Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:34:08.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Big Enclosures: The Later Neolithic Palisaded Enclosures of Scotland in their Northwestern European Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Gordon Noble  and
Kenneth Brophy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Palisaded enclosures were huge enclosed spaces with timber boundaries found across Britain, Ireland, and Scandinavia in the Neolithic. Five such sites have been identified in Scotland dating to the later Neolithic, four of which have been excavated to varying degrees. These sites form the main focus of this paper, which draws in particular on interim results from the authors' excavations at Forteviot, Perth and Kinross, during 2007–2009. The palisaded enclosures of Scotland are part of a wider British and Irish tradition and there are a number of European parallels, the closest of which lie in southern Scandinavia. The palisaded enclosures in Scotland are tightly clustered geographically and chronologically, constructed in the centuries after 2800 cal BC. This paper explores the function, role, and meaning of palisaded enclosures in Scotland and more generally, drawing not just on the architecture of the monuments, but also the individual posts that were used to create the enclosures. The role of these monuments in reconstituting nature is also considered.

Les enclos à palissade sont des vastes espaces fermés par des poteaux de bois, datant du Néolithique, et localisé à travers la Grande Bretagne, l'Irlande, et la Scandinavie. Cinq enclos à palissade Néolithiques ont été identifiés en Ecosse, dont quatre ont fait l'objet de fouilles plus ou moins exhaustives. Ces sites sont le sujet du présent article, qui s'appui plus particulièrement sur les fouilles des auteurs à Forteviot, Perth et Kinross, en 2007 – 2009. Faisant partie d'une tradition Britannique et Irlandaise plus vaste, les enclos à palissade écossais démontrent aussi quelques parallèles avec ceux connus en Europe continentale, notamment au sud de la Scandinavie. Les enclos à palissade écossais sont regroupés géographiquement et chronologiquement, ayant été datés aux siècles suivant 2800 BC calibrés. Notre article explore les fonctions, rôles et significations des enclos à palissade, en Ecosse et de façon plus générale, en abordant l'ensemble des monuments ainsi que les poteaux utilisés pour les ériger. Le rôle médiateur de ces monuments avec la nature est aussi évoqué. Translation by Nathan Schlanger.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Palisadenanlagen umschlossen weiträumige Bereiche mit Holzumgrenzungen, die während des Neolithikums in Großbritannien, Irland und Skandinavien auftraten. Fünf solche Anlagen, die in das spätere Neolithikum datieren, sind aus Schottland bekannt und vier sind mehr oder weniger vollständig ergraben worden. Sie bilden den Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrags, der sich besonders auf die vorläufigen Ergebnisse der Grabungen der Autoren in Forteviot, Perth und Kinross (2007–2009) konzentriert. Die schottischen Palisadenanlagen sind Teil einer großräumigen britischen und irischen Tradition. Zusätzlich gibt es eine Reihe von Parallelen auf dem europäischen Festland, mit den nächstgelegenen Beispielen aus Süd-Skandinavien. Die Palisadenanlagen Schottlands sind sowohl geografisch als auch chronologisch eng begrenzt, mit einem Entstehungsdatum nach 2800 kal BC. Dieser Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit der Funktion, Rolle und Bedeutung der Palisadenanlagen, nicht nur in Schottland, sondern darüber hinaus, und bezieht sich auf die Architektur dieser Monumente, als auch auf die einzelnen Pfosten, die zur Gestaltung der Anlagen benützt wurden. Zudem wird die Funktion dieser Anlagen in der Wiederherstellung der Natur in Betracht gezogen. Translation by Tina Jacob.

