Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T15:18:54.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Overview of the Western Anatolian Early Bronze Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Erkan Fidan ,
Deniz Sari  and
Murat Türkteki
Erkan Fidan*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Bilecik Seyh Edebali University, Turkey
Deniz Sari*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Bilecik Seyh Edebali University, Turkey
Murat Türkteki
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Bilecik Seyh Edebali University, Turkey
*
[email: [email protected]]
[email. [email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For a long time, assessments and evaluations of the western Anatolian Early Bronze Age (EBA) have only been based on the excavation results of Tarsus, Karataş-Semayük, Beycesultan, Demircihüyük, and Troy. However, excavations and surface surveys carried out in the last two decades have increased our knowledge enormously. In particular, the excavations of Liman Tepe, Küllüoba, and Seyitömer have made an immense contribution to the establishment of a reliable West Anatolian EBA chronology. The surface surveys have also made it possible to define better the borders of the cultural areas and pottery zones of the region. Based on these new data, new theories are presented here on the cultural and socio-political development of the region, as well as on regional and inter-regional relationships during the EBA.

Pendant longtemps, les études et évaluations sur l'Âge du Bronze ancien (EBA: Early Bronze Age) en Anatolie occidentale se sont uniquement basées sur les résultats des fouilles de Tarsus, Karataş-Semayük, Beycesultan, Demircihüyük et Troie. Toutefois les fouilles et les levés de surface effectués tout au long des deux dernières décennies ont considérablement accru nos connaissances. Plus particulièrement les fouilles de Liman Tepe, Küllüoba et Seyitömer ont immensément contribué à l'établissement d'une chronologie fiable de l'EBA ouest-anatolien. Les sondages de surface ont également permis de mieux définir les frontières des zones culturelles et céramiques de la région. En nous basant sur ces nouvelles données, nous présentons ici des nouvelles théories sur le développement culturel et socio-politique de la région, de même que sur les relations régionales et inter-régionales durant le EBA. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Über einen langen Zeitraum hinweg beruhten die Beurteilungen und Bewertungen der westanatolischen Frühbronzezeit auf den Ausgrabungsergebnissen von Tarsus, Karataş-Semayük, Beycesultan, Demircihüyük und Troja. Jedoch haben Ausgrabungen und Oberflächenbegehungen der letzten zwei Jahrzehnte unsere Kenntnisse deutlich bereichert. Besonders die Grabungen von Liman Tepe, Küllüoba und Seyitömer haben einen wesentlichen Beitrag zur Etablierung einer verlässlichen Chronologie der Frühbronzezeit in Westanatolien geleistet. Oberflächensurveys haben es zudem möglich gemacht, die Grenzen der Kulturgebiete und der Keramikzonen in den jeweiligen Regionen besser zu definieren. Anhand dieser neuen Ergebnisse werden hier neue Theorien zur kulturellen und soziopolitischen Entwicklung der Regionen wie auch zu lokalen und überregionalen Beziehungen während der Frühbronzezeit vorgestellt. Translation by Heiner Schwarzberg.

Keywords

western AnatoliaEarly Bronze AgeKüllüobaBithynian and Phrygian cultural regionsAnatolie occidentaleÂge du Bronze ancienKüllüobarégions culturelles bithyniennes et phrygiennesWestanatolienFrühbronzezeitKüllüobaBithynische KulturregionPhrygische Kulturregion
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , 2015 , pp. 60 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 the European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abay, E. & Dedeoğlu, F. 2005. 2003 Yılı Denizli/Çivril Ovası Yüzey Araştırması. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 22 (2): 42–50.Google Scholar
Abay, E. & Dedeoğlu, F. 2007. 2005 Yılı Denizli/Çivril Ovası Yüzey Araştırması. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 24 (1): 277–93.Google Scholar
Akdeniz, E. 2009. 2007 Yılında Manisa İli ve İlçelerinde Yürütülen Prehistorik-Protohistorik Yüzey Araştırmaları. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 26 (2): 255–66.Google Scholar
Akdeniz, E. 2010. 2008 Yılında Manisa İli ve İlçelerinde Yürütülen Prehistorik—Protohistorik Yüzey Araştırmaları. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 27 (1): 153–74.Google Scholar
Alkım, B. 1968. Anatolia I. Geneva: World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ay-Efe, D.Ş.M. 2001. The Small Finds. In: Efe, T. ed. The Salvage Excavations at Orman Fidanlığı. A Chalcolithic Site in lnland Northwestern Anatolia. İstanbul: TASK Vakfı Yayınları, pp. 127–58.Google Scholar
Begemann, F., Pernicka, E. & Schitt-Strecker, S. 1994. Metal Finds from Ilıpınar and the Advent of Arsenical Copper. Anatolica, 20: 203–15.Google Scholar
Bilgen, N. 2011a. Seyitömer Höyük Kazısı Ön Raporu (2006–2010). Kütahya: Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Bilgen, N. 2011b. Seyitömer Höyük. In: Şahoğlu, V. & Sotirakopoulou, P., eds. Across: The Cyclades and Western Anatolia during the 3rd Millenium BC. Istanbul: Sabancı University Sakıp Sabancı Museum, pp. 208–13.Google Scholar
Bilgen, N. 2012. Seyitömer Höyük Kazısı Ön Raporu (2011–2012). Kütahya: Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Bittel, K. 1942. Kleinasiatische Studien. Istanbuler Mitteilungen, 5: 1–204.Google Scholar
Bittel, K. 1971. Bemerkungen über die Prähistorische Ansiedlung auf dem Fikirtepe bei Kadıköy (İstanbul). Istanbuler 6 Mitteilungen, 19 (20): 1–19.Google Scholar
Blegen, C., Caskey, J.L. & Rawson, M. 1950. Troy I, General Introduction, The First and Second Settlements. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Broodbank, C. 2000. An Island Archaeology of the Early Cyclades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Çilingiroğlu, A., Çevik, Ö. & Çilingiroğlu, Ç. 2012. Ulucak Höyük towards Understanding the Early Farming Communities of Middle West Anatolia: The Contribution of Ulucak. In: Özdoğan, M., Başgelen, N. & Kuniholm, P., eds. The Neolithic in Turkey, New Excavations & New Research, Western Turkey. İstanbul: Archaeology and Art Publications, pp. 139–75.Google Scholar
Cline, E.H. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of the Bronze Age Aegean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cookson, C. 2008. The Houses from Ilıpınar Phase Z and VI Compared. In: Roodenberg, J. & Alpaslan Roodenberg, S., eds. Life and Death in a Prehistoric Settlement in Northwest Anatolia The Ilıpınar Excavations, Vol III. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, pp. 149–203.Google Scholar
Dedeoğlu, F. 2008. Cultural Transformation and Settlement System of Southwestern Anatolia from Neolithic to LBA: A Case Study from Denizili/Çivril Plain. In: Córdoba, J., Molist, J.M., Pérez, C., Rubio, I. & Martínez, S., eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, pp. 587–601.Google Scholar
Dedeoğlu, F. 2014. Yukarı Menderes Havzası Bölgesel Yerleşim Analizi: Erken Tunç Çağı'nda Sosyo-Ekonomik Örgütlenmedeki Değişim ve Dönüşüm Süreçleri. In: Çevik, Ö. & Erdoğu, B. eds. Tematik Arkeoloji Serisi 1—Yerleşim Sistemleri ve Mekan Analizi, Ege Yayınları, pp. 19–42.Google Scholar
Duru, R. 2006. Kuruçay Höyük II, (1978–1988 Kazılarının Sonuçları Geç Kalkolitik ve İlk Tunç Çağı Yerleşmeleri). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.Google Scholar
Duru, R. 2008. Burdur-Antalya Bölgesi'nin Altıbin Yılı. Suna—İnan Kıraç Akdeniz Medeniyetleri Araştırma Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
Duru, R. & Umurtak, G. 2008. Bademağacı Kazıları, 2006. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 2: 187–96.Google Scholar
Duru, R. & Umurtak, G. 2010. Bademağacı Kazıları, 2008, 31. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 3. Ankara, pp. 261–68.Google Scholar
Düring, B.S. 2011. The Prehistory of Asia Minor, From Complex Hunter-Gatherers to Early Urban Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Efe, T. 1988. Demircihöyük. Band III, Die Keramik 2, Die Frühebronzezeitliche Keramik der Jüngeren Phasen (ab Phase H). Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Efe, T. 1994. Eskişehir Yöresindeki Bazı Höyüklerde Saptanmış Olan İlk Tunç Çağı'na Geçiş Evresi Çanak Çömleği. Anadolu Araştırmaları, 13: 17–46.Google Scholar
Efe, T. 2002. The Interaction Between Cultural/Political Entities and Metal Working in Western Anatolia during the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Ages. Anatolian Metal, 2: 49–66.Google Scholar
Efe, T. 2003a. Batı Anadolu Tunç Çağı Uygarlığının Doğuşu. ArkeoAtlas, 2: 92–129.Google Scholar
Efe, T. 2003b. Pottery Distribution within the Bronze Age of Western Anatolia and its Implications upon Cultural, Political (and Ethnic?) Entities. In: Özbaşaran, M. & Boratav, A., eds. Archaeological Essays in Honour of Homo amatus: Güven Arsebük için Armağan Yazılar. İstanbul: Ege Yayinlari, pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
Efe, T. 2004. Kültür Gruplarından Krallıklara: Batı Anadolu'nun Tarihöncesi Kültürel ve Siyasal Gelişim Profili. Colloquium Anatolicum, 3: 15–29.Google Scholar
Efe, T. 2006. A Trinket Mold from Küllüoba near Seyitgazi/Eskişehir. In: Erkanal, A., Öktü, A., Özgen, E. & Günel, S., eds. Hayat Erkanal'a Armağan. Kültürlerin Yansıması/Studies in Honor of Hayat Erkanal. Cultural Reflections. İstanbul: Homer Kitabevi, pp. 301–04.Google Scholar
Efe, T. 2007. The Theories of the ‘Great Caravan Route’ between Cilicia and Troy: The Early Bronze Age III Period in Inland Western Anatolia. Anatolian Studies, 57: 47–64.Google Scholar
Efe, T. & Ay-Efe, D. 2000. Early Bronze Age I Pottery from Küllüoba Near Seyitgazi, Eskisehir. Anatolia Antiqua, 8: 1–87.Google Scholar
Efe, T. & Fidan, E. 2006. Pre-Middle Bronze Metal Objects from Inland Western Anatolia: A Typological and Chronological Evaluation. Anatolia Antiqua, 14: 15–43.Google Scholar
Efe, T. & Fidan, E. 2008. Complex II in the Early Bronze II Upper Town of Küllüoba Near Eskişehir. Anatolica, 34: 67–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efe, T. & Türkteki, M. 2011. Early Bronze Age Architecture in the Inland Western Anatolian Region. In: Şahoğlu, V. & Sotirakopoulou, P., eds. Across the Cyclades and Western Anatolia during the 3rd Millenium BC. İstanbul: Sabancı University Sakıp Sabancı Museum, pp. 198–207.Google Scholar
Efe, T., İlaslı, A. & Topbaş, A. 1995. Salvage Excavations of the Afyon Archaeological Museum, Part 1: Kaklık Mevkii, A Site Transitional to the Early Bronze Age. Studia Troica, 5: 357–99.Google Scholar
Erkanal, H. & Özkan, T. 1997. 1995 Bakla Tepe Kazıları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 18/1. Ankara: TTK Basımevi, pp. 261–79.Google Scholar
Erkanal, H. 2000. 1998 Liman Tepe Kazıları, 21. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 1: 251–62.Google Scholar
Erkanal, H. & Artzy, M. 2002. 2000 Yılı Liman Tepe Kazı Çalışmaları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 23 (1): 375–88.Google Scholar
Erkanal, H. & Özkan, T. 2000. 1998 Bakla Tepe Kazıları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 21 (1): 263–78.Google Scholar
Eslick, C. 2009. Elmalı-Karataş V, The Early Bronze Age Pottery of Karataş: Habitation Deposits. British Archaeological Reports. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Fidan, E. 2006. Waffen aus Metall vor der Mittleren Bronzezeit im Inland Westanatoliens. Colloquium Anatolicum, 5: 91–106.Google Scholar
Fidan, E. 2012a. Küllüoba İlk Tunç Çağı Mimarisi. M.A.S.R.O.P. E-Dergi, (Mimarlar, Arkeologlar, Sanat Tarihçileri, Restoratörler Ortak Platformu), 7: 1–44.Google Scholar
Fidan, E. 2012b. İç Kuzeybatı Anadolu İlk Tunç Çağı Gözlü Süs İğneleri (Toggle Pin). Colloquium Anatolicum, 11: 179–204.Google Scholar
Fidan, E. 2013. Küllüoba İlk Tunç Çağı Metal Eser Kalıpları. In. Ayter, P., Demirci, Ş. & Özer, A.M., eds. ODTÜ III. Arkeometri Çalıştayı, Türkiye Arkeolojisinde Metal: Arkeolojik ve Arkeometrik Çalışmalar. Yayınlayan: ODTÜ Arkeometri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, pp. 249–59.Google Scholar
Fidan, E. in press. Urbanism in the Western Anatolian Early Bronze Age, IV. In: International Archaeology Symposıum of Dumlupınar University at Kütahya, 2014.Google Scholar
French, D.H. 1969a. Anatolia and the Aegean in the Third Millenium B.C., Anatolia and the Aegean in the Third Millenium B.C. (unpublished PhD dissertation, Cambridge University).Google Scholar
French, D.H. 1969b. Prehistoric Sites in Northwest Anatolia II: The Balikesir and Akhisar/Manisa Area. Anatolian Studies, 19: 41–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetze, A. 1957. Kleinasien. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Goldmann, H. 1956. Excavations at Gözlükule, Tarsus from the Neolithic through the Bronze Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gürkan, G & Seeher, J. 1991. Die frühbronzezeitliche Nekropole von Küçükhöyük bei Bozüyük. Istanbuler Mitteilungen, 41: 39–96.Google Scholar
Horejs, B. 2009. Metalworkers at the Çukuriçi Höyük? An Early Bronze Age Mould and a Near Eastern Weight from Western Anatolia. Universitaetsforschungen zur Praehistorischen Archaeologie: Metals and Societies, vol. 169. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, pp. 358–68.Google Scholar
Horejs, B., Mehofer, M. & Pernicka, E. 2010. Metallhandweker im Frühen 3. Jt. v. Chr. Neue Ergebnisse vom Çukuriçi Höyük. İstanbuler Mitteilungen, 60: 7–37.Google Scholar
Jablonka, P. 2001. Şehrin Tahta Surları Troia II Aşağı Şehrinin Savunması. In: Korfmann, M. ed. Troia. Düş ve Gerçek. İstanbul: Homer Kitabevi, pp. 391–94.Google Scholar
Kaptan, E. 1998a. Bakla Tepe“de Eski Metalurjiye Ait Buluntular. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı, 13: 103–14.Google Scholar
Kaptan, E. 1998b. Liman Tepe“de Eski Metalurjiye Ait Buluntular. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı, 13: 83–102.Google Scholar
Karul, N. 2009. Kuzeybatı Anadolu'da Anahatlarıyla Neolitik-Kalkolitik Dönemler’. In: Doğan Alparslan, M. & Özdizbay, A. eds. Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri 11 Enstitüsü Haberler 28. Zero Yayınları, İstanbul, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Keskin, L. 2011. Metalworking in Western Anatolian Coastal Region during the 3rd Millennium BC. In: Şahoğlu, V. & Sotirakopoulou, P., eds. Across. The Cyclades and Western Anatolia during the 3rd Millennium BC. İstanbul: Sabancı University Sakıp Sabancı Museum, pp. 144–52.Google Scholar
Koçak, Ö. & Bilgin, M. 2005. Taşlı Höyük: An Important Early Bronze Age Settlement and Necropolis in Bolvadin-Dişli Village. Anatolia Antiqua, 13: 85–109.Google Scholar
Korfmann, M. 1983. Demircihüyük Die Ergebnisse Der Ausgrabungen 1975–1978 Band I, Architektur, Stragraphie und Befunde. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Korfmann, M. 1997. Troia 1995 Kazıları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 18 (1): 213–29.Google Scholar
Korfmann, M. 1998. Troia 1996 Kazıları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 19 (1): 427–53.Google Scholar
Korfmann, M., Girgin, G., Morçöl, G. & Kilic, S. 1995. Kumtepe 1993. Bericht über die Rettungs grabungen. Studia Troica, 5: 237–91.Google Scholar
Kouka, O. 2009. Third Millenium BC. Aegean Chronology. In: Manning, S. & Bruce, M., eds. Three Rings, Kings and Old World Archaeology and Environment, Studies in Honor of Ian Kuniholm. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 133–49.Google Scholar
Kouka, O. 2010. Third Millennium BC Aegean Chronology: Old and New Data from the Perspective of the Third Millennium AD. In: Manning, S. W. & Bruce, M. J., eds. Tree-Rings, Kings, and Old World Archaeology and Environment Papers Presented in Honor of Peter Ian Kuniholm. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 133–50.Google Scholar
Kouka, O. 2013. Minding the Gap Against the Gaps: The Early Bronze Age and the Transition to the Middle Bronze Age in the Northern and Eastern Aegean/Western Anatolia. American Journal of Archaeology, 117: 569–80.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. & Mellaart, J. 1962. Beycesultan Volume I. The Chalcolitic and Early Bronze Age Levels. London: The British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Massa, M. 2014. Destructions, Abandonments, Social Reorganisation and Climatic Change in West and Central Anatolia at the End of the Third Millennium BC. In: Erciyas, B. & Sökmen, E., eds. Arkeolojide Bölgesel Çalışmalar Sempozyum Bildirileri / Regional Studies in Archaeology Symposium Proceedings YAS 4. Istanbul: Ege Yayınları, pp. 89–123.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1954. Preliminary Report on a Survey of Pre-Classical Remains in Southern Turkey. Anatolian Studies, 4: 175–240.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1959. Notes on the Architectural Remains of Troy I and I. Anatolian Studies, 9: 131–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1970. Excavations at Hacılar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mellink, M.J. 1974. Excavations at Karataş-Semayük and Elmalı, Lycia, 1973. American Journal of Archaeology, 78: 351–59.Google Scholar
Mellink, M. 1989. Anatolia and Foreign Relations of Tarsus in the Early Bronze Age. In: Emre, K., Mellink, M., Hruda, B. & Özgüç, N., eds. Anatolia and the Near East. Studies in the Honor of Tahsin Özgüç. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, pp. 319–32.Google Scholar
Mellink, M. 1992. Anatolian Chronology. In: Ehrich, R.W. ed. Chronologies in Old World Archaeology I, II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 171–84, 207–20.Google Scholar
Mellink, M.J. 1964. Excavations at Karataş-Semayük in Lycia, 1963. American Journal of Archaeology, 68: 269–78.Google Scholar
Mellink, M.J. 1965. Excavations at Karataş-Semayük in Lycia, 1964. American Journal of Archaeology, 69: 241–51.Google Scholar
Mellink, M.J. 1969. Excavations at Karataş-Semayük and Elmalı. American Journal of Archaeology, 73: 293–307.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, M. 1994. Anatolisches Metallhandwerk. Neumunster: Wachholtz Verlag.Google Scholar
Orthmann, W. 1963. Die Keramik der Frühen Bronzezeit aus Inneranatolien. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M. 1979. Fikirtepe (unpublished PhD dissertation, Istanbul University).Google Scholar
Pernicka, E. 2001. Metalle machen Epoche. Bronze, Eisen und Silber. In: Korfmann, M., ed. Troia—Traum und Wirklichkeit. İstanbul: Homer Kitabevi, pp. 369–72.Google Scholar
Rahmstorf, L. 2006. Zur Ausbreitung vor der asiatischer Innovationen in die Frühbronzezeitlische Agäis. Praehistorische Zeitschrift, 81: 49–96.Google Scholar
Rahmstorf, L. 2011. Re-Integrating ‘Diffusion’: the Spread of Innovations among the Neolithic and Bronze Age Societies of Europe and the Near East. In: Wilkinson, T., Sherratt, S. & Bennet, J., eds. Interweaving Worlds Systemic Intgeractions in Eurasia, 7th to 1st Millennia BC. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 100–19.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1972. The Emergence of Civilisation The Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millenium B.C. London: Methuen Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Roodenberg, J., Thissen, L. & Buitenhuis, H. 1990. Preliminary Report on the Archaeological Investigations at Ilıpınar in the North West Anatolia. Anatolica, 16: 61–144.Google Scholar
Roodenberg, J.J. 1999. Investigation at Menteşe Höyük in the Yenişehir Basin. Anatolica, 25: 21–36.Google Scholar
Roodenberg, J.J. 2008. Stratigraphy and Architecture of Phases X and IX. In: Roodenberg, J.J. & Roodenberg, S.A., eds. Life and Death in a Prehistoric Settlement in Northwest Anatolia, The Ilıpınar Excavations III. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Rutter, J. 1979. Ceramic Change in the Aegean Early Bronze Age. The Kastri Group, Lefkandi I and Lerna IV: A Theory Concerning the Origin of Early Helladic III Ceramics. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California.Google Scholar
Rutter, J.B. 2008. The Anatolian Roots of Early Helladic III Drinking Behavior. In: Erkanal, H., Hauptmann, H., Şahoğlu, V. & Tuncel, R., eds. The Aegean in the Neolithic Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze Age, Proceedings of the International Symposium. Ankara University, Research Center for Maritime Archaeology (ANKÜSAM), Publication No 1. Ankara: Ankara University Press, pp. 461–81.Google Scholar
Sağlamtimur, H. & Ozan, A. 2012. Ege Gübre Neolitik Yerleşimi. In: Çilingiroğlu, A., Mercangöz, Z. & Polat, G., eds. Ege Üniversitesi Arkeolojik Kazıları. İzmir: Basımevi, pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
Şahin, F. 2013. Küllüoba Höyüğü Orta Tunç Çağı'na Geçiş Dönemi (Übergangsperiode): Mimari ve Çanak Çömlek (unpublished PhD dissertation, Istanbul University).Google Scholar
Şahoğlu, V. 2002. Liman Tepe Erken Tunç Çağı Seramiğinin Ege Arkeolojisindeki Yeri ve Önemi/Early Bronze Age Pottery from Liman Tepe and its Significance in the Archaeology of the Aegean (unpublished PhD dissertation, Ankara University).Google Scholar
Şahoğlu, V. 2004. Interregional Contacts Around the Aegean during the Early Bronze Age: New Evidence from the İzmir Region. Anadolu/Anatolia, 27: 97–120.Google Scholar
Şahoğlu, V. 2005. The Anatolian Trade Network and the Izmir Region During the Early Bronze Age. Oxford Journal Of Archaeology, 24: 339–61.Google Scholar
Şahoğlu, V. 2008. Liman Tepe and Bakla Tepe: New Evidence for the Relations Between the İzmir Region, The Cyclades and the Greek Mainland during the Late Fourth and Third Millennia BC. In: Erkanal, H., Hauptmann, H., Şahoğlu, V. & Tuncel, R., eds. Proceedings of the International Symposium, The Aegean in the Neolithic, Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze Age. Ankara University, Research Center for Maritime Archaeology (ANKÜSAM), Publication No 1. Ankara: Ankara University Press, pp. 483–501.Google Scholar
Sarı, D. 2009. Late EB II Pottery Recovered in Complex II of Küllüoba. Anatolia Antiqua, 17: 89–132.Google Scholar
Sarı, D. 2013a. Evolution culturelle et politique de l'Anatolie de l'Ouest au bronze ancien et au bronze moyen. Lille: Atelier national de reproduction des thèses.Google Scholar
Sarı, D. 2013b. The Cultural Development of Western Anatolia in the Third and Second Millennia B.C. and its Relationship with Migration Theories. In: Mouton, A., Rutherford, I. & Yakubovich, I., eds. Luwian Identities, Culture, Language and Religion Between Anatolia and the Aegean. Leiden: Brill, pp. 305–28.Google Scholar
Sazcı, G. 2007. The Treasures of Troia. İstanbul: Aygaz.Google Scholar
Schoop, U. 2005. Das anatolische Chalkolithikum. Eine chronologische Untersuchung zur vorbronzezeitlischen Kultursequenz im nördlichen Zentralanatolien und den angrenzenden Gebieten. Remshalden: Verlag BA Greiner.Google Scholar
Seeher, J. 2000. Die Bronzezeitliche Nekropole von Demircihüyük-Sarıket. Tübingen: Ernst Wasmuth Verlag.Google Scholar
Sperling, J.W. 1976. Kum Tepe in the Troad: Trial Excavations, 1934. Hesperia, 45: 305–64.Google Scholar
Stronach, D. 1962. Metal Objects. In: Lloyd, S. & Mellaart, J., eds. Beycesultan, vol. I. London: The British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, pp. 280–90.Google Scholar
Topbaş, A., Efe, T. & İlaslı, A. 1998. Salvage Excavations of the Afyon Archaeological Museum, Part II: The Settlement of Karaoğlan Mevkii and the Early Bronze Age Cemetery of Kaklık Mevkii. Anatolia Antiqua, VI: 21–94.Google Scholar
Türkteki, M. 2010. Batı ve Orta Anadolu'da Çark Yapımı Çanak Çömleğin Ortaya Çıkışı ve Gelişimi (unpublished PhD dissertation, İstanbul University).Google Scholar
Türkteki, M. 2012. Batı ve Orta Anadolu'da Çark Yapımı Çanak Çömleğin Ortaya Çıkışı ve Yayılımı. M.A.S.R.O.P. E-Journal, 7: 45–111.Google Scholar
Türkteki, M. 2013. The First Use of Wheel-Made Pottery and its Distribution in Western and Central Anatolia. In: Bombardieri, L., D'Agostino, A., Guarducci, G., Orsi, V. & Valentini, S., eds. SOMA 2012. Identity and Connectivity, Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Mediterranean Archaeology, Italy, 1–3 March 2012, vol. I. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2581. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 193–200.Google Scholar
Umurtak, G. & Duru, R. 2013. Yeniden Hacılar—Hacılar Büyük Höyük Kazıları 2011–2012. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi, 142: 1–22.Google Scholar
Ünlüsoy, S. 2006. Vom Reihenhaus zum Megaron-Troia I bis Troia III. In: Korfmann, M., ed. Troia Archaologie Siedlungshügnels und Seiner Landschaft. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp von Zabern, pp. 133–44.Google Scholar
Üstün-Türkteki, S. 2012. Göller Bölgesi İlk Tunç Çağı 1–2 Çanak Çömleği (unpublished PhD dissertation, İstanbul University).Google Scholar
Warner, J.L. 1994. Elmalı-Karataş II, The Early Bronze Age Village of Karataş. Bryn Mawr: Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
Yalçın, Ü. 2013. Anadolu Madenciliği. In: Ayter, P., Demirci, Ş. & Özer, A.M., eds. ODTÜ III. Arkeometri Çalıştayı, Türkiye, Arkeolojisinde Metal: Arkeolojik ve 12 Arkeometrik Çalışmalar. Yayınlayan: ODTÜ Arkeometri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar