Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:48:25.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Childbirth in prehistory: An introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Elisabeth Beausang
Elisabeth Beausang*
Affiliation:
Department of Classical Archaeology and Ancient History, Göteborg University, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Childbirth in prehistorical contexts is seldom considered since there seems to be an underlying assumption that this event lacks a surrounding and traceable material culture. The argument here is that this is a judgement based upon the refusal to acknowledge childbirth as an important social event. Therefore material remains have not been identified as related to childbirth in the archaeological record. The aim of this article is to show that childbirth as a concept has many important social implications and might in fact be traceable in a wide range of prehistoric material. To illustrate this, two examples of different remains are discussed. Firstly, a skeleton with indications of childbirth, as in the case of the mesolithic ‘Woman of Barum’ found in southern Sweden. In connection with this the social implications of mother, mothering will be discussed. Secondly, the Chalcolithic findings from Kissonerga-Mosphilia, Cyprus, are highlighted and suggested to be the remains of a functional set of birth-related equipment.

L'accouchement n'est pas souvent mentionné dans le contexte préhistorique, et ceci est probablement dû à la supposition qu'il n'est pas possible de démontrer l'existence d'une culture matérielle reliée à cet événement. Cette supposition est basée sur le manque d'attention portée à l'accouchement en tant qu'événement social important. En conséquence, peu d'interêt a été accordé aux restes de matériel associé à l'accouchement dans le contexte archéologique. Le but de cet article est de démontrer que l'accouchement, en tant que concept, a une importance sociale fondamentale et qu'il est possible d'en trouver la trace dans un éventail assez large de matériel préhistorique. Deux exemples sont présentés. Le premier est un squelette avec indication d'accouchement, connu sous le nom de “La femme de Barum”, trouvé dans le Sud de la Suède. Pour cet exemple, je centre ma discussion sur l'importance sociale d'être mère et du maternage. Le deuxième exemple est tiré des découvertes Chalcolithiques de Kissonerga-Mosphilia à Chypre et pourrait bien être le reste d'un ensemble d'équipement fonctionnel associé à l'accouchement.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Die Geburt wird in prähistorischen Kontexten selten berücksichtigt, was wohl in der Annahme begründet ist, dass dieses Ereignis keine ermittelbare materielle Kultur hinterlässt. Im folgenden wird nun argumentiert, dass dieses Urteil auf einer Vernachlässigung von Geburt als wichtiges soziales Ereignis basiert. Deshalb blieben die mit der Geburt in Beziehung stehenden archäologischen materiellen Hinterlassenschaften unbeachtet. Ziel dieses Artikels ist es zu zeigen, dass Geburt als Konzept viele wichtige soziale Implikationen hat und tatsächlich in einer Fülle prähistorischen Materials auffindbar sein mag. Zwei Beispiele hierfür werden diskutiert. Zum einen wurde ein Skelett mit Hinweisen auf eine Geburt in Südschweden gefunden, bekannt als die mesolithische “Frau von Barum”. In diesem Fall werden die sozialen Implikationen der Mutterschaft diskutiert. Zum anderen werden die chalkolitischen Funde von Kissonerga-Mosphilia, Zypern, beleuchtet und als Überreste eines funktionalen Sets von für Geburten genutzten Gerätschafteninterpretiert.

Keywords

BarumChalcolithicchildbirthCyprusKissonerga-MosphiliaMesolithicmotheringSweden
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , 2000 , pp. 69 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althin, C.A., 1951. Bäckaskog och Lummelunda. In Technica & Humaniora, Festskrift till Anders Nevsten: 13–38. Malmö: Landby & Lundgrens boktryckeri.Google Scholar
Angel, J.L., 1969. The basis of paleodemography. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 30(3):427–437.Google Scholar
Angel, J.L., 1971. Early Neolithic skeletons from Chatal Huyuk: demography and pathology. Anatolian Studies 21:77–98.Google Scholar
Angel, J.L. 1984. Health as a crucial factor in the changes from hunting to developed farming in the Eastern Mediterranean. In Cohen, M.N. and Armelagos, G.J. (eds), Paleopathology and the Origins of Agriculture: 510–574. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barfield, L. and Hodder, M., 1987. Burnt mounds as saunas. Antiquity 61:370–379.Google Scholar
Beausang, E., in prep. Childbirth in prehistory. PhD Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Beckman, G.M., 1983. Hittite Birth Rituals. Studien zu den Bogazköy-Texten, Kommission fur den Alten Orient der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Litteratur, Heft 29. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Bolen, KM., 1992. Prehistoric construction of mothering. World Archaeology 11:49–62.Google Scholar
Bolger, D., 1991. Other ceramics. In Peltenburg, E. (ed.), Lemba Archaeological Project. Vol. II.2: A Ceremonial Area at Kissonerga. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, Vol. LXX.3:28–37. Göteborg: Paul Åströms förlag.Google Scholar
Bretschneider, P., 1995. Polygyny: A Cross-Cultural Study. Uppsala Studies in Cultural Anthropology 20. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Bridges, R.S., 1998. The genetics of motherhood. Nature Genetics, 20(October):108–109.Google Scholar
Brinch Petersen, E., 1990. Nye grave fra jaegerstenalderen. Nationalmuseets arbejdsmark 36:19–33.Google Scholar
Browner, C.H. and Sargent, C.F., 1990. Anthropology and studies of human repro-duction. In Johnson, T.M. and Sargent, C.F. (eds), Medical Anthropology. A Handbook of Theory and Method: 215–230. New York, Westport, CT, London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Buikstiza, J. and Mielke, J.H., 1985. Demography, diet and health. In Gilbert, R.I. and Mielke, J.H. (eds), The Analysis of Prehistoric Diets: 359–422. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Callaway, H., 1978. The most essentially female function of all: giving birth. In Ardener, S. (ed.), Defining Females: The Nature of Women in Society: 163–186. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Chodorow, N., 1995. Femininum-Maskulinum: Modersfunktion och könssociologi. Swedish transl. from The Reproduction of Mothering, 1978. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.Google Scholar
Cosminsky, S., 1982. Childbirth and change: a Guatemalan study. In Mac-Cormack, C.P. (ed.), Ethnography of Fertility and Birth: 205–231. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davis-Floyd, R.E. and Sargent, C.F. eds, 1997. Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge, Cross-cultural Perspectives. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dean-Jones, L., 1994. Women's Bodies in Classical Greek Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
De Min, M., 1984. Adria Antica. In Aspes, A. (ed.), Il Veneto nell'antichità: 809–830. Verona.Google Scholar
Ehrström, Chr., 1974. Den europeiska förlossningsstolen. Nordisk Medicinhistorisk Årsbok. Stockholm: Medicinhistoriska museet.Google Scholar
Elliott, C., 1991. The ground stone artefacts. In Peltenburg, E. (ed.), Lemba Archaeological Project, Vol. II.2, A Ceremonial Area at Kissonerga. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, Vol. Lxx.3:61–68. Göteborg: Paul Âströms förlag.Google Scholar
Ford, C.S., 1945. A comparative study of human reproduction. Yale University Publications in Anthropology No. 32. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Galloway, P., 1997. Where have all the menstrual huts gone? The invisibility of menstrual huts in the late prehistoric southeast. In Claassen, C. and Joyce, R.A. (eds), Women in Prehistory, North America and MesoAmerica: 47–65. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennyslvania Press.Google Scholar
Gejvall, N-G., 1970. The fisherman from Barum: mother of several children! paleoanatomic finds from Bäckaskog. Fornvännen 65:281–289.Google Scholar
Gideon, T.E.C., 1962. A baby is born in Punjab. American Anthropologist 64:1220–1234.Google Scholar
Godelier, M., 1986. The Making of Great Men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goring, E., 1991. The anthropomorphic figurines. In Peltenburg, E. (ed.), Lemba Archaeological Project, Vol. II. 2, A Ceremonial Area at Kissonerga. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, Vol. XLL :39–61. Göteborg: Paul Åströms förlag.Google Scholar
Green, R., Suchey, J.M. and Gokhale, D., 1979. Analysis of dorsal pitting on the pubis in an extensive sample of modern American females. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 51:317–340.Google Scholar
Hansen, F., 1941. Fiskaren från Barum från ädre stenåldern. Handlingar angående Villands Härad: 13–25. Kristianstad: Villands härads Hembygdförening.Google Scholar
Höjeberg, P., 1981. Jordemor; Barnmorskor och Barnaföderskor i Sverige. Gidlunds: Södertälje.Google Scholar
Holm, U., 1993. Mödrande och praxis: en feministfilosofisk undersökning. Unpublished , Department of Philosophy, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Homans, H., 1982. Pregnancy and birth as rites of passage for two groups in Britain. In MacCormack, C.P. (ed.), Ethnography of Fertility and Birth: 231–269. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, E., 1939. Papyrus Carlsberg, no. VIII. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Hist. Fil. Meddellelser XXVI(5). Copenhagen: Det Kgl. Videnskabemes selskab.Google Scholar
Jordan, B., 1978. Birth in Four Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden and the United States. Montreal: Eden Press.Google Scholar
Kay, M.A., 1982. Anthropology of Human Birth. Philadelphia, PA: Pergamon Press. Kitzinger, S., 1979. Kvinnor som mödrar (Swedish transkl, of Women As Mothers. London 1978). Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, S., 1980. Pregnancy and Childbirth. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, S., 1982. The social context of birth: some comparisons between childbirth in Jamaica and Britain. In MacCormack, C.P. (ed.), Ethnography of Fertility and Birth: 171–205. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Knutsson, H., 1995. Slutvandrat? Aspekter på övergången från rörlig till bofast tillvaro. AUN 28, Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Köves-Zulauf, T., 1990. Römische Geburtsriten. In Zetemata, Heft 87. Monographien zur Classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Munich: C.H. Beck Verlag.Google Scholar
Laderman, C., 1982. Giving birth in a Malay village. In Kay, M.A. (ed.), Anthropology of Human Birth: 81–101. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1967. The effectiveness of symbols. In C. Lévi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology: 186–205. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lidén, O., 1948. Aktuella sydsvenska stenåldersproblem: Jonstorp, Sjöholmen och Barumsgraven. Lund: Gleerupska Univ.-bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, G., 1989. A child's world in an archaeological perspective. Norwegian Archaeological Review 22(2):90–105.Google Scholar
Lithell, U-B., 1981. Breastfeeding and reproduction. Studia Historica Upsaliensia 120. Uppsala.Google Scholar
MacCormack, C.P. ed., 1982. Biological, cultural and social adaption in human fertility and birth: a synthesis. In MacCormack, C.P. (ed.), Ethnography of Fertility and Birth: 1–25. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McGilvray, S., 1982. Sexual power and fertility in Sri Lanka. In MacCormack, C.P. (ed.), Ethnography of Fertility and Birth: 26–75. London: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Malefijt, A., 1968. Religion and Culture. London.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1967. Catal Hüyük: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Menascha, I., 1927. Die Geburtshilfe bei den alten Aegyptern. Archäologisches Gynäkologie 131:426–461.Google Scholar
Merchant, C., 1994. Naturens död. Brutus Östlings förlag: Symposion (Swedish transl. of The Death of Nature, 1980). Stockholm: Stehag.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M., 1981. The Politics of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Peltenburg, E. ed., 1991. Lemba Archaeological Project, Vol. II: 2. A Ceremonial Area at Kissonerga. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, Vol. Lxx.3. Göteborg: Paul Åströms förlag.Google Scholar
Pillsbury, B., 1982. Doing the month: confinement and convalescence of Chinese women after childbirth. In Kay, M.A. (ed.), Anthropology of Human Birth: 119–146. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.Google Scholar
Pitt, S., 1996. Technology and the mediation of gender relations in childbirth in post-war Britain. In Donald, M. and Hurcombe, L. (eds), Gender and Material Culture: Historical Perspectives. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reddy, W.M., 1997. Against construction. Current Anthropology 38(3):327–340.Google Scholar
Richards, A., 1982. Chisunga. London.Google Scholar
Rydbeck, O., 1945. Skelettgraven i Bäckaskog (sittande hukläge) och dess ålder. Meddelanden från Lunds Universitet Historiska Museum: 1–44. Lund: K. Humanistiska vetenskapssamfundet i Lund årsberättelse 1944–1945, v. 1945.Google Scholar
Sachs, L., 1983. Evil Eye or Bacteria; Turkish Migrant Women and Swedish Health Care. Studies in Social Anthropology, Stockholm: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Sachs, L., 1987. Medicinsk Antropologi. Borås: Liber AB.Google Scholar
Schultze Jena, L., 1933. Indiana 1: Leben, Glaube und Sprache der Quiche von Guatemala. Jena: G. Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Shimanske, F., 1996. Historiska Nyheter: Ny datering av äldsta kvinnan. Populär Historia 2(96):5.Google Scholar
Sigerist, H.E., 1951. A History of Medicine, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, R.E., 1950. Introduction to primitive obstetrics. Ciba Symposia 11(3)(Dec.): 1949–1950: 1158–1159.Google Scholar
Stenberger, M., 1979[1964]. Det forntida Sverige, 3rd edn. Lundon: Berlings.Google Scholar
Strassburg, J., 1995. Barn i mesolitikum. In Gräslund, B. (ed.), Arkeologi om barn. Occasional Papers in Archaeology 10:19–27. Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Surani, A.M., Keverne, E.B., Ishino, F., Barton, S.C., Viville, S. and Lefebvre, L., 1998. Abnormal maternal behaviour and growth retardation associated with loss of the imprinted gene Mest. Nature Genetics 20(October):163–169.Google Scholar
Swantz, M—L., 1969. Religious and magical rites of Bantu women in Tanzania. Unpublished , University of Daar es Salaam.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 1996. An Ethnography of the Neolithic: Early Prehistoric Societies in Southern Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vahros, I., 1966. Zur Geschichte und Folklore der Grossrussischen Sauna. Academia Scientiarium Fertnica Communicationes 197. Helsinki: FF.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, A., 1960. The Rites of Passage. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Welinder, S., 1973. Stenålderns mosseboplatser. ale 1:1—15. Kristianstad.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D.W., 1953. Transitional objects and transitional phenomena, a study of the first not-me possession. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 34:89–97.Google Scholar
Zias, J., 1995. Cannabis sativa (hashish) as an effective medication in antiquity: the anthropological evidence. In Campbell, S. and Green, A. (eds), The Archaeology of Death in the Ancient Near East: 232–234. Oxford: Oxbow Monographs 51.Google Scholar