Keywords

ScotlandNeolithicmonumentspalisaded enclosurestimberenvironmentsocial orderEcosseNéolithiquemonumentsenclos à palissadeboisenvironnementordre socialSchottlandNeolithikumMonumentePalisadenanlagenBauholzUmweltSozialordnung
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 14 , Issue 1-2 , 2011 , pp. 60 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Maney Publishing 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, N., 2006. Forteviot: A Pictish and Scottish Royal Centre. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Alcock, I. and Alcock, E.A., 1992. Reconnaissance excavations on early historic fortifications and other royal sites in Scotland, 1974–84; 5: A, Excavations & other field-work at Forteviot, Perthshire, 1981; B, Excavations at Urquhart Castle, Inverness-shire, 1983; C, Excavations at Dunnottar, Kincardineshire, 1984. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 122: 215–287.Google Scholar
Andersen, N. 1997. Sarup Volume 1. The Sarup Enclosures: The Funnel Beaker Culture of the Sarup Site Including Two Causewayed Camps Compared to the Contemporary Settlements in the Area and Other European Enclosures. Moesgaard: Jysk Arkñologiskselskab 33 (1).Google Scholar
Armit, I., 1990. Broch building in northern Scotland: the context of innovation. World Archaeology 21 (3): 435–145.Google Scholar
Ashmore, P., 1999. Radiocarbon dating: avoiding errors by avoiding mixed samples. Antiquity 73: 124–130.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J., 2002. Excavations at a Mesolithic and Neolithic occupation site at Chapel-field, Cowie, Stirling. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 132: 139–192.Google Scholar
Barclay, G.J., 2001. Neolithic enclosures in Scotland. In Darvill, T. and Thomas, J. (eds), Neolithic Enclosures in Atlantic Northwest Europe: 144–154. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., 1994. Fragments from Antiquity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1993. Altering the Earth. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1998. The Significance of Monuments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 2001. The birth of architecture. In Runciman, W.G. (ed.), The Origin of Human Social Institutions: 69–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 2007. The Prehistory of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, K., 2004. The palisaded enclosure at Hyllie, SW Scania. Journal of Nordic Archaeological Science 14: 35–44.Google Scholar
Brink, K., Kishonti, I., and Magnell, O., 2009. On the shore: life inside a palisaded enclosure and cultural change during the Middle Neolithic B in southern Scandinavia. Current Swedish Archaeology 17: 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brophy, K., 1999. The cursus monuments of Scotland. In Barclay, A. and Harding, J. (eds), Pathways and Ceremonies: The Cursus Monuments of Britain and Ireland: 120–129. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Brophy, K., 2003. Revealing Neolithic Europe: the impact of aerial reconnaissance. In Bourgeois, J. and Meganck, M. (eds), Aerial Photography and Archaeology 2003: A century of Information: 49–62. Ghent: Archaeological Reports, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Brophy, K., in press. Houses, halls and occupation in Britain and Ireland. In Fowler, C., Harding, J. and Hofmann, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brophy, K. and Noble, G., 2010. Forteviot, Perthshire, 2009: excavations of a henge and cist burial – interim report and data structure report. <http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/archaeology/research/projects/serf/>>Google Scholar
Brown, T., 1997. Clearances and clearings: deforestation in Mesolithic/Neolithic Britain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16: 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C., 1976. Meldon Bridge: a Neolithic defended promontory complex near Peebles. In Burgess, C. and Miket, R. (eds), Settlement and Economy in the Third and Second Millennia BC: 151–180. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (British Series 33).Google Scholar
Burgess, C., Topping, P., Mordant, C. and Maddison, M. (eds), 1988. Enclosures and Defences in the Neolithic of Western Europe. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 403).Google Scholar
Cherry, J., 1978. Generalization and the archaeology of the state. In Green, D., Haselgrove, C. and Spriggs, M. (eds), Social Organization and Settlement 411–437. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 47).Google Scholar
Cleal, R., Walker, K. and Montague, R., 1995. Stonehenge in its Landscape: Twentieth-Century Excavations. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Cummings, V. and Whittle, A., 2004. Places of Special Virtue: Megaliths in the Neolithic Landscapes of Wales. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Darvill, T., 2010. Prehistoric Britain (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvill, T. and Thomas, J., 2001. Neolithic enclosures in Atlantic northwest Europe: some recent trends. In Darvill, T. and Thomas, J. (eds), Neolithic Enclosures in Atlantic Northwest Europe: 1–23. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Driscoll, S.T., 1998. Picts and prehistory: cultural resource management in early medieval Scotland. World Archaeology 30 (1): 142–158.Google Scholar
Driscoll, S.T., Brophy, K. and Noble, G., 2010. The Strathearn Environs and Royal Forteviot Project (SERF). Antiquity Project Gallery <http://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/driscoll323/>Google Scholar
Gibson, A., 1998. Hindwell and the palisaded enclosures of Britain and Ireland. In Gibson, A. M. and Simpson, D.D.A. (eds), Prehistoric Ritual and Religion: 68–79. Stroud: Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
Gibson, A., 1999. The Walton Basin Project: Excavation and Survey in a Prehistoric Landscape 1993–7. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. (ed.), 2002a. Behind Wooden Walls: Neolithic Palisaded Enclosures in Europe. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1013).Google Scholar
Gibson, A., 2002b. The later Neolithic palisaded sites of Britain. In Gibson, A. (ed.), Behind Wooden Walls: Neolithic Palisaded Enclosures in Europe: 5–23. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1013).Google Scholar
Gibson, A., 2004. Visibility and invisibility: some thoughts on Neolithic and Bronze Age sites. In Barclay, G.J. and Shepherd, I.A.G. (eds), Scotland in Ancient Europe: The Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of Scotland in their European Context 155–169. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Gibson, A., 2005. Stonehenge and Timber Circles (2nd edn.). Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Grogan, E. and Roche, H., 2002. Irish palisaded enclosures – a long story. In Gibson, A. (ed.), Behind Wooden Walls: Neolithic Palisaded Enclosures in Europe: 24–27. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1013).Google Scholar
Hale, D., Platell, A. and Millard, A., 2009. A late Neolithic palisaded enclosure at Marne Barracks, Catterick, North Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 75: 265–304.Google Scholar
Hartwell, B., 1998. The Balynahatty complex. In Gibson, A. and Simpson, D.D.A. (eds), Prehistoric Ritual and Religion: Essays in Honour of Aubrey Burl: 32–44. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Hartwell, B., 2002. A Neolithic ceremonial complex at Ballynahatty, Co. Down. Antiquity 76: 526–532.Google Scholar
Kaul, F., Nielsen, F.O., and Nielsen, P.O., 2002. Vasagård og Rispebjerg: to indhegnede bopladser fra yngre stenalder på Bornholm. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark 2002: 119–138.Google Scholar
Larsson, L., 2008. Ritual structures in south Scandinavian prehistory. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 74: 193–214.Google Scholar
Lelong, O. and Pollard, T., 1998. The excavation and survey of prehistoric enclosures at Blackshouse Burn, Lanarkshire. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 128: 12–53.Google Scholar
Mercer, R., 1981. The excavation of a late Neolithic henge-type enclosure at Balfarg, Markinch, Fife, 1977–78. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 111: 63–171.Google Scholar
Meyer, M., 2002. Palisaded enclosures in the German Neolithic. In Gibson, A. (ed.), Behind Wooden Walls: Neolithic Palisaded Enclosures in Europe: 59–92. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1013).Google Scholar
Millican, K., 2009. Contextualizing the Cropmark Record: The Timber Monuments of the Neolithic of Scotland. (, University of Glasgow).Google Scholar
Noble, G., 2006. Neolithic Scotland: Timber, Stone, Earth and Fire. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Noble, G. and Brophy, K., 2008. Excavations at Forteviot palisaded enclosure, 2007 – interim report and data structure report. <http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/archaeology/research/projects/serf/>>Google Scholar
Noble, G. and Brophy, K., 2009. Forteviot, Perthshire 2008: excavations of a henge monument and timber circle – interim report and data structure report. <http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/archaeology/research/projects/serf/>>Google Scholar
Noble, G. and Brophy, K., in press. Ritual and remembrance at a prehistoric ceremonial complex in central Scotland: excavations at Forteviot, Perth and Kinross. Antiquity.Google Scholar
Oswald, A., Dyer, C. and Barber, M., 2001. The Creation of Monuments: Neolithic Causewayed Enclosures in the British Isles. Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., Pollard, J., Richards, C., Thomas, J., Tilley, C. and Welham, K., 2006. Materializing Stonehenge: the Stonehenge Riverside Project and new discoveries. Journal of Material Culture 11: 227–261.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1965. Ancient Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, J. and Reynolds, A., 2002. Avebury: Biography of a Landscape. Stroud: History Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1986. Introduction: peer polity interaction and socio-political change. In Renfrew, C. and Cherry, J. F. (eds), Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change: 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, C., 1993. Monumental choreography: architecture and spatial representation in late Neolithic Orkney. In Tilley, C. (ed.), Interpretative Archaeology. 143–180. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Richards, C., 1996. Henges and water: towards an elemental understanding of monumentality and landscape in late Neolithic Britain. Journal of Material Culture 1: 313–336.Google Scholar
Richards, C., 2004. Labouring with monuments: constructing the dolmen at Carreg Samson, south-west Wales. In Cummings, V. and Fowler, C. (eds), The Neolithic of the Irish Sea: Materiality and Traditions of Practice: 72–80. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Richards, C., 2005. Dwelling among the Monuments: An Examination of the Neolithic Village of Barnhouse, Maeshowe Passage Grace and Surrounding Monuments at Stenness, Orkney. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
St Joseph, J.K.S., 1976. Air reconnaissance: recent results. Antiquity 50: 55–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarre, C., 2010. Rocks of ages: tempo and time in megalithic monuments. European Journal of Archaeology 13 (2): 175–193.Google Scholar
Sheridan, A., 2001. Donegore Hill and other Irish Neolithic enclosures: a view from outside. In Darvill, T. and Thomas, J. (eds), Neolithic Enclosures in Atlantic Northwest Europe: 171–189. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Sheridan, A., Bradley, R. and Schulung, R., 2009. Radiocarbon dates arranged through NMS Archaeology Department during 2008/9. Discovery and Excavation in Scotland ns 10: 212–214.Google Scholar
Speak, S. and Burgess, C., 1999. Meldon Bridge: a centre of the third millennium BC in Peebleshire. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 129: 1–118.Google Scholar
Svensson, M., 2002. Palisade enclosures: the second generation of enclosed sites in the Neolithic of northern Europe. In Gibson, A. (ed.), Behind Wooden Walls: Neolithic Palisaded Enclosures in Europe: 28–58. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 1013).Google Scholar
Sweetman, D., 1985. A late Neolithic/early Bronze Age pit circle at Newgrange, Co. Meath. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 85C:195–221.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1996. Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretative Archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1999. Understanding the Neolithic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2001. Neolithic enclosures: reflection on excavations in Wales and Scotland. In Darvill, T. and Thomas, J. (eds), Neolithic Enclosures in Atlantic Northwest Europe: 132–143. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2004. The later Neolithic architectural repertoire: the case of the Dunragit complex. In Cleal, R. and Pollard, J. (eds), Monuments and Material Culture. Papers in Honour of an Avebury archaeologist: Isobel Smith: 98–108. Salisbury: Hobnob Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2010. The return of the Rinyo-Clacton folk? The cultural significance of the Grooved Ware complex in later Neolithic Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 20: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thörn, R., 2007. Oresundsförbindelsen och Arkeologin: Det Ideologiska Landskapet. Malmöfynd 12. Malmö: Malmö Kultur-milkö.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 1994. The Phenomenology of Landscape. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tinevez, J.-Y., 2002. The late Neolithic settlement of La Hersonnais, Pléchatel in its regional context. In Varndell, G. and Topping, P. (eds), Enclosures in Neolithic Europe: 37–50. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Varndell, G. and Topping, P. (eds), 2002. Enclosures in Neolithic Europe. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. and Longworth, I., 1971. Durrington Walls: Excavations 1966–1968. London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1960. Preliminary report on the excavations at Anlo in 1957 and 1958. Palaeohistoria 8: 59–90.Google Scholar
Watson, A., 2001. Composing Avebury. World Archaeology 33 (2): 296–314.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., 1996. Europe in the Neolithic: The Creation of New Worlds (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whittle, A., 1997. Sacred Mounds, Holy Rings. Silbury Hill and the West Kennet Palisade Enclosures: A Later Neolithic Complex in North Wiltshire. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Whittle, A.J. Pollard, and Grigson, C., 1999. The Harmony of Symbols: Windmill Hill Causewayed Enclosure, Wiltshire. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar