Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:39:39.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The work of making Malta: The Council of Europe's archaeology and planning committee 1988–1996

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Willem J.H. Willems
Willem J.H. Willems*
Affiliation:
Leiden University, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article began life as a paper in the session ‘Opening Doors for Archaeologists: Making Malta Work’ at the 2006 EAA Annual Meeting in Kracow, Poland. It explores the background of the European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (Revised), also known as the Valletta Convention or the Convention of Malta. The article examines some of the major issues that were discussed and describes the drafting process of the Convention from the author's personal perspective as one of the members of the committee responsible. It concludes with a brief consideration of some subsequent developments and a plea for a more active role for the EAA at Strasbourg and Brussels.

Cet article se fond sur une intervention lors de la séance «Opening Doors for Archaeologists: Making Malta Work» (Ouvrir les portes aux archéologues: Traduire en acte la Convention de Malte) à l'assemblée générale annuelle 2006 de l'EAA à Cracovie (Pologne). On y analyse le contexte de la Convention européenne pour la protection du patrimoine archéologique (révisé), aussi connu sous le nom de Convention de La Vallette ou Convention de Malte. On se penche également sur quelques-uns des principaux sujets traités lors de cette séance, et le processus d'ébauche de la convention est décrit du point de vue personnel de l'auteur, membre du comité responsable. L'article conclut par une brève considération de quelques développements ultérieurs, et lance un appel à un rôle plus actif de l'EAA à Strasbourg et à Bruxelles.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel beruht auf einem Vortrag, der anlässlich der Session “Opening Doors for Archaeologists: Making Malta Work” während des 12th EAA Annual Meeting 2006 in Krakau (Polen) gehalten wurde. Er untersucht den Hintergrund des „Europäisches Übereinkommens zum Schutz des archäologischen Erbes (revidierte Fassung)”, das auch unter dem Namen „Valetta-Konvention” oder “Malta-Konvention” bekannt ist. Der Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit einigen der wichtigsten Themen, die diskutiert wurden, und beschreibt den Entwicklungsprozess der Konvention aus der persönlichen Sicht des Verfassers, der zu den Mitgliedern des verantwortlichen Komitees gehörte. Er schließt mit einer kurzen Zusammenfassung einiger nachfolgender Entwicklungen und tritt für eine aktivere Rolle der EAA in Straßburg und Brüssel ein.

Keywords

archaeological heritage managementConvention of MaltaCouncil of Europeheritage protectionValletta ConventionConseil de l'EuropeConvention de MalteConvention de La Vallettegestion de l'héritage archéologiqueprotection de l'héritageArchäologische DenkmalpflegeDenkmalschutzEuroparatMalta-KonventionValetta-Konvention
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , 2007 , pp. 57 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrikopoulou-Strack, N.-J., 2007. Archaeology and heritage management in Germany. In Willems, W.J.H. and van den Dries, M. (eds), Quality Management in Archaeology: 13–21. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Barber, M. and Van Regteren Altena, J.F., eds, 1999. European Bronze Age Monuments. A Multilingual Glossary of Archaeological Terminology. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Carman, J., 2005. Against Cultural Property. Archaeology, Heritage and Ownership. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L., 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity 47(185):6–18.Google Scholar
CONVENTIONS.COE, 2008. URL (accessed 13 April 2008): http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp? Google Scholar
COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 1969. European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage. Strasbourg: Council of Europe (European Treaty Series 66).Google Scholar
COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 1987. Archaeology and Planning. Report of the Florence Colloquy. Strasbourg: Council of Europe (Architectural Heritage Reports and Studies 5).Google Scholar
COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 1989. Archaeology and Major Public Works. Report of the Nice Colloquy. Strasbourg: Council of Europe (Architectural Heritage Reports and Studies 12).Google Scholar
COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 1992. European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (Revised). Strasbourg: Council of Europe (European Treaty Series 143).Google Scholar
COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 1994. The Bronze Age – the first golden age of Europe, European Heritage 2. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 1999a. Core Data Standard for Archaeological Sites and Monuments. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 1999b. Report on the Situation of Urban Archaeology in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Demakopoulou, K., Eluère, C., Jensen, J., Jockenhövel, A. and Mohen, J.-P., eds, 1999. Gods and Heroes of the European Bronze Age. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
DoE (DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT), 1990. Planning Policy Guidance Note 16: Archaeology and Planning. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Fairclough, G. and Rippon, S., eds, 2002. Europe's Cultural Landscape: Archaeologists and the Management of Change. Brussels: EAC Occasional Paper 2.Google Scholar
Hänsel, B., ed., 1998. Mensch und Umwelt in der Bronzezeit Europas – Man and Environment in the European Bronze Age. Kiel: Oetker-Voges.Google Scholar
Hinton, P. and Jennings, D., 2007. Quality management of archaeology in Great Britain: present practice and future challenges. In Willems, W.J.H. and van den Dries, M. (eds), Quality Management in Archaeology: 100–112. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Lambrick, G., 2001. The Valletta Convention – A UK Perspective. Archeobrief 20:10–11.Google Scholar
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. and Beherens, W.W. III, 1972. Limits to Growth: a Report for The Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books (A Potomac Associates Book).Google Scholar
O'Keefe, P.J., 1993. The European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage. Antiquity 67(255):406–413.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, P.J., 2002. Shipwrecked Heritage. A Commentary on the UNESCO Convention on Underwater Cultural Heritage. Leicester: Institute of Art and Law.Google Scholar
Schuller, M., 2002. Building Archaeology. Paris: ICOMOS (Monuments and Sites, VII).Google Scholar
Trotzig, G., 1993. The new European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological heritage. Antiquity 67(255):414–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotzi, G. G., 2003. Ten years of protection of the archaeological heritage. Naturopa 99:20.Google Scholar
Wais, A. and Oster, I., eds, 2003. Archäologische Denkmalpflege in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Verband der Landesarchäologen in Deutschland.Google Scholar
Willems, W.J.H., ed., 2000. Challenges for European Archaeology. Zoetermeer: Ministry of OCW and Europæ Archæologiæ Consilium.Google Scholar
Willems, W.J.H. and Van Den Dries, M., eds, 2007. Quality Management in Archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Young, C., 2001. Valletta Convention. Future implications. Conservation Bulletin 41:51–54.Google Scholar