Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:21:31.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collyrium Stamps: An Indicator of Regional Practices in Roman Gaul

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Abstract

Collyrium stamps, objects used to mark eye medicines, are more commonly found in Gaul than any other Roman province. Since they appear after Roman occupation, it is believed they evince a spread of Roman medicine, but this idea is not well-supported. Through a detailed study of the collyrium stamps it is apparent that the stamps took on other functions beyond marking remedies. They were used as amulets and votive offerings, signified by the fact that most are made of steatite and schist, almost all are green – a colour associated with eye care, and a number are decorated with magical symbols, and also by their context. Ultimately, the manner in which they were used demonstrates an adaptation of Roman material culture to fit the practices and beliefs based on earlier Iron Age traditions in the region.

Les cachets d'oculistes, objets utilisés pour le marquage des médicaments pour les yeux, sont retrouvés plus communément en Gaule que dans les autres provinces romaines. Comme ils apparaissent seulement après l'occupation romaine, on estime qu'ils reflètent la diffusion de la médicine romaine, mais cette idée n'arrive pas à s'imposer. Après une étude détaillée des cachets de collyre, il apparut que la protection de la vision n'était pas seulement importante pour les habitants de la Gaule, mais que les timbres avaient des fonctions au-delà de marqueurs de remèdes. Ils étaient utilisés comme amulettes et offrandes votives, signalé par le fait que la plupart sont en stéatite et schiste; presque tous sont verts, une couleur associée aux soins des yeux; et un certain nombre portent des symboles magiques. Leur contexte indique leur dépôt votif. De plus, la façon dont ils étaient utilisés montre une adaptation de la culture matérielle romaine dans le but de correspondre aux pratiques et croyances basées sur les anciennes traditions datant de l'Âge du Fer dans la région. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Augensalbenstempel, Objekte, mit denen Augenmedikamente markiert wurden, werden allgemein häufiger in Gallien gefunden als in irgendeiner anderen römischen Provinz. Da sie im Zeitraum nach der römischen Okkupation erscheinen, wird angenommen, dass sie eine Ausbreitungrömischer Medizin belegen. Doch ist diese Idee nicht gut belegt. Aufgrund einer detaillierten Studie wurde klar, dass diese Stempel neben der Markierung von Pharmaka auch andere Funktionen besaßen. Sie wurden als Amulette und Votivgaben genutzt, was durch den Fakt, dass sie aus Steatit und Schiefer gefertigt wurden und fast alle grün sind (eine Farbe, die mit der Augenheilkunde verbunden ist), eine Anzahl von ihnen mit magischen Symbolen bedeckt ist und auch durch ihren Kontext untermauert wird. Letztendlich demonstriert die Art und Weise ihrer Nutzung eine Adaption römischer materieller Kultur, um die auf früheren eisenzeitlichen Traditionen basierenden Praktiken und Ansichten der Region anzupassen. Translation by Heiner Schwarzberg.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Maney Publishing 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AEL'Annee Epigraphique: Revue des Publications Epigraphiques Relatives a l'Antique Romaine. 1888. Paris.Google Scholar
Allason-Jones, L., 1999. Health care in the Roman north. Britannia 31: 131146.Google Scholar
Amand, M., 1956. Un nouveau fragment de vase de Bavay rehouvé à Tournai. Latomus 15: 347357.Google Scholar
Arcelin, P., 1979. La nécropole préromaine de l'Arcoule, commune du Paradou (Bouches-du-Rhöne). Documents d'Archéologie Méridionale 2: 113154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., 2001. Medicine, culture and military identity. In Davies, G., Gardner, A. and Lockyear, K. (eds), Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference Proceedings 2000: 5170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, P., 2002. Diagnosing some ills: the archaeology, literature and history of Roman medicine. In Baker, P. and Carr, G. (eds), Practitioners, Practices and Patients: New Approaches to Medical Archaeology and Anthropology: 1629. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Baker, P., 2004a. Medical Care for the Roman Army on the Rhine, Danube and British Frontiers from the First through Third Centuries AD. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1286).Google Scholar
Baker, P., 2004b. Roman medical instruments: archaeological interpretations of their possible ‘non-functional' uses. Journal of the Social History of Medicine 17: 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., 2009. Medicine, death and military virtues. In Marco Simón, F., Pino Polo, F. and Remesal Rodríguez, J. (eds), Formae Mortis: El Tránsito de la Vida a la Muerte en las Sociedades Antiguas: 2537. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C., 1989. Afterwards: render unto Caesar. In Barrett, J.C., Fitzpatrick, A.P. and Macinnes, L. (eds), Barbarians and Romans in North-west Europe from the Later Republic to Late Antiquity: 235241. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 471).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, F., 1977. Objects gallo-romains découverts à Échevronne (Cöte-d'Or). Antiquités Nationales 9: 5065.Google Scholar
Boon, G., 1983. Potters, oculists and eye troubles. Britannia 14: 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosman, A.V.A.J., 1995. Velserbroek B6 Velsen1-Velsen2: is there a relationship between the military equipment from the ritual site and the fortress of Velsen? Journal of Roman Military Equipment Studies 6: 8998.Google Scholar
Bowman, A.K. and Thomas, J.D., 1991. A military strength report from Vindolanda. Journal of Roman Studies 81: 6273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, A.K. and Thomas, J.D. 1994. The Vindolanda Writing Tablets ( Tabulae Vindolandenses II). London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, R., 1990. Découverte de la tombe d'un oculiste à Lyon. Gallia 47: 215249.Google Scholar
Bradley, M., 2009. Colour and Meaning in Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1998. The Passage of Arms: An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoards and Votive Deposits. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breitwieser, R., 1998. Medizin im Römischen Österreich. Linz: Linzer Archäologische Forschungen.Google Scholar
Bruneaux, J.-L. and Rapin, A., 1988. Boucliers et Lances, Dépöts et Trophées, Gournay II. Paris: Revue Archéologique de Picardie.Google Scholar
Carr, G., 2001. Romanisation and the body. In Davies, G., Gardner, A. and Lockyear, K. (eds), Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference Proceedings 2000: 112124. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Celsus. De Medicina. Spencer, W.G. (trans.) 1971. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press and William Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology: People, Places and Broken Objects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
CILCorpus Inscriptorum Latinorum. Consilio et Ductoritate Academie Litterarum Regiae Borussical Edition. 1862. Berlin: Academie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. and Lomas, K. (eds), 1997. Gender and Ethnicity in Ancient Italy. London: Accordia Research Institute, University of London.Google Scholar
Counihan, C., 1999. The Anthropology of Food and the Body: Gender, Meaning and Power. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cruse, A., 2004. Roman Medicine. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Davies, R., 1989 (1970). The Roman military medical service. In Breeze, D. and Maxfield, V. (eds), Service in the Roman Army: 209236. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Deneffe, V., 1896. Les Oculists Gallo-Romains au IIIe Siècle. Anvers: H. Caals.Google Scholar
Detys, S., 1988. Les ex-voto de guerison en Gaule. Dossiers Histoire et Archeolgie 123: 8287.Google Scholar
Dioscorides. De Materia Medica. Beck, L.Y. (trans.) 2005. Hildesheim and New York: Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
Dollfus, M.-A., 1965. L'exercice de l'ophtalmologie à l'époque gallo-romaine. Bulletin de la Société Nationale des Antiquaires de France 126: 107112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faider-Feytmans, G., 1979. Les Bronzes Romains de Belgique. Mainz: Velag Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Feugère, M., 1985. Un instrument chirurgical d'époque romaine à Quarante (Hérault). Archéologie en Languedoc 2: 4445.Google Scholar
Feugère, M., Künzl, E. and Weisser, U., 1988. Les Aiguilles Cataracte de Montbellet (Saöne-et-Loire). Tournus: Société des Amis des Arts et des Sciences.Google Scholar
Gaillet, Y., 1966. L'habitat gallo-romain de la cöte Saint-Martin à Narcy (Haute-Marne). Les Cahiers Haut Marnais 85: 7591.Google Scholar
Galen. An Outline of Empiricism in Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Walzer, R. and Frede, M. (trans.) 1985. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Galen. On Hygiene. Green, Robert Montraville (trans.) 1951. Springfield, Il: Thomas Press.Google Scholar
Gaume, G. and Högstrom, A., 1965. Note sur un instrument medical décoré gallo-romain. Revue Archéologie du Centre 4: 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, B.J., 1994. Medicine, Rationality and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M., 1992. Dictionary of Celtic Myth and Legend. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Gummerus, H., 1932. Der Ärztestand im Römischen Reiche nach den Inschriften. Helsinki: Akademische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Hart, G.H., 1999. Asclepiu: The God of Medicine. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.Google Scholar
Haverfield, F., 1906. The Romanisation of Roman Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heymans, H., 1977. Eine Hülse mit Arzt Instrumenten aus Maaseik (Belgien). Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 9: 97100.Google Scholar
Heymans, H. and Janssens, P., 1975–76. De ‘Trousse d'Oculiste' van Maaseik. Hades 14-15: 1012.Google Scholar
Hingley, R., 1997. Resistance and domination: social change in Roman Britain. In Mattingly, D. (ed.), Dialogues in Roman Imperialism: 81100. Ann Arbour, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 23.Google Scholar
Hingley, R., 2001. Roman Officers and English Gentlemen: the Imperial Origins of Roman Archaeology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hsu, E., 2002. Medical anthropology, materical culture and new directions. In Baker, P. and Carr, G. (eds), Practitioners, Practices and Patients: New Approaches to Medical Archaeology and Anthropology: 115. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Jackson, R., 1988. Doctors and Diseases in the Roman Empire. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, R., 1990. Roman doctors and their instruments: recent research into ancient practice. Journal of Roman Archaeology 3: 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R., 1993. Roman medicine: practitioners and their practices. In Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds), Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II 37. 1: 79100. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jackson, R., 1994. The surgical instruments, appliances and equipment in Celsus’ De Medicina . In Sabbah, G. and Mundry, J. (eds), La Médecine de Celse: 167209. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l'Université Saint-Étienne.Google Scholar
Jackson, R., 1995. The composition of Roman medical instrumentaria as an indicator of medical practice: a provisional assessment. In van der Eijk, Ph.J., M.F.J, Horstmannshoff and Schrijvers, P.H. (eds), Ancient Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context: 189208. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R., 1996. Eye medicine in the Roman empire. In Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds), Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II. 37. 3: 22282251. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
James, S., 1999. The community of the soldiers: a major identity and centre of power in the Roman Empire. In Baker, P., Forcey, C., Jundi, S. and Witcher, R. (eds), TRAC 98: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Leicester 1998: 1425. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, S., 2002. Writing the legions: the development and future of Roman military studies in Britain. Archaeological Journal 159: 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansenns, R., 1966. De benen stilet uit een gallo-romeins vrouwengraf, gevonden te Tongeren. Hades 5: 3437.Google Scholar
Jones, A. and MacGregor, G. (eds), 2002. Colouring the Past: The Significance of Colour in Archaeological Research. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A., 1980. Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künzl, E., 1979–81. Medizinische Instrumente aus dem römischen Altertum im Städtischen Museum Worms. Der Wormsgau 13: 4963.Google Scholar
Künzl, E., 1982. Römische Medizin im Spiegel archäologischer Funde. Archäologie in Deutschland 1 (Jan-März): 14.Google Scholar
Künzl, E., 1983. Medizinische Instrumente aus Sepulkralfunden der Römischen Kaiserzeit. Cologne: Rheinland Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Künzl, E., 1996. Forschungsbericht zu den antiken medizinischen Instrumenten. In Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds), Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II 37. 3: 24332639. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Künzl, E., 2002. Medizin in der Antike: Aus einer Welt ohne Narkose und Aspirin. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss Verlag GmBh.Google Scholar
Le Gall, J., 1985. Alésia. Le Siège de la Forteresse Gauloise par César. La Ville Gallo-Romaine. Le Culte de Sainte Reine. Paris: Imprint Nationale.Google Scholar
Lindenbaum, S. and Lock, M. (eds), 1993. Knowledge, Power and Practice: The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Livy. Ab Urbe Condita (vols. I and II). Walters, C.F. and Conway, R.S. (eds), 1974 (I); 1919 (II). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lo, V., 2002. Spirit of stone: technical considerations in treatment of the Jade Body. Bulletin of SOAS 65 (1): 99128.Google Scholar
Lutz, M., 1965. La region de la Haute-Sarre à l'époque romaine. Annuaire de la Société d'Histoire et d'Archéologie de la Lorraine 79: 522.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D., 2004: Being Roman: expressing identity in a provincial setting. Journal of Roman Archaeology 17: 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, M., 1990. The Romanisation of Britain: An Essay on Archaeological Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milne, J., 1907. Surgical Instruments in Greek and Roman Times. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, H., 1974. Ancient Opthalmological Agents: A Pharmo-Historical Study of the Collyrium Stamps and Seals used during Roman Antiquity. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Nutton, V., 1972. Roman oculists. Epigraphica 34: 1629.Google Scholar
Nutton, V., 2004. Ancient Medicine. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovid. Metamorphosis. Miller, F. J. (trans.) 1916–21. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press and William Heinemann Ltd.Google Scholar
Packard, R.M., 2000. Post colonial medicine. In Cooter, R. and Pickstone, J. (eds), Medicine in the Twentieth Century: 97112. London: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
PGMThe Greek Magical Papyri in Translation. Betz, H.D. (ed.). 1992. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pilet, C., Lemière, J. and Buchet, L., 1975. Un Chantier de Fouilles Contemporaines: Le Nécropole de Frénouville (Calvados). Rouen: Museum Rouen.Google Scholar
Plato. Timaeus. Waterfield, R. (trans.) 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pliny the Elder. Naturalis Historiae. Ianus, L. (ed.) 1880. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Revell, L., 2009. Roman Imperialism and Local Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, R. and Keller, J. (eds), 2007. Roman by Integration: Dimensions of Group Identity in Material Culture and Text. Ann Arbour, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 66.Google Scholar
Salles, C., 1985. Les cahets d'oculistes. In Pelletier, A. (ed.), La Mèdicine en Gaule: Villes d'Eaux, Sanctuaires des Eaux: 89102. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Salles, C., 1988. Des ordonnances sur la pierre. Dossiers Histoire et Archaeologie 126: 6264.Google Scholar
Scheid, J., 1992. Épigraphie et sanctuaries guérisseurs en Gaule. Mélanges de l'Ecole Française de Rome: Antiquité 104 (1): 2550.Google Scholar
Schoppa, H., 1963. Die Römische Kaiserzeit. Wiesbaden: Schriften des Städtischen Museums, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Scott, E., 1991. Animal and infant burials in Romano-British villas: a revitalization movement. In Garwood, P., Jennings, D., Skeates, R. and Toms, J. (eds), Sacred and Profane. Proceedings of a Conference on Archaeology, Ritual and Religion, Oxford 1989: 115121. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 32.Google Scholar
Seneca. Epistulae Morales. Gummere, R.M. (trans.) 1917–25. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Solier, Y., 1981. Les épaves de Gruissan. Archaeonautica 3: 220229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tendille, C., 1981. Mobiliers métalliques protohístoriques de la region Nîmose. Instruments de toilette et vaiselle (IV). Documents d'Archéologie Méridionale 4: 6182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Térouanne, P., 1960. Dédicaces a Mars Mullo découvertes a Allones (Sarthe). Gallia 18 (1): 185189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinquier, J., 2002. Les couleurs de rěve: l'onirocriticon d'Artémidore. In Villard, L. (ed.), Couleurs et Vision dans l'Antiquité Classique: 97128. Rouen: Publications de l'Université de Rouen.Google Scholar
Turner, V., 1984. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Dommelen, P. and Terrenato, N. (eds), 2007. Articulating Local Cultures: Power and Identity under the Expanding Roman Republic. Ann Arbour, MI: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 63.Google Scholar
van Driel-Murray, C., 1999. And these feet were made for walking. In Baker, P., Forcey, C., Jundi, S. and Witcher, R. (eds), TRAC 98: Proceedings of the Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference: 98112. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Vitruvius. On Architecture. Howe, T. N. and Rowland, I. D. (trans.) 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Villard, L. (ed.), 2002. Couleurs et Vision dans l'Antiquité Classique. Rouen: l'Université de Rouen.Google Scholar
Voinot, J., 1984. Inventaire des cachets d'oculistes gallo-romains. Conférences Lyonnaises d'Optalmologie 150: 1578.Google Scholar
Voinot, J., 1999. Les Cachets à Collyres dans le Monde Romain. Montagnac: Monique Mergoil (Instrumentum 7).Google Scholar
von Staden, H., 1995. Anatomy and rhetoric: Galen on dissection and persuasion. The Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 50: 4766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watermann, R.A., 1980. Mensch und Medizin zwischen Macht und Militär der Römischen Kaiserzeit. Frankfurt am Main: Gerhard Michter Verlag.Google Scholar
Webster, J., 1996. Sanctuaries and sacred places. In Green, M. (ed.), The Celtic World: 445464. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webster, J., 1997a. Necessary comparisons: a post-colonial approach to religious syncretism in the Roman provinces. World Archaeology 28 (3): 324338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J., 1997b. A negotiated syncretism: readings on the development of Romano-Celtic Religion. In Mattingly, D. (ed.), Dialogues in Roman Imperialism: 165184. Ann Arbour: Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series.Google Scholar
Wells, P.S., 1999. The Barbarians Speak: How the Conquered Peoples Shaped Roman Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmanns, J.C. 1995a. Der Arzt in der römischen Armee der frühen und hohen Kaiserzeit. In van der Eijk, Ph.J., Horstmannshoff, H.F. J. and Schrijvers, P.H. (eds), Ancient Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context: 171188. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmanns, J.C., 1995b. Der Sanitätsdienst im Römischen Reich. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York: Olms Weidmann.Google Scholar
Woolf, G., 1998. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilisation in Gaul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar