die Vorgeschichtlichen Denkmäler von Malta. Man 2: 41–44.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1903. Pre-Phoenician writing in Crete, and its bearings on the history of the alphabet. Man 3: 50–55.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1905. The Palace of Knossos and its dependencies. Annual of the British School at Athens 11: 1–26.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1908. The European diffusion of primitive pictography. In Marrett, R.R. (ed.), Anthropology and the Classics: 3–43. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1916. New archaeological lights on the origins of civilization in Europe: its Magdalenian forerunners in the South-West and Aegean cradle. Annual of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Newcastle-on-Tyne (printed pamphlet).Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1921–1936. The Palace of Minos: A Comparative Account of the Successive Stages of the Early Cretan Civilization as Illustrated by the Discoveries at Knossos (4 vols.). London: Macmillan and Co. Google Scholar
Evans, A., 1924. Preface. In Xanthoudides, S., The Vaulted Tombs of Mesará (v–xiii). Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Evans, Joan, 1943. Time and Chance: The Story of Arthur Evans and his Forebears. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Evans, John, 1872. Ancient Stone Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments of Great Britain. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Fabian, J., 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fergusson, J., 1860. Stonehenge. Quarterly Review 108: 200–225.Google Scholar
Fergusson, J., 1872. Rude Stone Monuments in all Countries: Their Age and Uses. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Fotiadis, M., 2006. Factual claims in late nineteenth century European prehistory and the descent of a modern discipline's ideology. Journal of Social Archaeology 6 (1): 5–27.Google Scholar
Frazer, J.G., 1890. The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (2 vols). London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Frazer, J.G., 1918. Folk-lore in the Old Testament: Studies in Comparative Religion, Legend and Law (3 vols). London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
García Guinea, M.A., 2001. Altamira and Other Cantabrian Caves. Madrid: Silex.Google Scholar
Gere, C., 2009. Knossos and the Prophets of Modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodison, L. and Morris, C., 1998. Beyond the ‘Great Mother’: the sacred world of the Minoans. In Goodison, L. and Morris, C. (eds), Ancient Goddesses: The Myths and the Evidence: 113–132. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Gosden, C., 1999. Anthropology and Archaeology: A Changing Relationship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greenwell, W., 1865. Notices on the examination of ancient grave-hills in the North Riding of Yorkshire. Archaeological Journal 22: 97–117,241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. (ed.), 2002a. Labyrinth Revisited. Oxford: Oxbow Press.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y., 2002b. What future for the ‘Minoan’ past? Rethinking Minoan archaeology. In Hamilakis, Y. (ed.), Labyrinth Revisited: 2–28. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. and Momigliano, N. (eds), 2006. Archaeology and European Modernity: Producing and Consuming the ‘Minoans’. Padova: Creta Antica.Google Scholar
Hogarth, D. G., 1899–1900. The Dictaean Cave. Annual of the British School at Athens 6: 94–116.Google Scholar
Hughes-Brock, H. and Boardman, J. (eds), 2009. Corpus der Minoischen und Myke-nischen Siegel CMS VI, 1–2: Oxford. The Ashmolean Museum. Mainz: von Zabern.Google Scholar
Kipling, R., 1902. Just So Stories: For Little Children. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Koehl, R.B., 2006. Aegean Bronze Age Rhyta. Philadelphia: Institute for Aegean Prehistory Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A., 1988. The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations of an Illusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuper, A., 2005. The Reinvention of Primitive Society: Transformations of a Myth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J., 1865. Pre-historic Times, as Illustrated by Ancient Remains, and the Manners and Customs of Modern Savages. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J., 1870. Origin of Civilisation and the Primitive Condition of Man: Mental and Social Condition of Savages. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J., 1875. Origin of Civilisation and the Primitive Condition of Man: Mental and Social Condition of Savages (3rd edn.). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J., 1879. Scientific Lectures. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
MacGillivray, J.A., 2000. Minotaur: Sir Arthur Evans and the Archaeology of the Minoan Myth. London: John Cape.Google Scholar
Marinatos, N., 1993. Minoan Religion:Ritual, Image, and Symbol. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, A., 1901. Die Vorgeschichtlichen Denkmäler von Malta. Munich: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
McEnroe, J., 1995. Sir Arthur Evans and Edwardian archaeology. Classical Bulletin 71 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar
McNeal, R.A., 1974. The legacy of Arthur Evans. California Studies in Classical Antiquity 6: 205–220.Google Scholar
Milton, J., 1858. Comus: A Mask (ed. Lawes, H.). London: George Routledge and Co. Google Scholar
Morris, C., 2006. From ideologies of motherhood to ‘collecting Mother Goddesses’. In Hamilakis, Y. and Momigliano, N. (eds), Archaeology and European Modernity: Producing and Consuming the ‘Minoans’: 69–78. Padova: Creta Antica.Google Scholar
Myers, J.W., Myers, E.E. and Cadogan, G., 1992. The Aerial Atlas of Ancient Crete. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Myres, J.L., 1899–1901. The age and purpose of the megalithic structures of Tripoli and Barbary. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London 18: 280–293.Google Scholar
Myres, J.L., 1941. Arthur John Evans. 1851-1941. Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society 3(10):941–968.Google Scholar
Nilsson, S., 1838–43. Skandinaviska Nordens Ur-Invånare: Ett Försök i Komparativa Ethnografien och ett Bidrag till Menniskoslägtets Utvecklings-Historia. Lund: Berlingska.Google Scholar
Nilsson, S., 1868. The Primitive Inhabitants of Scandinavia: An Essay on Comparative Ethnography, and a Contribution to the History of the Development of Mankind (3rd edn., ed. Lubbock, J.). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. and Ramilisonina, , 1998. Stonehenge for the ancestors: the stones pass on the message. Antiquity 72: 308–326.Google Scholar
Peatfield, A.A.D., 2000. Minoan religion. In Huxley, D. (ed.), Cretan Quests: British Explorers, Excavators and Historians: 138–150. London: British School at Athens.Google Scholar
Peet, T.E., 1912. Rough Stone Monuments and their Builders. London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Persson, A.W., 1942. The Religion of Greece in Prehistoric Times. Berkeley: University of California Press (Sather Classical Lectures 17).Google Scholar
Petrie, F., 1880. Stonehenge: Plans, Descriptions and Theories. London: Edward Stanford.Google Scholar
Ramsay, W.M., 1884. Sepulchral customs in ancient Phrygia. Journal of Hellenic Studies 5: 241–262.Google Scholar
Schliemann, H. 1878. Mycenae: A Narrative of Researches and Discoveries at Mycenœ and Tiryns. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Sergi, G., 1901 [1895]. The Mediterranean Race: A Study of the Origin of European Peoples (first English translation). London: Walter Scott Publishing (The Contemporary Science Series).Google Scholar
Thurnam, J., 1865. On the Two Principal Forms of Ancient British and Gaulish Skulls (from the Memoirs of the Anthropological Society of London, vol. 1). London: T. Richards.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tylor, E.B., 1865. Researches into the Early History of Mankind and the Development of Civilization. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Tylor, E.B., 1866. The religion of savages. Fortnightly Review 6: 71–86.Google Scholar
Tylor, E.B., 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom (2 vols.). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Virgil. Eclogues, Georgia, Aeneid I-VI. Rushton Fairclough, H. (trans.) 1967. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, P., 1969. Minoan Stone Vases. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitley, J., 2009. The Chimera of continuity: what would ‘continuity of cult' actually demonstrate? In D'Agata, L. and Van de Moortel, A. (eds), Archaeologies of Cult: Essays on Ritual and Cult in Crete in Honor of Geraldine C. Gesell: 279–288. Princeton: Hesperia Supplement 42.Google Scholar