Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:46:35.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeological Archives: Serving the Public Interest?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Nick Merriman  and
Hedley Swain
Nick Merriman
Affiliation:
University College London
Hedley Swain
Affiliation:
Museum of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to highlight the neglected role of archaeological archives in Cultural Resource Management in particular and in the discipline of archaeology in general. Through reference to a major recent survey of the size, condition, usage and future prospects of archaeological archives in England, it is argued that the neglect of archives leads to fundamental questions regarding the purpose of archaeology in general. Why are archaeological archives generated and kept ‘for posterity’? If they are worthy of retention, how can they be better used and integrated into the discipline? It is argued that there is a need to recognize the ‘ex situ’ archaeological resource as a concept and that archaeology should recognize that the study of this resource should be a major area of activity alongside the generation of new information through fieldwork.

Le but de cet article est d'attirer l'attention sur le rôle negligeable joué jusqu'au présent par les archives archéologiques dans la gestion des ressources culturelles en particulier et dans la discipline archéologique en général. Les résultats d'une enquête récente concernant la taille, l'étendue, les conditions d'utilisation et les possibilités futures des archives archéologiques en Angleterre, prouvent que qu'elles sont negligées et ceci soulève des questions fondamentales concernant le but de l'archéologie en général. Pourquoi les archives archéologiques sont-elles produites et préservées pour la posterité? Si ces archives valent la peine d'être préservées, comment pourraient-on les utiliser et les intégrer plus largement dans la discipline? Les auteurs montrent qu'il est nécessaire de reconnaitre le status ‘ex-situ’ de ces ressources archéologiques. L'archéologie doit reconnaitre que l'étude de cette ressource est une zone d'activité majeure qui devrait être conduite en parallèle avec la constitution d'informations nouvelles produites par le travail de terrain.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es auf die vernachlässigte Rolle archäologischer Archive insbesondere bei der Verwaltung kultureller Ressourcen und in der Disziplin der Archäologie im allgemeinen hinzuweisen. Dies geschieht in Bezug auf eine vor kurzem vorgenommene weitgehende Begutachtung der Größe, des Zustandes, des Nutzens und der zukünftigen Perspektiven archäologischer Archive in England. Es wird argumentiert, daß die Vernachlässigung der Archive zu grundlegenden Fragen bezüglich des Sinn und Zwecks von Archäologie im allgemeinen führt. Warum werden archäologische Archive angelegt und ‘für die Nachwelt’ aufrechterhalten? Wenn sie es wert sind aufrecht erhalten zu werden, wie können sie besser genutzt und besser in die Disziplin integriert werden? Es wird argumentiert, daß eine Notwendigkeit besteht diese ex situ – archäologische Quelle als ein Konzept anzuerkennen und daß die Archäologie erkennen sollte, daß das Studium dieser Quelle eines der hauptsächlichen Aktivitätsfelder zusammen mit der Erzeugung neuer Information durch praktische Arbeit sein sollte.

Keywords

accessarchivescostmuseumspublic archaeology
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , 1999 , pp. 249 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D., 1997. A Common Wealth. Museums and Learning in the United Kingdom. London: Department of National Heritage.Google Scholar
Batey, C., 1995. In touch with the past at Glasgow museums. In Denford, G. (ed.), Museum Archaeology – What's New? The Museum Archaeologist 21. Conference Proceedings Edinburgh 1994, 19–23. Winchester: Society of Museum Archaeologists.Google Scholar
CBA (Council for British Archaeology), 1996. Threat to urban research as archive faces closure. British Archaeology 12: 4.Google Scholar
DCMS, 1998. A New Cultural Framework. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.Google Scholar
DoE, 1975. Principles of Publication in Field Archaeology (The Frere Report). London: Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
DoE, 1978. The Scientific Treatment of Material from Rescue Excavations. London: Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
DoE, 1981. Storage of Finds from Grant-Aided Rescue Excavations. Advisory Note 31. London: Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
DoE, 1990. Planning Policy Guidance 16: Archaeology and Planning. (PPG16). London: Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
Heritage, English, 1991a. Management of Archaeological Projects. Second Edition. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Heritage, English, 1991b. Exploring Our Past. Strategies for the Archaeology of England. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Heritage, English, 1995. Planning for the Past. Volume 1. A Review of Archaeological Assessment Procedures in England 1982–1991. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Heritage, English, 1997. English Heritage Archaeology Division Research Agenda. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Falk, J.H. and Dierking, L.D., 1992. The Museum Experience. Washington DC: Whales-back Books.Google Scholar
Fowler, P.J., 1970a. The crisis in field archaeology. Current Archaeology 23: 343–345.Google Scholar
Fowler, P.J., 1970b. Archaeology and Museums, 1970–2000 AD. Museums Journal 70 (3): 120–121.Google Scholar
Hinton, P., 1993. Archives and Publication in the Real World. In Southworth, E. (ed.), Ticking Up The Pieces' – Adapting to Change in Museums and Archaeology. The Museum Archaeologist 18. Conference Proceedings Sheffield 1991: 6–9. Liverpool: Society of Museum Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (ed.), 1994a. The Educational Role of Museums. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hooper-Greenhill, E., 1994b. Museums and their Visitors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. and Ralston, I., (eds), 1993. Archaeological Resource Management in the UK. Stroud: Institute of Field Archaeologists/Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
Jones, B., 1984. Past Imperfect. The Story of Rescue Archaeology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lord, B., Lord, G.D. and Nicks, J., 1989. The Cost of Collecting. Collection Management in UK Museums. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
McGimsey, C.R. III, 1972. Public Archaeology. New York: Seminar Press Google Scholar
Merriman, N., 1991. Beyond The Glass Case. The Past, the Heritage and the Public in Britain. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Merriman, N., 1993. The use of collections: the need for a positive approach. In Southworth, E., (ed.), ‘Picking Up The Pieces’ – Adapting to Change in Museums and Archaeology. The Museum Archaeologist 18. Conference Proceedings Sheffield 1991: 10–17. Liverpool: Society of Museum Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Merriman, N., 1997. The Peopling of London project. In Hooper-Greenhill, E. (ed.), Cultural Diversity. Developing Museum Audiences in Britain: 119–148. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Merriman, N., 1998. Records of metropolitan archaeology: unwanted residues or primary sources? In Roberts, M.V. (ed.), Archives and the Metropolis: 57–64. London: Corporation of London.Google Scholar
MGC, 1986. Eligibility Criteria for the Grant-Aided Storage of Excavation Archives. London: Museums and Galleries Commission.Google Scholar
Museums Association, 1997. Codes of Ethics. (Second Edition). London: Museums Association.Google Scholar
Museums Association, 1998. Definition of a museum. Museums Journal 98 (11): 40.Google Scholar
Owen, J. (ed.), 1995. Towards an Accessible Archaeological Archive. The Transfer of Archaeological Archives to Museums; Guidelines for use in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. London: Society of Museum Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Pearce, S., 1993. Museum archaeology. In Hunter, J. and Ralston, I., (eds), Archaeological Resource Management in the UK. Stroud: Institute of Field Archaeologists/Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
Petrie, W.M.F., 1904. Methods and Aims in Archaeology. New York: Blom.Google Scholar
Rahtz, P.A. (ed.), 1974. Rescue Archaeology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rescue/CBA, 1974. Archaeology and Government. A Plan for Archaeology in Britain. London: Rescue/CBA.Google Scholar
SMA (Society of Museum Archaeologists), 1995. Long term storage and curation of archaeological archives. Unpublished discussion document.Google Scholar
Swain, H. (ed.), 1991. Competitive Tendering in Archaeology. Hertford: Rescue/SCAUM.Google Scholar
Swain, H., 1996. Here comes a national museums crisis. British Archaeology 12: 11.Google Scholar
Swain, H., 1997. Archaeological archive transfer: theory and practice. In Denford, G.T. (ed.), Representing Archaeology in Museums, The Museum Archaeologist 22. Conference Proceedings, London 1995: 122–144. Winchester: Society of Museum Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Swain, H., 1998. A Survey of Archaeological Archives in England. London: Museums and Galleries Commission/English Heritage.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M., 1954. Archaeology from the Earth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar